Radiation protection for an intra-operative X-ray device

Therapeutic partial breast irradiation can be delivered intra-operatively using the Intrabeam 50 kVp compact X-ray device. Spherical applicators are added to the source to give an isotropic radiation dose. The low energy of this unit leads to rapid attenuation with distance, but dose rates are much...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2011-11, Vol.84 (1007), p.1034-1039
Hauptverfasser: EATON, D. J, GONZALEZ, R, DUCK, S, KESHTGAR, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1039
container_issue 1007
container_start_page 1034
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 84
creator EATON, D. J
GONZALEZ, R
DUCK, S
KESHTGAR, M
description Therapeutic partial breast irradiation can be delivered intra-operatively using the Intrabeam 50 kVp compact X-ray device. Spherical applicators are added to the source to give an isotropic radiation dose. The low energy of this unit leads to rapid attenuation with distance, but dose rates are much greater than for diagnostic procedures. To investigate the shielding requirements for this unit, attenuation measurements were carried out with manufacturer-provided tungsten-rubber sheets, lead, plasterboard and bricks. A prospective environmental dose rate survey was also conducted in the designated theatre. As a result of isotropic geometry, the scattered dose around shielding can be 1% of primary and thus often dominates measured dose rates compared with transmission. The absorbed dose rate of the unshielded source at 1 m was 11.6 mGy h(-1) but this was reduced by 95% with the shielding sheets. Measured values for the common shielding materials were similar to reference data for the attenuation of a 50 kVp diagnostic X-ray beam. Two lead screens were constructed to shield operators remaining in the theatre and an air vent into a service corridor. A lead apron would also provide suitable attenuation, although a screen allows greater flexibility for treatment operators. With these measures, staff doses were reduced to negligible quantities. Survey measurements taken during patient treatments confirmed no additional measures were required, but the theatre should be a controlled area and access restricted. Results from this study and reference data can be used for planning other facilities.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr/29466902
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3473704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>900627474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-52aff35c602f9bde2d9d51d506753c14f608ba424e62a1b3ea4bb267c09ae47b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtLw0AQhxdRbH3cPEsu4sXo7CO7yUWQ4gsKgih4WyabjW5Js3U3LfS_N7Wtj9PMMB-_GT5CTihcUpYVV-UkXLFCSFkA2yFDqkSe5jm87ZIhAKiUsjwbkIMYJ6sxK2CfDBjlIAD4kOTPWDnsnG-TWfCdNd9t7UOCbeLaLmDqZzb0xMImb2nAZVLZhTP2iOzV2ER7vKmH5PXu9mX0kI6f7h9HN-PUCMq7NGNY1zwzElhdlJVlVVFltMpAqowbKmoJeYmCCSsZ0pJbFGXJpDJQoBWq5Ifkep07m5dTWxm7-qnRs-CmGJbao9P_N6370O9-oblQXIHoA843AcF_zm3s9NRFY5sGW-vnURcAkimhVuTFmjTBxxhs_XOFgl651r1rvXXd46d_P_uBt3J74GwDYDTY1AFb4-IvJyRXSnH-BdRNh-k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900627474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation protection for an intra-operative X-ray device</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>EATON, D. J ; GONZALEZ, R ; DUCK, S ; KESHTGAR, M</creator><creatorcontrib>EATON, D. J ; GONZALEZ, R ; DUCK, S ; KESHTGAR, M</creatorcontrib><description>Therapeutic partial breast irradiation can be delivered intra-operatively using the Intrabeam 50 kVp compact X-ray device. Spherical applicators are added to the source to give an isotropic radiation dose. The low energy of this unit leads to rapid attenuation with distance, but dose rates are much greater than for diagnostic procedures. To investigate the shielding requirements for this unit, attenuation measurements were carried out with manufacturer-provided tungsten-rubber sheets, lead, plasterboard and bricks. A prospective environmental dose rate survey was also conducted in the designated theatre. As a result of isotropic geometry, the scattered dose around shielding can be 1% of primary and thus often dominates measured dose rates compared with transmission. The absorbed dose rate of the unshielded source at 1 m was 11.6 mGy h(-1) but this was reduced by 95% with the shielding sheets. Measured values for the common shielding materials were similar to reference data for the attenuation of a 50 kVp diagnostic X-ray beam. Two lead screens were constructed to shield operators remaining in the theatre and an air vent into a service corridor. A lead apron would also provide suitable attenuation, although a screen allows greater flexibility for treatment operators. With these measures, staff doses were reduced to negligible quantities. Survey measurements taken during patient treatments confirmed no additional measures were required, but the theatre should be a controlled area and access restricted. Results from this study and reference data can be used for planning other facilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr/29466902</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21304003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJRAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Intraoperative Period ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Prospective Studies ; Protective Devices ; Radiation Protection - instrumentation ; Radiation Protection - methods ; Radioprotection ; Radiotherapy - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2011-11, Vol.84 (1007), p.1034-1039</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 The British Institute of Radiology 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-52aff35c602f9bde2d9d51d506753c14f608ba424e62a1b3ea4bb267c09ae47b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-52aff35c602f9bde2d9d51d506753c14f608ba424e62a1b3ea4bb267c09ae47b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24637773$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>EATON, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GONZALEZ, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUCK, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KESHTGAR, M</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation protection for an intra-operative X-ray device</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Therapeutic partial breast irradiation can be delivered intra-operatively using the Intrabeam 50 kVp compact X-ray device. Spherical applicators are added to the source to give an isotropic radiation dose. The low energy of this unit leads to rapid attenuation with distance, but dose rates are much greater than for diagnostic procedures. To investigate the shielding requirements for this unit, attenuation measurements were carried out with manufacturer-provided tungsten-rubber sheets, lead, plasterboard and bricks. A prospective environmental dose rate survey was also conducted in the designated theatre. As a result of isotropic geometry, the scattered dose around shielding can be 1% of primary and thus often dominates measured dose rates compared with transmission. The absorbed dose rate of the unshielded source at 1 m was 11.6 mGy h(-1) but this was reduced by 95% with the shielding sheets. Measured values for the common shielding materials were similar to reference data for the attenuation of a 50 kVp diagnostic X-ray beam. Two lead screens were constructed to shield operators remaining in the theatre and an air vent into a service corridor. A lead apron would also provide suitable attenuation, although a screen allows greater flexibility for treatment operators. With these measures, staff doses were reduced to negligible quantities. Survey measurements taken during patient treatments confirmed no additional measures were required, but the theatre should be a controlled area and access restricted. Results from this study and reference data can be used for planning other facilities.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Period</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Protective Devices</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - methods</subject><subject>Radioprotection</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtLw0AQhxdRbH3cPEsu4sXo7CO7yUWQ4gsKgih4WyabjW5Js3U3LfS_N7Wtj9PMMB-_GT5CTihcUpYVV-UkXLFCSFkA2yFDqkSe5jm87ZIhAKiUsjwbkIMYJ6sxK2CfDBjlIAD4kOTPWDnsnG-TWfCdNd9t7UOCbeLaLmDqZzb0xMImb2nAZVLZhTP2iOzV2ER7vKmH5PXu9mX0kI6f7h9HN-PUCMq7NGNY1zwzElhdlJVlVVFltMpAqowbKmoJeYmCCSsZ0pJbFGXJpDJQoBWq5Ifkep07m5dTWxm7-qnRs-CmGJbao9P_N6370O9-oblQXIHoA843AcF_zm3s9NRFY5sGW-vnURcAkimhVuTFmjTBxxhs_XOFgl651r1rvXXd46d_P_uBt3J74GwDYDTY1AFb4-IvJyRXSnH-BdRNh-k</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>EATON, D. J</creator><creator>GONZALEZ, R</creator><creator>DUCK, S</creator><creator>KESHTGAR, M</creator><general>British Institute of Radiology</general><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Radiation protection for an intra-operative X-ray device</title><author>EATON, D. J ; GONZALEZ, R ; DUCK, S ; KESHTGAR, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-52aff35c602f9bde2d9d51d506753c14f608ba424e62a1b3ea4bb267c09ae47b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Period</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Protective Devices</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - methods</topic><topic>Radioprotection</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>EATON, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GONZALEZ, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUCK, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KESHTGAR, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>EATON, D. J</au><au>GONZALEZ, R</au><au>DUCK, S</au><au>KESHTGAR, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation protection for an intra-operative X-ray device</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1007</issue><spage>1034</spage><epage>1039</epage><pages>1034-1039</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><coden>BJRAAP</coden><abstract>Therapeutic partial breast irradiation can be delivered intra-operatively using the Intrabeam 50 kVp compact X-ray device. Spherical applicators are added to the source to give an isotropic radiation dose. The low energy of this unit leads to rapid attenuation with distance, but dose rates are much greater than for diagnostic procedures. To investigate the shielding requirements for this unit, attenuation measurements were carried out with manufacturer-provided tungsten-rubber sheets, lead, plasterboard and bricks. A prospective environmental dose rate survey was also conducted in the designated theatre. As a result of isotropic geometry, the scattered dose around shielding can be 1% of primary and thus often dominates measured dose rates compared with transmission. The absorbed dose rate of the unshielded source at 1 m was 11.6 mGy h(-1) but this was reduced by 95% with the shielding sheets. Measured values for the common shielding materials were similar to reference data for the attenuation of a 50 kVp diagnostic X-ray beam. Two lead screens were constructed to shield operators remaining in the theatre and an air vent into a service corridor. A lead apron would also provide suitable attenuation, although a screen allows greater flexibility for treatment operators. With these measures, staff doses were reduced to negligible quantities. Survey measurements taken during patient treatments confirmed no additional measures were required, but the theatre should be a controlled area and access restricted. Results from this study and reference data can be used for planning other facilities.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>21304003</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr/29466902</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2011-11, Vol.84 (1007), p.1034-1039
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3473704
source MEDLINE; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Oxford Journals Online
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biological effects of radiation
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Prospective Studies
Protective Devices
Radiation Protection - instrumentation
Radiation Protection - methods
Radioprotection
Radiotherapy - instrumentation
Radiotherapy Dosage
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
title Radiation protection for an intra-operative X-ray device
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20protection%20for%20an%20intra-operative%20X-ray%20device&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=EATON,%20D.%20J&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1007&rft.spage=1034&rft.epage=1039&rft.pages=1034-1039&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft.coden=BJRAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr/29466902&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E900627474%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900627474&rft_id=info:pmid/21304003&rfr_iscdi=true