The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System

Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. General 2012-11, Vol.141 (4), p.682-698
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Yetta K, Folstein, Jonathan R, Gauthier, Isabel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 698
container_issue 4
container_start_page 682
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. General
container_volume 141
creator Wong, Yetta K
Folstein, Jonathan R
Gauthier, Isabel
description Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system. (Contains 9 figures, 8 tables and 3 footnotes.)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0027822
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3417157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ993751</ericid><sourcerecordid>964198525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-f78ec8f95baaa00de1095bf0193d348da5c123796bb0886935acfd520e3317da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVuLFDEQhYMo7rgK_gCRRhF8aU3lnhdB1vHG4oCuvoZ0utrN0JfZpFvcf29kZ2dVsF5SUF-dnOIQ8hDoC6Bcv_SUMm0Yu0VWYLmtWanbZEWpVTUXQh6RezlvaSlu1F1yxJhQRimzIpuzc6w--XlJWE1dtf65wxRxDFi9wRnTEEfM1abZYpirz7hLmHGc_RynMVdxrOay_S3mxffVl8s843Cf3Ol8n_HB_j0mX9-uz07e16ebdx9OXp_WQWgz1502GExnZeN9Md8i0NJ3tLhvuTCtlwEY11Y1DTVGWS596FrJKHIOuvX8mLy60t0tzYBtKK6S790uxcGnSzf56P6ejPHcfZ9-OC5Ag9RF4PleIE0XC-bZDTEH7Hs_4rRkB8CEltxKU9An_6DbaUljOc9ZJcAayWSBnv4PApAMFHAQN7-GNOWcsDs4Bup-R-muoyzo4z8vPIDX2RXg2R7wOfi-S34MMd9wSiphGBTu0RVXkg2H8fqjtVxL4L8ASM-t8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>964198525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wong, Yetta K ; Folstein, Jonathan R ; Gauthier, Isabel</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta K ; Folstein, Jonathan R ; Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system. (Contains 9 figures, 8 tables and 3 footnotes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-3445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0027822</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22468668</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPGEDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Hemisphere Functions ; Experience Level ; Expertise ; Eyes &amp; eyesight ; Female ; Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Infants ; Learning ; Learning - physiology ; Learning Processes ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Novelty (Stimulus Dimension) ; Object Recognition ; Perception ; Perceptual Learning ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sensory perception ; Task Analysis ; Testing ; Time Factors ; Training ; Vision ; Visual Perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual Stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2012-11, Vol.141 (4), p.682-698</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2012</rights><rights>2012, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-f78ec8f95baaa00de1095bf0193d348da5c123796bb0886935acfd520e3317da3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6249-4769</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ993751$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26564821$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22468668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folstein, Jonathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><title>The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><description>Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system. (Contains 9 figures, 8 tables and 3 footnotes.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Hemisphere Functions</subject><subject>Experience Level</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Eyes &amp; eyesight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</subject><subject>Object Recognition</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Learning</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-3445</issn><issn>1939-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVuLFDEQhYMo7rgK_gCRRhF8aU3lnhdB1vHG4oCuvoZ0utrN0JfZpFvcf29kZ2dVsF5SUF-dnOIQ8hDoC6Bcv_SUMm0Yu0VWYLmtWanbZEWpVTUXQh6RezlvaSlu1F1yxJhQRimzIpuzc6w--XlJWE1dtf65wxRxDFi9wRnTEEfM1abZYpirz7hLmHGc_RynMVdxrOay_S3mxffVl8s843Cf3Ol8n_HB_j0mX9-uz07e16ebdx9OXp_WQWgz1502GExnZeN9Md8i0NJ3tLhvuTCtlwEY11Y1DTVGWS596FrJKHIOuvX8mLy60t0tzYBtKK6S790uxcGnSzf56P6ejPHcfZ9-OC5Ag9RF4PleIE0XC-bZDTEH7Hs_4rRkB8CEltxKU9An_6DbaUljOc9ZJcAayWSBnv4PApAMFHAQN7-GNOWcsDs4Bup-R-muoyzo4z8vPIDX2RXg2R7wOfi-S34MMd9wSiphGBTu0RVXkg2H8fqjtVxL4L8ASM-t8w</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Wong, Yetta K</creator><creator>Folstein, Jonathan R</creator><creator>Gauthier, Isabel</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-4769</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System</title><author>Wong, Yetta K ; Folstein, Jonathan R ; Gauthier, Isabel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-f78ec8f95baaa00de1095bf0193d348da5c123796bb0886935acfd520e3317da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Hemisphere Functions</topic><topic>Experience Level</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Eyes &amp; eyesight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</topic><topic>Object Recognition</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Learning</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folstein, Jonathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Yetta K</au><au>Folstein, Jonathan R</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ993751</ericid><atitle>The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>682</spage><epage>698</epage><pages>682-698</pages><issn>0096-3445</issn><eissn>1939-2222</eissn><coden>JPGEDD</coden><abstract>Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system. (Contains 9 figures, 8 tables and 3 footnotes.)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>22468668</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0027822</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-4769</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-3445
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2012-11, Vol.141 (4), p.682-698
issn 0096-3445
1939-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3417157
source APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Attention - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain
Brain - physiology
Brain Hemisphere Functions
Experience Level
Expertise
Eyes & eyesight
Female
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Infants
Learning
Learning - physiology
Learning Processes
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Neuropsychological Tests
Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)
Object Recognition
Perception
Perceptual Learning
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Sensory perception
Task Analysis
Testing
Time Factors
Training
Vision
Visual Perception
Visual Perception - physiology
Visual Stimuli
Young Adult
title The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Nature%20of%20Experience%20Determines%20Object%20Representations%20in%20the%20Visual%20System&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20General&rft.au=Wong,%20Yetta%20K&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=682&rft.epage=698&rft.pages=682-698&rft.issn=0096-3445&rft.eissn=1939-2222&rft.coden=JPGEDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0027822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E964198525%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=964198525&rft_id=info:pmid/22468668&rft_ericid=EJ993751&rfr_iscdi=true