Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction

The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2012-05, Vol.302 (9), p.H1838-H1846
Hauptverfasser: Vaseghi, Marmar, Lux, Robert L, Mahajan, Aman, Shivkumar, Kalyanam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page H1846
container_issue 9
container_start_page H1838
container_title American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology
container_volume 302
creator Vaseghi, Marmar
Lux, Robert L
Mahajan, Aman
Shivkumar, Kalyanam
description The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy (ICM). The effects of direct sympathetic stimulation were assessed using isoproterenol, while those of reflex sympathetic stimulation were assessed with nitroprusside infusion in ICM patients (n = 5). Five patients without cardiomyopathy were also studied. Local repolarization was measured from intracardiac electrograms that were used to calculate the activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Isoproterenol significantly increased heterogeneity in repolarization in patients with ICM; the decrease in ARI from baseline was 72.9 ± 9.1 ms in more viable regions, 64.5 ± 8.9 ms in the scar, and 54.9 ± 9.1 ms in border zones (P = 0.0002 and 0.014 comparing normal and scar to border zones, respectively). In response to nitroprusside, the ARI at the border zones decreased significantly more than either scar or surrounding viable myocardium, which showed an increase in ARI (P = 0.014 and 0.08 comparing normal tissue and scar to border zones, respectively). Furthermore, isoproterenol increased ARI dispersion by 70%, while nitroprusside increased ARI dispersion by 230% when ICM patients were compared to those with structurally normal hearts (P = 0.0015 and P < 0.001, respectively). In humans, both direct and reflex sympathetic stimulations increase regional differences in repolarization. The normal tissue surrounding the scar appears denervated. Dispersion of ARI in response to sympathetic stimulation is significantly increased in patients with ICM.
doi_str_mv 10.1152/ajpheart.01106.2011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3362058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2659294051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9c52dcb849ec8853755b9e0733a52accade266f08215ad6f2c1f948415d23ba83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9r3DAQxUVI6W62_QSBYMilF28ljaW1L4WypEkhkEPSs5iV5ViLbbmSnLD99LWzf2hzGpj3m8fMPEIuGV0yJvhX3Pa1QR-XlDEql3wsZ2Q-KjxlAopzMqcgIZUMxIxchLCllIqVhI9kxjlkQsh8TvTjru0x1iZanYRo26HBaF2X2E57g8GEpLShNz5MTVcl3vSuQW__HLGkHlrsQvJqY520O6fRlxabUanQ6wn6RD5U2ATz-VAX5NePm6f1XXr_cPtz_f0-1RlATAsteKk3eVYYnecCVkJsCkNXACg4ao2l4VJWNOdMYCkrrllVZHnGRMlhgzksyLe9bz9sWlNq00WPjeq9bdHvlEOr_lc6W6tn96IAJKdiMvhyMPDu92BCVK0N2jQNdsYNQbHxxSxnMuMjev0O3brBd-N5E8WFXHGYKNhT2rsQvKlOyzCqphDVMUT1FqKaQhynrv694zRzTA3-AkZXnVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1012567232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society Paid</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vaseghi, Marmar ; Lux, Robert L ; Mahajan, Aman ; Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Marmar ; Lux, Robert L ; Mahajan, Aman ; Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creatorcontrib><description>The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy (ICM). The effects of direct sympathetic stimulation were assessed using isoproterenol, while those of reflex sympathetic stimulation were assessed with nitroprusside infusion in ICM patients (n = 5). Five patients without cardiomyopathy were also studied. Local repolarization was measured from intracardiac electrograms that were used to calculate the activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Isoproterenol significantly increased heterogeneity in repolarization in patients with ICM; the decrease in ARI from baseline was 72.9 ± 9.1 ms in more viable regions, 64.5 ± 8.9 ms in the scar, and 54.9 ± 9.1 ms in border zones (P = 0.0002 and 0.014 comparing normal and scar to border zones, respectively). In response to nitroprusside, the ARI at the border zones decreased significantly more than either scar or surrounding viable myocardium, which showed an increase in ARI (P = 0.014 and 0.08 comparing normal tissue and scar to border zones, respectively). Furthermore, isoproterenol increased ARI dispersion by 70%, while nitroprusside increased ARI dispersion by 230% when ICM patients were compared to those with structurally normal hearts (P = 0.0015 and P &lt; 0.001, respectively). In humans, both direct and reflex sympathetic stimulations increase regional differences in repolarization. The normal tissue surrounding the scar appears denervated. Dispersion of ARI in response to sympathetic stimulation is significantly increased in patients with ICM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01106.2011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22345568</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPPDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physiological Society</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects ; Action Potentials - physiology ; Adult ; Aged ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; Cardiomyopathies - complications ; Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Catheter Ablation ; Dispersion ; Electrocardiography ; Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac ; Female ; Heart attacks ; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Humans ; Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology ; Isoproterenol - pharmacology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Nitroprusside - pharmacology ; Pharmaceuticals ; Side effects ; Sympathetic Nervous System - drug effects ; Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology ; Sympathomimetics - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2012-05, Vol.302 (9), p.H1838-H1846</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physiological Society May 1, 2012</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 the American Physiological Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9c52dcb849ec8853755b9e0733a52accade266f08215ad6f2c1f948415d23ba83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9c52dcb849ec8853755b9e0733a52accade266f08215ad6f2c1f948415d23ba83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Marmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lux, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Aman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creatorcontrib><title>Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction</title><title>American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology</title><addtitle>Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol</addtitle><description>The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy (ICM). The effects of direct sympathetic stimulation were assessed using isoproterenol, while those of reflex sympathetic stimulation were assessed with nitroprusside infusion in ICM patients (n = 5). Five patients without cardiomyopathy were also studied. Local repolarization was measured from intracardiac electrograms that were used to calculate the activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Isoproterenol significantly increased heterogeneity in repolarization in patients with ICM; the decrease in ARI from baseline was 72.9 ± 9.1 ms in more viable regions, 64.5 ± 8.9 ms in the scar, and 54.9 ± 9.1 ms in border zones (P = 0.0002 and 0.014 comparing normal and scar to border zones, respectively). In response to nitroprusside, the ARI at the border zones decreased significantly more than either scar or surrounding viable myocardium, which showed an increase in ARI (P = 0.014 and 0.08 comparing normal tissue and scar to border zones, respectively). Furthermore, isoproterenol increased ARI dispersion by 70%, while nitroprusside increased ARI dispersion by 230% when ICM patients were compared to those with structurally normal hearts (P = 0.0015 and P &lt; 0.001, respectively). In humans, both direct and reflex sympathetic stimulations increase regional differences in repolarization. The normal tissue surrounding the scar appears denervated. Dispersion of ARI in response to sympathetic stimulation is significantly increased in patients with ICM.</description><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects</subject><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - complications</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology</subject><subject>Isoproterenol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Nitroprusside - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Sympathetic Nervous System - drug effects</subject><subject>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sympathomimetics - pharmacology</subject><issn>0363-6135</issn><issn>1522-1539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9r3DAQxUVI6W62_QSBYMilF28ljaW1L4WypEkhkEPSs5iV5ViLbbmSnLD99LWzf2hzGpj3m8fMPEIuGV0yJvhX3Pa1QR-XlDEql3wsZ2Q-KjxlAopzMqcgIZUMxIxchLCllIqVhI9kxjlkQsh8TvTjru0x1iZanYRo26HBaF2X2E57g8GEpLShNz5MTVcl3vSuQW__HLGkHlrsQvJqY520O6fRlxabUanQ6wn6RD5U2ATz-VAX5NePm6f1XXr_cPtz_f0-1RlATAsteKk3eVYYnecCVkJsCkNXACg4ao2l4VJWNOdMYCkrrllVZHnGRMlhgzksyLe9bz9sWlNq00WPjeq9bdHvlEOr_lc6W6tn96IAJKdiMvhyMPDu92BCVK0N2jQNdsYNQbHxxSxnMuMjev0O3brBd-N5E8WFXHGYKNhT2rsQvKlOyzCqphDVMUT1FqKaQhynrv694zRzTA3-AkZXnVk</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Vaseghi, Marmar</creator><creator>Lux, Robert L</creator><creator>Mahajan, Aman</creator><creator>Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction</title><author>Vaseghi, Marmar ; Lux, Robert L ; Mahajan, Aman ; Shivkumar, Kalyanam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9c52dcb849ec8853755b9e0733a52accade266f08215ad6f2c1f948415d23ba83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - drug effects</topic><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - complications</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology</topic><topic>Isoproterenol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Nitroprusside - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Sympathetic Nervous System - drug effects</topic><topic>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sympathomimetics - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Marmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lux, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Aman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivkumar, Kalyanam</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaseghi, Marmar</au><au>Lux, Robert L</au><au>Mahajan, Aman</au><au>Shivkumar, Kalyanam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>302</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>H1838</spage><epage>H1846</epage><pages>H1838-H1846</pages><issn>0363-6135</issn><eissn>1522-1539</eissn><coden>AJPPDI</coden><abstract>The sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a key role in genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmias. The myocardial effect of sympathetic stimulation on myocardial repolarization in humans is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy (ICM). The effects of direct sympathetic stimulation were assessed using isoproterenol, while those of reflex sympathetic stimulation were assessed with nitroprusside infusion in ICM patients (n = 5). Five patients without cardiomyopathy were also studied. Local repolarization was measured from intracardiac electrograms that were used to calculate the activation recovery interval (ARI), a surrogate of action potential duration. Isoproterenol significantly increased heterogeneity in repolarization in patients with ICM; the decrease in ARI from baseline was 72.9 ± 9.1 ms in more viable regions, 64.5 ± 8.9 ms in the scar, and 54.9 ± 9.1 ms in border zones (P = 0.0002 and 0.014 comparing normal and scar to border zones, respectively). In response to nitroprusside, the ARI at the border zones decreased significantly more than either scar or surrounding viable myocardium, which showed an increase in ARI (P = 0.014 and 0.08 comparing normal tissue and scar to border zones, respectively). Furthermore, isoproterenol increased ARI dispersion by 70%, while nitroprusside increased ARI dispersion by 230% when ICM patients were compared to those with structurally normal hearts (P = 0.0015 and P &lt; 0.001, respectively). In humans, both direct and reflex sympathetic stimulations increase regional differences in repolarization. The normal tissue surrounding the scar appears denervated. Dispersion of ARI in response to sympathetic stimulation is significantly increased in patients with ICM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>22345568</pmid><doi>10.1152/ajpheart.01106.2011</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-6135
ispartof American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2012-05, Vol.302 (9), p.H1838-H1846
issn 0363-6135
1522-1539
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3362058
source MEDLINE; American Physiological Society Paid; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Action Potentials - drug effects
Action Potentials - physiology
Adult
Aged
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Blood Pressure - physiology
Cardiomyopathies - complications
Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology
Cardiovascular disease
Catheter Ablation
Dispersion
Electrocardiography
Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac
Female
Heart attacks
Heart Conduction System - physiopathology
Heart Rate - drug effects
Heart Rate - physiology
Humans
Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathophysiology
Isoproterenol - pharmacology
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Nitroprusside - pharmacology
Pharmaceuticals
Side effects
Sympathetic Nervous System - drug effects
Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology
Sympathomimetics - pharmacology
title Sympathetic stimulation increases dispersion of repolarization in humans with myocardial infarction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sympathetic%20stimulation%20increases%20dispersion%20of%20repolarization%20in%20humans%20with%20myocardial%20infarction&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physiology.%20Heart%20and%20circulatory%20physiology&rft.au=Vaseghi,%20Marmar&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=302&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=H1838&rft.epage=H1846&rft.pages=H1838-H1846&rft.issn=0363-6135&rft.eissn=1522-1539&rft.coden=AJPPDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/ajpheart.01106.2011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2659294051%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1012567232&rft_id=info:pmid/22345568&rfr_iscdi=true