Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents

This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types. Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.e610-e617
Hauptverfasser: Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel, Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés, López-Lozano, José-Francisco, Albaladejo, Alberto, Torres-Lagares, Daniel, Montero, Javier, Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e617
container_issue 4
container_start_page e610
container_title Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal
container_volume 17
creator Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel
Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés
López-Lozano, José-Francisco
Albaladejo, Alberto
Torres-Lagares, Daniel
Montero, Javier
Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús
description This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types. Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co-Cr (CC); and (3) vacuum-cast Ti (CT). Frameworks were luted onto machined implant abutments under constant seating pressure. Each alloy group was randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10 each) according to the cement system utilized: Subgroup 1 (KC) used resin-modified glass-ionomer Ketac Cem Plus; Subgroup 2 (PF) used Panavia F 2.0 dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 3 (RXU) used RelyX Unicem 2 Automix self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 4 (PIC) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary Premier Implant Cement; and Subgroup 5 (DT) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary DentoTemp cement. Vertical misfit was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were run to investigate the effect of alloy/fabrication technique, and cement type on vertical misfit. The statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. The alloy/manufacturing technique and the luting cement affected the vertical discrepancy (p < 0.001). For each cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit (p < 0.01) whereas CC and CT frames were statistically similar. Within each alloy group, PF and RXU provided comparably greater discrepancies than KC, PIC, and DT, which showed no differences. Laser sintering may be an alternative to vacuum-casting of base metals to obtain passive-fitting implant-supported crown copings. The best marginal adaptation corresponded to laser sintered structures luted with glass-ionomer KC, or temporary PIC or DT cements. The highest discrepancies were recorded for Co-Cr and Ti cast frameworks bonded with PF or RXU resinous agents. All groups were within the clinically acceptable misfit range.
doi_str_mv 10.4317/medoral.17997
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3476024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1023293008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d206798a7122e1ddad25ce4de231d10723058ace06618c6a71a7a0282a1141723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1P3DAQxS3Uqny0R66Vj72E2k7WTi5ICJUPCYlL4WpN7cniKolT21nEuf94Z2GL4GTL8_ObmfcYO5bipKml-T6ijwmGE2m6zuyxA6m7ttJdoz-8ue-zw5x_C1EbafQntq9UrdRKNQfs7z2mEhwMfAy5D4XHng-QMVU5TAUTeg6T5xtwyzJWDnLhYZwHmEqVl3mOqRDhUnycuItzmNaZD8v27TGUB-6xD1MoYYPPKgVH-gHpacsQy2GNU8mf2ccehoxfducRu7v48fP8qrq5vbw-P7upHC1aKq-ENl0LRiqF0nvwauWw8ahq6aUwqharFhwKrWXrNHFgQKhWgZSNpPIRO33RnZdfZJuj3uScnVMYaSYbIdj3lSk82HXc2LoxWqiGBL7tBFL8s2AulkxzOJAdGJdspSBfu1qIltDqBSVvck7Yv7aRwm6Ds7vg7HNwxH99O9sr_T-p-h-qwpmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1023293008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel ; Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés ; López-Lozano, José-Francisco ; Albaladejo, Alberto ; Torres-Lagares, Daniel ; Montero, Javier ; Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creator><creatorcontrib>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel ; Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés ; López-Lozano, José-Francisco ; Albaladejo, Alberto ; Torres-Lagares, Daniel ; Montero, Javier ; Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types. Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co-Cr (CC); and (3) vacuum-cast Ti (CT). Frameworks were luted onto machined implant abutments under constant seating pressure. Each alloy group was randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10 each) according to the cement system utilized: Subgroup 1 (KC) used resin-modified glass-ionomer Ketac Cem Plus; Subgroup 2 (PF) used Panavia F 2.0 dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 3 (RXU) used RelyX Unicem 2 Automix self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 4 (PIC) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary Premier Implant Cement; and Subgroup 5 (DT) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary DentoTemp cement. Vertical misfit was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were run to investigate the effect of alloy/fabrication technique, and cement type on vertical misfit. The statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. The alloy/manufacturing technique and the luting cement affected the vertical discrepancy (p &lt; 0.001). For each cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit (p &lt; 0.01) whereas CC and CT frames were statistically similar. Within each alloy group, PF and RXU provided comparably greater discrepancies than KC, PIC, and DT, which showed no differences. Laser sintering may be an alternative to vacuum-casting of base metals to obtain passive-fitting implant-supported crown copings. The best marginal adaptation corresponded to laser sintered structures luted with glass-ionomer KC, or temporary PIC or DT cements. The highest discrepancies were recorded for Co-Cr and Ti cast frameworks bonded with PF or RXU resinous agents. All groups were within the clinically acceptable misfit range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1698-4447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1698-6946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17997</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22322524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Medicina Oral S.L</publisher><subject>Crowns ; Dental Cements ; Dental Implant-Abutment Design ; Dentistry ; Laser in Dentistry ; Lasers ; Vacuum</subject><ispartof>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.e610-e617</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d206798a7122e1ddad25ce4de231d10723058ace06618c6a71a7a0282a1141723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476024/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476024/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Lozano, José-Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albaladejo, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Lagares, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montero, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents</title><title>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</title><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types. Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co-Cr (CC); and (3) vacuum-cast Ti (CT). Frameworks were luted onto machined implant abutments under constant seating pressure. Each alloy group was randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10 each) according to the cement system utilized: Subgroup 1 (KC) used resin-modified glass-ionomer Ketac Cem Plus; Subgroup 2 (PF) used Panavia F 2.0 dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 3 (RXU) used RelyX Unicem 2 Automix self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 4 (PIC) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary Premier Implant Cement; and Subgroup 5 (DT) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary DentoTemp cement. Vertical misfit was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were run to investigate the effect of alloy/fabrication technique, and cement type on vertical misfit. The statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. The alloy/manufacturing technique and the luting cement affected the vertical discrepancy (p &lt; 0.001). For each cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit (p &lt; 0.01) whereas CC and CT frames were statistically similar. Within each alloy group, PF and RXU provided comparably greater discrepancies than KC, PIC, and DT, which showed no differences. Laser sintering may be an alternative to vacuum-casting of base metals to obtain passive-fitting implant-supported crown copings. The best marginal adaptation corresponded to laser sintered structures luted with glass-ionomer KC, or temporary PIC or DT cements. The highest discrepancies were recorded for Co-Cr and Ti cast frameworks bonded with PF or RXU resinous agents. All groups were within the clinically acceptable misfit range.</description><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Laser in Dentistry</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><issn>1698-6946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1P3DAQxS3Uqny0R66Vj72E2k7WTi5ICJUPCYlL4WpN7cniKolT21nEuf94Z2GL4GTL8_ObmfcYO5bipKml-T6ijwmGE2m6zuyxA6m7ttJdoz-8ue-zw5x_C1EbafQntq9UrdRKNQfs7z2mEhwMfAy5D4XHng-QMVU5TAUTeg6T5xtwyzJWDnLhYZwHmEqVl3mOqRDhUnycuItzmNaZD8v27TGUB-6xD1MoYYPPKgVH-gHpacsQy2GNU8mf2ccehoxfducRu7v48fP8qrq5vbw-P7upHC1aKq-ENl0LRiqF0nvwauWw8ahq6aUwqharFhwKrWXrNHFgQKhWgZSNpPIRO33RnZdfZJuj3uScnVMYaSYbIdj3lSk82HXc2LoxWqiGBL7tBFL8s2AulkxzOJAdGJdspSBfu1qIltDqBSVvck7Yv7aRwm6Ds7vg7HNwxH99O9sr_T-p-h-qwpmQ</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel</creator><creator>Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés</creator><creator>López-Lozano, José-Francisco</creator><creator>Albaladejo, Alberto</creator><creator>Torres-Lagares, Daniel</creator><creator>Montero, Javier</creator><creator>Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creator><general>Medicina Oral S.L</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents</title><author>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel ; Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés ; López-Lozano, José-Francisco ; Albaladejo, Alberto ; Torres-Lagares, Daniel ; Montero, Javier ; Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-d206798a7122e1ddad25ce4de231d10723058ace06618c6a71a7a0282a1141723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Laser in Dentistry</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Lozano, José-Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albaladejo, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Lagares, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montero, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castillo-de-Oyagüe, Raquel</au><au>Sánchez-Turrión, Andrés</au><au>López-Lozano, José-Francisco</au><au>Albaladejo, Alberto</au><au>Torres-Lagares, Daniel</au><au>Montero, Javier</au><au>Suárez-García, Maria-Jesús</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents</atitle><jtitle>Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal</jtitle><addtitle>Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e610</spage><epage>e617</epage><pages>e610-e617</pages><issn>1698-6946</issn><issn>1698-4447</issn><eissn>1698-6946</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the vertical discrepancy of implant-supported crown structures constructed with vacuum-casting and Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) technologies, and luted with different cement types. Crown copings were fabricated using: (1) direct metal laser sintered Co-Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co-Cr (CC); and (3) vacuum-cast Ti (CT). Frameworks were luted onto machined implant abutments under constant seating pressure. Each alloy group was randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n = 10 each) according to the cement system utilized: Subgroup 1 (KC) used resin-modified glass-ionomer Ketac Cem Plus; Subgroup 2 (PF) used Panavia F 2.0 dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 3 (RXU) used RelyX Unicem 2 Automix self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; Subgroup 4 (PIC) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary Premier Implant Cement; and Subgroup 5 (DT) used acrylic/urethane-based temporary DentoTemp cement. Vertical misfit was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were run to investigate the effect of alloy/fabrication technique, and cement type on vertical misfit. The statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. The alloy/manufacturing technique and the luting cement affected the vertical discrepancy (p &lt; 0.001). For each cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit (p &lt; 0.01) whereas CC and CT frames were statistically similar. Within each alloy group, PF and RXU provided comparably greater discrepancies than KC, PIC, and DT, which showed no differences. Laser sintering may be an alternative to vacuum-casting of base metals to obtain passive-fitting implant-supported crown copings. The best marginal adaptation corresponded to laser sintered structures luted with glass-ionomer KC, or temporary PIC or DT cements. The highest discrepancies were recorded for Co-Cr and Ti cast frameworks bonded with PF or RXU resinous agents. All groups were within the clinically acceptable misfit range.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Medicina Oral S.L</pub><pmid>22322524</pmid><doi>10.4317/medoral.17997</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1698-6946
ispartof Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal, 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.e610-e617
issn 1698-6946
1698-4447
1698-6946
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3476024
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Crowns
Dental Cements
Dental Implant-Abutment Design
Dentistry
Laser in Dentistry
Lasers
Vacuum
title Vertical misfit of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported crown copings luted with definitive and temporary luting agents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T04%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20misfit%20of%20laser-sintered%20and%20vacuum-cast%20implant-supported%20crown%20copings%20luted%20with%20definitive%20and%20temporary%20luting%20agents&rft.jtitle=Medicina%20oral,%20patolog%C3%ADa%20oral%20y%20cirug%C3%ADa%20bucal&rft.au=Castillo-de-Oyag%C3%BCe,%20Raquel&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e610&rft.epage=e617&rft.pages=e610-e617&rft.issn=1698-6946&rft.eissn=1698-6946&rft_id=info:doi/10.4317/medoral.17997&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1023293008%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1023293008&rft_id=info:pmid/22322524&rfr_iscdi=true