Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction
The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2012-05, Vol.302 (9), p.H1838-H1846 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | H1846 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | H1838 |
container_title | American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology |
container_volume | 302 |
creator | Vaseghi, Marmar Lux, Robert L Mahajan, Aman Shivkumar, Kalyanam |
description | The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy (ICM). The effects of direct sympathetic stimulation were assessed using isoproterenol, while those of reflex sympathetic stimulation were assessed with nitroprusside infusion in ICM patients (n = 5). Five patients without cardiomyopathy were also studied. Local repolarization was measured from intracardiac electrograms that were used to calculate the activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Isoproterenol significantly increased heterogeneity in repolarization in patients with ICM; the decrease in ARI from baseline was 72.9 ± 9.1 ms in more viable regions, 64.5 ± 8.9 ms in the scar, and 54.9 ± 9.1 ms in border zones (P = 0.0002 and 0.014 comparing normal and scar to border zones, respectively). In response to nitroprusside, the ARI at the border zones decreased significantly more than either scar or surrounding viable myocardium, which showed an increase in ARI (P = 0.014 and 0.08 comparing normal tissue and scar to border zones, respectively). Furthermore, isoproterenol increased ARI dispersion by 70%, while nitroprusside increased ARI dispersion by 230% when ICM patients were compared to those with structurally normal hearts (P = 0.0015 and P < 0.001, respectively). In humans, both direct and reflex sympathetic stimulations increase regional differences in repolarization. The normal tissue surrounding the scar appears denervated. Dispersion of ARI in response to sympathetic stimulation is significantly increased in patients with ICM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/ajpheart.01106.2011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3362058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2659294051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9c52dcb849ec8853755b9e0733a52accade266f08215ad6f2c1f948415d23ba83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9r3DAQxUVI6W62_QSBYMilF28ljaW1L4WypEkhkEPSs5iV5ViLbbmSnLD99LWzf2hzGpj3m8fMPEIuGV0yJvhX3Pa1QR-XlDEql3wsZ2Q-KjxlAopzMqcgIZUMxIxchLCllIqVhI9kxjlkQsh8TvTjru0x1iZanYRo26HBaF2X2E57g8GEpLShNz5MTVcl3vSuQW__HLGkHlrsQvJqY520O6fRlxabUanQ6wn6RD5U2ATz-VAX5NePm6f1XXr_cPtz_f0-1RlATAsteKk3eVYYnecCVkJsCkNXACg4ao2l4VJWNOdMYCkrrllVZHnGRMlhgzksyLe9bz9sWlNq00WPjeq9bdHvlEOr_lc6W6tn96IAJKdiMvhyMPDu92BCVK0N2jQNdsYNQbHxxSxnMuMjev0O3brBd-N5E8WFXHGYKNhT2rsQvKlOyzCqphDVMUT1FqKaQhynrv694zRzTA3-AkZXnVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1012567232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society Paid</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vaseghi, Marmar ; Lux, Robert L ; Mahajan, Aman ; Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Marmar ; Lux, Robert L ; Mahajan, Aman ; Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creatorcontrib><description>The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy (ICM). The effects of direct sympathetic stimulation were assessed using isoproterenol, while those of reflex sympathetic stimulation were assessed with nitroprusside infusion in ICM patients (n = 5). Five patients without cardiomyopathy were also studied. Local repolarization was measured from intracardiac electrograms that were used to calculate the activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Isoproterenol significantly increased heterogeneity in repolarization in patients with ICM; the decrease in ARI from baseline was 72.9 ± 9.1 ms in more viable regions, 64.5 ± 8.9 ms in the scar, and 54.9 ± 9.1 ms in border zones (P = 0.0002 and 0.014 comparing normal and scar to border zones, respectively). In response to nitroprusside, the ARI at the border zones decreased significantly more than either scar or surrounding viable myocardium, which showed an increase in ARI (P = 0.014 and 0.08 comparing normal tissue and scar to border zones, respectively). Furthermore, isoproterenol increased ARI dispersion by 70%, while nitroprusside increased ARI dispersion by 230% when ICM patients were compared to those with structurally normal hearts (P = 0.0015 and P < 0.001, respectively). In humans, both direct and reflex sympathetic stimulations increase regional differences in repolarization. The normal tissue surrounding the scar appears denervated. Dispersion of ARI in response to sympathetic stimulation is significantly increased in patients with ICM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01106.2011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22345568</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPPDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physiological Society</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects ; Action Potentials - physiology ; Adult ; Aged ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; Cardiomyopathies - complications ; Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Catheter Ablation ; Dispersion ; Electrocardiography ; Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac ; Female ; Heart attacks ; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Humans ; Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology ; Isoproterenol - pharmacology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Nitroprusside - pharmacology ; Pharmaceuticals ; Side effects ; Sympathetic Nervous System - drug effects ; Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology ; Sympathomimetics - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2012-05, Vol.302 (9), p.H1838-H1846</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physiological Society May 1, 2012</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 the American Physiological Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9c52dcb849ec8853755b9e0733a52accade266f08215ad6f2c1f948415d23ba83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9c52dcb849ec8853755b9e0733a52accade266f08215ad6f2c1f948415d23ba83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Marmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lux, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Aman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creatorcontrib><title>Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction</title><title>American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology</title><addtitle>Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol</addtitle><description>The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy (ICM). The effects of direct sympathetic stimulation were assessed using isoproterenol, while those of reflex sympathetic stimulation were assessed with nitroprusside infusion in ICM patients (n = 5). Five patients without cardiomyopathy were also studied. Local repolarization was measured from intracardiac electrograms that were used to calculate the activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Isoproterenol significantly increased heterogeneity in repolarization in patients with ICM; the decrease in ARI from baseline was 72.9 ± 9.1 ms in more viable regions, 64.5 ± 8.9 ms in the scar, and 54.9 ± 9.1 ms in border zones (P = 0.0002 and 0.014 comparing normal and scar to border zones, respectively). In response to nitroprusside, the ARI at the border zones decreased significantly more than either scar or surrounding viable myocardium, which showed an increase in ARI (P = 0.014 and 0.08 comparing normal tissue and scar to border zones, respectively). Furthermore, isoproterenol increased ARI dispersion by 70%, while nitroprusside increased ARI dispersion by 230% when ICM patients were compared to those with structurally normal hearts (P = 0.0015 and P < 0.001, respectively). In humans, both direct and reflex sympathetic stimulations increase regional differences in repolarization. The normal tissue surrounding the scar appears denervated. Dispersion of ARI in response to sympathetic stimulation is significantly increased in patients with ICM.</description><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects</subject><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - complications</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology</subject><subject>Isoproterenol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Nitroprusside - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Sympathetic Nervous System - drug effects</subject><subject>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sympathomimetics - pharmacology</subject><issn>0363-6135</issn><issn>1522-1539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9r3DAQxUVI6W62_QSBYMilF28ljaW1L4WypEkhkEPSs5iV5ViLbbmSnLD99LWzf2hzGpj3m8fMPEIuGV0yJvhX3Pa1QR-XlDEql3wsZ2Q-KjxlAopzMqcgIZUMxIxchLCllIqVhI9kxjlkQsh8TvTjru0x1iZanYRo26HBaF2X2E57g8GEpLShNz5MTVcl3vSuQW__HLGkHlrsQvJqY520O6fRlxabUanQ6wn6RD5U2ATz-VAX5NePm6f1XXr_cPtz_f0-1RlATAsteKk3eVYYnecCVkJsCkNXACg4ao2l4VJWNOdMYCkrrllVZHnGRMlhgzksyLe9bz9sWlNq00WPjeq9bdHvlEOr_lc6W6tn96IAJKdiMvhyMPDu92BCVK0N2jQNdsYNQbHxxSxnMuMjev0O3brBd-N5E8WFXHGYKNhT2rsQvKlOyzCqphDVMUT1FqKaQhynrv694zRzTA3-AkZXnVk</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Vaseghi, Marmar</creator><creator>Lux, Robert L</creator><creator>Mahajan, Aman</creator><creator>Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction</title><author>Vaseghi, Marmar ; Lux, Robert L ; Mahajan, Aman ; Shivkumar, Kalyanam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9c52dcb849ec8853755b9e0733a52accade266f08215ad6f2c1f948415d23ba83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - drug effects</topic><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - complications</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology</topic><topic>Isoproterenol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Nitroprusside - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Sympathetic Nervous System - drug effects</topic><topic>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sympathomimetics - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Marmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lux, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Aman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaseghi, Marmar</au><au>Lux, Robert L</au><au>Mahajan, Aman</au><au>Shivkumar, Kalyanam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>302</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>H1838</spage><epage>H1846</epage><pages>H1838-H1846</pages><issn>0363-6135</issn><eissn>1522-1539</eissn><coden>AJPPDI</coden><abstract>The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy (ICM). The effects of direct sympathetic stimulation were assessed using isoproterenol, while those of reflex sympathetic stimulation were assessed with nitroprusside infusion in ICM patients (n = 5). Five patients without cardiomyopathy were also studied. Local repolarization was measured from intracardiac electrograms that were used to calculate the activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Isoproterenol significantly increased heterogeneity in repolarization in patients with ICM; the decrease in ARI from baseline was 72.9 ± 9.1 ms in more viable regions, 64.5 ± 8.9 ms in the scar, and 54.9 ± 9.1 ms in border zones (P = 0.0002 and 0.014 comparing normal and scar to border zones, respectively). In response to nitroprusside, the ARI at the border zones decreased significantly more than either scar or surrounding viable myocardium, which showed an increase in ARI (P = 0.014 and 0.08 comparing normal tissue and scar to border zones, respectively). Furthermore, isoproterenol increased ARI dispersion by 70%, while nitroprusside increased ARI dispersion by 230% when ICM patients were compared to those with structurally normal hearts (P = 0.0015 and P < 0.001, respectively). In humans, both direct and reflex sympathetic stimulations increase regional differences in repolarization. The normal tissue surrounding the scar appears denervated. Dispersion of ARI in response to sympathetic stimulation is significantly increased in patients with ICM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>22345568</pmid><doi>10.1152/ajpheart.01106.2011</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-6135 |
ispartof | American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2012-05, Vol.302 (9), p.H1838-H1846 |
issn | 0363-6135 1522-1539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3362058 |
source | MEDLINE; American Physiological Society Paid; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Action Potentials - drug effects Action Potentials - physiology Adult Aged Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology Blood Pressure - drug effects Blood Pressure - physiology Cardiomyopathies - complications Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology Cardiovascular disease Catheter Ablation Dispersion Electrocardiography Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac Female Heart attacks Heart Conduction System - physiopathology Heart Rate - drug effects Heart Rate - physiology Humans Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology Isoproterenol - pharmacology Male Middle Aged Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology Nitroprusside - pharmacology Pharmaceuticals Side effects Sympathetic Nervous System - drug effects Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology Sympathomimetics - pharmacology |
title | Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sympathetic%20stimulation%20increases%20dispersion%20of%20repolarization%20in%20humans%20with%20myocardial%20infarction&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physiology.%20Heart%20and%20circulatory%20physiology&rft.au=Vaseghi,%20Marmar&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=302&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=H1838&rft.epage=H1846&rft.pages=H1838-H1846&rft.issn=0363-6135&rft.eissn=1522-1539&rft.coden=AJPPDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/ajpheart.01106.2011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2659294051%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1012567232&rft_id=info:pmid/22345568&rfr_iscdi=true |