Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents
This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types. Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.e610-e617 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e617 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e610 |
container_title | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés López-Lozano, José-Francisco Albaladejo, Alberto Torres-Lagares, Daniel Montero, Javier Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types.
Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co-Cr (CC); and (3) vacuum-cast Ti (CT). Frameworks were luted onto machined implant abutments under constant seating pressure. Each alloy group was randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10 each) according to the cement system utilized: Subgroup 1 (KC) used resin-modified glass-ionomer Ketac Cem Plus; Subgroup 2 (PF) used Panavia F 2.0 dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 3 (RXU) used RelyX Unicem 2 Automix self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 4 (PIC) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary Premier Implant Cement; and Subgroup 5 (DT) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary DentoTemp cement. Vertical misfit was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were run to investigate the effect of alloy/fabrication technique, and cement type on vertical misfit. The statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
The alloy/manufacturing technique and the luting cement affected the vertical discrepancy (p < 0.001). For each cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit (p < 0.01) whereas CC and CT frames were statistically similar. Within each alloy group, PF and RXU provided comparably greater discrepancies than KC, PIC, and DT, which showed no differences.
Laser sintering may be an alternative to vacuum-casting of base metals to obtain passive-fitting implant-supported crown copings. The best marginal adaptation corresponded to laser sintered structures luted with glass-ionomer KC, or temporary PIC or DT cements. The highest discrepancies were recorded for Co-Cr and Ti cast frameworks bonded with PF or RXU resinous agents. All groups were within the clinically acceptable misfit range. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4317/medoral.17997 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3476024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1023293008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d206798a7122e1ddad25ce4de231d10723058ace06618c6a71a7a0282a1141723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1P3DAQxS3Uqny0R66Vj72E2k7WTi5ICJUPCYlL4WpN7cniKolT21nEuf94Z2GL4GTL8_ObmfcYO5bipKml-T6ijwmGE2m6zuyxA6m7ttJdoz-8ue-zw5x_C1EbafQntq9UrdRKNQfs7z2mEhwMfAy5D4XHng-QMVU5TAUTeg6T5xtwyzJWDnLhYZwHmEqVl3mOqRDhUnycuItzmNaZD8v27TGUB-6xD1MoYYPPKgVH-gHpacsQy2GNU8mf2ccehoxfducRu7v48fP8qrq5vbw-P7upHC1aKq-ENl0LRiqF0nvwauWw8ahq6aUwqharFhwKrWXrNHFgQKhWgZSNpPIRO33RnZdfZJuj3uScnVMYaSYbIdj3lSk82HXc2LoxWqiGBL7tBFL8s2AulkxzOJAdGJdspSBfu1qIltDqBSVvck7Yv7aRwm6Ds7vg7HNwxH99O9sr_T-p-h-qwpmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1023293008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel ; Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés ; López-Lozano, José-Francisco ; Albaladejo, Alberto ; Torres-Lagares, Daniel ; Montero, Javier ; Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creator><creatorcontrib>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel ; Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés ; López-Lozano, José-Francisco ; Albaladejo, Alberto ; Torres-Lagares, Daniel ; Montero, Javier ; Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types.
Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co-Cr (CC); and (3) vacuum-cast Ti (CT). Frameworks were luted onto machined implant abutments under constant seating pressure. Each alloy group was randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10 each) according to the cement system utilized: Subgroup 1 (KC) used resin-modified glass-ionomer Ketac Cem Plus; Subgroup 2 (PF) used Panavia F 2.0 dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 3 (RXU) used RelyX Unicem 2 Automix self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 4 (PIC) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary Premier Implant Cement; and Subgroup 5 (DT) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary DentoTemp cement. Vertical misfit was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were run to investigate the effect of alloy/fabrication technique, and cement type on vertical misfit. The statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
The alloy/manufacturing technique and the luting cement affected the vertical discrepancy (p < 0.001). For each cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit (p < 0.01) whereas CC and CT frames were statistically similar. Within each alloy group, PF and RXU provided comparably greater discrepancies than KC, PIC, and DT, which showed no differences.
Laser sintering may be an alternative to vacuum-casting of base metals to obtain passive-fitting implant-supported crown copings. The best marginal adaptation corresponded to laser sintered structures luted with glass-ionomer KC, or temporary PIC or DT cements. The highest discrepancies were recorded for Co-Cr and Ti cast frameworks bonded with PF or RXU resinous agents. All groups were within the clinically acceptable misfit range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1698-4447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17997</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22322524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Medicina Oral S.L</publisher><subject>Crowns ; Dental Cements ; Dental Implant-Abutment Design ; Dentistry ; Laser in Dentistry ; Lasers ; Vacuum</subject><ispartof>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.e610-e617</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d206798a7122e1ddad25ce4de231d10723058ace06618c6a71a7a0282a1141723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476024/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476024/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Lozano, José-Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albaladejo, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Lagares, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montero, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents</title><title>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</title><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types.
Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co-Cr (CC); and (3) vacuum-cast Ti (CT). Frameworks were luted onto machined implant abutments under constant seating pressure. Each alloy group was randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10 each) according to the cement system utilized: Subgroup 1 (KC) used resin-modified glass-ionomer Ketac Cem Plus; Subgroup 2 (PF) used Panavia F 2.0 dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 3 (RXU) used RelyX Unicem 2 Automix self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 4 (PIC) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary Premier Implant Cement; and Subgroup 5 (DT) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary DentoTemp cement. Vertical misfit was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were run to investigate the effect of alloy/fabrication technique, and cement type on vertical misfit. The statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
The alloy/manufacturing technique and the luting cement affected the vertical discrepancy (p < 0.001). For each cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit (p < 0.01) whereas CC and CT frames were statistically similar. Within each alloy group, PF and RXU provided comparably greater discrepancies than KC, PIC, and DT, which showed no differences.
Laser sintering may be an alternative to vacuum-casting of base metals to obtain passive-fitting implant-supported crown copings. The best marginal adaptation corresponded to laser sintered structures luted with glass-ionomer KC, or temporary PIC or DT cements. The highest discrepancies were recorded for Co-Cr and Ti cast frameworks bonded with PF or RXU resinous agents. All groups were within the clinically acceptable misfit range.</description><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Laser in Dentistry</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><issn>1698-6946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1P3DAQxS3Uqny0R66Vj72E2k7WTi5ICJUPCYlL4WpN7cniKolT21nEuf94Z2GL4GTL8_ObmfcYO5bipKml-T6ijwmGE2m6zuyxA6m7ttJdoz-8ue-zw5x_C1EbafQntq9UrdRKNQfs7z2mEhwMfAy5D4XHng-QMVU5TAUTeg6T5xtwyzJWDnLhYZwHmEqVl3mOqRDhUnycuItzmNaZD8v27TGUB-6xD1MoYYPPKgVH-gHpacsQy2GNU8mf2ccehoxfducRu7v48fP8qrq5vbw-P7upHC1aKq-ENl0LRiqF0nvwauWw8ahq6aUwqharFhwKrWXrNHFgQKhWgZSNpPIRO33RnZdfZJuj3uScnVMYaSYbIdj3lSk82HXc2LoxWqiGBL7tBFL8s2AulkxzOJAdGJdspSBfu1qIltDqBSVvck7Yv7aRwm6Ds7vg7HNwxH99O9sr_T-p-h-qwpmQ</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel</creator><creator>Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés</creator><creator>López-Lozano, José-Francisco</creator><creator>Albaladejo, Alberto</creator><creator>Torres-Lagares, Daniel</creator><creator>Montero, Javier</creator><creator>Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creator><general>Medicina Oral S.L</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents</title><author>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel ; Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés ; López-Lozano, José-Francisco ; Albaladejo, Alberto ; Torres-Lagares, Daniel ; Montero, Javier ; Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d206798a7122e1ddad25ce4de231d10723058ace06618c6a71a7a0282a1141723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Laser in Dentistry</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Lozano, José-Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albaladejo, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Lagares, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montero, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel</au><au>Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés</au><au>López-Lozano, José-Francisco</au><au>Albaladejo, Alberto</au><au>Torres-Lagares, Daniel</au><au>Montero, Javier</au><au>Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents</atitle><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e610</spage><epage>e617</epage><pages>e610-e617</pages><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><eissn>1698-6946</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types.
Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co-Cr (CC); and (3) vacuum-cast Ti (CT). Frameworks were luted onto machined implant abutments under constant seating pressure. Each alloy group was randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10 each) according to the cement system utilized: Subgroup 1 (KC) used resin-modified glass-ionomer Ketac Cem Plus; Subgroup 2 (PF) used Panavia F 2.0 dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 3 (RXU) used RelyX Unicem 2 Automix self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 4 (PIC) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary Premier Implant Cement; and Subgroup 5 (DT) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary DentoTemp cement. Vertical misfit was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were run to investigate the effect of alloy/fabrication technique, and cement type on vertical misfit. The statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
The alloy/manufacturing technique and the luting cement affected the vertical discrepancy (p < 0.001). For each cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit (p < 0.01) whereas CC and CT frames were statistically similar. Within each alloy group, PF and RXU provided comparably greater discrepancies than KC, PIC, and DT, which showed no differences.
Laser sintering may be an alternative to vacuum-casting of base metals to obtain passive-fitting implant-supported crown copings. The best marginal adaptation corresponded to laser sintered structures luted with glass-ionomer KC, or temporary PIC or DT cements. The highest discrepancies were recorded for Co-Cr and Ti cast frameworks bonded with PF or RXU resinous agents. All groups were within the clinically acceptable misfit range.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Medicina Oral S.L</pub><pmid>22322524</pmid><doi>10.4317/medoral.17997</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1698-6946 |
ispartof | Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.e610-e617 |
issn | 1698-6946 1698-4447 1698-6946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3476024 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Crowns Dental Cements Dental Implant-Abutment Design Dentistry Laser in Dentistry Lasers Vacuum |
title | Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T04%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20misfit%20of%20laser-sintered%20and%20vacuum-cast%20implant-supported%20crown%20copings%20luted%20with%20definitive%20and%20temporary%20luting%20agents&rft.jtitle=Medicina%20oral,%20patolog%C3%ADa%20oral%20y%20cirug%C3%ADa%20bucal&rft.au=Castillo-de-Oyag%C3%BCe,%20Raquel&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e610&rft.epage=e617&rft.pages=e610-e617&rft.issn=1698-6946&rft.eissn=1698-6946&rft_id=info:doi/10.4317/medoral.17997&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1023293008%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1023293008&rft_id=info:pmid/22322524&rfr_iscdi=true |