Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1

ABSTRACT Objective: To gather information on the materials and methods employed in root canal treatment by dentists in Turkey Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to 1,527 dentists who attended the Turkish Dental Association Congress. Respondents were asked to choose one or more suitable answers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of dentistry 2012-10, Vol.6 (4), p.376-384
Hauptverfasser: Unal, Gul Celik, Kaya, Bulem Ureyen, Tac, Ali Gurhan, Kececi, Ayse Diljin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 384
container_issue 4
container_start_page 376
container_title European journal of dentistry
container_volume 6
creator Unal, Gul Celik
Kaya, Bulem Ureyen
Tac, Ali Gurhan
Kececi, Ayse Diljin
description ABSTRACT Objective: To gather information on the materials and methods employed in root canal treatment by dentists in Turkey Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to 1,527 dentists who attended the Turkish Dental Association Congress. Respondents were asked to choose one or more suitable answers for the questions. Data was gathered for demographic and professional information regarding stages, materials, and methods commonly used in endodontic therapy. The collected data was analyzed using the statistical package SPSS. Descriptive statistics were given as frequencies (n) and percent (%). Chi-square (χ2) test was used to investigate the influence of gender and the years of professional activity for the materials and techniques employed. Results: The response rate was 49%. A total of 97% of respondents were working in a general dental practice. Of respondents, 44% were using an agent containing arsenic or aldehyde. Only 5.1% of the respondents preferred the rubber dam isolation method. Sodium hypochlorite was the most popular choice (73%) as a root canal irrigation solution. Calcium hydroxide was the most commonly used medicament (53%). Most of the practitioners (77%) preferred radiographs for working-length determination. Root canal preparation done solely with K-Files or in combination with other instruments was preferred by 73.1% of the respondents. Ni-Ti hand or rotary files were used by 79.7% of the practitioners. Polymer based root canal sealers were the sealers most frequently chosen (48.4%). The majority of the respondents (66.2%) preferred cold lateral condensation as an obturation technique. Gender affected the preference of intracanal medicament, periapical radiographs for working-length determination, root canal instrument, root canal sealers, and root canal obturation technique (P
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-0039-1698975
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3474551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1113982311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4095-c1f62818eac17384987bf45a21dd9a8e8f565df1949a134d65ea645c899ec59a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2LFDEQxRtR3HX16lFy9GCvqclHJx4EWfyCBQXXc8gk1TtZuzttkl7p_94MMw568FQF-dXL472meQ70EqgQr3NLKdMtSK10Jx4058CoaDsu-cPTLuRZ8yTnO0olk1o_bs42jHYdB3ne_Pq2pHtcSeyJLSWUxWN-RUZbMAU7ZGInT0Ysu-gzmRP2mBJ6EiaSYizE2ckOpOww2Xkl25Xc4lT3gXicSh1zsq4Eh_uDmyX9wPUN-WpTIfC0edRXfXx2nBfN9w_vb64-tddfPn6-enfdOk61aB30cqNAoXXQMcW16rY9F3YD3murUPVCCt-D5toC414KtJILp7RGJ7RlF83bg-68bEf0rvqq_sycwmjTaqIN5t-XKezMbbw3jNfgBFSBl0eBFH8umIsZQ3Y4DHbCuGQDAEyrDYM9enlAXYo517BO3wA1-7ZMNvu2zLGtevDib3Mn_E89FWgPQNkFHNHcxSXVxPP_BH8D1mKf-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1113982311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</source><creator>Unal, Gul Celik ; Kaya, Bulem Ureyen ; Tac, Ali Gurhan ; Kececi, Ayse Diljin</creator><creatorcontrib>Unal, Gul Celik ; Kaya, Bulem Ureyen ; Tac, Ali Gurhan ; Kececi, Ayse Diljin</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To gather information on the materials and methods employed in root canal treatment by dentists in Turkey Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to 1,527 dentists who attended the Turkish Dental Association Congress. Respondents were asked to choose one or more suitable answers for the questions. Data was gathered for demographic and professional information regarding stages, materials, and methods commonly used in endodontic therapy. The collected data was analyzed using the statistical package SPSS. Descriptive statistics were given as frequencies (n) and percent (%). Chi-square (χ2) test was used to investigate the influence of gender and the years of professional activity for the materials and techniques employed. Results: The response rate was 49%. A total of 97% of respondents were working in a general dental practice. Of respondents, 44% were using an agent containing arsenic or aldehyde. Only 5.1% of the respondents preferred the rubber dam isolation method. Sodium hypochlorite was the most popular choice (73%) as a root canal irrigation solution. Calcium hydroxide was the most commonly used medicament (53%). Most of the practitioners (77%) preferred radiographs for working-length determination. Root canal preparation done solely with K-Files or in combination with other instruments was preferred by 73.1% of the respondents. Ni-Ti hand or rotary files were used by 79.7% of the practitioners. Polymer based root canal sealers were the sealers most frequently chosen (48.4%). The majority of the respondents (66.2%) preferred cold lateral condensation as an obturation technique. Gender affected the preference of intracanal medicament, periapical radiographs for working-length determination, root canal instrument, root canal sealers, and root canal obturation technique (P&lt;.05). Years of professional experience affected the preference of devitalizing agents, irrigation solutions, intracanal medicament, root canal instrument, root canal sealer, and root canal obturation technique (P&lt;.05). Conclusions: It is clear that a number of dentists, irrespective of the time elapsed since their graduation, relied on techniques, and used products and materials that are currently favoured by expert opinion. Unfortunately, it was noted that some practitioners are still using arsenic- and aldehyde- containing devitalizing agents, and most did not use rubber dam as an isolation method. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:376-384)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-7456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-7464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698975</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23077416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</publisher><subject>Original Article</subject><ispartof>European journal of dentistry, 2012-10, Vol.6 (4), p.376-384</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4095-c1f62818eac17384987bf45a21dd9a8e8f565df1949a134d65ea645c899ec59a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474551/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474551/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,20891,27924,27925,53791,53793,54587</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23077416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Unal, Gul Celik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Bulem Ureyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tac, Ali Gurhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kececi, Ayse Diljin</creatorcontrib><title>Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1</title><title>European journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To gather information on the materials and methods employed in root canal treatment by dentists in Turkey Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to 1,527 dentists who attended the Turkish Dental Association Congress. Respondents were asked to choose one or more suitable answers for the questions. Data was gathered for demographic and professional information regarding stages, materials, and methods commonly used in endodontic therapy. The collected data was analyzed using the statistical package SPSS. Descriptive statistics were given as frequencies (n) and percent (%). Chi-square (χ2) test was used to investigate the influence of gender and the years of professional activity for the materials and techniques employed. Results: The response rate was 49%. A total of 97% of respondents were working in a general dental practice. Of respondents, 44% were using an agent containing arsenic or aldehyde. Only 5.1% of the respondents preferred the rubber dam isolation method. Sodium hypochlorite was the most popular choice (73%) as a root canal irrigation solution. Calcium hydroxide was the most commonly used medicament (53%). Most of the practitioners (77%) preferred radiographs for working-length determination. Root canal preparation done solely with K-Files or in combination with other instruments was preferred by 73.1% of the respondents. Ni-Ti hand or rotary files were used by 79.7% of the practitioners. Polymer based root canal sealers were the sealers most frequently chosen (48.4%). The majority of the respondents (66.2%) preferred cold lateral condensation as an obturation technique. Gender affected the preference of intracanal medicament, periapical radiographs for working-length determination, root canal instrument, root canal sealers, and root canal obturation technique (P&lt;.05). Years of professional experience affected the preference of devitalizing agents, irrigation solutions, intracanal medicament, root canal instrument, root canal sealer, and root canal obturation technique (P&lt;.05). Conclusions: It is clear that a number of dentists, irrespective of the time elapsed since their graduation, relied on techniques, and used products and materials that are currently favoured by expert opinion. Unfortunately, it was noted that some practitioners are still using arsenic- and aldehyde- containing devitalizing agents, and most did not use rubber dam as an isolation method. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:376-384)</description><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>1305-7456</issn><issn>1305-7464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0U6</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2LFDEQxRtR3HX16lFy9GCvqclHJx4EWfyCBQXXc8gk1TtZuzttkl7p_94MMw568FQF-dXL472meQ70EqgQr3NLKdMtSK10Jx4058CoaDsu-cPTLuRZ8yTnO0olk1o_bs42jHYdB3ne_Pq2pHtcSeyJLSWUxWN-RUZbMAU7ZGInT0Ysu-gzmRP2mBJ6EiaSYizE2ckOpOww2Xkl25Xc4lT3gXicSh1zsq4Eh_uDmyX9wPUN-WpTIfC0edRXfXx2nBfN9w_vb64-tddfPn6-enfdOk61aB30cqNAoXXQMcW16rY9F3YD3murUPVCCt-D5toC414KtJILp7RGJ7RlF83bg-68bEf0rvqq_sycwmjTaqIN5t-XKezMbbw3jNfgBFSBl0eBFH8umIsZQ3Y4DHbCuGQDAEyrDYM9enlAXYo517BO3wA1-7ZMNvu2zLGtevDib3Mn_E89FWgPQNkFHNHcxSXVxPP_BH8D1mKf-w</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Unal, Gul Celik</creator><creator>Kaya, Bulem Ureyen</creator><creator>Tac, Ali Gurhan</creator><creator>Kececi, Ayse Diljin</creator><general>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</general><general>Dental Investigations Society</general><scope>0U6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1</title><author>Unal, Gul Celik ; Kaya, Bulem Ureyen ; Tac, Ali Gurhan ; Kececi, Ayse Diljin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4095-c1f62818eac17384987bf45a21dd9a8e8f565df1949a134d65ea645c899ec59a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Unal, Gul Celik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Bulem Ureyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tac, Ali Gurhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kececi, Ayse Diljin</creatorcontrib><collection>Thieme Connect Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Unal, Gul Celik</au><au>Kaya, Bulem Ureyen</au><au>Tac, Ali Gurhan</au><au>Kececi, Ayse Diljin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>376-384</pages><issn>1305-7456</issn><eissn>1305-7464</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: To gather information on the materials and methods employed in root canal treatment by dentists in Turkey Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to 1,527 dentists who attended the Turkish Dental Association Congress. Respondents were asked to choose one or more suitable answers for the questions. Data was gathered for demographic and professional information regarding stages, materials, and methods commonly used in endodontic therapy. The collected data was analyzed using the statistical package SPSS. Descriptive statistics were given as frequencies (n) and percent (%). Chi-square (χ2) test was used to investigate the influence of gender and the years of professional activity for the materials and techniques employed. Results: The response rate was 49%. A total of 97% of respondents were working in a general dental practice. Of respondents, 44% were using an agent containing arsenic or aldehyde. Only 5.1% of the respondents preferred the rubber dam isolation method. Sodium hypochlorite was the most popular choice (73%) as a root canal irrigation solution. Calcium hydroxide was the most commonly used medicament (53%). Most of the practitioners (77%) preferred radiographs for working-length determination. Root canal preparation done solely with K-Files or in combination with other instruments was preferred by 73.1% of the respondents. Ni-Ti hand or rotary files were used by 79.7% of the practitioners. Polymer based root canal sealers were the sealers most frequently chosen (48.4%). The majority of the respondents (66.2%) preferred cold lateral condensation as an obturation technique. Gender affected the preference of intracanal medicament, periapical radiographs for working-length determination, root canal instrument, root canal sealers, and root canal obturation technique (P&lt;.05). Years of professional experience affected the preference of devitalizing agents, irrigation solutions, intracanal medicament, root canal instrument, root canal sealer, and root canal obturation technique (P&lt;.05). Conclusions: It is clear that a number of dentists, irrespective of the time elapsed since their graduation, relied on techniques, and used products and materials that are currently favoured by expert opinion. Unfortunately, it was noted that some practitioners are still using arsenic- and aldehyde- containing devitalizing agents, and most did not use rubber dam as an isolation method. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:376-384)</abstract><cop>A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India</cop><pub>Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd</pub><pmid>23077416</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0039-1698975</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1305-7456
ispartof European journal of dentistry, 2012-10, Vol.6 (4), p.376-384
issn 1305-7456
1305-7464
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3474551
source PubMed Central Free; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Thieme Connect Journals Open Access
subjects Original Article
title Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20of%20attitudes,%20materials%20and%20methods%20preferred%20in%20root%20canal%20therapy%20by%20general%20dental%20practice%20in%20Turkey:%20Part%201&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Unal,%20Gul%20Celik&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=376-384&rft.issn=1305-7456&rft.eissn=1305-7464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0039-1698975&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1113982311%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1113982311&rft_id=info:pmid/23077416&rfr_iscdi=true