Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience

Objectives To study the outcome of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with or without mucosal flap preservation, without mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance. To determine the duration of the surgical procedure of DCR, influence of simultaneously perfo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2009-09, Vol.61 (3), p.223-226
Hauptverfasser: Deviprasad, D., Mahesh, S. G., Pujary, K., Pillai, S., Mallick, S. A., Jain, V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 226
container_issue 3
container_start_page 223
container_title Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
container_volume 61
creator Deviprasad, D.
Mahesh, S. G.
Pujary, K.
Pillai, S.
Mallick, S. A.
Jain, V.
description Objectives To study the outcome of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with or without mucosal flap preservation, without mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance. To determine the duration of the surgical procedure of DCR, influence of simultaneously performed endonasal endoscopic procedures for concomitant sinonasal diseases. Methods Combined retrospective and prospective study in our tertiary referral center. 24 patients with chronic dacryocystitis underwent 25 standard endonasal endoscopic DCR procedures, 10 with and 15 without mucosal flap preservation. 6 of these had concomitant sinonasal diseases for which they underwent septoplasty or functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) or both, simultaneously or as staged procedures. Relief from epiphora and patency of the nasolacrimal fistula was assessed by nasal endoscopy and syringing of the lacrimal apparatus at 1 week, 3 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Results Out of 18 patients who underwent only DCR, 17 patients (94.44%) had complete relief from epiphora. Out of 6 patients who underwent 7 DCRs with concomitant sinonasal surgery, 5 patients (85.71%) had complete relief from epiphora. Overall 23 out of 25 DCRs (92%) had complete relief. In 15 of the 25 procedures, mucosal flap was excised completely. In remaining 10 procedures, flap was trimmed, repositioned to cover exposed bone around the newly created nasolacrimal fistula. In either situation, only one patient each had partial block of the nasolacrimal fistula. Average duration of the surgical procedure of DCR was 18 min. Conclusion Endonasal endoscopic DCR is a viable alternative to external DCR, co-existing sinonasal diseases can be managed simultaneously, as may be required in 25% of cases. It can be performed under 20 min without mucosal flap preservation, mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance and can still provide a good success rate (92%) with less complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12070-009-0071-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3449975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1126620307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-23af8020418926b17ce64756e262b1b95511dca67752d701fbc7027bada8ef443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMottR-AC-yRy-rk2w20-1BkFL_gOBFzyGbzbZbdpOatGL76U1pLXpxYJiBee8l_Ai5pHBDAfA2UAYIKUARG2m6PSF9KDBLEQFP4w60SHPOaI8MQ1hALMFQZNk56bEsmgWHPhlPbeWsCqpNTNyCdstGJ5XSfuP0JqycnzfWxdltxolb-8R8LY1vjNXmgpzVqg1meJgD8v4wfZs8pS-vj8-T-5dUc85WKctUPQIGnI4KJkqK2giOuTBMsJKWRZ5TWmklEHNWIdC61AgMS1Wpkak5zwbkbp-7XJedqbSxK69aufRNp_xGOtXIvxfbzOXMfcqM86LAPAZcHwK8-1ibsJJdE7RpW2WNWwdJKROCQQYYpXQv1d6F4E19fIaC3GGXe-wyYpc77HIbPVe__3d0_ECOArYXhHiyM-PlIpK0kdk_qd8jcY6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1126620307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Deviprasad, D. ; Mahesh, S. G. ; Pujary, K. ; Pillai, S. ; Mallick, S. A. ; Jain, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Deviprasad, D. ; Mahesh, S. G. ; Pujary, K. ; Pillai, S. ; Mallick, S. A. ; Jain, V.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To study the outcome of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with or without mucosal flap preservation, without mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance. To determine the duration of the surgical procedure of DCR, influence of simultaneously performed endonasal endoscopic procedures for concomitant sinonasal diseases. Methods Combined retrospective and prospective study in our tertiary referral center. 24 patients with chronic dacryocystitis underwent 25 standard endonasal endoscopic DCR procedures, 10 with and 15 without mucosal flap preservation. 6 of these had concomitant sinonasal diseases for which they underwent septoplasty or functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) or both, simultaneously or as staged procedures. Relief from epiphora and patency of the nasolacrimal fistula was assessed by nasal endoscopy and syringing of the lacrimal apparatus at 1 week, 3 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Results Out of 18 patients who underwent only DCR, 17 patients (94.44%) had complete relief from epiphora. Out of 6 patients who underwent 7 DCRs with concomitant sinonasal surgery, 5 patients (85.71%) had complete relief from epiphora. Overall 23 out of 25 DCRs (92%) had complete relief. In 15 of the 25 procedures, mucosal flap was excised completely. In remaining 10 procedures, flap was trimmed, repositioned to cover exposed bone around the newly created nasolacrimal fistula. In either situation, only one patient each had partial block of the nasolacrimal fistula. Average duration of the surgical procedure of DCR was 18 min. Conclusion Endonasal endoscopic DCR is a viable alternative to external DCR, co-existing sinonasal diseases can be managed simultaneously, as may be required in 25% of cases. It can be performed under 20 min without mucosal flap preservation, mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance and can still provide a good success rate (92%) with less complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-5421</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2231-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-7707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12070-009-0071-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23120640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Head and Neck Surgery ; Main ; Main Article ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Otorhinolaryngology</subject><ispartof>Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery, 2009-09, Vol.61 (3), p.223-226</ispartof><rights>Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-23af8020418926b17ce64756e262b1b95511dca67752d701fbc7027bada8ef443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-23af8020418926b17ce64756e262b1b95511dca67752d701fbc7027bada8ef443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449975/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449975/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23120640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deviprasad, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pujary, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillai, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallick, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience</title><title>Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery</title><addtitle>Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives To study the outcome of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with or without mucosal flap preservation, without mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance. To determine the duration of the surgical procedure of DCR, influence of simultaneously performed endonasal endoscopic procedures for concomitant sinonasal diseases. Methods Combined retrospective and prospective study in our tertiary referral center. 24 patients with chronic dacryocystitis underwent 25 standard endonasal endoscopic DCR procedures, 10 with and 15 without mucosal flap preservation. 6 of these had concomitant sinonasal diseases for which they underwent septoplasty or functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) or both, simultaneously or as staged procedures. Relief from epiphora and patency of the nasolacrimal fistula was assessed by nasal endoscopy and syringing of the lacrimal apparatus at 1 week, 3 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Results Out of 18 patients who underwent only DCR, 17 patients (94.44%) had complete relief from epiphora. Out of 6 patients who underwent 7 DCRs with concomitant sinonasal surgery, 5 patients (85.71%) had complete relief from epiphora. Overall 23 out of 25 DCRs (92%) had complete relief. In 15 of the 25 procedures, mucosal flap was excised completely. In remaining 10 procedures, flap was trimmed, repositioned to cover exposed bone around the newly created nasolacrimal fistula. In either situation, only one patient each had partial block of the nasolacrimal fistula. Average duration of the surgical procedure of DCR was 18 min. Conclusion Endonasal endoscopic DCR is a viable alternative to external DCR, co-existing sinonasal diseases can be managed simultaneously, as may be required in 25% of cases. It can be performed under 20 min without mucosal flap preservation, mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance and can still provide a good success rate (92%) with less complications.</description><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Main</subject><subject>Main Article</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><issn>0019-5421</issn><issn>2231-3796</issn><issn>0973-7707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMottR-AC-yRy-rk2w20-1BkFL_gOBFzyGbzbZbdpOatGL76U1pLXpxYJiBee8l_Ai5pHBDAfA2UAYIKUARG2m6PSF9KDBLEQFP4w60SHPOaI8MQ1hALMFQZNk56bEsmgWHPhlPbeWsCqpNTNyCdstGJ5XSfuP0JqycnzfWxdltxolb-8R8LY1vjNXmgpzVqg1meJgD8v4wfZs8pS-vj8-T-5dUc85WKctUPQIGnI4KJkqK2giOuTBMsJKWRZ5TWmklEHNWIdC61AgMS1Wpkak5zwbkbp-7XJedqbSxK69aufRNp_xGOtXIvxfbzOXMfcqM86LAPAZcHwK8-1ibsJJdE7RpW2WNWwdJKROCQQYYpXQv1d6F4E19fIaC3GGXe-wyYpc77HIbPVe__3d0_ECOArYXhHiyM-PlIpK0kdk_qd8jcY6o</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Deviprasad, D.</creator><creator>Mahesh, S. G.</creator><creator>Pujary, K.</creator><creator>Pillai, S.</creator><creator>Mallick, S. A.</creator><creator>Jain, V.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience</title><author>Deviprasad, D. ; Mahesh, S. G. ; Pujary, K. ; Pillai, S. ; Mallick, S. A. ; Jain, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-23af8020418926b17ce64756e262b1b95511dca67752d701fbc7027bada8ef443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Main</topic><topic>Main Article</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deviprasad, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pujary, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillai, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallick, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deviprasad, D.</au><au>Mahesh, S. G.</au><au>Pujary, K.</au><au>Pillai, S.</au><au>Mallick, S. A.</au><au>Jain, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience</atitle><jtitle>Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>223-226</pages><issn>0019-5421</issn><issn>2231-3796</issn><eissn>0973-7707</eissn><abstract>Objectives To study the outcome of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with or without mucosal flap preservation, without mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance. To determine the duration of the surgical procedure of DCR, influence of simultaneously performed endonasal endoscopic procedures for concomitant sinonasal diseases. Methods Combined retrospective and prospective study in our tertiary referral center. 24 patients with chronic dacryocystitis underwent 25 standard endonasal endoscopic DCR procedures, 10 with and 15 without mucosal flap preservation. 6 of these had concomitant sinonasal diseases for which they underwent septoplasty or functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) or both, simultaneously or as staged procedures. Relief from epiphora and patency of the nasolacrimal fistula was assessed by nasal endoscopy and syringing of the lacrimal apparatus at 1 week, 3 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Results Out of 18 patients who underwent only DCR, 17 patients (94.44%) had complete relief from epiphora. Out of 6 patients who underwent 7 DCRs with concomitant sinonasal surgery, 5 patients (85.71%) had complete relief from epiphora. Overall 23 out of 25 DCRs (92%) had complete relief. In 15 of the 25 procedures, mucosal flap was excised completely. In remaining 10 procedures, flap was trimmed, repositioned to cover exposed bone around the newly created nasolacrimal fistula. In either situation, only one patient each had partial block of the nasolacrimal fistula. Average duration of the surgical procedure of DCR was 18 min. Conclusion Endonasal endoscopic DCR is a viable alternative to external DCR, co-existing sinonasal diseases can be managed simultaneously, as may be required in 25% of cases. It can be performed under 20 min without mucosal flap preservation, mitomycin local application, silicon tube stenting or laser assistance and can still provide a good success rate (92%) with less complications.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23120640</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12070-009-0071-z</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-5421
ispartof Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2009-09, Vol.61 (3), p.223-226
issn 0019-5421
2231-3796
0973-7707
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3449975
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Head and Neck Surgery
Main
Main Article
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Otorhinolaryngology
title Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endonasal%20endoscopic%20dacryocystorhinostomy:%20our%20experience&rft.jtitle=Indian%20Journal%20of%20Otolaryngology%20and%20Head%20&%20Neck%20Surgery&rft.au=Deviprasad,%20D.&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=223-226&rft.issn=0019-5421&rft.eissn=0973-7707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12070-009-0071-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1126620307%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1126620307&rft_id=info:pmid/23120640&rfr_iscdi=true