Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI
Introduction We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection. Methods We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect res...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child's nervous system 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.1171-1180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1180 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1171 |
container_title | Child's nervous system |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Kubben, P. L. van Santbrink, H. ter Laak-Poort, M. Weber, J. W. Vles, J. S. H. Granzen, B. van Overbeeke, J. J. Cornips, E. M. J. |
description | Introduction
We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection.
Methods
We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect residual tumor and update neuronavigation. We compared final iMR interpretation by the neurosurgeon with early postoperative MR interpretation by a neuroradiologist.
Results
Patient positioning was straightforward, and image quality (T1 7-min 4-mm sequences) sufficient in all cases. In five cases, contrast enhancement suspect for residual tumor was noted on initial postresection iMR images. In one case, a slight discrepancy with postoperative imaging after 3 months was no longer visible after 1 year. No serious perioperative adverse events related to the PoleStar N20 were encountered, except for transient shoulder pain in two.
Conclusions
Using the PoleStar N20 iMR system is technically feasible and safe for both supra- and infratentorial tumor resections in children of all ages. Their small head and shoulders favor positioning in the magnet bore and allow the field of view to cover more than the area of primary interest, e.g., the ventricles in an infratentorial case. Standard surgical equipment may be used without significant limitations. In this series, the use of iMR leads to an increased extent of tumor resection in 45 % of cases. Correlation between iMR and early postoperative MR is excellent, provided image quality is optimal and interpretation is carefully done by someone sufficiently familiar with the system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3402673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1027832795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3fb69125efc9a4586cd33a297178d31177b7ca714e5e7eb58216150e3bc4cc743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAUhCMEopfCA7BBXrIx-C9xLgskVPFzpVZIVVlbjnOS68qxg-0U5al4RXyVUmDDyov5zow1U1UvKXlDCZFvEyG8pZhQhmlLa9w-qnZUcI4Jr8njakdY3WBJBDmrnqV0SwitW7Z_Wp0x1rRCSLmrfh6m2cEEPutsg0dhQBpNobMOUEmp8Q2yPkcdZoiFuAN0dY3SmjJMRUAz9FbnaA3ysMSAgzfBhdEa7VBa4ghxfYcG0MkWR5tXpH2PTIgR3Jb3w-YjAh3diuaQ8p-Yox2PeLDgepRyBD8W7ur68Lx6MmiX4MX9e159-_Tx5uILvvz6-XDx4RIbIVjGfOiaPWU1DGavRd02pudcs72ksu05pVJ20mhJBdQgoSu10IbWBHhnhDFS8PPq_eY7L90EvYFTCU7N0U46ripoq_5VvD2qMdwpLghrJC8Gr-8NYvi-QMpqssmAc9pDWJKihMmWM7mvC0o31MSQUoThIYYSdRpabUOrMrQ6Da3acvPq7_89XPxetgBsA1KRfBlC3YYl-tLZf1x_ASOCuEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1027832795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kubben, P. L. ; van Santbrink, H. ; ter Laak-Poort, M. ; Weber, J. W. ; Vles, J. S. H. ; Granzen, B. ; van Overbeeke, J. J. ; Cornips, E. M. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kubben, P. L. ; van Santbrink, H. ; ter Laak-Poort, M. ; Weber, J. W. ; Vles, J. S. H. ; Granzen, B. ; van Overbeeke, J. J. ; Cornips, E. M. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection.
Methods
We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect residual tumor and update neuronavigation. We compared final iMR interpretation by the neurosurgeon with early postoperative MR interpretation by a neuroradiologist.
Results
Patient positioning was straightforward, and image quality (T1 7-min 4-mm sequences) sufficient in all cases. In five cases, contrast enhancement suspect for residual tumor was noted on initial postresection iMR images. In one case, a slight discrepancy with postoperative imaging after 3 months was no longer visible after 1 year. No serious perioperative adverse events related to the PoleStar N20 were encountered, except for transient shoulder pain in two.
Conclusions
Using the PoleStar N20 iMR system is technically feasible and safe for both supra- and infratentorial tumor resections in children of all ages. Their small head and shoulders favor positioning in the magnet bore and allow the field of view to cover more than the area of primary interest, e.g., the ventricles in an infratentorial case. Standard surgical equipment may be used without significant limitations. In this series, the use of iMR leads to an increased extent of tumor resection in 45 % of cases. Correlation between iMR and early postoperative MR is excellent, provided image quality is optimal and interpretation is carefully done by someone sufficiently familiar with the system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-7040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-0350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22684477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medical Oncology - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Neuronavigation - instrumentation ; Neuronavigation - methods ; Neurosciences ; Neurosurgery ; Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods ; Original Paper ; Pediatrics - methods</subject><ispartof>Child's nervous system, 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.1171-1180</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3fb69125efc9a4586cd33a297178d31177b7ca714e5e7eb58216150e3bc4cc743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3fb69125efc9a4586cd33a297178d31177b7ca714e5e7eb58216150e3bc4cc743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22684477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kubben, P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Santbrink, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Laak-Poort, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vles, J. S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granzen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Overbeeke, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornips, E. M. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI</title><title>Child's nervous system</title><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><description>Introduction
We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection.
Methods
We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect residual tumor and update neuronavigation. We compared final iMR interpretation by the neurosurgeon with early postoperative MR interpretation by a neuroradiologist.
Results
Patient positioning was straightforward, and image quality (T1 7-min 4-mm sequences) sufficient in all cases. In five cases, contrast enhancement suspect for residual tumor was noted on initial postresection iMR images. In one case, a slight discrepancy with postoperative imaging after 3 months was no longer visible after 1 year. No serious perioperative adverse events related to the PoleStar N20 were encountered, except for transient shoulder pain in two.
Conclusions
Using the PoleStar N20 iMR system is technically feasible and safe for both supra- and infratentorial tumor resections in children of all ages. Their small head and shoulders favor positioning in the magnet bore and allow the field of view to cover more than the area of primary interest, e.g., the ventricles in an infratentorial case. Standard surgical equipment may be used without significant limitations. In this series, the use of iMR leads to an increased extent of tumor resection in 45 % of cases. Correlation between iMR and early postoperative MR is excellent, provided image quality is optimal and interpretation is carefully done by someone sufficiently familiar with the system.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Neuronavigation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Neuronavigation - methods</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pediatrics - methods</subject><issn>0256-7040</issn><issn>1433-0350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAUhCMEopfCA7BBXrIx-C9xLgskVPFzpVZIVVlbjnOS68qxg-0U5al4RXyVUmDDyov5zow1U1UvKXlDCZFvEyG8pZhQhmlLa9w-qnZUcI4Jr8njakdY3WBJBDmrnqV0SwitW7Z_Wp0x1rRCSLmrfh6m2cEEPutsg0dhQBpNobMOUEmp8Q2yPkcdZoiFuAN0dY3SmjJMRUAz9FbnaA3ysMSAgzfBhdEa7VBa4ghxfYcG0MkWR5tXpH2PTIgR3Jb3w-YjAh3diuaQ8p-Yox2PeLDgepRyBD8W7ur68Lx6MmiX4MX9e159-_Tx5uILvvz6-XDx4RIbIVjGfOiaPWU1DGavRd02pudcs72ksu05pVJ20mhJBdQgoSu10IbWBHhnhDFS8PPq_eY7L90EvYFTCU7N0U46ripoq_5VvD2qMdwpLghrJC8Gr-8NYvi-QMpqssmAc9pDWJKihMmWM7mvC0o31MSQUoThIYYSdRpabUOrMrQ6Da3acvPq7_89XPxetgBsA1KRfBlC3YYl-tLZf1x_ASOCuEU</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Kubben, P. L.</creator><creator>van Santbrink, H.</creator><creator>ter Laak-Poort, M.</creator><creator>Weber, J. W.</creator><creator>Vles, J. S. H.</creator><creator>Granzen, B.</creator><creator>van Overbeeke, J. J.</creator><creator>Cornips, E. M. J.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI</title><author>Kubben, P. L. ; van Santbrink, H. ; ter Laak-Poort, M. ; Weber, J. W. ; Vles, J. S. H. ; Granzen, B. ; van Overbeeke, J. J. ; Cornips, E. M. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3fb69125efc9a4586cd33a297178d31177b7ca714e5e7eb58216150e3bc4cc743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Neuronavigation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Neuronavigation - methods</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pediatrics - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kubben, P. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Santbrink, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Laak-Poort, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vles, J. S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granzen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Overbeeke, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornips, E. M. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Child's nervous system</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kubben, P. L.</au><au>van Santbrink, H.</au><au>ter Laak-Poort, M.</au><au>Weber, J. W.</au><au>Vles, J. S. H.</au><au>Granzen, B.</au><au>van Overbeeke, J. J.</au><au>Cornips, E. M. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI</atitle><jtitle>Child's nervous system</jtitle><stitle>Childs Nerv Syst</stitle><addtitle>Childs Nerv Syst</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1171</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1171-1180</pages><issn>0256-7040</issn><eissn>1433-0350</eissn><abstract>Introduction
We analyze our preliminary experience using the PoleStar N20 mobile intraoperative MR (iMR) system as an adjunct for pediatric brain tumor resection.
Methods
We analyzed 11 resections in nine children between 1 month and 17 years old. After resection, we acquired iMR scans to detect residual tumor and update neuronavigation. We compared final iMR interpretation by the neurosurgeon with early postoperative MR interpretation by a neuroradiologist.
Results
Patient positioning was straightforward, and image quality (T1 7-min 4-mm sequences) sufficient in all cases. In five cases, contrast enhancement suspect for residual tumor was noted on initial postresection iMR images. In one case, a slight discrepancy with postoperative imaging after 3 months was no longer visible after 1 year. No serious perioperative adverse events related to the PoleStar N20 were encountered, except for transient shoulder pain in two.
Conclusions
Using the PoleStar N20 iMR system is technically feasible and safe for both supra- and infratentorial tumor resections in children of all ages. Their small head and shoulders favor positioning in the magnet bore and allow the field of view to cover more than the area of primary interest, e.g., the ventricles in an infratentorial case. Standard surgical equipment may be used without significant limitations. In this series, the use of iMR leads to an increased extent of tumor resection in 45 % of cases. Correlation between iMR and early postoperative MR is excellent, provided image quality is optimal and interpretation is carefully done by someone sufficiently familiar with the system.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22684477</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0256-7040 |
ispartof | Child's nervous system, 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.1171-1180 |
issn | 0256-7040 1433-0350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3402673 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Brain Neoplasms - surgery Child Child, Preschool Feasibility Studies Female Humans Infant Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Medical Oncology - methods Medicine Medicine & Public Health Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods Neuronavigation - instrumentation Neuronavigation - methods Neurosciences Neurosurgery Neurosurgical Procedures - instrumentation Neurosurgical Procedures - methods Original Paper Pediatrics - methods |
title | Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T00%3A47%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20mobile%200.15-T%20intraoperative%20MR%20system%20in%20pediatric%20neuro-oncological%20surgery:%20feasibility%20and%20correlation%20with%20early%20postoperative%20high-field%20strength%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Child's%20nervous%20system&rft.au=Kubben,%20P.%20L.&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1171&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1171-1180&rft.issn=0256-7040&rft.eissn=1433-0350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00381-012-1815-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1027832795%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1027832795&rft_id=info:pmid/22684477&rfr_iscdi=true |