Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken

The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta eleg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology letters (2005) 2012-08, Vol.8 (4), p.631-635
Hauptverfasser: Kasai, Fumio, O'Brien, Patricia C. M., Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 635
container_issue 4
container_start_page 631
container_title Biology letters (2005)
container_volume 8
creator Kasai, Fumio
O'Brien, Patricia C. M.
Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.
description The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, TSC) and the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, CNI), and bird and reptile genomes have been highly conserved during evolution. In this study, size and GC content of all chromosomes are measured from the flow karyotypes of GGA, TSC and CNI. Genome sizes estimated from the total chromosome size demonstrate that TSC and CNI are 1.21 Gb and 1.29 Gb, respectively. This refines previous overestimations and reveals similar genome sizes in chicken, turtle and crocodile. Analysis of chromosome GC content in each of these three species shows a higher GC content in smaller chromosomes than in larger chromosomes. This contrasts with mammals and squamates in which GC content does not correlate with chromosome size. These data suggest that a common ancestor of birds, turtles and crocodiles had a small genome size and a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias, distinct from the squamate lineage.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0141
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3391471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654664827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-939b7f1b44f4a59089d747e0f9442c457632efb9a219fd072aad99cebfd1cfce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEoqVw5Yh85JLFjp14zQEJVRSQKoEQHxUXy3HGW3cde2s7QDjzh-OwZQUHxMkezXs_zcyrqocErwgW6ycx9W7VYNKsMGHkVnVMOGO1aPnF7cO_I0fVvZSuMKac4_ZuddQ0TBDe0ePqxztQKUFKI_iMgkEb8GEElOx3QNajPMXsACk_IB2DDoMtVa8SDCh4pC9jGENaDGPhTBF-YfoZGRe-oq2Kc8jzzvrNU6RdSAt3tE5Fm2eUQ_FbvQV_v7pjlEvw4OY9qT6cvXh_-qo-f_Py9enz81q3nORaUNFzQ3rGDFOtwGsxcMYBG8FYo1lbFmrA9EI1RJgB80apQQgNvRmINhroSfVsz91N_QiDLrNG5eQu2rFMKoOy8u-Ot5dyE75ISgVhnBTA4xtADNcTpCxHmzQ4pzyEKUnStazr2Lrh_5fikgHtWMuKdLWXlgunFMEcJiJYLinLJWW5pCyXlIvh0Z97HOS_Yy0CuhfEMJeDBm0hz_IqTNGX8t_Yeu-yKcO3A1XFrew45a38uGbyrOOfcfvpQr6lPwHLtsh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024936454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kasai, Fumio ; O'Brien, Patricia C. M. ; Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Fumio ; O'Brien, Patricia C. M. ; Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creatorcontrib><description>The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, TSC) and the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, CNI), and bird and reptile genomes have been highly conserved during evolution. In this study, size and GC content of all chromosomes are measured from the flow karyotypes of GGA, TSC and CNI. Genome sizes estimated from the total chromosome size demonstrate that TSC and CNI are 1.21 Gb and 1.29 Gb, respectively. This refines previous overestimations and reveals similar genome sizes in chicken, turtle and crocodile. Analysis of chromosome GC content in each of these three species shows a higher GC content in smaller chromosomes than in larger chromosomes. This contrasts with mammals and squamates in which GC content does not correlate with chromosome size. These data suggest that a common ancestor of birds, turtles and crocodiles had a small genome size and a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias, distinct from the squamate lineage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-957X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22491763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Alligators and Crocodiles - genetics ; Animals ; Base Composition ; Chickens - genetics ; Chromosome Painting ; Chromosome Size ; Chromosomes - genetics ; Crocodylus niloticus ; Databases, Nucleic Acid ; Gallus gallus domesticus ; GC content ; Genome Biology ; Genome Size ; Karyotype ; Karyotyping - methods ; Male ; Reptile Genome Evolution ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Trachemys scripta elegans ; Turtles - genetics</subject><ispartof>Biology letters (2005), 2012-08, Vol.8 (4), p.631-635</ispartof><rights>This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-939b7f1b44f4a59089d747e0f9442c457632efb9a219fd072aad99cebfd1cfce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-939b7f1b44f4a59089d747e0f9442c457632efb9a219fd072aad99cebfd1cfce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391471/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391471/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22491763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Fumio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Patricia C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creatorcontrib><title>Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken</title><title>Biology letters (2005)</title><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><description>The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, TSC) and the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, CNI), and bird and reptile genomes have been highly conserved during evolution. In this study, size and GC content of all chromosomes are measured from the flow karyotypes of GGA, TSC and CNI. Genome sizes estimated from the total chromosome size demonstrate that TSC and CNI are 1.21 Gb and 1.29 Gb, respectively. This refines previous overestimations and reveals similar genome sizes in chicken, turtle and crocodile. Analysis of chromosome GC content in each of these three species shows a higher GC content in smaller chromosomes than in larger chromosomes. This contrasts with mammals and squamates in which GC content does not correlate with chromosome size. These data suggest that a common ancestor of birds, turtles and crocodiles had a small genome size and a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias, distinct from the squamate lineage.</description><subject>Alligators and Crocodiles - genetics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Base Composition</subject><subject>Chickens - genetics</subject><subject>Chromosome Painting</subject><subject>Chromosome Size</subject><subject>Chromosomes - genetics</subject><subject>Crocodylus niloticus</subject><subject>Databases, Nucleic Acid</subject><subject>Gallus gallus domesticus</subject><subject>GC content</subject><subject>Genome Biology</subject><subject>Genome Size</subject><subject>Karyotype</subject><subject>Karyotyping - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reptile Genome Evolution</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Trachemys scripta elegans</subject><subject>Turtles - genetics</subject><issn>1744-9561</issn><issn>1744-957X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEoqVw5Yh85JLFjp14zQEJVRSQKoEQHxUXy3HGW3cde2s7QDjzh-OwZQUHxMkezXs_zcyrqocErwgW6ycx9W7VYNKsMGHkVnVMOGO1aPnF7cO_I0fVvZSuMKac4_ZuddQ0TBDe0ePqxztQKUFKI_iMgkEb8GEElOx3QNajPMXsACk_IB2DDoMtVa8SDCh4pC9jGENaDGPhTBF-YfoZGRe-oq2Kc8jzzvrNU6RdSAt3tE5Fm2eUQ_FbvQV_v7pjlEvw4OY9qT6cvXh_-qo-f_Py9enz81q3nORaUNFzQ3rGDFOtwGsxcMYBG8FYo1lbFmrA9EI1RJgB80apQQgNvRmINhroSfVsz91N_QiDLrNG5eQu2rFMKoOy8u-Ot5dyE75ISgVhnBTA4xtADNcTpCxHmzQ4pzyEKUnStazr2Lrh_5fikgHtWMuKdLWXlgunFMEcJiJYLinLJWW5pCyXlIvh0Z97HOS_Yy0CuhfEMJeDBm0hz_IqTNGX8t_Yeu-yKcO3A1XFrew45a38uGbyrOOfcfvpQr6lPwHLtsh0</recordid><startdate>20120823</startdate><enddate>20120823</enddate><creator>Kasai, Fumio</creator><creator>O'Brien, Patricia C. M.</creator><creator>Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120823</creationdate><title>Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken</title><author>Kasai, Fumio ; O'Brien, Patricia C. M. ; Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-939b7f1b44f4a59089d747e0f9442c457632efb9a219fd072aad99cebfd1cfce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Alligators and Crocodiles - genetics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Base Composition</topic><topic>Chickens - genetics</topic><topic>Chromosome Painting</topic><topic>Chromosome Size</topic><topic>Chromosomes - genetics</topic><topic>Crocodylus niloticus</topic><topic>Databases, Nucleic Acid</topic><topic>Gallus gallus domesticus</topic><topic>GC content</topic><topic>Genome Biology</topic><topic>Genome Size</topic><topic>Karyotype</topic><topic>Karyotyping - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reptile Genome Evolution</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Trachemys scripta elegans</topic><topic>Turtles - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Fumio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Patricia C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kasai, Fumio</au><au>O'Brien, Patricia C. M.</au><au>Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken</atitle><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle><stitle>Biol. Lett</stitle><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><date>2012-08-23</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>631</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>631-635</pages><issn>1744-9561</issn><eissn>1744-957X</eissn><abstract>The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, TSC) and the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, CNI), and bird and reptile genomes have been highly conserved during evolution. In this study, size and GC content of all chromosomes are measured from the flow karyotypes of GGA, TSC and CNI. Genome sizes estimated from the total chromosome size demonstrate that TSC and CNI are 1.21 Gb and 1.29 Gb, respectively. This refines previous overestimations and reveals similar genome sizes in chicken, turtle and crocodile. Analysis of chromosome GC content in each of these three species shows a higher GC content in smaller chromosomes than in larger chromosomes. This contrasts with mammals and squamates in which GC content does not correlate with chromosome size. These data suggest that a common ancestor of birds, turtles and crocodiles had a small genome size and a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias, distinct from the squamate lineage.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>22491763</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsbl.2012.0141</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-9561
ispartof Biology letters (2005), 2012-08, Vol.8 (4), p.631-635
issn 1744-9561
1744-957X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3391471
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Alligators and Crocodiles - genetics
Animals
Base Composition
Chickens - genetics
Chromosome Painting
Chromosome Size
Chromosomes - genetics
Crocodylus niloticus
Databases, Nucleic Acid
Gallus gallus domesticus
GC content
Genome Biology
Genome Size
Karyotype
Karyotyping - methods
Male
Reptile Genome Evolution
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Trachemys scripta elegans
Turtles - genetics
title Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reassessment%20of%20genome%20size%20in%20turtle%20and%20crocodile%20based%20on%20chromosome%20measurement%20by%20flow%20karyotyping:%20close%20similarity%20to%20chicken&rft.jtitle=Biology%20letters%20(2005)&rft.au=Kasai,%20Fumio&rft.date=2012-08-23&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=631&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=631-635&rft.issn=1744-9561&rft.eissn=1744-957X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1654664827%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024936454&rft_id=info:pmid/22491763&rfr_iscdi=true