Contribution of the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society to describing a scenario for implementing organ donation after Maastricht type III cardiocirculatory death in France
French law allows organ donation after death due to cardiocirculatory arrest. In the Maastricht classification, type III non-heart-beating donors are those who experience cardiocirculatory arrest after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. French authorities in charge of regulating organ don...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of intensive care 2012-07, Vol.2 (1), p.23-23, Article 23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Annals of intensive care |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard Haddad, Lise Kentish-Barnes, Nancy Nitenberg, Gérard Robert, René Villers, Daniel Dreyfuss, Didier |
description | French law allows organ donation after death due to cardiocirculatory arrest. In the Maastricht classification, type III non-heart-beating donors are those who experience cardiocirculatory arrest after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. French authorities in charge of regulating organ donation (Agence de la Biomédecine, ABM) are considering organ collection from Maastricht type III donors. We describe a scenario for Maastricht type III organ donation that fully complies with the ethical norms governing care to dying patients. That organ donation may occur after death should have no impact on the care given to the patient and family. The dead-donor rule must be followed scrupulously: the organ retrieval procedure must neither cause nor hasten death. The decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, withdrawal modalities, and care provided to the patient and family must adhere strictly to the requirements set forth in patient-rights legislation (the 2005 Léonetti law in France) and should not be influenced in any way by the possibility of organ donation. A major ethical issue regarding the family is how best to transition from discussing treatment-withdrawal decisions to discussing possible organ retrieval for donation should the patient die rapidly after treatment withdrawal. Close cooperation between the healthcare team and the organ retrieval team is crucial to minimize the distress of family members during this transition. Modalities for implementing Maastricht type III organ donation are discussed here, including the best location for withdrawing life-sustaining treatments (operating room or intensive care unit). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/2110-5820-2-23 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3475084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3584967051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-75ba54f53c06d26a09a3a5b9b171abad5a893c848787e7268593c8b93745faec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqVXjsgSFy5pYzuOsxekakVppCIOwNmaOJONq8RebKfS_jl-G063XW358MX2zNN7bz6y7C0tLiitq0tGaZGLmhU5yxl_kZ0eAi-P3ifZeQh3RTqikIzx19kJY7KUleSn2a-1s9Gbdo7GWeJ6EgckGAejA9FumkyMiE_xa49WD6SxEW0w90jW4JF8c9pg3JHoSIdBJzJjNwRI0GjBG0d654mZtiNOaOOSc34DlnTOwoMq9BE9-QIQkhM9RBJ3WyRN0xANvjOJ3ut5hOj8LilAHIixyQtYjW-yVz2MAc8f77Psx_Wn7-ub_Pbr52Z9dZu3glYxl6IFUfaC66LqWAXFCjiIdtVSSaGFTkC94roua1lLlKyqxfJtV1yWogfU_Cz7uOfdzu2EXaosehjV1psJ_E45MOp5xppBbdy94qUURV0mgqs9QWvcfwieZ1Lz1TJCtYxQMcV44vjwaMK7nzOGqCaTmjyOYNHNQVFK-aqmolrk3v8BvXOzt6lFilYiFVgKXiXUxR6lvQvBY3_wk3SXDfvbwbvjNhzgT_uUAJd7QEgpu0F_pPtvyt-EqN8f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652684536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society to describing a scenario for implementing organ donation after Maastricht type III cardiocirculatory death in France</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre ; Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard ; Haddad, Lise ; Kentish-Barnes, Nancy ; Nitenberg, Gérard ; Robert, René ; Villers, Daniel ; Dreyfuss, Didier</creator><creatorcontrib>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre ; Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard ; Haddad, Lise ; Kentish-Barnes, Nancy ; Nitenberg, Gérard ; Robert, René ; Villers, Daniel ; Dreyfuss, Didier</creatorcontrib><description>French law allows organ donation after death due to cardiocirculatory arrest. In the Maastricht classification, type III non-heart-beating donors are those who experience cardiocirculatory arrest after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. French authorities in charge of regulating organ donation (Agence de la Biomédecine, ABM) are considering organ collection from Maastricht type III donors. We describe a scenario for Maastricht type III organ donation that fully complies with the ethical norms governing care to dying patients. That organ donation may occur after death should have no impact on the care given to the patient and family. The dead-donor rule must be followed scrupulously: the organ retrieval procedure must neither cause nor hasten death. The decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, withdrawal modalities, and care provided to the patient and family must adhere strictly to the requirements set forth in patient-rights legislation (the 2005 Léonetti law in France) and should not be influenced in any way by the possibility of organ donation. A major ethical issue regarding the family is how best to transition from discussing treatment-withdrawal decisions to discussing possible organ retrieval for donation should the patient die rapidly after treatment withdrawal. Close cooperation between the healthcare team and the organ retrieval team is crucial to minimize the distress of family members during this transition. Modalities for implementing Maastricht type III organ donation are discussed here, including the best location for withdrawing life-sustaining treatments (operating room or intensive care unit).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2110-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2110-5820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-23</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22747673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Review</subject><ispartof>Annals of intensive care, 2012-07, Vol.2 (1), p.23-23, Article 23</ispartof><rights>Graftieaux et al.; licensee Springer. 2012. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright ©2012 Graftieaux et al.; licensee Springer. 2012 Graftieaux et al.; licensee Springer.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-75ba54f53c06d26a09a3a5b9b171abad5a893c848787e7268593c8b93745faec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-75ba54f53c06d26a09a3a5b9b171abad5a893c848787e7268593c8b93745faec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3475084/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3475084/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,41101,41469,42170,42538,51300,51557,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22747673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kentish-Barnes, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitenberg, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villers, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyfuss, Didier</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society to describing a scenario for implementing organ donation after Maastricht type III cardiocirculatory death in France</title><title>Annals of intensive care</title><addtitle>Ann. Intensive Care</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Intensive Care</addtitle><description>French law allows organ donation after death due to cardiocirculatory arrest. In the Maastricht classification, type III non-heart-beating donors are those who experience cardiocirculatory arrest after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. French authorities in charge of regulating organ donation (Agence de la Biomédecine, ABM) are considering organ collection from Maastricht type III donors. We describe a scenario for Maastricht type III organ donation that fully complies with the ethical norms governing care to dying patients. That organ donation may occur after death should have no impact on the care given to the patient and family. The dead-donor rule must be followed scrupulously: the organ retrieval procedure must neither cause nor hasten death. The decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, withdrawal modalities, and care provided to the patient and family must adhere strictly to the requirements set forth in patient-rights legislation (the 2005 Léonetti law in France) and should not be influenced in any way by the possibility of organ donation. A major ethical issue regarding the family is how best to transition from discussing treatment-withdrawal decisions to discussing possible organ retrieval for donation should the patient die rapidly after treatment withdrawal. Close cooperation between the healthcare team and the organ retrieval team is crucial to minimize the distress of family members during this transition. Modalities for implementing Maastricht type III organ donation are discussed here, including the best location for withdrawing life-sustaining treatments (operating room or intensive care unit).</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2110-5820</issn><issn>2110-5820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqVXjsgSFy5pYzuOsxekakVppCIOwNmaOJONq8RebKfS_jl-G063XW358MX2zNN7bz6y7C0tLiitq0tGaZGLmhU5yxl_kZ0eAi-P3ifZeQh3RTqikIzx19kJY7KUleSn2a-1s9Gbdo7GWeJ6EgckGAejA9FumkyMiE_xa49WD6SxEW0w90jW4JF8c9pg3JHoSIdBJzJjNwRI0GjBG0d654mZtiNOaOOSc34DlnTOwoMq9BE9-QIQkhM9RBJ3WyRN0xANvjOJ3ut5hOj8LilAHIixyQtYjW-yVz2MAc8f77Psx_Wn7-ub_Pbr52Z9dZu3glYxl6IFUfaC66LqWAXFCjiIdtVSSaGFTkC94roua1lLlKyqxfJtV1yWogfU_Cz7uOfdzu2EXaosehjV1psJ_E45MOp5xppBbdy94qUURV0mgqs9QWvcfwieZ1Lz1TJCtYxQMcV44vjwaMK7nzOGqCaTmjyOYNHNQVFK-aqmolrk3v8BvXOzt6lFilYiFVgKXiXUxR6lvQvBY3_wk3SXDfvbwbvjNhzgT_uUAJd7QEgpu0F_pPtvyt-EqN8f</recordid><startdate>20120702</startdate><enddate>20120702</enddate><creator>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard</creator><creator>Haddad, Lise</creator><creator>Kentish-Barnes, Nancy</creator><creator>Nitenberg, Gérard</creator><creator>Robert, René</creator><creator>Villers, Daniel</creator><creator>Dreyfuss, Didier</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120702</creationdate><title>Contribution of the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society to describing a scenario for implementing organ donation after Maastricht type III cardiocirculatory death in France</title><author>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre ; Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard ; Haddad, Lise ; Kentish-Barnes, Nancy ; Nitenberg, Gérard ; Robert, René ; Villers, Daniel ; Dreyfuss, Didier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-75ba54f53c06d26a09a3a5b9b171abad5a893c848787e7268593c8b93745faec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Lise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kentish-Barnes, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitenberg, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villers, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyfuss, Didier</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graftieaux, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard</au><au>Haddad, Lise</au><au>Kentish-Barnes, Nancy</au><au>Nitenberg, Gérard</au><au>Robert, René</au><au>Villers, Daniel</au><au>Dreyfuss, Didier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society to describing a scenario for implementing organ donation after Maastricht type III cardiocirculatory death in France</atitle><jtitle>Annals of intensive care</jtitle><stitle>Ann. Intensive Care</stitle><addtitle>Ann Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2012-07-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>23-23</pages><artnum>23</artnum><issn>2110-5820</issn><eissn>2110-5820</eissn><abstract>French law allows organ donation after death due to cardiocirculatory arrest. In the Maastricht classification, type III non-heart-beating donors are those who experience cardiocirculatory arrest after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. French authorities in charge of regulating organ donation (Agence de la Biomédecine, ABM) are considering organ collection from Maastricht type III donors. We describe a scenario for Maastricht type III organ donation that fully complies with the ethical norms governing care to dying patients. That organ donation may occur after death should have no impact on the care given to the patient and family. The dead-donor rule must be followed scrupulously: the organ retrieval procedure must neither cause nor hasten death. The decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, withdrawal modalities, and care provided to the patient and family must adhere strictly to the requirements set forth in patient-rights legislation (the 2005 Léonetti law in France) and should not be influenced in any way by the possibility of organ donation. A major ethical issue regarding the family is how best to transition from discussing treatment-withdrawal decisions to discussing possible organ retrieval for donation should the patient die rapidly after treatment withdrawal. Close cooperation between the healthcare team and the organ retrieval team is crucial to minimize the distress of family members during this transition. Modalities for implementing Maastricht type III organ donation are discussed here, including the best location for withdrawing life-sustaining treatments (operating room or intensive care unit).</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>22747673</pmid><doi>10.1186/2110-5820-2-23</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2110-5820 |
ispartof | Annals of intensive care, 2012-07, Vol.2 (1), p.23-23, Article 23 |
issn | 2110-5820 2110-5820 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3475084 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine Emergency Medicine Intensive Intensive care Medicine Medicine & Public Health Review |
title | Contribution of the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society to describing a scenario for implementing organ donation after Maastricht type III cardiocirculatory death in France |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A30%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20the%20ethics%20committee%20of%20the%20French%20Intensive%20Care%20Society%20to%20describing%20a%20scenario%20for%20implementing%20organ%20donation%20after%20Maastricht%20type%20III%20cardiocirculatory%20death%20in%20France&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20intensive%20care&rft.au=Graftieaux,%20Jean-Pierre&rft.date=2012-07-02&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=23-23&rft.artnum=23&rft.issn=2110-5820&rft.eissn=2110-5820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2110-5820-2-23&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3584967051%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652684536&rft_id=info:pmid/22747673&rfr_iscdi=true |