Clinical assisted reproduction are : Singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?

Our purpose was to determine the risk of premature delivery among singleton pregnancies derived from assisted reproduction technology (ART). Ninety-five singleton ART pregnancies and 190 matched spontaneous pregnancies were assessed for preterm delivery rates, pregnancy complications, and cesarean s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2001-05, Vol.18 (5), p.245-249
Hauptverfasser: PERRI, T, CHEN, R, YOELI, R, MERLOB, P, ORVIETO, R, SHALEV, Y, BEN-RAFAEL, Z, BAR-HAVA, I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 5
container_start_page 245
container_title Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
container_volume 18
creator PERRI, T
CHEN, R
YOELI, R
MERLOB, P
ORVIETO, R
SHALEV, Y
BEN-RAFAEL, Z
BAR-HAVA, I
description Our purpose was to determine the risk of premature delivery among singleton pregnancies derived from assisted reproduction technology (ART). Ninety-five singleton ART pregnancies and 190 matched spontaneous pregnancies were assessed for preterm delivery rates, pregnancy complications, and cesarean section rates in a retrospective study at an academic medical center. Among the ART singleton deliveries group (n = 95), 19 (20%) were preterm, which was statistically significantly higher than the 4% (8 of 190) found in the control group. Among the pregnancies achieved by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the severe male-factor infertility subgroup (n = 22), only one preterm delivery occurred (4.5%). Singleton ART pregnancies are at an increased risk of preterm delivery compared to singleton pregnancies after spontaneous conception. The higher rate may be attributed to various infertility cofactors, such as uterine malformations, previous operative procedures that involved cervical dilatation, and a history of pelvic infection. This is supported by the finding that ICSI-derived pregnancies in couples with strict male-factor infertility are not at an increased risk of preterm delivery.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1016614217411
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3455328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>387043161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1118-c08fdaa4e516a77b25fff0901363b33a7f35097e6a6a181383efdb00d488943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1v1DAQhq0K1JbCmauFuKbMZPyVHkDVigJSJQ7lHnkTe-uStYPtVNp_T1askBCn-Xr0zszL2FuEa4SWPtzeIKBSKFrUAvGMXaLU1GgieLHmIE0DQpkL9qqUJwDoTEvn7AJRKCG1uGRlM4UYBjtxW0oo1Y08uzmncRlqSJHb7PgNfwhxN7l6rP-nnh2vbniMaUq7A5-z20Ubh-AKt5XnUH7y5I_tva1LDvXw6TV76e1U3JtTvGIPd59_bL4299-_fNvc3jczIppmAONHa4WTqKzW21Z676EDJEVbIqs9Sei0U1ZZNEiGnB-3AKMwphN0xT7-UZ2X7d6Ng4s126mfc9jbfOiTDf2_kxge-1167klISa1ZBd6dBHL6tbhS-6e05Lhe3Ler56ClhhV6f4JsWV30-fh6-bsFQRnqJP0G2fmDVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216607570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical assisted reproduction are : Singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>PERRI, T ; CHEN, R ; YOELI, R ; MERLOB, P ; ORVIETO, R ; SHALEV, Y ; BEN-RAFAEL, Z ; BAR-HAVA, I</creator><creatorcontrib>PERRI, T ; CHEN, R ; YOELI, R ; MERLOB, P ; ORVIETO, R ; SHALEV, Y ; BEN-RAFAEL, Z ; BAR-HAVA, I</creatorcontrib><description>Our purpose was to determine the risk of premature delivery among singleton pregnancies derived from assisted reproduction technology (ART). Ninety-five singleton ART pregnancies and 190 matched spontaneous pregnancies were assessed for preterm delivery rates, pregnancy complications, and cesarean section rates in a retrospective study at an academic medical center. Among the ART singleton deliveries group (n = 95), 19 (20%) were preterm, which was statistically significantly higher than the 4% (8 of 190) found in the control group. Among the pregnancies achieved by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the severe male-factor infertility subgroup (n = 22), only one preterm delivery occurred (4.5%). Singleton ART pregnancies are at an increased risk of preterm delivery compared to singleton pregnancies after spontaneous conception. The higher rate may be attributed to various infertility cofactors, such as uterine malformations, previous operative procedures that involved cervical dilatation, and a history of pelvic infection. This is supported by the finding that ICSI-derived pregnancies in couples with strict male-factor infertility are not at an increased risk of preterm delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1016614217411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11464574</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JARGE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Mother. Fetoplacental unit. Mammary gland. Milk ; Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation ; Vertebrates: reproduction</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2001-05, Vol.18 (5), p.245-249</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers May 2001</rights><rights>Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3455328/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3455328/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1068395$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PERRI, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOELI, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERLOB, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ORVIETO, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHALEV, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEN-RAFAEL, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAR-HAVA, I</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical assisted reproduction are : Singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><description>Our purpose was to determine the risk of premature delivery among singleton pregnancies derived from assisted reproduction technology (ART). Ninety-five singleton ART pregnancies and 190 matched spontaneous pregnancies were assessed for preterm delivery rates, pregnancy complications, and cesarean section rates in a retrospective study at an academic medical center. Among the ART singleton deliveries group (n = 95), 19 (20%) were preterm, which was statistically significantly higher than the 4% (8 of 190) found in the control group. Among the pregnancies achieved by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the severe male-factor infertility subgroup (n = 22), only one preterm delivery occurred (4.5%). Singleton ART pregnancies are at an increased risk of preterm delivery compared to singleton pregnancies after spontaneous conception. The higher rate may be attributed to various infertility cofactors, such as uterine malformations, previous operative procedures that involved cervical dilatation, and a history of pelvic infection. This is supported by the finding that ICSI-derived pregnancies in couples with strict male-factor infertility are not at an increased risk of preterm delivery.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Mother. Fetoplacental unit. Mammary gland. Milk</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation</subject><subject>Vertebrates: reproduction</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1v1DAQhq0K1JbCmauFuKbMZPyVHkDVigJSJQ7lHnkTe-uStYPtVNp_T1askBCn-Xr0zszL2FuEa4SWPtzeIKBSKFrUAvGMXaLU1GgieLHmIE0DQpkL9qqUJwDoTEvn7AJRKCG1uGRlM4UYBjtxW0oo1Y08uzmncRlqSJHb7PgNfwhxN7l6rP-nnh2vbniMaUq7A5-z20Ubh-AKt5XnUH7y5I_tva1LDvXw6TV76e1U3JtTvGIPd59_bL4299-_fNvc3jczIppmAONHa4WTqKzW21Z676EDJEVbIqs9Sei0U1ZZNEiGnB-3AKMwphN0xT7-UZ2X7d6Ng4s126mfc9jbfOiTDf2_kxge-1167klISa1ZBd6dBHL6tbhS-6e05Lhe3Ler56ClhhV6f4JsWV30-fh6-bsFQRnqJP0G2fmDVQ</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>PERRI, T</creator><creator>CHEN, R</creator><creator>YOELI, R</creator><creator>MERLOB, P</creator><creator>ORVIETO, R</creator><creator>SHALEV, Y</creator><creator>BEN-RAFAEL, Z</creator><creator>BAR-HAVA, I</creator><general>Kluwer/Plenum</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Clinical assisted reproduction are : Singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?</title><author>PERRI, T ; CHEN, R ; YOELI, R ; MERLOB, P ; ORVIETO, R ; SHALEV, Y ; BEN-RAFAEL, Z ; BAR-HAVA, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1118-c08fdaa4e516a77b25fff0901363b33a7f35097e6a6a181383efdb00d488943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Mother. Fetoplacental unit. Mammary gland. Milk</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation</topic><topic>Vertebrates: reproduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PERRI, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOELI, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERLOB, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ORVIETO, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHALEV, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEN-RAFAEL, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAR-HAVA, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PERRI, T</au><au>CHEN, R</au><au>YOELI, R</au><au>MERLOB, P</au><au>ORVIETO, R</au><au>SHALEV, Y</au><au>BEN-RAFAEL, Z</au><au>BAR-HAVA, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical assisted reproduction are : Singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>245-249</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><coden>JARGE4</coden><abstract>Our purpose was to determine the risk of premature delivery among singleton pregnancies derived from assisted reproduction technology (ART). Ninety-five singleton ART pregnancies and 190 matched spontaneous pregnancies were assessed for preterm delivery rates, pregnancy complications, and cesarean section rates in a retrospective study at an academic medical center. Among the ART singleton deliveries group (n = 95), 19 (20%) were preterm, which was statistically significantly higher than the 4% (8 of 190) found in the control group. Among the pregnancies achieved by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the severe male-factor infertility subgroup (n = 22), only one preterm delivery occurred (4.5%). Singleton ART pregnancies are at an increased risk of preterm delivery compared to singleton pregnancies after spontaneous conception. The higher rate may be attributed to various infertility cofactors, such as uterine malformations, previous operative procedures that involved cervical dilatation, and a history of pelvic infection. This is supported by the finding that ICSI-derived pregnancies in couples with strict male-factor infertility are not at an increased risk of preterm delivery.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Kluwer/Plenum</pub><pmid>11464574</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1016614217411</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0468
ispartof Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2001-05, Vol.18 (5), p.245-249
issn 1058-0468
1573-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3455328
source PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Mother. Fetoplacental unit. Mammary gland. Milk
Pregnancy. Parturition. Lactation
Vertebrates: reproduction
title Clinical assisted reproduction are : Singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T17%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20assisted%20reproduction%20are%20:%20Singleton%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20pregnancies%20at%20risk%20of%20prematurity?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=PERRI,%20T&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=245-249&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft.coden=JARGE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1016614217411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E387043161%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216607570&rft_id=info:pmid/11464574&rfr_iscdi=true