A multicenter mortality prediction model for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation
OBJECTIVE:Significant deficiencies exist in the communication of prognosis for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute illness, in part because of clinician uncertainty about long-term outcomes. We sought to refine a mortality prediction model for patients requiring prolonged...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care medicine 2012-04, Vol.40 (4), p.1171-1176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1171 |
container_title | Critical care medicine |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Carson, Shannon S Kahn, Jeremy M Hough, Catherine L Seeley, Eric J White, Douglas B Douglas, Ivor S Cox, Christopher E Caldwell, Ellen Bangdiwala, Shrikant I Garrett, Joanne M Rubenfeld, Gordon D |
description | OBJECTIVE:Significant deficiencies exist in the communication of prognosis for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute illness, in part because of clinician uncertainty about long-term outcomes. We sought to refine a mortality prediction model for patients requiring prolonged ventilation using a multicentered study design.
DESIGN:Cohort study.
SETTING:Five geographically diverse tertiary care medical centers in the United States (California, Colorado, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington).
PATIENTS:Two hundred sixty adult patients who received at least 21 days of mechanical ventilation after acute illness.
INTERVENTIONS:None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:For the probability model, we included age, platelet count, and requirement for vasopressors and/or hemodialysis, each measured on day 21 of mechanical ventilation, in a logistic regression model with 1-yr mortality as the outcome variable. We subsequently modified a simplified prognostic scoring rule (ProVent score) by categorizing the risk variables (age 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 yrs; platelet count 0–150 and >150; vasopressors; hemodialysis) in another logistic regression model and assigning points to variables according to β coefficient values. Overall mortality at 1 yr was 48%. The area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic curve for the primary ProVent probability model was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75–0.81), and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .89. The area under the curve for the categorical model was 0.77, and the p value for the goodness-of-fit statistic was .34. The area under the curve for the ProVent score was 0.76, and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .60. For the 50 patients with a ProVent score >2, only one patient was able to be discharged directly home, and 1-yr mortality was 86%.
CONCLUSION:The ProVent probability model is a simple and reproducible model that can accurately identify patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation who are at high risk of 1-yr mortality. (Crit Care Med 2012; 40:–1176) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182387d43 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3395423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1009127637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-829ada79663ce276c19c4e585ef8ddd6d07e6b2e059da8527d10290651fd65313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwBgjNBonNtP4d2xukKioUqRUbWBvHvpMYPONgz6Tq29dR0gJdsLJkf-f43HsQekvwGcFani-XN2d4hQkDRhRlSnrOnqEFEQy3mGr2HC0w1rhlXLMT9KqUnxgTLiR7iU4oxQp3nC3Qj4tmmOMUHIwT5GZIebIxTHfNNoMPbgpprJceYtOn3GztFCpYmgwOwi6M68qlmMY1-GYAt7FjcDY2uwqFaPfq1-hFb2OBN8fzFH3_dPltedVef_38ZXlx3TquJGsV1dZbqbuOOaCyc0Q7DkIJ6JX3vvNYQreigIX2VgkqPalD4k6Q3neCEXaKPh58t_NqAL-fJ9totjkMNt-ZZIP592UMG7NOO8OYFpyyavDhaJDT7xnKZIZQHMRoR0hzMaRuk9RkTFaUH1CXUykZ-sdvCDb7ckwtxzwtp8re_R3xUfTQRgXeHwFb6hr7bEcXyh9O7CHNK6cO3G2KtbXyK863kM0GbJw2_89wDyA0rM0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009127637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multicenter mortality prediction model for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Carson, Shannon S ; Kahn, Jeremy M ; Hough, Catherine L ; Seeley, Eric J ; White, Douglas B ; Douglas, Ivor S ; Cox, Christopher E ; Caldwell, Ellen ; Bangdiwala, Shrikant I ; Garrett, Joanne M ; Rubenfeld, Gordon D</creator><creatorcontrib>Carson, Shannon S ; Kahn, Jeremy M ; Hough, Catherine L ; Seeley, Eric J ; White, Douglas B ; Douglas, Ivor S ; Cox, Christopher E ; Caldwell, Ellen ; Bangdiwala, Shrikant I ; Garrett, Joanne M ; Rubenfeld, Gordon D ; ProVent Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:Significant deficiencies exist in the communication of prognosis for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute illness, in part because of clinician uncertainty about long-term outcomes. We sought to refine a mortality prediction model for patients requiring prolonged ventilation using a multicentered study design.
DESIGN:Cohort study.
SETTING:Five geographically diverse tertiary care medical centers in the United States (California, Colorado, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington).
PATIENTS:Two hundred sixty adult patients who received at least 21 days of mechanical ventilation after acute illness.
INTERVENTIONS:None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:For the probability model, we included age, platelet count, and requirement for vasopressors and/or hemodialysis, each measured on day 21 of mechanical ventilation, in a logistic regression model with 1-yr mortality as the outcome variable. We subsequently modified a simplified prognostic scoring rule (ProVent score) by categorizing the risk variables (age 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 yrs; platelet count 0–150 and >150; vasopressors; hemodialysis) in another logistic regression model and assigning points to variables according to β coefficient values. Overall mortality at 1 yr was 48%. The area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic curve for the primary ProVent probability model was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75–0.81), and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .89. The area under the curve for the categorical model was 0.77, and the p value for the goodness-of-fit statistic was .34. The area under the curve for the ProVent score was 0.76, and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .60. For the 50 patients with a ProVent score >2, only one patient was able to be discharged directly home, and 1-yr mortality was 86%.
CONCLUSION:The ProVent probability model is a simple and reproducible model that can accurately identify patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation who are at high risk of 1-yr mortality. (Crit Care Med 2012; 40:–1176)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182387d43</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22080643</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCMDC7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Critical Care - statistics & numerical data ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Platelet Count ; Renal Dialysis ; Respiration, Artificial - mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 2012-04, Vol.40 (4), p.1171-1176</ispartof><rights>2012 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-829ada79663ce276c19c4e585ef8ddd6d07e6b2e059da8527d10290651fd65313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-829ada79663ce276c19c4e585ef8ddd6d07e6b2e059da8527d10290651fd65313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25643394$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22080643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carson, Shannon S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Jeremy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hough, Catherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeley, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Ivor S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bangdiwala, Shrikant I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubenfeld, Gordon D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ProVent Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>A multicenter mortality prediction model for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:Significant deficiencies exist in the communication of prognosis for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute illness, in part because of clinician uncertainty about long-term outcomes. We sought to refine a mortality prediction model for patients requiring prolonged ventilation using a multicentered study design.
DESIGN:Cohort study.
SETTING:Five geographically diverse tertiary care medical centers in the United States (California, Colorado, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington).
PATIENTS:Two hundred sixty adult patients who received at least 21 days of mechanical ventilation after acute illness.
INTERVENTIONS:None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:For the probability model, we included age, platelet count, and requirement for vasopressors and/or hemodialysis, each measured on day 21 of mechanical ventilation, in a logistic regression model with 1-yr mortality as the outcome variable. We subsequently modified a simplified prognostic scoring rule (ProVent score) by categorizing the risk variables (age 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 yrs; platelet count 0–150 and >150; vasopressors; hemodialysis) in another logistic regression model and assigning points to variables according to β coefficient values. Overall mortality at 1 yr was 48%. The area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic curve for the primary ProVent probability model was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75–0.81), and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .89. The area under the curve for the categorical model was 0.77, and the p value for the goodness-of-fit statistic was .34. The area under the curve for the ProVent score was 0.76, and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .60. For the 50 patients with a ProVent score >2, only one patient was able to be discharged directly home, and 1-yr mortality was 86%.
CONCLUSION:The ProVent probability model is a simple and reproducible model that can accurately identify patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation who are at high risk of 1-yr mortality. (Crit Care Med 2012; 40:–1176)</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Critical Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Platelet Count</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - mortality</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwBgjNBonNtP4d2xukKioUqRUbWBvHvpMYPONgz6Tq29dR0gJdsLJkf-f43HsQekvwGcFani-XN2d4hQkDRhRlSnrOnqEFEQy3mGr2HC0w1rhlXLMT9KqUnxgTLiR7iU4oxQp3nC3Qj4tmmOMUHIwT5GZIebIxTHfNNoMPbgpprJceYtOn3GztFCpYmgwOwi6M68qlmMY1-GYAt7FjcDY2uwqFaPfq1-hFb2OBN8fzFH3_dPltedVef_38ZXlx3TquJGsV1dZbqbuOOaCyc0Q7DkIJ6JX3vvNYQreigIX2VgkqPalD4k6Q3neCEXaKPh58t_NqAL-fJ9totjkMNt-ZZIP592UMG7NOO8OYFpyyavDhaJDT7xnKZIZQHMRoR0hzMaRuk9RkTFaUH1CXUykZ-sdvCDb7ckwtxzwtp8re_R3xUfTQRgXeHwFb6hr7bEcXyh9O7CHNK6cO3G2KtbXyK863kM0GbJw2_89wDyA0rM0</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Carson, Shannon S</creator><creator>Kahn, Jeremy M</creator><creator>Hough, Catherine L</creator><creator>Seeley, Eric J</creator><creator>White, Douglas B</creator><creator>Douglas, Ivor S</creator><creator>Cox, Christopher E</creator><creator>Caldwell, Ellen</creator><creator>Bangdiwala, Shrikant I</creator><creator>Garrett, Joanne M</creator><creator>Rubenfeld, Gordon D</creator><general>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>A multicenter mortality prediction model for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation</title><author>Carson, Shannon S ; Kahn, Jeremy M ; Hough, Catherine L ; Seeley, Eric J ; White, Douglas B ; Douglas, Ivor S ; Cox, Christopher E ; Caldwell, Ellen ; Bangdiwala, Shrikant I ; Garrett, Joanne M ; Rubenfeld, Gordon D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4873-829ada79663ce276c19c4e585ef8ddd6d07e6b2e059da8527d10290651fd65313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Critical Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Platelet Count</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - mortality</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carson, Shannon S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Jeremy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hough, Catherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeley, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Ivor S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bangdiwala, Shrikant I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrett, Joanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubenfeld, Gordon D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ProVent Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carson, Shannon S</au><au>Kahn, Jeremy M</au><au>Hough, Catherine L</au><au>Seeley, Eric J</au><au>White, Douglas B</au><au>Douglas, Ivor S</au><au>Cox, Christopher E</au><au>Caldwell, Ellen</au><au>Bangdiwala, Shrikant I</au><au>Garrett, Joanne M</au><au>Rubenfeld, Gordon D</au><aucorp>ProVent Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multicenter mortality prediction model for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1171</spage><epage>1176</epage><pages>1171-1176</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><coden>CCMDC7</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE:Significant deficiencies exist in the communication of prognosis for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute illness, in part because of clinician uncertainty about long-term outcomes. We sought to refine a mortality prediction model for patients requiring prolonged ventilation using a multicentered study design.
DESIGN:Cohort study.
SETTING:Five geographically diverse tertiary care medical centers in the United States (California, Colorado, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington).
PATIENTS:Two hundred sixty adult patients who received at least 21 days of mechanical ventilation after acute illness.
INTERVENTIONS:None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:For the probability model, we included age, platelet count, and requirement for vasopressors and/or hemodialysis, each measured on day 21 of mechanical ventilation, in a logistic regression model with 1-yr mortality as the outcome variable. We subsequently modified a simplified prognostic scoring rule (ProVent score) by categorizing the risk variables (age 18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 yrs; platelet count 0–150 and >150; vasopressors; hemodialysis) in another logistic regression model and assigning points to variables according to β coefficient values. Overall mortality at 1 yr was 48%. The area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic curve for the primary ProVent probability model was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75–0.81), and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .89. The area under the curve for the categorical model was 0.77, and the p value for the goodness-of-fit statistic was .34. The area under the curve for the ProVent score was 0.76, and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .60. For the 50 patients with a ProVent score >2, only one patient was able to be discharged directly home, and 1-yr mortality was 86%.
CONCLUSION:The ProVent probability model is a simple and reproducible model that can accurately identify patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation who are at high risk of 1-yr mortality. (Crit Care Med 2012; 40:–1176)</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>22080643</pmid><doi>10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182387d43</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-3493 |
ispartof | Critical care medicine, 2012-04, Vol.40 (4), p.1171-1176 |
issn | 0090-3493 1530-0293 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3395423 |
source | Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Critical Care - statistics & numerical data Emergency and intensive respiratory care Female Humans Intensive care medicine Kaplan-Meier Estimate Logistic Models Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Models, Statistical Platelet Count Renal Dialysis Respiration, Artificial - mortality Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use Young Adult |
title | A multicenter mortality prediction model for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A17%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multicenter%20mortality%20prediction%20model%20for%20patients%20receiving%20prolonged%20mechanical%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Carson,%20Shannon%20S&rft.aucorp=ProVent%20Investigators&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1171&rft.epage=1176&rft.pages=1171-1176&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft.coden=CCMDC7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182387d43&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1009127637%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009127637&rft_id=info:pmid/22080643&rfr_iscdi=true |