The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma
Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma with 900 new diagnoses per year in Europe (EU27). It has a poor survival rate in the face of metastatic disease, with no more than 10% survival of the 35% who develop recurrence. Despite the remaining majority having localised disease, app...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical sarcoma research 2012-02, Vol.2 (1), p.7-7, Article 7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Clinical sarcoma research |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | van Maldegem, Annmeik M Hogendoorn, Pancras Cw Hassan, Andrew B |
description | Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma with 900 new diagnoses per year in Europe (EU27). It has a poor survival rate in the face of metastatic disease, with no more than 10% survival of the 35% who develop recurrence. Despite the remaining majority having localised disease, approximately 30% still relapse and die despite salvage therapies. Prognostic factors may identify patients at higher risk that might require differential therapeutic interventions. Aside from phenotypic features, quantitative biomarkers based on biological measurements may help identify tumours that are more aggressive. We audited the research which has been done to identify prognostic biomarkers for Ewing sarcoma in the past 15 years. We identified 86 articles were identified using defined search criteria. A total of 11,625 patients were reported, although this number reflects reanalysis of several cohorts. For phenotypic markers, independent reports suggest that tumour size > 8 cm and the presence of metastasis appeared strong predictors of negative outcome. Good histological response (necrosis > 90%) after treatment appeared a significant predictor for a positive outcome. However, data proposing biological biomarkers for practical clinical use remain un-validated with only one secondary report published. Our recommendation is that we can stratify patients according to their stage and using the phenotypic features of metastases, tumour size and histological response. For biological biomarkers, we suggest a number of validating studies including markers for 9p21 locus, heat shock proteins, telomerase related markers, interleukins, tumour necrosis factors, VEGF pathway, lymphocyte count, and a number of other markers including Ki-67. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/2045-3329-2-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3351700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1014111987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b440t-bab6b6d40536672dea7f08214e88ace86857f93af5b5ab8b43bdcd6d15bea6a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkbtPwzAQxi0EolXpyIo8sgT8iB9ZEKgqD6kSS5kt23FaQxoXOwXx35OopSoCL2ffffr5vjsAzjG6wljya4JyllFKioxk4ggM9-_jg_sAjFN6Rd3hiAnETsGAECaFFMUQTOdLB23tG291DTfJwVBB48NKxzcXE9QJrmNYNCG13sJK2zZ0Wd_A6advFjDpaDvtGTipdJ3ceBdH4OV-Op88ZrPnh6fJ3SwzeY7azGjDDS9zxCjngpROiwpJgnMnpbZOcslEVVBdMcO0kSanprQlLzEzTnNN6QjcbLnrjVm50rqmjbpW6-i7fr9U0F79rjR-qRbhQ1HKsECoA9xuAb3F_wG_K5071U9S9ZNURIkOcbnrIYb3jUutWvlkXV3rxoVNUhjhHGNcyF6abaU2hpSiq_YfYaT6Bf5BXxza26t_1kW_AUt-l-o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1014111987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>van Maldegem, Annmeik M ; Hogendoorn, Pancras Cw ; Hassan, Andrew B</creator><creatorcontrib>van Maldegem, Annmeik M ; Hogendoorn, Pancras Cw ; Hassan, Andrew B</creatorcontrib><description>Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma with 900 new diagnoses per year in Europe (EU27). It has a poor survival rate in the face of metastatic disease, with no more than 10% survival of the 35% who develop recurrence. Despite the remaining majority having localised disease, approximately 30% still relapse and die despite salvage therapies. Prognostic factors may identify patients at higher risk that might require differential therapeutic interventions. Aside from phenotypic features, quantitative biomarkers based on biological measurements may help identify tumours that are more aggressive. We audited the research which has been done to identify prognostic biomarkers for Ewing sarcoma in the past 15 years. We identified 86 articles were identified using defined search criteria. A total of 11,625 patients were reported, although this number reflects reanalysis of several cohorts. For phenotypic markers, independent reports suggest that tumour size > 8 cm and the presence of metastasis appeared strong predictors of negative outcome. Good histological response (necrosis > 90%) after treatment appeared a significant predictor for a positive outcome. However, data proposing biological biomarkers for practical clinical use remain un-validated with only one secondary report published. Our recommendation is that we can stratify patients according to their stage and using the phenotypic features of metastases, tumour size and histological response. For biological biomarkers, we suggest a number of validating studies including markers for 9p21 locus, heat shock proteins, telomerase related markers, interleukins, tumour necrosis factors, VEGF pathway, lymphocyte count, and a number of other markers including Ki-67.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-3329</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-3329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2045-3329-2-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22587879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Short Report</subject><ispartof>Clinical sarcoma research, 2012-02, Vol.2 (1), p.7-7, Article 7</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©2012 van Maldegem et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012 van Maldegem et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b440t-bab6b6d40536672dea7f08214e88ace86857f93af5b5ab8b43bdcd6d15bea6a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b440t-bab6b6d40536672dea7f08214e88ace86857f93af5b5ab8b43bdcd6d15bea6a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351700/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351700/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Maldegem, Annmeik M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogendoorn, Pancras Cw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Andrew B</creatorcontrib><title>The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma</title><title>Clinical sarcoma research</title><addtitle>Clin Sarcoma Res</addtitle><description>Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma with 900 new diagnoses per year in Europe (EU27). It has a poor survival rate in the face of metastatic disease, with no more than 10% survival of the 35% who develop recurrence. Despite the remaining majority having localised disease, approximately 30% still relapse and die despite salvage therapies. Prognostic factors may identify patients at higher risk that might require differential therapeutic interventions. Aside from phenotypic features, quantitative biomarkers based on biological measurements may help identify tumours that are more aggressive. We audited the research which has been done to identify prognostic biomarkers for Ewing sarcoma in the past 15 years. We identified 86 articles were identified using defined search criteria. A total of 11,625 patients were reported, although this number reflects reanalysis of several cohorts. For phenotypic markers, independent reports suggest that tumour size > 8 cm and the presence of metastasis appeared strong predictors of negative outcome. Good histological response (necrosis > 90%) after treatment appeared a significant predictor for a positive outcome. However, data proposing biological biomarkers for practical clinical use remain un-validated with only one secondary report published. Our recommendation is that we can stratify patients according to their stage and using the phenotypic features of metastases, tumour size and histological response. For biological biomarkers, we suggest a number of validating studies including markers for 9p21 locus, heat shock proteins, telomerase related markers, interleukins, tumour necrosis factors, VEGF pathway, lymphocyte count, and a number of other markers including Ki-67.</description><subject>Short Report</subject><issn>2045-3329</issn><issn>2045-3329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkbtPwzAQxi0EolXpyIo8sgT8iB9ZEKgqD6kSS5kt23FaQxoXOwXx35OopSoCL2ffffr5vjsAzjG6wljya4JyllFKioxk4ggM9-_jg_sAjFN6Rd3hiAnETsGAECaFFMUQTOdLB23tG291DTfJwVBB48NKxzcXE9QJrmNYNCG13sJK2zZ0Wd_A6advFjDpaDvtGTipdJ3ceBdH4OV-Op88ZrPnh6fJ3SwzeY7azGjDDS9zxCjngpROiwpJgnMnpbZOcslEVVBdMcO0kSanprQlLzEzTnNN6QjcbLnrjVm50rqmjbpW6-i7fr9U0F79rjR-qRbhQ1HKsECoA9xuAb3F_wG_K5071U9S9ZNURIkOcbnrIYb3jUutWvlkXV3rxoVNUhjhHGNcyF6abaU2hpSiq_YfYaT6Bf5BXxza26t_1kW_AUt-l-o</recordid><startdate>20120208</startdate><enddate>20120208</enddate><creator>van Maldegem, Annmeik M</creator><creator>Hogendoorn, Pancras Cw</creator><creator>Hassan, Andrew B</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120208</creationdate><title>The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma</title><author>van Maldegem, Annmeik M ; Hogendoorn, Pancras Cw ; Hassan, Andrew B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b440t-bab6b6d40536672dea7f08214e88ace86857f93af5b5ab8b43bdcd6d15bea6a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Short Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Maldegem, Annmeik M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogendoorn, Pancras Cw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Andrew B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical sarcoma research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Maldegem, Annmeik M</au><au>Hogendoorn, Pancras Cw</au><au>Hassan, Andrew B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma</atitle><jtitle>Clinical sarcoma research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Sarcoma Res</addtitle><date>2012-02-08</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>7-7</pages><artnum>7</artnum><issn>2045-3329</issn><eissn>2045-3329</eissn><abstract>Ewing Sarcoma is the second most common primary bone sarcoma with 900 new diagnoses per year in Europe (EU27). It has a poor survival rate in the face of metastatic disease, with no more than 10% survival of the 35% who develop recurrence. Despite the remaining majority having localised disease, approximately 30% still relapse and die despite salvage therapies. Prognostic factors may identify patients at higher risk that might require differential therapeutic interventions. Aside from phenotypic features, quantitative biomarkers based on biological measurements may help identify tumours that are more aggressive. We audited the research which has been done to identify prognostic biomarkers for Ewing sarcoma in the past 15 years. We identified 86 articles were identified using defined search criteria. A total of 11,625 patients were reported, although this number reflects reanalysis of several cohorts. For phenotypic markers, independent reports suggest that tumour size > 8 cm and the presence of metastasis appeared strong predictors of negative outcome. Good histological response (necrosis > 90%) after treatment appeared a significant predictor for a positive outcome. However, data proposing biological biomarkers for practical clinical use remain un-validated with only one secondary report published. Our recommendation is that we can stratify patients according to their stage and using the phenotypic features of metastases, tumour size and histological response. For biological biomarkers, we suggest a number of validating studies including markers for 9p21 locus, heat shock proteins, telomerase related markers, interleukins, tumour necrosis factors, VEGF pathway, lymphocyte count, and a number of other markers including Ki-67.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>22587879</pmid><doi>10.1186/2045-3329-2-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-3329 |
ispartof | Clinical sarcoma research, 2012-02, Vol.2 (1), p.7-7, Article 7 |
issn | 2045-3329 2045-3329 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3351700 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Short Report |
title | The clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic factors in Ewing sarcoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A06%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20clinical%20use%20of%20biomarkers%20as%20prognostic%20factors%20in%20Ewing%20sarcoma&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20sarcoma%20research&rft.au=van%20Maldegem,%20Annmeik%20M&rft.date=2012-02-08&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=7-7&rft.artnum=7&rft.issn=2045-3329&rft.eissn=2045-3329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2045-3329-2-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1014111987%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1014111987&rft_id=info:pmid/22587879&rfr_iscdi=true |