Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI

Introduction We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection. Methods We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child's nervous system 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.1171-1180
Hauptverfasser: Kubben, P. L., van Santbrink, H., ter Laak-Poort, M., Weber, J. W., Vles, J. S. H., Granzen, B., van Overbeeke, J. J., Cornips, E. M. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1180
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1171
container_title Child's nervous system
container_volume 28
creator Kubben, P. L.
van Santbrink, H.
ter Laak-Poort, M.
Weber, J. W.
Vles, J. S. H.
Granzen, B.
van Overbeeke, J. J.
Cornips, E. M. J.
description Introduction We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection. Methods We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect residual tumor and update neuronavigation. We compared final iMR interpretation by the neurosurgeon with early postoperative MR interpretation by a neuroradiologist. Results Patient positioning was straightforward, and image quality (T1 7-min 4-mm sequences) sufficient in all cases. In five cases, contrast enhancement suspect for residual tumor was noted on initial postresection iMR images. In one case, a slight discrepancy with postoperative imaging after 3 months was no longer visible after 1 year. No serious perioperative adverse events related to the PoleStar N20 were encountered, except for transient shoulder pain in two. Conclusions Using the PoleStar N20 iMR system is technically feasible and safe for both supra- and infratentorial tumor resections in children of all ages. Their small head and shoulders favor positioning in the magnet bore and allow the field of view to cover more than the area of primary interest, e.g., the ventricles in an infratentorial case. Standard surgical equipment may be used without significant limitations. In this series, the use of iMR leads to an increased extent of tumor resection in 45 % of cases. Correlation between iMR and early postoperative MR is excellent, provided image quality is optimal and interpretation is carefully done by someone sufficiently familiar with the system.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3402673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1027832795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3fb69125efc9a4586cd33a297178d31177b7ca714e5e7eb58216150e3bc4cc743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAUhCMEopfCA7BBXrIx-C9xLgskVPFzpVZIVVlbjnOS68qxg-0U5al4RXyVUmDDyov5zow1U1UvKXlDCZFvEyG8pZhQhmlLa9w-qnZUcI4Jr8njakdY3WBJBDmrnqV0SwitW7Z_Wp0x1rRCSLmrfh6m2cEEPutsg0dhQBpNobMOUEmp8Q2yPkcdZoiFuAN0dY3SmjJMRUAz9FbnaA3ysMSAgzfBhdEa7VBa4ghxfYcG0MkWR5tXpH2PTIgR3Jb3w-YjAh3diuaQ8p-Yox2PeLDgepRyBD8W7ur68Lx6MmiX4MX9e159-_Tx5uILvvz6-XDx4RIbIVjGfOiaPWU1DGavRd02pudcs72ksu05pVJ20mhJBdQgoSu10IbWBHhnhDFS8PPq_eY7L90EvYFTCU7N0U46ripoq_5VvD2qMdwpLghrJC8Gr-8NYvi-QMpqssmAc9pDWJKihMmWM7mvC0o31MSQUoThIYYSdRpabUOrMrQ6Da3acvPq7_89XPxetgBsA1KRfBlC3YYl-tLZf1x_ASOCuEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1027832795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kubben, P. L. ; van Santbrink, H. ; ter Laak-Poort, M. ; Weber, J. W. ; Vles, J. S. H. ; Granzen, B. ; van Overbeeke, J. J. ; Cornips, E. M. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kubben, P. L. ; van Santbrink, H. ; ter Laak-Poort, M. ; Weber, J. W. ; Vles, J. S. H. ; Granzen, B. ; van Overbeeke, J. J. ; Cornips, E. M. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection. Methods We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect residual tumor and update neuronavigation. We compared final iMR interpretation by the neurosurgeon with early postoperative MR interpretation by a neuroradiologist. Results Patient positioning was straightforward, and image quality (T1 7-min 4-mm sequences) sufficient in all cases. In five cases, contrast enhancement suspect for residual tumor was noted on initial postresection iMR images. In one case, a slight discrepancy with postoperative imaging after 3 months was no longer visible after 1 year. No serious perioperative adverse events related to the PoleStar N20 were encountered, except for transient shoulder pain in two. Conclusions Using the PoleStar N20 iMR system is technically feasible and safe for both supra- and infratentorial tumor resections in children of all ages. Their small head and shoulders favor positioning in the magnet bore and allow the field of view to cover more than the area of primary interest, e.g., the ventricles in an infratentorial case. Standard surgical equipment may be used without significant limitations. In this series, the use of iMR leads to an increased extent of tumor resection in 45 % of cases. Correlation between iMR and early postoperative MR is excellent, provided image quality is optimal and interpretation is carefully done by someone sufficiently familiar with the system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-7040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-0350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22684477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medical Oncology - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Neuronavigation - instrumentation ; Neuronavigation - methods ; Neurosciences ; Neurosurgery ; Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods ; Original Paper ; Pediatrics - methods</subject><ispartof>Child's nervous system, 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.1171-1180</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3fb69125efc9a4586cd33a297178d31177b7ca714e5e7eb58216150e3bc4cc743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3fb69125efc9a4586cd33a297178d31177b7ca714e5e7eb58216150e3bc4cc743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22684477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kubben, P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Santbrink, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Laak-Poort, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vles, J. S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granzen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Overbeeke, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornips, E. M. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI</title><title>Child's nervous system</title><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><description>Introduction We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection. Methods We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect residual tumor and update neuronavigation. We compared final iMR interpretation by the neurosurgeon with early postoperative MR interpretation by a neuroradiologist. Results Patient positioning was straightforward, and image quality (T1 7-min 4-mm sequences) sufficient in all cases. In five cases, contrast enhancement suspect for residual tumor was noted on initial postresection iMR images. In one case, a slight discrepancy with postoperative imaging after 3 months was no longer visible after 1 year. No serious perioperative adverse events related to the PoleStar N20 were encountered, except for transient shoulder pain in two. Conclusions Using the PoleStar N20 iMR system is technically feasible and safe for both supra- and infratentorial tumor resections in children of all ages. Their small head and shoulders favor positioning in the magnet bore and allow the field of view to cover more than the area of primary interest, e.g., the ventricles in an infratentorial case. Standard surgical equipment may be used without significant limitations. In this series, the use of iMR leads to an increased extent of tumor resection in 45 % of cases. Correlation between iMR and early postoperative MR is excellent, provided image quality is optimal and interpretation is carefully done by someone sufficiently familiar with the system.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Neuronavigation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Neuronavigation - methods</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pediatrics - methods</subject><issn>0256-7040</issn><issn>1433-0350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAUhCMEopfCA7BBXrIx-C9xLgskVPFzpVZIVVlbjnOS68qxg-0U5al4RXyVUmDDyov5zow1U1UvKXlDCZFvEyG8pZhQhmlLa9w-qnZUcI4Jr8njakdY3WBJBDmrnqV0SwitW7Z_Wp0x1rRCSLmrfh6m2cEEPutsg0dhQBpNobMOUEmp8Q2yPkcdZoiFuAN0dY3SmjJMRUAz9FbnaA3ysMSAgzfBhdEa7VBa4ghxfYcG0MkWR5tXpH2PTIgR3Jb3w-YjAh3diuaQ8p-Yox2PeLDgepRyBD8W7ur68Lx6MmiX4MX9e159-_Tx5uILvvz6-XDx4RIbIVjGfOiaPWU1DGavRd02pudcs72ksu05pVJ20mhJBdQgoSu10IbWBHhnhDFS8PPq_eY7L90EvYFTCU7N0U46ripoq_5VvD2qMdwpLghrJC8Gr-8NYvi-QMpqssmAc9pDWJKihMmWM7mvC0o31MSQUoThIYYSdRpabUOrMrQ6Da3acvPq7_89XPxetgBsA1KRfBlC3YYl-tLZf1x_ASOCuEU</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Kubben, P. L.</creator><creator>van Santbrink, H.</creator><creator>ter Laak-Poort, M.</creator><creator>Weber, J. W.</creator><creator>Vles, J. S. H.</creator><creator>Granzen, B.</creator><creator>van Overbeeke, J. J.</creator><creator>Cornips, E. M. J.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI</title><author>Kubben, P. L. ; van Santbrink, H. ; ter Laak-Poort, M. ; Weber, J. W. ; Vles, J. S. H. ; Granzen, B. ; van Overbeeke, J. J. ; Cornips, E. M. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3fb69125efc9a4586cd33a297178d31177b7ca714e5e7eb58216150e3bc4cc743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Neuronavigation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Neuronavigation - methods</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pediatrics - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kubben, P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Santbrink, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Laak-Poort, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vles, J. S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granzen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Overbeeke, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornips, E. M. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Child's nervous system</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kubben, P. L.</au><au>van Santbrink, H.</au><au>ter Laak-Poort, M.</au><au>Weber, J. W.</au><au>Vles, J. S. H.</au><au>Granzen, B.</au><au>van Overbeeke, J. J.</au><au>Cornips, E. M. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI</atitle><jtitle>Child's nervous system</jtitle><stitle>Childs Nerv Syst</stitle><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1171</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1171-1180</pages><issn>0256-7040</issn><eissn>1433-0350</eissn><abstract>Introduction We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection. Methods We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect residual tumor and update neuronavigation. We compared final iMR interpretation by the neurosurgeon with early postoperative MR interpretation by a neuroradiologist. Results Patient positioning was straightforward, and image quality (T1 7-min 4-mm sequences) sufficient in all cases. In five cases, contrast enhancement suspect for residual tumor was noted on initial postresection iMR images. In one case, a slight discrepancy with postoperative imaging after 3 months was no longer visible after 1 year. No serious perioperative adverse events related to the PoleStar N20 were encountered, except for transient shoulder pain in two. Conclusions Using the PoleStar N20 iMR system is technically feasible and safe for both supra- and infratentorial tumor resections in children of all ages. Their small head and shoulders favor positioning in the magnet bore and allow the field of view to cover more than the area of primary interest, e.g., the ventricles in an infratentorial case. Standard surgical equipment may be used without significant limitations. In this series, the use of iMR leads to an increased extent of tumor resection in 45 % of cases. Correlation between iMR and early postoperative MR is excellent, provided image quality is optimal and interpretation is carefully done by someone sufficiently familiar with the system.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22684477</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0256-7040
ispartof Child's nervous system, 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.1171-1180
issn 0256-7040
1433-0350
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3402673
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adolescent
Brain Neoplasms - surgery
Child
Child, Preschool
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Infant
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medical Oncology - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation
Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
Neuronavigation - instrumentation
Neuronavigation - methods
Neurosciences
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation
Neurosurgical Procedures - methods
Original Paper
Pediatrics - methods
title Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T00%3A47%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20mobile%200.15-T%20intraoperative%20MR%20system%20in%20pediatric%20neuro-oncological%20surgery:%20feasibility%20and%20correlation%20with%20early%20postoperative%20high-field%20strength%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Child's%20nervous%20system&rft.au=Kubben,%20P.%20L.&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1171&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1171-1180&rft.issn=0256-7040&rft.eissn=1433-0350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1027832795%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1027832795&rft_id=info:pmid/22684477&rfr_iscdi=true