In vitro comparison of four treatments which discourage infestation by head lice
Products which discourage the transmission of head lice are appealing; however, few studies have tested this concept. This study aims to test the efficacy of four commercial products which claim to discourage infestation by head lice; MOOV Head Lice Defence Spray (MOOV), Wild Child Quit Nits Head Li...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Parasitology research (1987) 2012-05, Vol.110 (5), p.1695-1699 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1699 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1695 |
| container_title | Parasitology research (1987) |
| container_volume | 110 |
| creator | Greive, Kerryn A. Barnes, Tanya M. |
| description | Products which discourage the transmission of head lice are appealing; however, few studies have tested this concept. This study aims to test the efficacy of four commercial products which claim to discourage infestation by head lice; MOOV Head Lice Defence Spray (MOOV), Wild Child Quit Nits Head Lice Defence Spray (Wild Child), 100% Natural Head Lice Beater (Lice Beater) or Lysout Natural Anti-Lice Spray (Lysout). An in vitro challenge test was used. Briefly, one half of a filter paper lining the base of a petri dish was treated with the test product. Lice were then introduced to the centre of the dish, which was covered and placed in the dark at 20°C for 30 min. The number of lice on the treated and untreated sides of the filter paper was then counted after 2, 4 and 8 h post-application. MOOV was significantly more effective at discouraging the transmission of lice than the water control (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00436-011-2687-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3325406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A306359100</galeid><sourcerecordid>A306359100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-67439a4048004eaf13d144b94553ae6378fc63244e78e0d1dfa97d45126d9ef03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl9rFDEUxYModq1-AF8kIEJfpubvZOZFKMVqoaAP-hyymZvdlJlkTWYr_fbeZdZqQSQPCbm_e3IPJ4S85uycM2beV8aUbBvGeSPazjTmCVlxJUXDe62fkhXr8YxVeUJe1HrLGDetUs_JiRBMsk7KFfl6nehdnEumPk87V2LNieZAQ94XOhdw8wRprvTnNvotHWL1WHAboDEFqLObI_Lre7oFN9AxenhJngU3Vnh13E_J96uP3y4_NzdfPl1fXtw0XhsxN61RsneKqQ49gAtcDlypda-0lg5aabrgWymUAtMBG_gQXG8Gpblohx4Ck6fkw6K7268nGDxOWdxodyVOrtzb7KJ9XElxazf5zkoptGItCpwdBUr-sUcvdkJ3MI4uQd5Xy5VgXOhOdIi-XdCNG8Gi84yK_oDbC4lSusc4kDr_B4VrgCn6nCBEvH_UwJcGX3KtBcLD9JzZQ8B2CdhihPYQsDXY8-Zv2w8dvxNF4N0RcNW7MRSXfKx_ON1x_CIHIbFwFUtpA8XeYrIJI_vP678ASXi8ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1420125828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro comparison of four treatments which discourage infestation by head lice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Greive, Kerryn A. ; Barnes, Tanya M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greive, Kerryn A. ; Barnes, Tanya M.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Products which discourage the transmission of head lice are appealing; however, few studies have tested this concept. This study aims to test the efficacy of four commercial products which claim to discourage infestation by head lice; MOOV Head Lice Defence Spray (MOOV), Wild Child Quit Nits Head Lice Defence Spray (Wild Child), 100% Natural Head Lice Beater (Lice Beater) or Lysout Natural Anti-Lice Spray (Lysout). An in vitro challenge test was used. Briefly, one half of a filter paper lining the base of a petri dish was treated with the test product. Lice were then introduced to the centre of the dish, which was covered and placed in the dark at 20°C for 30 min. The number of lice on the treated and untreated sides of the filter paper was then counted after 2, 4 and 8 h post-application. MOOV was significantly more effective at discouraging the transmission of lice than the water control (
p
< 0.01), while Wild Child and Lysout were not at all time points. Lice Beater was significantly worse than the water control after 2 h (
p
< 0.01), while there was no difference after 4 and 8 h. MOOV was found to perform significantly better than Wild Child (
p
< 0.05) and Lice Beater (
p
< 0.05) at all time points. It also performed significantly better than Lysout at 2 (
p
< 0.05) and 8 h (
p
< 0.05), but not 4 h. MOOV offers the best efficacy and consistency of performance of the four products tested to discourage the transmission of head lice.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2687-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22030833</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PARREZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; children ; Control ; drug effects ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; General aspects and techniques. Study of several systematic groups. Models ; Health aspects ; Host-parasite relationships ; Immunology ; Insecticides ; Insecticides - pharmacology ; Invertebrates ; Lice ; lice infestations ; Lice Infestations - prevention & control ; Lice Infestations - transmission ; Medical Microbiology ; methods ; Microbiology ; Original Paper ; Parasitology ; Parasitology - methods ; Pediculus ; Pediculus - drug effects ; Pediculus humanus capitis ; Pests ; pharmacology ; Physiological aspects ; prevention & control ; product testing ; transmission</subject><ispartof>Parasitology research (1987), 2012-05, Vol.110 (5), p.1695-1699</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-67439a4048004eaf13d144b94553ae6378fc63244e78e0d1dfa97d45126d9ef03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-67439a4048004eaf13d144b94553ae6378fc63244e78e0d1dfa97d45126d9ef03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00436-011-2687-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00436-011-2687-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25811437$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22030833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greive, Kerryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Tanya M.</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro comparison of four treatments which discourage infestation by head lice</title><title>Parasitology research (1987)</title><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Products which discourage the transmission of head lice are appealing; however, few studies have tested this concept. This study aims to test the efficacy of four commercial products which claim to discourage infestation by head lice; MOOV Head Lice Defence Spray (MOOV), Wild Child Quit Nits Head Lice Defence Spray (Wild Child), 100% Natural Head Lice Beater (Lice Beater) or Lysout Natural Anti-Lice Spray (Lysout). An in vitro challenge test was used. Briefly, one half of a filter paper lining the base of a petri dish was treated with the test product. Lice were then introduced to the centre of the dish, which was covered and placed in the dark at 20°C for 30 min. The number of lice on the treated and untreated sides of the filter paper was then counted after 2, 4 and 8 h post-application. MOOV was significantly more effective at discouraging the transmission of lice than the water control (
p
< 0.01), while Wild Child and Lysout were not at all time points. Lice Beater was significantly worse than the water control after 2 h (
p
< 0.01), while there was no difference after 4 and 8 h. MOOV was found to perform significantly better than Wild Child (
p
< 0.05) and Lice Beater (
p
< 0.05) at all time points. It also performed significantly better than Lysout at 2 (
p
< 0.05) and 8 h (
p
< 0.05), but not 4 h. MOOV offers the best efficacy and consistency of performance of the four products tested to discourage the transmission of head lice.]]></description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>drug effects</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General aspects and techniques. Study of several systematic groups. Models</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Host-parasite relationships</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insecticides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Lice</subject><subject>lice infestations</subject><subject>Lice Infestations - prevention & control</subject><subject>Lice Infestations - transmission</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><subject>Parasitology - methods</subject><subject>Pediculus</subject><subject>Pediculus - drug effects</subject><subject>Pediculus humanus capitis</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>pharmacology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>prevention & control</subject><subject>product testing</subject><subject>transmission</subject><issn>0932-0113</issn><issn>1432-1955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl9rFDEUxYModq1-AF8kIEJfpubvZOZFKMVqoaAP-hyymZvdlJlkTWYr_fbeZdZqQSQPCbm_e3IPJ4S85uycM2beV8aUbBvGeSPazjTmCVlxJUXDe62fkhXr8YxVeUJe1HrLGDetUs_JiRBMsk7KFfl6nehdnEumPk87V2LNieZAQ94XOhdw8wRprvTnNvotHWL1WHAboDEFqLObI_Lre7oFN9AxenhJngU3Vnh13E_J96uP3y4_NzdfPl1fXtw0XhsxN61RsneKqQ49gAtcDlypda-0lg5aabrgWymUAtMBG_gQXG8Gpblohx4Ck6fkw6K7268nGDxOWdxodyVOrtzb7KJ9XElxazf5zkoptGItCpwdBUr-sUcvdkJ3MI4uQd5Xy5VgXOhOdIi-XdCNG8Gi84yK_oDbC4lSusc4kDr_B4VrgCn6nCBEvH_UwJcGX3KtBcLD9JzZQ8B2CdhihPYQsDXY8-Zv2w8dvxNF4N0RcNW7MRSXfKx_ON1x_CIHIbFwFUtpA8XeYrIJI_vP678ASXi8ag</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Greive, Kerryn A.</creator><creator>Barnes, Tanya M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>In vitro comparison of four treatments which discourage infestation by head lice</title><author>Greive, Kerryn A. ; Barnes, Tanya M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-67439a4048004eaf13d144b94553ae6378fc63244e78e0d1dfa97d45126d9ef03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>drug effects</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General aspects and techniques. Study of several systematic groups. Models</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Host-parasite relationships</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insecticides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Lice</topic><topic>lice infestations</topic><topic>Lice Infestations - prevention & control</topic><topic>Lice Infestations - transmission</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><topic>Parasitology - methods</topic><topic>Pediculus</topic><topic>Pediculus - drug effects</topic><topic>Pediculus humanus capitis</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>pharmacology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>prevention & control</topic><topic>product testing</topic><topic>transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greive, Kerryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Tanya M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greive, Kerryn A.</au><au>Barnes, Tanya M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro comparison of four treatments which discourage infestation by head lice</atitle><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle><stitle>Parasitol Res</stitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1695</spage><epage>1699</epage><pages>1695-1699</pages><issn>0932-0113</issn><eissn>1432-1955</eissn><coden>PARREZ</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Products which discourage the transmission of head lice are appealing; however, few studies have tested this concept. This study aims to test the efficacy of four commercial products which claim to discourage infestation by head lice; MOOV Head Lice Defence Spray (MOOV), Wild Child Quit Nits Head Lice Defence Spray (Wild Child), 100% Natural Head Lice Beater (Lice Beater) or Lysout Natural Anti-Lice Spray (Lysout). An in vitro challenge test was used. Briefly, one half of a filter paper lining the base of a petri dish was treated with the test product. Lice were then introduced to the centre of the dish, which was covered and placed in the dark at 20°C for 30 min. The number of lice on the treated and untreated sides of the filter paper was then counted after 2, 4 and 8 h post-application. MOOV was significantly more effective at discouraging the transmission of lice than the water control (
p
< 0.01), while Wild Child and Lysout were not at all time points. Lice Beater was significantly worse than the water control after 2 h (
p
< 0.01), while there was no difference after 4 and 8 h. MOOV was found to perform significantly better than Wild Child (
p
< 0.05) and Lice Beater (
p
< 0.05) at all time points. It also performed significantly better than Lysout at 2 (
p
< 0.05) and 8 h (
p
< 0.05), but not 4 h. MOOV offers the best efficacy and consistency of performance of the four products tested to discourage the transmission of head lice.]]></abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22030833</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00436-011-2687-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0932-0113 |
| ispartof | Parasitology research (1987), 2012-05, Vol.110 (5), p.1695-1699 |
| issn | 0932-0113 1432-1955 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3325406 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine children Control drug effects Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects General aspects and techniques. Study of several systematic groups. Models Health aspects Host-parasite relationships Immunology Insecticides Insecticides - pharmacology Invertebrates Lice lice infestations Lice Infestations - prevention & control Lice Infestations - transmission Medical Microbiology methods Microbiology Original Paper Parasitology Parasitology - methods Pediculus Pediculus - drug effects Pediculus humanus capitis Pests pharmacology Physiological aspects prevention & control product testing transmission |
| title | In vitro comparison of four treatments which discourage infestation by head lice |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A22%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20comparison%20of%20four%20treatments%20which%20discourage%20infestation%20by%20head%20lice&rft.jtitle=Parasitology%20research%20(1987)&rft.au=Greive,%20Kerryn%20A.&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1695&rft.epage=1699&rft.pages=1695-1699&rft.issn=0932-0113&rft.eissn=1432-1955&rft.coden=PARREZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00436-011-2687-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA306359100%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1420125828&rft_id=info:pmid/22030833&rft_galeid=A306359100&rfr_iscdi=true |