Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling

Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep undergro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental health perspectives 2012-04, Vol.120 (4), p.483-486
Hauptverfasser: Goldstein, Bernard D., Kriesky, Jill, Pavliakova, Barbara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 486
container_issue 4
container_start_page 483
container_title Environmental health perspectives
container_volume 120
creator Goldstein, Bernard D.
Kriesky, Jill
Pavliakova, Barbara
description Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep underground. Response to public concern about potential adverse environmental and health impacts has led to the formation of state and national advisory committees. Objectives: We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama and governors of the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania contain individuals with expertise pertinent to human environmental public health. We also analyze the extent to which human health issues are of concern to the public by reviewing presentations at the public meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive. Results: At a public hearing held by the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee 62.7% of those not in favor of drilling mentioned health issues. Although public health is specified to be a concern in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals with health expertise among the 52 members of the Pennsylvania Governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Advisory Commission, or the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the environmental public health concerns related to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concerns contained recognizable environmental public health expertise.
doi_str_mv 10.1289/ehp.1104594
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3339470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A287751030</galeid><jstor_id>41548616</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A287751030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-59fa26f8e9f13a59edee11e36ab8340443f42173c1678b4354632329670a20c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN01trFDEUAOBBFFurTz4rAUEU2ZrbJBMfhGWtbaGlsi2-huzsmd2UTLImM4v9G_5is9tt7cqCMg8DyZdzTi6nKF4SfEhopT7CfHFICOal4o-KfVKWdKAU5Y-LfYwVGQgpyr3iWUrXGGNSCfG02KOUMiYl3i9-nduUrJ-hJoYWdXNAV2bi4BMaBwcoNOuhI7-0MfgWfGcc-tZPnK3RCRjXzdEotG3vbXeDrEfHYQnxzg2nS5tCvFmTVZbgExqDMx1MURfQuYk1ONcndDk3OdmXaJ3LpTwvnjTGJXix-R8UV1-PrkYng7OL49PR8GxQS4y7QakaQ0VTgWoIM6WCKQAhwISZVIxjzlnDKZGsJkJWE85KLhhlVAmJDcU1Oyg-34Zd9JMWpnUuOhqnF9G2Jt7oYKzenvF2rmdhqRljikucA7zbBIjhRw-p03mXqx0ZD6FPOueVSgjG-L8pJlLJsqIy0zd_0evQR58PIiuspGSlIn_ULJ-ctr4JucR6FVQPaSVlSTBbVTjYoWbgIe8neGhsHt7yhzt8_qbQ2nrngvdbC7Lp4Gc3M31K-vRy_P_24vu2ffvAztcvLQXXd6s3tA0_3MI6hpQiNPf3R7BedYfO3aE33ZH164dXfm_v2iGDV7fgOnUh3s9zUvJKEMF-Ay8xEGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009773591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Goldstein, Bernard D. ; Kriesky, Jill ; Pavliakova, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Bernard D. ; Kriesky, Jill ; Pavliakova, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep underground. Response to public concern about potential adverse environmental and health impacts has led to the formation of state and national advisory committees. Objectives: We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama and governors of the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania contain individuals with expertise pertinent to human environmental public health. We also analyze the extent to which human health issues are of concern to the public by reviewing presentations at the public meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive. Results: At a public hearing held by the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee 62.7% of those not in favor of drilling mentioned health issues. Although public health is specified to be a concern in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals with health expertise among the 52 members of the Pennsylvania Governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Advisory Commission, or the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the environmental public health concerns related to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concerns contained recognizable environmental public health expertise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22233770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</publisher><subject>Advisory Committees - organization &amp; administration ; Analysis ; Commentary ; Drilling ; Environmental agencies ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental health ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Policy ; Environmental Pollution - adverse effects ; Environmental Pollution - analysis ; Environmental Pollution - prevention &amp; control ; Extraction and Processing Industry ; Federal Government ; Fossil Fuels ; Gas fields ; Gas well drilling ; Governors ; Health ; Health and wellness ; Hearing ; Human ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Maryland ; Natural gas ; Pennsylvania ; Public Health ; Recognition ; Shale ; Shales ; State Government ; Subcommittees ; United States</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 2012-04, Vol.120 (4), p.483-486</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Apr 2012</rights><rights>2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-59fa26f8e9f13a59edee11e36ab8340443f42173c1678b4354632329670a20c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-59fa26f8e9f13a59edee11e36ab8340443f42173c1678b4354632329670a20c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41548616$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41548616$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22233770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Bernard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriesky, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavliakova, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep underground. Response to public concern about potential adverse environmental and health impacts has led to the formation of state and national advisory committees. Objectives: We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama and governors of the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania contain individuals with expertise pertinent to human environmental public health. We also analyze the extent to which human health issues are of concern to the public by reviewing presentations at the public meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive. Results: At a public hearing held by the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee 62.7% of those not in favor of drilling mentioned health issues. Although public health is specified to be a concern in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals with health expertise among the 52 members of the Pennsylvania Governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Advisory Commission, or the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the environmental public health concerns related to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concerns contained recognizable environmental public health expertise.</description><subject>Advisory Committees - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Commentary</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Policy</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - adverse effects</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Extraction and Processing Industry</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Fossil Fuels</subject><subject>Gas fields</subject><subject>Gas well drilling</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health and wellness</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shales</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>Subcommittees</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN01trFDEUAOBBFFurTz4rAUEU2ZrbJBMfhGWtbaGlsi2-huzsmd2UTLImM4v9G_5is9tt7cqCMg8DyZdzTi6nKF4SfEhopT7CfHFICOal4o-KfVKWdKAU5Y-LfYwVGQgpyr3iWUrXGGNSCfG02KOUMiYl3i9-nduUrJ-hJoYWdXNAV2bi4BMaBwcoNOuhI7-0MfgWfGcc-tZPnK3RCRjXzdEotG3vbXeDrEfHYQnxzg2nS5tCvFmTVZbgExqDMx1MURfQuYk1ONcndDk3OdmXaJ3LpTwvnjTGJXix-R8UV1-PrkYng7OL49PR8GxQS4y7QakaQ0VTgWoIM6WCKQAhwISZVIxjzlnDKZGsJkJWE85KLhhlVAmJDcU1Oyg-34Zd9JMWpnUuOhqnF9G2Jt7oYKzenvF2rmdhqRljikucA7zbBIjhRw-p03mXqx0ZD6FPOueVSgjG-L8pJlLJsqIy0zd_0evQR58PIiuspGSlIn_ULJ-ctr4JucR6FVQPaSVlSTBbVTjYoWbgIe8neGhsHt7yhzt8_qbQ2nrngvdbC7Lp4Gc3M31K-vRy_P_24vu2ffvAztcvLQXXd6s3tA0_3MI6hpQiNPf3R7BedYfO3aE33ZH164dXfm_v2iGDV7fgOnUh3s9zUvJKEMF-Ay8xEGw</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Goldstein, Bernard D.</creator><creator>Kriesky, Jill</creator><creator>Pavliakova, Barbara</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling</title><author>Goldstein, Bernard D. ; Kriesky, Jill ; Pavliakova, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-59fa26f8e9f13a59edee11e36ab8340443f42173c1678b4354632329670a20c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Advisory Committees - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Commentary</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Policy</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - adverse effects</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Extraction and Processing Industry</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Fossil Fuels</topic><topic>Gas fields</topic><topic>Gas well drilling</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health and wellness</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shales</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>Subcommittees</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Bernard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriesky, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavliakova, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldstein, Bernard D.</au><au>Kriesky, Jill</au><au>Pavliakova, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>486</epage><pages>483-486</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>Background: The Marcellus Shale is a vast natural gas field underlying parts of Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland. Rapid development of this field has been enabled by advances in hydrofracking techniques that include injection of chemical and physical agents deep underground. Response to public concern about potential adverse environmental and health impacts has led to the formation of state and national advisory committees. Objectives: We review the extent to which advisory committees formed in 2011 by President Obama and governors of the states of Maryland and Pennsylvania contain individuals with expertise pertinent to human environmental public health. We also analyze the extent to which human health issues are of concern to the public by reviewing presentations at the public meeting of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) Natural Gas Subcommittee formed by the U.S. President's directive. Results: At a public hearing held by the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee 62.7% of those not in favor of drilling mentioned health issues. Although public health is specified to be a concern in the executive orders forming these three advisory committees, we could identify no individuals with health expertise among the 52 members of the Pennsylvania Governor's Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Advisory Commission, or the SEAB Natural Gas Subcommittee. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the environmental public health concerns related to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, neither state nor national advisory committees selected to respond to these concerns contained recognizable environmental public health expertise.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</pub><pmid>22233770</pmid><doi>10.1289/ehp.1104594</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6765
ispartof Environmental health perspectives, 2012-04, Vol.120 (4), p.483-486
issn 0091-6765
1552-9924
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3339470
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Advisory Committees - organization & administration
Analysis
Commentary
Drilling
Environmental agencies
Environmental aspects
Environmental health
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Policy
Environmental Pollution - adverse effects
Environmental Pollution - analysis
Environmental Pollution - prevention & control
Extraction and Processing Industry
Federal Government
Fossil Fuels
Gas fields
Gas well drilling
Governors
Health
Health and wellness
Hearing
Human
Hydraulic fracturing
Maryland
Natural gas
Pennsylvania
Public Health
Recognition
Shale
Shales
State Government
Subcommittees
United States
title Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Missing%20from%20the%20Table:%20Role%20of%20the%20Environmental%20Public%20Health%20Community%20in%20Governmental%20Advisory%20Commissions%20Related%20to%20Marcellus%20Shale%20Drilling&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Goldstein,%20Bernard%20D.&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=486&rft.pages=483-486&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.1104594&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA287751030%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009773591&rft_id=info:pmid/22233770&rft_galeid=A287751030&rft_jstor_id=41548616&rfr_iscdi=true