Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?

How listeners categorize two phones predicts the success with which they will discriminate the given phonetic distinction. In the case of bilinguals, such perceptual patterns could reveal whether the listener's two phonological systems are integrated or separate. This is of particular interest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of phonetics 2012-07, Vol.40 (4), p.582-594
Hauptverfasser: Antoniou, Mark, Tyler, Michael D., Best, Catherine T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 594
container_issue 4
container_start_page 582
container_title Journal of phonetics
container_volume 40
creator Antoniou, Mark
Tyler, Michael D.
Best, Catherine T.
description How listeners categorize two phones predicts the success with which they will discriminate the given phonetic distinction. In the case of bilinguals, such perceptual patterns could reveal whether the listener's two phonological systems are integrated or separate. This is of particular interest when a given contrast is realized differently in each language, as is the case with Greek and English stop-voicing distinctions. We had Greek–English early sequential bilinguals and Greek and English monolinguals (baselines) categorize, rate, and discriminate stop-voicing contrasts in each language. All communication with each group of bilinguals occurred solely in one language mode, Greek or English. The monolingual groups showed the expected native-language constraints, each perceiving their native contrast more accurately than the opposing nonnative contrast. Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings for the same physical stimuli differed, consistent with their language mode, yet their discrimination performance was unaffected by language mode and biased toward their dominant language (English). We conclude that bilinguals integrate both languages in a common phonetic space that is swayed by their long-term dominant language environment for discrimination, but that they selectively attend to language-specific phonetic information for phonologically motivated judgments (category-goodness ratings). ► Greek–English bilinguals and monolinguals categorized and discriminated stop-voicing contrasts. ► Monolinguals perceived native contrasts more accurately than nonnative. ► Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings differed, consistent with the language mode. ► But their discrimination performance was unaffected and biased toward their dominant language (English). ► Bilinguals integrate both languages, but are swayed by their dominant language for discrimination.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3403831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0095447012000411</els_id><sourcerecordid>1221438983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-ace273e970a286e7b30fa8c65573a6485109d9a13361f37bb4d4ffd1162780e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCH-CAfOSSMP6MixArtHxKlbgsZ8txJsVVEhc7bbX_HkddVnBhTx5rnnn1zryEvGRQM2D6za4-RT_VHBivQdUA6hFZMViryqhGPyYrWGopG7ggz3LeQflLYE_JBedGSqbFitibU6Qnd5vpHOkQ8ozTW_ox0g2vujiGyU0zbcMQpu3BDZnuMXkMR6R5jnt6jMGXDnXex9Qt1SLiFnaLdIwdXj0nT_oyiC_u3kvy4_Onm-uv1eb7l2_XHzaVV5zNlfPIG4HrBhw3GptWQO-M10o1wmlpVFmrWzsmhGa9aNpWdrLvO8Y0bwygFpfk_Vl3f2hH7DxOc3KD3acwunRrowv2384UftptPFohQRjBisDrO4EUfx0wz3YM2eNQ1sF4yJYZvrjh0jyMquJSS5D8YZRzJoVZG1FQfkZ9ijkn7O_NM7BL3nZnl7ztkrcFZUveZejV32vfj_wJuADvzgCW4x8DJpt9wMljFxL62XYx_E__N2k5u-o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221438983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Antoniou, Mark ; Tyler, Michael D. ; Best, Catherine T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Mark ; Tyler, Michael D. ; Best, Catherine T.</creatorcontrib><description>How listeners categorize two phones predicts the success with which they will discriminate the given phonetic distinction. In the case of bilinguals, such perceptual patterns could reveal whether the listener's two phonological systems are integrated or separate. This is of particular interest when a given contrast is realized differently in each language, as is the case with Greek and English stop-voicing distinctions. We had Greek–English early sequential bilinguals and Greek and English monolinguals (baselines) categorize, rate, and discriminate stop-voicing contrasts in each language. All communication with each group of bilinguals occurred solely in one language mode, Greek or English. The monolingual groups showed the expected native-language constraints, each perceiving their native contrast more accurately than the opposing nonnative contrast. Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings for the same physical stimuli differed, consistent with their language mode, yet their discrimination performance was unaffected by language mode and biased toward their dominant language (English). We conclude that bilinguals integrate both languages in a common phonetic space that is swayed by their long-term dominant language environment for discrimination, but that they selectively attend to language-specific phonetic information for phonologically motivated judgments (category-goodness ratings). ► Greek–English bilinguals and monolinguals categorized and discriminated stop-voicing contrasts. ► Monolinguals perceived native contrasts more accurately than nonnative. ► Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings differed, consistent with the language mode. ► But their discrimination performance was unaffected and biased toward their dominant language (English). ► Bilinguals integrate both languages, but are swayed by their dominant language for discrimination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-4470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22844163</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHNB9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of phonetics, 2012-07, Vol.40 (4), p.582-594</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-ace273e970a286e7b30fa8c65573a6485109d9a13361f37bb4d4ffd1162780e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-ace273e970a286e7b30fa8c65573a6485109d9a13361f37bb4d4ffd1162780e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22844163$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, Catherine T.</creatorcontrib><title>Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?</title><title>Journal of phonetics</title><addtitle>J Phon</addtitle><description>How listeners categorize two phones predicts the success with which they will discriminate the given phonetic distinction. In the case of bilinguals, such perceptual patterns could reveal whether the listener's two phonological systems are integrated or separate. This is of particular interest when a given contrast is realized differently in each language, as is the case with Greek and English stop-voicing distinctions. We had Greek–English early sequential bilinguals and Greek and English monolinguals (baselines) categorize, rate, and discriminate stop-voicing contrasts in each language. All communication with each group of bilinguals occurred solely in one language mode, Greek or English. The monolingual groups showed the expected native-language constraints, each perceiving their native contrast more accurately than the opposing nonnative contrast. Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings for the same physical stimuli differed, consistent with their language mode, yet their discrimination performance was unaffected by language mode and biased toward their dominant language (English). We conclude that bilinguals integrate both languages in a common phonetic space that is swayed by their long-term dominant language environment for discrimination, but that they selectively attend to language-specific phonetic information for phonologically motivated judgments (category-goodness ratings). ► Greek–English bilinguals and monolinguals categorized and discriminated stop-voicing contrasts. ► Monolinguals perceived native contrasts more accurately than nonnative. ► Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings differed, consistent with the language mode. ► But their discrimination performance was unaffected and biased toward their dominant language (English). ► Bilinguals integrate both languages, but are swayed by their dominant language for discrimination.</description><issn>0095-4470</issn><issn>1095-8576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCH-CAfOSSMP6MixArtHxKlbgsZ8txJsVVEhc7bbX_HkddVnBhTx5rnnn1zryEvGRQM2D6za4-RT_VHBivQdUA6hFZMViryqhGPyYrWGopG7ggz3LeQflLYE_JBedGSqbFitibU6Qnd5vpHOkQ8ozTW_ox0g2vujiGyU0zbcMQpu3BDZnuMXkMR6R5jnt6jMGXDnXex9Qt1SLiFnaLdIwdXj0nT_oyiC_u3kvy4_Onm-uv1eb7l2_XHzaVV5zNlfPIG4HrBhw3GptWQO-M10o1wmlpVFmrWzsmhGa9aNpWdrLvO8Y0bwygFpfk_Vl3f2hH7DxOc3KD3acwunRrowv2384UftptPFohQRjBisDrO4EUfx0wz3YM2eNQ1sF4yJYZvrjh0jyMquJSS5D8YZRzJoVZG1FQfkZ9ijkn7O_NM7BL3nZnl7ztkrcFZUveZejV32vfj_wJuADvzgCW4x8DJpt9wMljFxL62XYx_E__N2k5u-o</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Antoniou, Mark</creator><creator>Tyler, Michael D.</creator><creator>Best, Catherine T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?</title><author>Antoniou, Mark ; Tyler, Michael D. ; Best, Catherine T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-ace273e970a286e7b30fa8c65573a6485109d9a13361f37bb4d4ffd1162780e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antoniou, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, Catherine T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of phonetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antoniou, Mark</au><au>Tyler, Michael D.</au><au>Best, Catherine T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phonetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Phon</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>582</spage><epage>594</epage><pages>582-594</pages><issn>0095-4470</issn><eissn>1095-8576</eissn><coden>JPHNB9</coden><abstract>How listeners categorize two phones predicts the success with which they will discriminate the given phonetic distinction. In the case of bilinguals, such perceptual patterns could reveal whether the listener's two phonological systems are integrated or separate. This is of particular interest when a given contrast is realized differently in each language, as is the case with Greek and English stop-voicing distinctions. We had Greek–English early sequential bilinguals and Greek and English monolinguals (baselines) categorize, rate, and discriminate stop-voicing contrasts in each language. All communication with each group of bilinguals occurred solely in one language mode, Greek or English. The monolingual groups showed the expected native-language constraints, each perceiving their native contrast more accurately than the opposing nonnative contrast. Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings for the same physical stimuli differed, consistent with their language mode, yet their discrimination performance was unaffected by language mode and biased toward their dominant language (English). We conclude that bilinguals integrate both languages in a common phonetic space that is swayed by their long-term dominant language environment for discrimination, but that they selectively attend to language-specific phonetic information for phonologically motivated judgments (category-goodness ratings). ► Greek–English bilinguals and monolinguals categorized and discriminated stop-voicing contrasts. ► Monolinguals perceived native contrasts more accurately than nonnative. ► Bilinguals' category-goodness ratings differed, consistent with the language mode. ► But their discrimination performance was unaffected and biased toward their dominant language (English). ► Bilinguals integrate both languages, but are swayed by their dominant language for discrimination.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22844163</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-4470
ispartof Journal of phonetics, 2012-07, Vol.40 (4), p.582-594
issn 0095-4470
1095-8576
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3403831
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
title Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A59%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20ways%20to%20listen:%20Do%20L2-dominant%20bilinguals%20perceive%20stop%20voicing%20according%20to%20language%20mode?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phonetics&rft.au=Antoniou,%20Mark&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=582&rft.epage=594&rft.pages=582-594&rft.issn=0095-4470&rft.eissn=1095-8576&rft.coden=JPHNB9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1221438983%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221438983&rft_id=info:pmid/22844163&rft_els_id=S0095447012000411&rfr_iscdi=true