The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System
Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. General 2012-11, Vol.141 (4), p.682-698 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 698 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 682 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. General |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Wong, Yetta K Folstein, Jonathan R Gauthier, Isabel |
description | Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system. (Contains 9 figures, 8 tables and 3 footnotes.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0027822 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3417157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ993751</ericid><sourcerecordid>964198525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-f78ec8f95baaa00de1095bf0193d348da5c123796bb0886935acfd520e3317da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVuLFDEQhYMo7rgK_gCRRhF8aU3lnhdB1vHG4oCuvoZ0utrN0JfZpFvcf29kZ2dVsF5SUF-dnOIQ8hDoC6Bcv_SUMm0Yu0VWYLmtWanbZEWpVTUXQh6RezlvaSlu1F1yxJhQRimzIpuzc6w--XlJWE1dtf65wxRxDFi9wRnTEEfM1abZYpirz7hLmHGc_RynMVdxrOay_S3mxffVl8s843Cf3Ol8n_HB_j0mX9-uz07e16ebdx9OXp_WQWgz1502GExnZeN9Md8i0NJ3tLhvuTCtlwEY11Y1DTVGWS596FrJKHIOuvX8mLy60t0tzYBtKK6S790uxcGnSzf56P6ejPHcfZ9-OC5Ag9RF4PleIE0XC-bZDTEH7Hs_4rRkB8CEltxKU9An_6DbaUljOc9ZJcAayWSBnv4PApAMFHAQN7-GNOWcsDs4Bup-R-muoyzo4z8vPIDX2RXg2R7wOfi-S34MMd9wSiphGBTu0RVXkg2H8fqjtVxL4L8ASM-t8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>964198525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wong, Yetta K ; Folstein, Jonathan R ; Gauthier, Isabel</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta K ; Folstein, Jonathan R ; Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system. (Contains 9 figures, 8 tables and 3 footnotes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-3445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0027822</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22468668</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPGEDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Hemisphere Functions ; Experience Level ; Expertise ; Eyes & eyesight ; Female ; Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Infants ; Learning ; Learning - physiology ; Learning Processes ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Novelty (Stimulus Dimension) ; Object Recognition ; Perception ; Perceptual Learning ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sensory perception ; Task Analysis ; Testing ; Time Factors ; Training ; Vision ; Visual Perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual Stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2012-11, Vol.141 (4), p.682-698</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2012</rights><rights>2012, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-f78ec8f95baaa00de1095bf0193d348da5c123796bb0886935acfd520e3317da3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6249-4769</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ993751$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26564821$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22468668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folstein, Jonathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><title>The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><description>Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system. (Contains 9 figures, 8 tables and 3 footnotes.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Hemisphere Functions</subject><subject>Experience Level</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</subject><subject>Object Recognition</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Learning</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-3445</issn><issn>1939-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVuLFDEQhYMo7rgK_gCRRhF8aU3lnhdB1vHG4oCuvoZ0utrN0JfZpFvcf29kZ2dVsF5SUF-dnOIQ8hDoC6Bcv_SUMm0Yu0VWYLmtWanbZEWpVTUXQh6RezlvaSlu1F1yxJhQRimzIpuzc6w--XlJWE1dtf65wxRxDFi9wRnTEEfM1abZYpirz7hLmHGc_RynMVdxrOay_S3mxffVl8s843Cf3Ol8n_HB_j0mX9-uz07e16ebdx9OXp_WQWgz1502GExnZeN9Md8i0NJ3tLhvuTCtlwEY11Y1DTVGWS596FrJKHIOuvX8mLy60t0tzYBtKK6S790uxcGnSzf56P6ejPHcfZ9-OC5Ag9RF4PleIE0XC-bZDTEH7Hs_4rRkB8CEltxKU9An_6DbaUljOc9ZJcAayWSBnv4PApAMFHAQN7-GNOWcsDs4Bup-R-muoyzo4z8vPIDX2RXg2R7wOfi-S34MMd9wSiphGBTu0RVXkg2H8fqjtVxL4L8ASM-t8w</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Wong, Yetta K</creator><creator>Folstein, Jonathan R</creator><creator>Gauthier, Isabel</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-4769</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System</title><author>Wong, Yetta K ; Folstein, Jonathan R ; Gauthier, Isabel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-f78ec8f95baaa00de1095bf0193d348da5c123796bb0886935acfd520e3317da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Hemisphere Functions</topic><topic>Experience Level</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</topic><topic>Object Recognition</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Learning</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folstein, Jonathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Yetta K</au><au>Folstein, Jonathan R</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ993751</ericid><atitle>The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>682</spage><epage>698</epage><pages>682-698</pages><issn>0096-3445</issn><eissn>1939-2222</eissn><coden>JPGEDD</coden><abstract>Visual perceptual learning (PL) and perceptual expertise (PE) traditionally lead to different training effects and recruit different brain areas, but reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Here, we tested how the learning history influences visual object representations. Two groups were trained with tasks typically used in PL or PE studies, with the same novel objects, training duration and parafoveal stimulus presentation. We observed qualitatively different changes in the cortical representations of these objects following PL and PE training, replicating typical training effects in each field. These effects were also modulated by testing tasks, suggesting that experience interacts with attentional set and that the choice of testing tasks critically determines the pattern of training effects one can observe after a short-term visual training. Experience appears sufficient to account for prior differences in the neural locus of learning between PL and PE. The nature of the experience with an object's category can determine its representation in the visual system. (Contains 9 figures, 8 tables and 3 footnotes.)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>22468668</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0027822</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-4769</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-3445 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2012-11, Vol.141 (4), p.682-698 |
issn | 0096-3445 1939-2222 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3417157 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Attention - physiology Biological and medical sciences Brain Brain - physiology Brain Hemisphere Functions Experience Level Expertise Eyes & eyesight Female Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Infants Learning Learning - physiology Learning Processes Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Neuropsychological Tests Novelty (Stimulus Dimension) Object Recognition Perception Perceptual Learning Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sensory perception Task Analysis Testing Time Factors Training Vision Visual Perception Visual Perception - physiology Visual Stimuli Young Adult |
title | The Nature of Experience Determines Object Representations in the Visual System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Nature%20of%20Experience%20Determines%20Object%20Representations%20in%20the%20Visual%20System&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20General&rft.au=Wong,%20Yetta%20K&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=682&rft.epage=698&rft.pages=682-698&rft.issn=0096-3445&rft.eissn=1939-2222&rft.coden=JPGEDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0027822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E964198525%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=964198525&rft_id=info:pmid/22468668&rft_ericid=EJ993751&rfr_iscdi=true |