Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling
Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep undergro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental health perspectives 2012-04, Vol.120 (4), p.483-486 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 486 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 483 |
container_title | Environmental health perspectives |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Goldstein, Bernard D. Kriesky, Jill Pavliakova, Barbara |
description | Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep underground. Response to public concern about potential adverse environmental and health impacts has led to the formation of state and national advisory committees. Objectives: We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama and governors of the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania contain individuals with expertise pertinent to human environmental public health. We also analyze the extent to which human health issues are of concern to the public by reviewing presentations at the public meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive. Results: At a public hearing held by the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee 62.7% of those not in favor of drilling mentioned health issues. Although public health is specified to be a concern in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals with health expertise among the 52 members of the Pennsylvania Governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Advisory Commission, or the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the environmental public health concerns related to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concerns contained recognizable environmental public health expertise. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1289/ehp.1104594 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3339470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A287751030</galeid><jstor_id>41548616</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A287751030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-59fa26f8e9f13a59edee11e36ab8340443f42173c1678b4354632329670a20c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN01trFDEUAOBBFFurTz4rAUEU2ZrbJBMfhGWtbaGlsi2-huzsmd2UTLImM4v9G_5is9tt7cqCMg8DyZdzTi6nKF4SfEhopT7CfHFICOal4o-KfVKWdKAU5Y-LfYwVGQgpyr3iWUrXGGNSCfG02KOUMiYl3i9-nduUrJ-hJoYWdXNAV2bi4BMaBwcoNOuhI7-0MfgWfGcc-tZPnK3RCRjXzdEotG3vbXeDrEfHYQnxzg2nS5tCvFmTVZbgExqDMx1MURfQuYk1ONcndDk3OdmXaJ3LpTwvnjTGJXix-R8UV1-PrkYng7OL49PR8GxQS4y7QakaQ0VTgWoIM6WCKQAhwISZVIxjzlnDKZGsJkJWE85KLhhlVAmJDcU1Oyg-34Zd9JMWpnUuOhqnF9G2Jt7oYKzenvF2rmdhqRljikucA7zbBIjhRw-p03mXqx0ZD6FPOueVSgjG-L8pJlLJsqIy0zd_0evQR58PIiuspGSlIn_ULJ-ctr4JucR6FVQPaSVlSTBbVTjYoWbgIe8neGhsHt7yhzt8_qbQ2nrngvdbC7Lp4Gc3M31K-vRy_P_24vu2ffvAztcvLQXXd6s3tA0_3MI6hpQiNPf3R7BedYfO3aE33ZH164dXfm_v2iGDV7fgOnUh3s9zUvJKEMF-Ay8xEGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009773591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Goldstein, Bernard D. ; Kriesky, Jill ; Pavliakova, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Bernard D. ; Kriesky, Jill ; Pavliakova, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep underground. Response to public concern about potential adverse environmental and health impacts has led to the formation of state and national advisory committees. Objectives: We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama and governors of the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania contain individuals with expertise pertinent to human environmental public health. We also analyze the extent to which human health issues are of concern to the public by reviewing presentations at the public meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive. Results: At a public hearing held by the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee 62.7% of those not in favor of drilling mentioned health issues. Although public health is specified to be a concern in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals with health expertise among the 52 members of the Pennsylvania Governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Advisory Commission, or the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the environmental public health concerns related to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concerns contained recognizable environmental public health expertise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22233770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</publisher><subject>Advisory Committees - organization & administration ; Analysis ; Commentary ; Drilling ; Environmental agencies ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental health ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Policy ; Environmental Pollution - adverse effects ; Environmental Pollution - analysis ; Environmental Pollution - prevention & control ; Extraction and Processing Industry ; Federal Government ; Fossil Fuels ; Gas fields ; Gas well drilling ; Governors ; Health ; Health and wellness ; Hearing ; Human ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Maryland ; Natural gas ; Pennsylvania ; Public Health ; Recognition ; Shale ; Shales ; State Government ; Subcommittees ; United States</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 2012-04, Vol.120 (4), p.483-486</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Apr 2012</rights><rights>2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-59fa26f8e9f13a59edee11e36ab8340443f42173c1678b4354632329670a20c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-59fa26f8e9f13a59edee11e36ab8340443f42173c1678b4354632329670a20c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41548616$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41548616$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22233770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Bernard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriesky, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavliakova, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep underground. Response to public concern about potential adverse environmental and health impacts has led to the formation of state and national advisory committees. Objectives: We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama and governors of the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania contain individuals with expertise pertinent to human environmental public health. We also analyze the extent to which human health issues are of concern to the public by reviewing presentations at the public meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive. Results: At a public hearing held by the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee 62.7% of those not in favor of drilling mentioned health issues. Although public health is specified to be a concern in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals with health expertise among the 52 members of the Pennsylvania Governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Advisory Commission, or the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the environmental public health concerns related to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concerns contained recognizable environmental public health expertise.</description><subject>Advisory Committees - organization & administration</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Commentary</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Policy</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - adverse effects</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>Extraction and Processing Industry</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Fossil Fuels</subject><subject>Gas fields</subject><subject>Gas well drilling</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health and wellness</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shales</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>Subcommittees</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN01trFDEUAOBBFFurTz4rAUEU2ZrbJBMfhGWtbaGlsi2-huzsmd2UTLImM4v9G_5is9tt7cqCMg8DyZdzTi6nKF4SfEhopT7CfHFICOal4o-KfVKWdKAU5Y-LfYwVGQgpyr3iWUrXGGNSCfG02KOUMiYl3i9-nduUrJ-hJoYWdXNAV2bi4BMaBwcoNOuhI7-0MfgWfGcc-tZPnK3RCRjXzdEotG3vbXeDrEfHYQnxzg2nS5tCvFmTVZbgExqDMx1MURfQuYk1ONcndDk3OdmXaJ3LpTwvnjTGJXix-R8UV1-PrkYng7OL49PR8GxQS4y7QakaQ0VTgWoIM6WCKQAhwISZVIxjzlnDKZGsJkJWE85KLhhlVAmJDcU1Oyg-34Zd9JMWpnUuOhqnF9G2Jt7oYKzenvF2rmdhqRljikucA7zbBIjhRw-p03mXqx0ZD6FPOueVSgjG-L8pJlLJsqIy0zd_0evQR58PIiuspGSlIn_ULJ-ctr4JucR6FVQPaSVlSTBbVTjYoWbgIe8neGhsHt7yhzt8_qbQ2nrngvdbC7Lp4Gc3M31K-vRy_P_24vu2ffvAztcvLQXXd6s3tA0_3MI6hpQiNPf3R7BedYfO3aE33ZH164dXfm_v2iGDV7fgOnUh3s9zUvJKEMF-Ay8xEGw</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Goldstein, Bernard D.</creator><creator>Kriesky, Jill</creator><creator>Pavliakova, Barbara</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling</title><author>Goldstein, Bernard D. ; Kriesky, Jill ; Pavliakova, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-59fa26f8e9f13a59edee11e36ab8340443f42173c1678b4354632329670a20c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Advisory Committees - organization & administration</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Commentary</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Policy</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - adverse effects</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>Extraction and Processing Industry</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Fossil Fuels</topic><topic>Gas fields</topic><topic>Gas well drilling</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health and wellness</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shales</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>Subcommittees</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Bernard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriesky, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavliakova, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldstein, Bernard D.</au><au>Kriesky, Jill</au><au>Pavliakova, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>486</epage><pages>483-486</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep underground. Response to public concern about potential adverse environmental and health impacts has led to the formation of state and national advisory committees. Objectives: We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama and governors of the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania contain individuals with expertise pertinent to human environmental public health. We also analyze the extent to which human health issues are of concern to the public by reviewing presentations at the public meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive. Results: At a public hearing held by the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee 62.7% of those not in favor of drilling mentioned health issues. Although public health is specified to be a concern in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals with health expertise among the 52 members of the Pennsylvania Governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Advisory Commission, or the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the environmental public health concerns related to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concerns contained recognizable environmental public health expertise.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</pub><pmid>22233770</pmid><doi>10.1289/ehp.1104594</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-6765 |
ispartof | Environmental health perspectives, 2012-04, Vol.120 (4), p.483-486 |
issn | 0091-6765 1552-9924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3339470 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Advisory Committees - organization & administration Analysis Commentary Drilling Environmental agencies Environmental aspects Environmental health Environmental Monitoring Environmental Policy Environmental Pollution - adverse effects Environmental Pollution - analysis Environmental Pollution - prevention & control Extraction and Processing Industry Federal Government Fossil Fuels Gas fields Gas well drilling Governors Health Health and wellness Hearing Human Hydraulic fracturing Maryland Natural gas Pennsylvania Public Health Recognition Shale Shales State Government Subcommittees United States |
title | Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Missing%20from%20the%20Table:%20Role%20of%20the%20Environmental%20Public%20Health%20Community%20in%20Governmental%20Advisory%20Commissions%20Related%20to%20Marcellus%20Shale%20Drilling&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Goldstein,%20Bernard%20D.&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=486&rft.pages=483-486&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.1104594&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA287751030%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009773591&rft_id=info:pmid/22233770&rft_galeid=A287751030&rft_jstor_id=41548616&rfr_iscdi=true |