Birth Outcomes Across Three Rural-Urban Typologies in the Finger Lakes Region of New York

Purpose: The study is a descriptive, population‐based analysis of birth outcomes in the New York State Finger Lakes region designed to determine whether perinatal outcomes differed across 3 rural typologies. Methods: Hospital birth data for the Finger Lakes region from 2006 to 2007 were used to iden...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of rural health 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.162-173
Hauptverfasser: Strutz, Kelly L., Dozier, Ann M., van Wijngaarden, Edwin, Glantz, J. Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 2
container_start_page 162
container_title The Journal of rural health
container_volume 28
creator Strutz, Kelly L.
Dozier, Ann M.
van Wijngaarden, Edwin
Glantz, J. Christopher
description Purpose: The study is a descriptive, population‐based analysis of birth outcomes in the New York State Finger Lakes region designed to determine whether perinatal outcomes differed across 3 rural typologies. Methods: Hospital birth data for the Finger Lakes region from 2006 to 2007 were used to identify births classified as low birthweight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), and preterm delivery (PTD). Maternal residences were defined using 3 existing ZIP code‐level rural‐urban typologies: Census Bureau ZIP codes, Rural‐Urban Commuting Area codes, and Primary Service Areas. Within each typology, rural maternal characteristics and birth outcomes were compared to those in urban areas using multivariable logistic regression models. Findings: In bivariate analyses, rurality was associated with LBW and SGA for all typologies, whereas PTD was associated with residence in the Census Bureau typology only. After controlling for demographic characteristics, births to mothers in the most rural level of the Census Bureau typology and to all rural mothers in the Rural‐Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) and Primary Service Area typologies were more likely to be LBW and PTD. SGA was not consistently associated with residence across typologies. Conclusions: The typologies produced similar results for these outcomes, although effects were of greater magnitude in the RUCA and Primary Service Area typologies than in the Census Bureau typology. Comparison across typologies can have practical implications for researchers and policy makers interested in understanding the dynamics of rurality and birth outcomes in their regions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00392.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3337719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ960389</ericid><sourcerecordid>963488241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6252-aee0f3c02bec06d444e19d2dd050e7e05a8815b0fb59b4e93667f46c755bc1ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxCyxAXcpPjbjoSQxrR1TGWTqk5s3FhOctK6TePiJKz997jrqIALwDe2_D7vsc9HkiCCBySud_MBUVynmEkyoJiQAcYso4P1o-RwLzxODrHOcKqkuDlInrXtHGOaacafJgeUcqEZUYfJ7UcXuhm66rvCL6FFx0XwbYsmswCAxn2wdXodctugyWblaz91kXEN6maAzlwzhYBGdhHvxjB1vkG-Qpdwh259WDxPnlS2buHFw36UXJ-dTk7O09HV8NPJ8SgtJBU0tQC4YgWmORRYlpxzIFlJyxILDAqwsFoTkeMqF1nOIWNSqorLQgmRF8SW7Cj5sIu76vMllAU0Xfy1WQW3tGFjvHXmd6VxMzP13w1jTCmSxQBvHgIE_62HtjNL1xZQ17YB37cmk4xrTTmJ5Nu_kkRRLQWVKvs3SinhTDClI_r6D3Tu-9DEmhkiuIhNpJJHSu-o-wYFqPYZEmy2Q2HmZtt7s-292Q6FuR8Ks47WV79WaG_8OQUReLkDILhiL59eZBIzvc3l_U6-czVs_vtdczE-j4doT3d213aw3tttWBipmBLmy-XQKDq8-SwmY_OV_QCIr9zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545089264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Birth Outcomes Across Three Rural-Urban Typologies in the Finger Lakes Region of New York</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Strutz, Kelly L. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; van Wijngaarden, Edwin ; Glantz, J. Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Strutz, Kelly L. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; van Wijngaarden, Edwin ; Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The study is a descriptive, population‐based analysis of birth outcomes in the New York State Finger Lakes region designed to determine whether perinatal outcomes differed across 3 rural typologies. Methods: Hospital birth data for the Finger Lakes region from 2006 to 2007 were used to identify births classified as low birthweight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), and preterm delivery (PTD). Maternal residences were defined using 3 existing ZIP code‐level rural‐urban typologies: Census Bureau ZIP codes, Rural‐Urban Commuting Area codes, and Primary Service Areas. Within each typology, rural maternal characteristics and birth outcomes were compared to those in urban areas using multivariable logistic regression models. Findings: In bivariate analyses, rurality was associated with LBW and SGA for all typologies, whereas PTD was associated with residence in the Census Bureau typology only. After controlling for demographic characteristics, births to mothers in the most rural level of the Census Bureau typology and to all rural mothers in the Rural‐Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) and Primary Service Area typologies were more likely to be LBW and PTD. SGA was not consistently associated with residence across typologies. Conclusions: The typologies produced similar results for these outcomes, although effects were of greater magnitude in the RUCA and Primary Service Area typologies than in the Census Bureau typology. Comparison across typologies can have practical implications for researchers and policy makers interested in understanding the dynamics of rurality and birth outcomes in their regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00392.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22458317</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRHEEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Birth ; Birth Certificates ; birth outcomes ; Birth weight ; Births ; Body Weight ; Census ; Census Figures ; Census of Population ; Childbirth ; Classification ; Commuting ; Comparative Analysis ; Correlation ; Data Analysis ; Demographics ; Female ; Finger lakes region ; Fingers ; Geographic Regions ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Identification ; Infant, Low Birth Weight ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Small for Gestational Age ; Lakes ; Medical research ; Mothers ; Multivariate Analysis ; New York ; New York (state) ; New York - epidemiology ; Place of Residence ; Premature Birth - epidemiology ; Premature Infants ; Prenatal Care ; regression analysis ; Reproductive health ; Residence ; residence characteristics ; rural ; Rural Areas ; Rural communities ; Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Rural Urban Differences ; Urban Population - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of rural health, 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.162-173</ispartof><rights>2011 National Rural Health Association</rights><rights>2011 National Rural Health Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6252-aee0f3c02bec06d444e19d2dd050e7e05a8815b0fb59b4e93667f46c755bc1ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6252-aee0f3c02bec06d444e19d2dd050e7e05a8815b0fb59b4e93667f46c755bc1ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1748-0361.2011.00392.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1748-0361.2011.00392.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27865,27866,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ960389$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22458317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strutz, Kelly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijngaarden, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Birth Outcomes Across Three Rural-Urban Typologies in the Finger Lakes Region of New York</title><title>The Journal of rural health</title><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Purpose: The study is a descriptive, population‐based analysis of birth outcomes in the New York State Finger Lakes region designed to determine whether perinatal outcomes differed across 3 rural typologies. Methods: Hospital birth data for the Finger Lakes region from 2006 to 2007 were used to identify births classified as low birthweight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), and preterm delivery (PTD). Maternal residences were defined using 3 existing ZIP code‐level rural‐urban typologies: Census Bureau ZIP codes, Rural‐Urban Commuting Area codes, and Primary Service Areas. Within each typology, rural maternal characteristics and birth outcomes were compared to those in urban areas using multivariable logistic regression models. Findings: In bivariate analyses, rurality was associated with LBW and SGA for all typologies, whereas PTD was associated with residence in the Census Bureau typology only. After controlling for demographic characteristics, births to mothers in the most rural level of the Census Bureau typology and to all rural mothers in the Rural‐Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) and Primary Service Area typologies were more likely to be LBW and PTD. SGA was not consistently associated with residence across typologies. Conclusions: The typologies produced similar results for these outcomes, although effects were of greater magnitude in the RUCA and Primary Service Area typologies than in the Census Bureau typology. Comparison across typologies can have practical implications for researchers and policy makers interested in understanding the dynamics of rurality and birth outcomes in their regions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Birth Certificates</subject><subject>birth outcomes</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Census Figures</subject><subject>Census of Population</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Commuting</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger lakes region</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Geographic Regions</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Infant, Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Small for Gestational Age</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>New York (state)</subject><subject>New York - epidemiology</subject><subject>Place of Residence</subject><subject>Premature Birth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Premature Infants</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Residence</subject><subject>residence characteristics</subject><subject>rural</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Rural Urban Differences</subject><subject>Urban Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0890-765X</issn><issn>1748-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxCyxAXcpPjbjoSQxrR1TGWTqk5s3FhOctK6TePiJKz997jrqIALwDe2_D7vsc9HkiCCBySud_MBUVynmEkyoJiQAcYso4P1o-RwLzxODrHOcKqkuDlInrXtHGOaacafJgeUcqEZUYfJ7UcXuhm66rvCL6FFx0XwbYsmswCAxn2wdXodctugyWblaz91kXEN6maAzlwzhYBGdhHvxjB1vkG-Qpdwh259WDxPnlS2buHFw36UXJ-dTk7O09HV8NPJ8SgtJBU0tQC4YgWmORRYlpxzIFlJyxILDAqwsFoTkeMqF1nOIWNSqorLQgmRF8SW7Cj5sIu76vMllAU0Xfy1WQW3tGFjvHXmd6VxMzP13w1jTCmSxQBvHgIE_62HtjNL1xZQ17YB37cmk4xrTTmJ5Nu_kkRRLQWVKvs3SinhTDClI_r6D3Tu-9DEmhkiuIhNpJJHSu-o-wYFqPYZEmy2Q2HmZtt7s-292Q6FuR8Ks47WV79WaG_8OQUReLkDILhiL59eZBIzvc3l_U6-czVs_vtdczE-j4doT3d213aw3tttWBipmBLmy-XQKDq8-SwmY_OV_QCIr9zQ</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Strutz, Kelly L.</creator><creator>Dozier, Ann M.</creator><creator>van Wijngaarden, Edwin</creator><creator>Glantz, J. Christopher</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Birth Outcomes Across Three Rural-Urban Typologies in the Finger Lakes Region of New York</title><author>Strutz, Kelly L. ; Dozier, Ann M. ; van Wijngaarden, Edwin ; Glantz, J. Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6252-aee0f3c02bec06d444e19d2dd050e7e05a8815b0fb59b4e93667f46c755bc1ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Birth Certificates</topic><topic>birth outcomes</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Census Figures</topic><topic>Census of Population</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Commuting</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger lakes region</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Geographic Regions</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Infant, Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Small for Gestational Age</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>New York (state)</topic><topic>New York - epidemiology</topic><topic>Place of Residence</topic><topic>Premature Birth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Premature Infants</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Residence</topic><topic>residence characteristics</topic><topic>rural</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Rural Urban Differences</topic><topic>Urban Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strutz, Kelly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijngaarden, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glantz, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strutz, Kelly L.</au><au>Dozier, Ann M.</au><au>van Wijngaarden, Edwin</au><au>Glantz, J. Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ960389</ericid><atitle>Birth Outcomes Across Three Rural-Urban Typologies in the Finger Lakes Region of New York</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>162-173</pages><issn>0890-765X</issn><eissn>1748-0361</eissn><coden>JRHEEX</coden><abstract>Purpose: The study is a descriptive, population‐based analysis of birth outcomes in the New York State Finger Lakes region designed to determine whether perinatal outcomes differed across 3 rural typologies. Methods: Hospital birth data for the Finger Lakes region from 2006 to 2007 were used to identify births classified as low birthweight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), and preterm delivery (PTD). Maternal residences were defined using 3 existing ZIP code‐level rural‐urban typologies: Census Bureau ZIP codes, Rural‐Urban Commuting Area codes, and Primary Service Areas. Within each typology, rural maternal characteristics and birth outcomes were compared to those in urban areas using multivariable logistic regression models. Findings: In bivariate analyses, rurality was associated with LBW and SGA for all typologies, whereas PTD was associated with residence in the Census Bureau typology only. After controlling for demographic characteristics, births to mothers in the most rural level of the Census Bureau typology and to all rural mothers in the Rural‐Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) and Primary Service Area typologies were more likely to be LBW and PTD. SGA was not consistently associated with residence across typologies. Conclusions: The typologies produced similar results for these outcomes, although effects were of greater magnitude in the RUCA and Primary Service Area typologies than in the Census Bureau typology. Comparison across typologies can have practical implications for researchers and policy makers interested in understanding the dynamics of rurality and birth outcomes in their regions.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22458317</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00392.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-765X
ispartof The Journal of rural health, 2012-03, Vol.28 (2), p.162-173
issn 0890-765X
1748-0361
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3337719
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; PAIS Index; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Birth
Birth Certificates
birth outcomes
Birth weight
Births
Body Weight
Census
Census Figures
Census of Population
Childbirth
Classification
Commuting
Comparative Analysis
Correlation
Data Analysis
Demographics
Female
Finger lakes region
Fingers
Geographic Regions
Hospitals
Humans
Identification
Infant, Low Birth Weight
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Small for Gestational Age
Lakes
Medical research
Mothers
Multivariate Analysis
New York
New York (state)
New York - epidemiology
Place of Residence
Premature Birth - epidemiology
Premature Infants
Prenatal Care
regression analysis
Reproductive health
Residence
residence characteristics
rural
Rural Areas
Rural communities
Rural Population - statistics & numerical data
Rural Urban Differences
Urban Population - statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
title Birth Outcomes Across Three Rural-Urban Typologies in the Finger Lakes Region of New York
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A41%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Birth%20Outcomes%20Across%20Three%20Rural-Urban%20Typologies%20in%20the%20Finger%20Lakes%20Region%20of%20New%20York&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Strutz,%20Kelly%20L.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=162-173&rft.issn=0890-765X&rft.eissn=1748-0361&rft.coden=JRHEEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00392.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E963488241%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545089264&rft_id=info:pmid/22458317&rft_ericid=EJ960389&rfr_iscdi=true