Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken
The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta eleg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biology letters (2005) 2012-08, Vol.8 (4), p.631-635 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 635 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 631 |
container_title | Biology letters (2005) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Kasai, Fumio O'Brien, Patricia C. M. Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A. |
description | The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, TSC) and the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, CNI), and bird and reptile genomes have been highly conserved during evolution. In this study, size and GC content of all chromosomes are measured from the flow karyotypes of GGA, TSC and CNI. Genome sizes estimated from the total chromosome size demonstrate that TSC and CNI are 1.21 Gb and 1.29 Gb, respectively. This refines previous overestimations and reveals similar genome sizes in chicken, turtle and crocodile. Analysis of chromosome GC content in each of these three species shows a higher GC content in smaller chromosomes than in larger chromosomes. This contrasts with mammals and squamates in which GC content does not correlate with chromosome size. These data suggest that a common ancestor of birds, turtles and crocodiles had a small genome size and a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias, distinct from the squamate lineage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0141 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3391471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654664827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-939b7f1b44f4a59089d747e0f9442c457632efb9a219fd072aad99cebfd1cfce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEoqVw5Yh85JLFjp14zQEJVRSQKoEQHxUXy3HGW3cde2s7QDjzh-OwZQUHxMkezXs_zcyrqocErwgW6ycx9W7VYNKsMGHkVnVMOGO1aPnF7cO_I0fVvZSuMKac4_ZuddQ0TBDe0ePqxztQKUFKI_iMgkEb8GEElOx3QNajPMXsACk_IB2DDoMtVa8SDCh4pC9jGENaDGPhTBF-YfoZGRe-oq2Kc8jzzvrNU6RdSAt3tE5Fm2eUQ_FbvQV_v7pjlEvw4OY9qT6cvXh_-qo-f_Py9enz81q3nORaUNFzQ3rGDFOtwGsxcMYBG8FYo1lbFmrA9EI1RJgB80apQQgNvRmINhroSfVsz91N_QiDLrNG5eQu2rFMKoOy8u-Ot5dyE75ISgVhnBTA4xtADNcTpCxHmzQ4pzyEKUnStazr2Lrh_5fikgHtWMuKdLWXlgunFMEcJiJYLinLJWW5pCyXlIvh0Z97HOS_Yy0CuhfEMJeDBm0hz_IqTNGX8t_Yeu-yKcO3A1XFrew45a38uGbyrOOfcfvpQr6lPwHLtsh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024936454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kasai, Fumio ; O'Brien, Patricia C. M. ; Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Fumio ; O'Brien, Patricia C. M. ; Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creatorcontrib><description>The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, TSC) and the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, CNI), and bird and reptile genomes have been highly conserved during evolution. In this study, size and GC content of all chromosomes are measured from the flow karyotypes of GGA, TSC and CNI. Genome sizes estimated from the total chromosome size demonstrate that TSC and CNI are 1.21 Gb and 1.29 Gb, respectively. This refines previous overestimations and reveals similar genome sizes in chicken, turtle and crocodile. Analysis of chromosome GC content in each of these three species shows a higher GC content in smaller chromosomes than in larger chromosomes. This contrasts with mammals and squamates in which GC content does not correlate with chromosome size. These data suggest that a common ancestor of birds, turtles and crocodiles had a small genome size and a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias, distinct from the squamate lineage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-957X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22491763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Alligators and Crocodiles - genetics ; Animals ; Base Composition ; Chickens - genetics ; Chromosome Painting ; Chromosome Size ; Chromosomes - genetics ; Crocodylus niloticus ; Databases, Nucleic Acid ; Gallus gallus domesticus ; GC content ; Genome Biology ; Genome Size ; Karyotype ; Karyotyping - methods ; Male ; Reptile Genome Evolution ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Trachemys scripta elegans ; Turtles - genetics</subject><ispartof>Biology letters (2005), 2012-08, Vol.8 (4), p.631-635</ispartof><rights>This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-939b7f1b44f4a59089d747e0f9442c457632efb9a219fd072aad99cebfd1cfce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-939b7f1b44f4a59089d747e0f9442c457632efb9a219fd072aad99cebfd1cfce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391471/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391471/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22491763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Fumio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Patricia C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creatorcontrib><title>Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken</title><title>Biology letters (2005)</title><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><description>The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, TSC) and the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, CNI), and bird and reptile genomes have been highly conserved during evolution. In this study, size and GC content of all chromosomes are measured from the flow karyotypes of GGA, TSC and CNI. Genome sizes estimated from the total chromosome size demonstrate that TSC and CNI are 1.21 Gb and 1.29 Gb, respectively. This refines previous overestimations and reveals similar genome sizes in chicken, turtle and crocodile. Analysis of chromosome GC content in each of these three species shows a higher GC content in smaller chromosomes than in larger chromosomes. This contrasts with mammals and squamates in which GC content does not correlate with chromosome size. These data suggest that a common ancestor of birds, turtles and crocodiles had a small genome size and a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias, distinct from the squamate lineage.</description><subject>Alligators and Crocodiles - genetics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Base Composition</subject><subject>Chickens - genetics</subject><subject>Chromosome Painting</subject><subject>Chromosome Size</subject><subject>Chromosomes - genetics</subject><subject>Crocodylus niloticus</subject><subject>Databases, Nucleic Acid</subject><subject>Gallus gallus domesticus</subject><subject>GC content</subject><subject>Genome Biology</subject><subject>Genome Size</subject><subject>Karyotype</subject><subject>Karyotyping - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reptile Genome Evolution</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Trachemys scripta elegans</subject><subject>Turtles - genetics</subject><issn>1744-9561</issn><issn>1744-957X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEoqVw5Yh85JLFjp14zQEJVRSQKoEQHxUXy3HGW3cde2s7QDjzh-OwZQUHxMkezXs_zcyrqocErwgW6ycx9W7VYNKsMGHkVnVMOGO1aPnF7cO_I0fVvZSuMKac4_ZuddQ0TBDe0ePqxztQKUFKI_iMgkEb8GEElOx3QNajPMXsACk_IB2DDoMtVa8SDCh4pC9jGENaDGPhTBF-YfoZGRe-oq2Kc8jzzvrNU6RdSAt3tE5Fm2eUQ_FbvQV_v7pjlEvw4OY9qT6cvXh_-qo-f_Py9enz81q3nORaUNFzQ3rGDFOtwGsxcMYBG8FYo1lbFmrA9EI1RJgB80apQQgNvRmINhroSfVsz91N_QiDLrNG5eQu2rFMKoOy8u-Ot5dyE75ISgVhnBTA4xtADNcTpCxHmzQ4pzyEKUnStazr2Lrh_5fikgHtWMuKdLWXlgunFMEcJiJYLinLJWW5pCyXlIvh0Z97HOS_Yy0CuhfEMJeDBm0hz_IqTNGX8t_Yeu-yKcO3A1XFrew45a38uGbyrOOfcfvpQr6lPwHLtsh0</recordid><startdate>20120823</startdate><enddate>20120823</enddate><creator>Kasai, Fumio</creator><creator>O'Brien, Patricia C. M.</creator><creator>Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120823</creationdate><title>Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken</title><author>Kasai, Fumio ; O'Brien, Patricia C. M. ; Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-939b7f1b44f4a59089d747e0f9442c457632efb9a219fd072aad99cebfd1cfce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Alligators and Crocodiles - genetics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Base Composition</topic><topic>Chickens - genetics</topic><topic>Chromosome Painting</topic><topic>Chromosome Size</topic><topic>Chromosomes - genetics</topic><topic>Crocodylus niloticus</topic><topic>Databases, Nucleic Acid</topic><topic>Gallus gallus domesticus</topic><topic>GC content</topic><topic>Genome Biology</topic><topic>Genome Size</topic><topic>Karyotype</topic><topic>Karyotyping - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reptile Genome Evolution</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Trachemys scripta elegans</topic><topic>Turtles - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Fumio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Patricia C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kasai, Fumio</au><au>O'Brien, Patricia C. M.</au><au>Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken</atitle><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle><stitle>Biol. Lett</stitle><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><date>2012-08-23</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>631</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>631-635</pages><issn>1744-9561</issn><eissn>1744-957X</eissn><abstract>The genome size in turtles and crocodiles is thought to be much larger than the 1.2 Gb of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus, GGA), according to the animal genome size database. However, GGA macrochromosomes show extensive homology in the karyotypes of the red eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, TSC) and the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, CNI), and bird and reptile genomes have been highly conserved during evolution. In this study, size and GC content of all chromosomes are measured from the flow karyotypes of GGA, TSC and CNI. Genome sizes estimated from the total chromosome size demonstrate that TSC and CNI are 1.21 Gb and 1.29 Gb, respectively. This refines previous overestimations and reveals similar genome sizes in chicken, turtle and crocodile. Analysis of chromosome GC content in each of these three species shows a higher GC content in smaller chromosomes than in larger chromosomes. This contrasts with mammals and squamates in which GC content does not correlate with chromosome size. These data suggest that a common ancestor of birds, turtles and crocodiles had a small genome size and a chromosomal size-dependent GC bias, distinct from the squamate lineage.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>22491763</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsbl.2012.0141</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-9561 |
ispartof | Biology letters (2005), 2012-08, Vol.8 (4), p.631-635 |
issn | 1744-9561 1744-957X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3391471 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Alligators and Crocodiles - genetics Animals Base Composition Chickens - genetics Chromosome Painting Chromosome Size Chromosomes - genetics Crocodylus niloticus Databases, Nucleic Acid Gallus gallus domesticus GC content Genome Biology Genome Size Karyotype Karyotyping - methods Male Reptile Genome Evolution Sequence Analysis, DNA Trachemys scripta elegans Turtles - genetics |
title | Reassessment of genome size in turtle and crocodile based on chromosome measurement by flow karyotyping: close similarity to chicken |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reassessment%20of%20genome%20size%20in%20turtle%20and%20crocodile%20based%20on%20chromosome%20measurement%20by%20flow%20karyotyping:%20close%20similarity%20to%20chicken&rft.jtitle=Biology%20letters%20(2005)&rft.au=Kasai,%20Fumio&rft.date=2012-08-23&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=631&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=631-635&rft.issn=1744-9561&rft.eissn=1744-957X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1654664827%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024936454&rft_id=info:pmid/22491763&rfr_iscdi=true |