Assessment of dual tasking has no clinical value for fall prediction in Parkinson’s disease
The objective of this study is to investigate the value of dual-task performance for the prediction of falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Two hundred sixty-three patients with PD (H&Y 1–3, 65.2 ± 7.9 years) walked two times along a 10-m trajectory, both under single-task and dual-t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurology 2012-09, Vol.259 (9), p.1840-1847 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1847 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1840 |
container_title | Journal of neurology |
container_volume | 259 |
creator | Smulders, Katrijn Esselink, Rianne A. J. Weiss, Aner Kessels, Roy P. C. Geurts, Alexander C. H. Bloem, Bastiaan R. |
description | The objective of this study is to investigate the value of dual-task performance for the prediction of falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Two hundred sixty-three patients with PD (H&Y 1–3, 65.2 ± 7.9 years) walked two times along a 10-m trajectory, both under single-task and dual-task (DT) conditions (combined with an auditory Stroop task). To control for a cueing effect, Stroop stimuli were presented at variable or fixed 1- or 2-s intervals. The auditory Stroop task was also performed alone. Dual-task costs were calculated for gait speed, stride length, stride time, stride time variability, step and stride regularity, step symmetry and Stroop composite scores (accuracy/reaction time). Subsequently, falls were registered prospectively for 1 year (monthly assessments). Patients were categorized as non-recurrent fallers (no or 1 fall) or recurrent fallers (>1 falls). Recurrent fallers (35%) had a significantly higher disease severity, lower MMSE scores, and higher Timed “Up & Go” test scores than non-recurrent fallers. Under DT conditions, gait speed and stride lengths were significantly decreased. Stride time, stride time variability, step and stride regularity, and step symmetry did not change under DT conditions. Stroop dual-task costs were only significant for the 2-s Stroop interval trials. Importantly, recurrent fallers did not show different dual-task costs compared to non-recurrent fallers on any of the gait or Stroop parameters. These results did not change after correction for baseline group differences. Deterioration of gait or Stroop performance under dual-task conditions was not associated with prospective falls in this large sample of patients with PD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00415-012-6419-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3432779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1122623798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-51ae35a7357333109276b71737765c5d4c58615b6e92f5cc004bf2763d65d6123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9qVDEQxoNY7Fp9AG8kIII3p-Z_NjdCKfUPFPRCLyVkc3K2qWeTNXNOwbu-hq_nkzhl11oF8Sow8_sm881HyBPOjjlj9iUwprjuGBedUdx16h5ZcCVFx5V298mCScU6LbU6JA8BLhljS2w8IIdCCKcE1wvy-QQgAWxSmWgdaD-HkU4BvuSyphcBaKk0jrnkiPWrMM6JDrXRIYwj3bbU5zjlWmgu9ENoKIJaflx_B9pnSAHSI3KAKKTH-_eIfHp99vH0bXf-_s2705PzLmopp07zkKQOVmorpeTMCWtWlltprdFR9yrqpeF6ZZITg44Rba8GZGRvdG-4kEfk1W7udl5tUh_RTQuj37a8Ce2bryH7PzslX_h1vfISr2WtwwEv9gNa_TonmPwmQ0zjGEqqM3jOhTBCWrf8P8qM425pmUH02V_oZZ1bwUsgheasNlYjxXdUbBWgpeF2b878Tc5-l7PHnP1Nzl6h5uldw7eKX8Ei8HwPBMDshhZKzPCbM1IKzRhyYscBtso6tbsr_uv3nzypv14</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037775675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of dual tasking has no clinical value for fall prediction in Parkinson’s disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Smulders, Katrijn ; Esselink, Rianne A. J. ; Weiss, Aner ; Kessels, Roy P. C. ; Geurts, Alexander C. H. ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smulders, Katrijn ; Esselink, Rianne A. J. ; Weiss, Aner ; Kessels, Roy P. C. ; Geurts, Alexander C. H. ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study is to investigate the value of dual-task performance for the prediction of falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Two hundred sixty-three patients with PD (H&Y 1–3, 65.2 ± 7.9 years) walked two times along a 10-m trajectory, both under single-task and dual-task (DT) conditions (combined with an auditory Stroop task). To control for a cueing effect, Stroop stimuli were presented at variable or fixed 1- or 2-s intervals. The auditory Stroop task was also performed alone. Dual-task costs were calculated for gait speed, stride length, stride time, stride time variability, step and stride regularity, step symmetry and Stroop composite scores (accuracy/reaction time). Subsequently, falls were registered prospectively for 1 year (monthly assessments). Patients were categorized as non-recurrent fallers (no or 1 fall) or recurrent fallers (>1 falls). Recurrent fallers (35%) had a significantly higher disease severity, lower MMSE scores, and higher Timed “Up & Go” test scores than non-recurrent fallers. Under DT conditions, gait speed and stride lengths were significantly decreased. Stride time, stride time variability, step and stride regularity, and step symmetry did not change under DT conditions. Stroop dual-task costs were only significant for the 2-s Stroop interval trials. Importantly, recurrent fallers did not show different dual-task costs compared to non-recurrent fallers on any of the gait or Stroop parameters. These results did not change after correction for baseline group differences. Deterioration of gait or Stroop performance under dual-task conditions was not associated with prospective falls in this large sample of patients with PD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1459</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6419-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22294215</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNRYA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls ; Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical trials ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - etiology ; Costs ; Degenerative and inherited degenerative diseases of the nervous system. Leukodystrophies. Prion diseases ; Education ; Executive function ; Falls ; Female ; Gait ; Gait - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Movement disorders ; Neurodegenerative diseases ; Neurologic Examination ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosciences ; Original Communication ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis ; Parkinson Disease - physiopathology ; Parkinson's disease ; Performance evaluation ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Reaction time task ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurology, 2012-09, Vol.259 (9), p.1840-1847</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-51ae35a7357333109276b71737765c5d4c58615b6e92f5cc004bf2763d65d6123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-51ae35a7357333109276b71737765c5d4c58615b6e92f5cc004bf2763d65d6123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00415-012-6419-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00415-012-6419-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26332500$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22294215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smulders, Katrijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esselink, Rianne A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Aner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessels, Roy P. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geurts, Alexander C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of dual tasking has no clinical value for fall prediction in Parkinson’s disease</title><title>Journal of neurology</title><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study is to investigate the value of dual-task performance for the prediction of falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Two hundred sixty-three patients with PD (H&Y 1–3, 65.2 ± 7.9 years) walked two times along a 10-m trajectory, both under single-task and dual-task (DT) conditions (combined with an auditory Stroop task). To control for a cueing effect, Stroop stimuli were presented at variable or fixed 1- or 2-s intervals. The auditory Stroop task was also performed alone. Dual-task costs were calculated for gait speed, stride length, stride time, stride time variability, step and stride regularity, step symmetry and Stroop composite scores (accuracy/reaction time). Subsequently, falls were registered prospectively for 1 year (monthly assessments). Patients were categorized as non-recurrent fallers (no or 1 fall) or recurrent fallers (>1 falls). Recurrent fallers (35%) had a significantly higher disease severity, lower MMSE scores, and higher Timed “Up & Go” test scores than non-recurrent fallers. Under DT conditions, gait speed and stride lengths were significantly decreased. Stride time, stride time variability, step and stride regularity, and step symmetry did not change under DT conditions. Stroop dual-task costs were only significant for the 2-s Stroop interval trials. Importantly, recurrent fallers did not show different dual-task costs compared to non-recurrent fallers on any of the gait or Stroop parameters. These results did not change after correction for baseline group differences. Deterioration of gait or Stroop performance under dual-task conditions was not associated with prospective falls in this large sample of patients with PD.</description><subject>Accidental Falls</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Degenerative and inherited degenerative diseases of the nervous system. Leukodystrophies. Prion diseases</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement disorders</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative diseases</subject><subject>Neurologic Examination</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Communication</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reaction time task</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0340-5354</issn><issn>1432-1459</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9qVDEQxoNY7Fp9AG8kIII3p-Z_NjdCKfUPFPRCLyVkc3K2qWeTNXNOwbu-hq_nkzhl11oF8Sow8_sm881HyBPOjjlj9iUwprjuGBedUdx16h5ZcCVFx5V298mCScU6LbU6JA8BLhljS2w8IIdCCKcE1wvy-QQgAWxSmWgdaD-HkU4BvuSyphcBaKk0jrnkiPWrMM6JDrXRIYwj3bbU5zjlWmgu9ENoKIJaflx_B9pnSAHSI3KAKKTH-_eIfHp99vH0bXf-_s2705PzLmopp07zkKQOVmorpeTMCWtWlltprdFR9yrqpeF6ZZITg44Rba8GZGRvdG-4kEfk1W7udl5tUh_RTQuj37a8Ce2bryH7PzslX_h1vfISr2WtwwEv9gNa_TonmPwmQ0zjGEqqM3jOhTBCWrf8P8qM425pmUH02V_oZZ1bwUsgheasNlYjxXdUbBWgpeF2b878Tc5-l7PHnP1Nzl6h5uldw7eKX8Ei8HwPBMDshhZKzPCbM1IKzRhyYscBtso6tbsr_uv3nzypv14</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Smulders, Katrijn</creator><creator>Esselink, Rianne A. J.</creator><creator>Weiss, Aner</creator><creator>Kessels, Roy P. C.</creator><creator>Geurts, Alexander C. H.</creator><creator>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Assessment of dual tasking has no clinical value for fall prediction in Parkinson’s disease</title><author>Smulders, Katrijn ; Esselink, Rianne A. J. ; Weiss, Aner ; Kessels, Roy P. C. ; Geurts, Alexander C. H. ; Bloem, Bastiaan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-51ae35a7357333109276b71737765c5d4c58615b6e92f5cc004bf2763d65d6123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Degenerative and inherited degenerative diseases of the nervous system. Leukodystrophies. Prion diseases</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement disorders</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative diseases</topic><topic>Neurologic Examination</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Communication</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reaction time task</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smulders, Katrijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esselink, Rianne A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Aner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessels, Roy P. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geurts, Alexander C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smulders, Katrijn</au><au>Esselink, Rianne A. J.</au><au>Weiss, Aner</au><au>Kessels, Roy P. C.</au><au>Geurts, Alexander C. H.</au><au>Bloem, Bastiaan R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of dual tasking has no clinical value for fall prediction in Parkinson’s disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>259</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1840</spage><epage>1847</epage><pages>1840-1847</pages><issn>0340-5354</issn><eissn>1432-1459</eissn><coden>JNRYA9</coden><abstract>The objective of this study is to investigate the value of dual-task performance for the prediction of falls in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Two hundred sixty-three patients with PD (H&Y 1–3, 65.2 ± 7.9 years) walked two times along a 10-m trajectory, both under single-task and dual-task (DT) conditions (combined with an auditory Stroop task). To control for a cueing effect, Stroop stimuli were presented at variable or fixed 1- or 2-s intervals. The auditory Stroop task was also performed alone. Dual-task costs were calculated for gait speed, stride length, stride time, stride time variability, step and stride regularity, step symmetry and Stroop composite scores (accuracy/reaction time). Subsequently, falls were registered prospectively for 1 year (monthly assessments). Patients were categorized as non-recurrent fallers (no or 1 fall) or recurrent fallers (>1 falls). Recurrent fallers (35%) had a significantly higher disease severity, lower MMSE scores, and higher Timed “Up & Go” test scores than non-recurrent fallers. Under DT conditions, gait speed and stride lengths were significantly decreased. Stride time, stride time variability, step and stride regularity, and step symmetry did not change under DT conditions. Stroop dual-task costs were only significant for the 2-s Stroop interval trials. Importantly, recurrent fallers did not show different dual-task costs compared to non-recurrent fallers on any of the gait or Stroop parameters. These results did not change after correction for baseline group differences. Deterioration of gait or Stroop performance under dual-task conditions was not associated with prospective falls in this large sample of patients with PD.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22294215</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00415-012-6419-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5354 |
ispartof | Journal of neurology, 2012-09, Vol.259 (9), p.1840-1847 |
issn | 0340-5354 1432-1459 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3432779 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Accidental Falls Adult Aged Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Clinical trials Cognition & reasoning Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Cognition Disorders - etiology Costs Degenerative and inherited degenerative diseases of the nervous system. Leukodystrophies. Prion diseases Education Executive function Falls Female Gait Gait - physiology Humans Male Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Movement disorders Neurodegenerative diseases Neurologic Examination Neurology Neuropsychological Tests Neuroradiology Neurosciences Original Communication Parkinson Disease - diagnosis Parkinson Disease - physiopathology Parkinson's disease Performance evaluation Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Reaction time task Task Performance and Analysis Walking |
title | Assessment of dual tasking has no clinical value for fall prediction in Parkinson’s disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A40%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20dual%20tasking%20has%20no%20clinical%20value%20for%20fall%20prediction%20in%20Parkinson%E2%80%99s%20disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Smulders,%20Katrijn&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=259&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1840&rft.epage=1847&rft.pages=1840-1847&rft.issn=0340-5354&rft.eissn=1432-1459&rft.coden=JNRYA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00415-012-6419-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1122623798%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037775675&rft_id=info:pmid/22294215&rfr_iscdi=true |