Collaborative behavioral management among parolees: drug use, crime and re-arrest in the Step'n Out randomized trial

ABSTRACT Aims  To determine whether collaborative behavioral management (CBM) reduces substance use, crime and re‐arrest among drug‐involved parolees. Design  Step'n Out was a randomized behavioral trial of CBM versus standard parole (SP) during 2004–08. CBM adapted evidence‐based role inductio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2012-06, Vol.107 (6), p.1099-1108
Hauptverfasser: Friedmann, Peter D., Green, Traci C., Taxman, Faye S., Harrington, Magdalena, Rhodes, Anne G., Katz, Elizabeth, O'Connell, Daniel, Martin, Steven S., Frisman, Linda K., Litt, Mark, Burdon, William, Clarke, Jennifer G., Fletcher, Bennett W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1108
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1099
container_title Addiction (Abingdon, England)
container_volume 107
creator Friedmann, Peter D.
Green, Traci C.
Taxman, Faye S.
Harrington, Magdalena
Rhodes, Anne G.
Katz, Elizabeth
O'Connell, Daniel
Martin, Steven S.
Frisman, Linda K.
Litt, Mark
Burdon, William
Clarke, Jennifer G.
Fletcher, Bennett W.
description ABSTRACT Aims  To determine whether collaborative behavioral management (CBM) reduces substance use, crime and re‐arrest among drug‐involved parolees. Design  Step'n Out was a randomized behavioral trial of CBM versus standard parole (SP) during 2004–08. CBM adapted evidence‐based role induction, behavioral contracting and contingent reinforcement to provide parole officer/treatment counselor dyads with positive tools in addition to sanctions to manage parolees' behavior over 12 weeks. Setting  Six parole offices in five states in the USA. Participants  Parolee volunteers with a mandate for addiction treatment and a minimum of 3 months of parole (n = 476). Follow‐up was 94% at 3 months and 86% at 9 months. Measurements  Drug use and crime in a given month from calendar interviews 3 and 9 months after parole initiation, and re‐arrests from criminal justice administrative data. Findings  The CBM group had fewer months in which they used their primary drug [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05, 0.78, P = 0.02] and alcohol (ARR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.66, P = 0.006) over follow‐up. CBM had its greatest effects among parolees who reported marijuana or another ‘non‐hard’ drug as their primary drug; parolees who preferred stimulants or opiates did not benefit. No differences were seen in total crime, re‐arrests or parole revocations. Conclusions  Collaborative behavioral management may reduce substance use among primary marijuana or other ‘non‐hard’ drug‐using parolees without increasing revocations. Because the majority of drug violation arrests in the United States are for marijuana, these findings have important implications for the management of a substantial proportion of the US community correctional population.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03769.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3321077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024212412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6369-68720d0fd64a0b3f1f73448c350a5bcc0b345bb892f7c282b5ec1d87ccfc60463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktuO0zAQhiMEYsvCKyBLCMEFKT7GCRJIqy5dWC27WgHi0nKcSeuSxMVOSpenx6GlHG7ANz59_2hm_kkSRPCUxPV8NSUswynmnE0pJmSKmcyK6fZWMjl83E4muMhESgnHR8m9EFYYY5kX_G5yRCmRgnMxSfqZaxpdOq97uwFUwlJvbLw1qNWdXkALXY9067oFWmvvGoDwAlV-WKAhwDNkvG0B6a5CHlLtPYQe2Q71S0Dve1g_6dDV0CMfAdfab1Ch3lvd3E_u1LoJ8GC_Hycf568_zN6kF1dnb2cnF6nJWFakWS4prnBdZVzjktWklozz3DCBtSiNiW9clGVe0FoamtNSgCFVLo2pTYZ5xo6TV7u466FsoTKxlliZWsektb9RTlv1509nl2rhNooxSrCUMcDTfQDvvgyxONXaYCB2rAM3BEWIIJjTmMG_UUw5JZSTEX30F7pyg-9iJyJFommFoCOV7yjjXQge6kPeBKtxCtRKjWar0Ww1ToH6MQVqG6UPf6_7IPxpewQe7wEdjG7qaJCx4RcncskIY5F7ueO-2gZu_jsBdXJ6Op6iPt3pbehhe9Br_1llkkmhPl2eqev5uXx3OT9X1-w7-vvdFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010969522</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collaborative behavioral management among parolees: drug use, crime and re-arrest in the Step'n Out randomized trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Friedmann, Peter D. ; Green, Traci C. ; Taxman, Faye S. ; Harrington, Magdalena ; Rhodes, Anne G. ; Katz, Elizabeth ; O'Connell, Daniel ; Martin, Steven S. ; Frisman, Linda K. ; Litt, Mark ; Burdon, William ; Clarke, Jennifer G. ; Fletcher, Bennett W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedmann, Peter D. ; Green, Traci C. ; Taxman, Faye S. ; Harrington, Magdalena ; Rhodes, Anne G. ; Katz, Elizabeth ; O'Connell, Daniel ; Martin, Steven S. ; Frisman, Linda K. ; Litt, Mark ; Burdon, William ; Clarke, Jennifer G. ; Fletcher, Bennett W. ; Step'n Out Research Group of CJ-DATS ; the Step'n Out Research Group of CJ‐DATS</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Aims  To determine whether collaborative behavioral management (CBM) reduces substance use, crime and re‐arrest among drug‐involved parolees. Design  Step'n Out was a randomized behavioral trial of CBM versus standard parole (SP) during 2004–08. CBM adapted evidence‐based role induction, behavioral contracting and contingent reinforcement to provide parole officer/treatment counselor dyads with positive tools in addition to sanctions to manage parolees' behavior over 12 weeks. Setting  Six parole offices in five states in the USA. Participants  Parolee volunteers with a mandate for addiction treatment and a minimum of 3 months of parole (n = 476). Follow‐up was 94% at 3 months and 86% at 9 months. Measurements  Drug use and crime in a given month from calendar interviews 3 and 9 months after parole initiation, and re‐arrests from criminal justice administrative data. Findings  The CBM group had fewer months in which they used their primary drug [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05, 0.78, P = 0.02] and alcohol (ARR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.66, P = 0.006) over follow‐up. CBM had its greatest effects among parolees who reported marijuana or another ‘non‐hard’ drug as their primary drug; parolees who preferred stimulants or opiates did not benefit. No differences were seen in total crime, re‐arrests or parole revocations. Conclusions  Collaborative behavioral management may reduce substance use among primary marijuana or other ‘non‐hard’ drug‐using parolees without increasing revocations. Because the majority of drug violation arrests in the United States are for marijuana, these findings have important implications for the management of a substantial proportion of the US community correctional population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03769.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22175445</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Addiction ; Addictive behaviors ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Alcohol ; Arrest ; Behavior modification ; Behavior Therapy - methods ; Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Community reinforcement approach ; contingency management ; Crime ; Crime - prevention &amp; control ; Crime - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Criminal justice ; Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal ; Drug abuse ; Drug users ; Female ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Law Enforcement ; Male ; Marijuana ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Miscellaneous ; Offenders ; Parole ; Parole &amp; probation ; Population ; Prisoner rehabilitation ; Prisoners - statistics &amp; numerical data ; probation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; role induction ; Secondary Prevention ; substance abuse treatment ; Substance-Related Disorders - rehabilitation ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments ; Trials ; U.S.A ; United States</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012-06, Vol.107 (6), p.1099-1108</ispartof><rights>Published 2011. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6369-68720d0fd64a0b3f1f73448c350a5bcc0b345bb892f7c282b5ec1d87ccfc60463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6369-68720d0fd64a0b3f1f73448c350a5bcc0b345bb892f7c282b5ec1d87ccfc60463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1360-0443.2011.03769.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1360-0443.2011.03769.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27844,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25873133$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22175445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedmann, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Traci C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taxman, Faye S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Anne G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisman, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litt, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdon, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Jennifer G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Bennett W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Step'n Out Research Group of CJ-DATS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Step'n Out Research Group of CJ‐DATS</creatorcontrib><title>Collaborative behavioral management among parolees: drug use, crime and re-arrest in the Step'n Out randomized trial</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Aims  To determine whether collaborative behavioral management (CBM) reduces substance use, crime and re‐arrest among drug‐involved parolees. Design  Step'n Out was a randomized behavioral trial of CBM versus standard parole (SP) during 2004–08. CBM adapted evidence‐based role induction, behavioral contracting and contingent reinforcement to provide parole officer/treatment counselor dyads with positive tools in addition to sanctions to manage parolees' behavior over 12 weeks. Setting  Six parole offices in five states in the USA. Participants  Parolee volunteers with a mandate for addiction treatment and a minimum of 3 months of parole (n = 476). Follow‐up was 94% at 3 months and 86% at 9 months. Measurements  Drug use and crime in a given month from calendar interviews 3 and 9 months after parole initiation, and re‐arrests from criminal justice administrative data. Findings  The CBM group had fewer months in which they used their primary drug [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05, 0.78, P = 0.02] and alcohol (ARR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.66, P = 0.006) over follow‐up. CBM had its greatest effects among parolees who reported marijuana or another ‘non‐hard’ drug as their primary drug; parolees who preferred stimulants or opiates did not benefit. No differences were seen in total crime, re‐arrests or parole revocations. Conclusions  Collaborative behavioral management may reduce substance use among primary marijuana or other ‘non‐hard’ drug‐using parolees without increasing revocations. Because the majority of drug violation arrests in the United States are for marijuana, these findings have important implications for the management of a substantial proportion of the US community correctional population.</description><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Arrest</subject><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Community reinforcement approach</subject><subject>contingency management</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Crime - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Crime - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug users</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Law Enforcement</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Parole</subject><subject>Parole &amp; probation</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prisoner rehabilitation</subject><subject>Prisoners - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>probation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>role induction</subject><subject>Secondary Prevention</subject><subject>substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktuO0zAQhiMEYsvCKyBLCMEFKT7GCRJIqy5dWC27WgHi0nKcSeuSxMVOSpenx6GlHG7ANz59_2hm_kkSRPCUxPV8NSUswynmnE0pJmSKmcyK6fZWMjl83E4muMhESgnHR8m9EFYYY5kX_G5yRCmRgnMxSfqZaxpdOq97uwFUwlJvbLw1qNWdXkALXY9067oFWmvvGoDwAlV-WKAhwDNkvG0B6a5CHlLtPYQe2Q71S0Dve1g_6dDV0CMfAdfab1Ch3lvd3E_u1LoJ8GC_Hycf568_zN6kF1dnb2cnF6nJWFakWS4prnBdZVzjktWklozz3DCBtSiNiW9clGVe0FoamtNSgCFVLo2pTYZ5xo6TV7u466FsoTKxlliZWsektb9RTlv1509nl2rhNooxSrCUMcDTfQDvvgyxONXaYCB2rAM3BEWIIJjTmMG_UUw5JZSTEX30F7pyg-9iJyJFommFoCOV7yjjXQge6kPeBKtxCtRKjWar0Ww1ToH6MQVqG6UPf6_7IPxpewQe7wEdjG7qaJCx4RcncskIY5F7ueO-2gZu_jsBdXJ6Op6iPt3pbehhe9Br_1llkkmhPl2eqev5uXx3OT9X1-w7-vvdFg</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Friedmann, Peter D.</creator><creator>Green, Traci C.</creator><creator>Taxman, Faye S.</creator><creator>Harrington, Magdalena</creator><creator>Rhodes, Anne G.</creator><creator>Katz, Elizabeth</creator><creator>O'Connell, Daniel</creator><creator>Martin, Steven S.</creator><creator>Frisman, Linda K.</creator><creator>Litt, Mark</creator><creator>Burdon, William</creator><creator>Clarke, Jennifer G.</creator><creator>Fletcher, Bennett W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Collaborative behavioral management among parolees: drug use, crime and re-arrest in the Step'n Out randomized trial</title><author>Friedmann, Peter D. ; Green, Traci C. ; Taxman, Faye S. ; Harrington, Magdalena ; Rhodes, Anne G. ; Katz, Elizabeth ; O'Connell, Daniel ; Martin, Steven S. ; Frisman, Linda K. ; Litt, Mark ; Burdon, William ; Clarke, Jennifer G. ; Fletcher, Bennett W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6369-68720d0fd64a0b3f1f73448c350a5bcc0b345bb892f7c282b5ec1d87ccfc60463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Arrest</topic><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Community reinforcement approach</topic><topic>contingency management</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Crime - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Crime - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug users</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Law Enforcement</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Parole</topic><topic>Parole &amp; probation</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prisoner rehabilitation</topic><topic>Prisoners - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>probation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>role induction</topic><topic>Secondary Prevention</topic><topic>substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedmann, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Traci C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taxman, Faye S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Anne G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisman, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litt, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdon, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Jennifer G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Bennett W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Step'n Out Research Group of CJ-DATS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Step'n Out Research Group of CJ‐DATS</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedmann, Peter D.</au><au>Green, Traci C.</au><au>Taxman, Faye S.</au><au>Harrington, Magdalena</au><au>Rhodes, Anne G.</au><au>Katz, Elizabeth</au><au>O'Connell, Daniel</au><au>Martin, Steven S.</au><au>Frisman, Linda K.</au><au>Litt, Mark</au><au>Burdon, William</au><au>Clarke, Jennifer G.</au><au>Fletcher, Bennett W.</au><aucorp>Step'n Out Research Group of CJ-DATS</aucorp><aucorp>the Step'n Out Research Group of CJ‐DATS</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collaborative behavioral management among parolees: drug use, crime and re-arrest in the Step'n Out randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1099</spage><epage>1108</epage><pages>1099-1108</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Aims  To determine whether collaborative behavioral management (CBM) reduces substance use, crime and re‐arrest among drug‐involved parolees. Design  Step'n Out was a randomized behavioral trial of CBM versus standard parole (SP) during 2004–08. CBM adapted evidence‐based role induction, behavioral contracting and contingent reinforcement to provide parole officer/treatment counselor dyads with positive tools in addition to sanctions to manage parolees' behavior over 12 weeks. Setting  Six parole offices in five states in the USA. Participants  Parolee volunteers with a mandate for addiction treatment and a minimum of 3 months of parole (n = 476). Follow‐up was 94% at 3 months and 86% at 9 months. Measurements  Drug use and crime in a given month from calendar interviews 3 and 9 months after parole initiation, and re‐arrests from criminal justice administrative data. Findings  The CBM group had fewer months in which they used their primary drug [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05, 0.78, P = 0.02] and alcohol (ARR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.66, P = 0.006) over follow‐up. CBM had its greatest effects among parolees who reported marijuana or another ‘non‐hard’ drug as their primary drug; parolees who preferred stimulants or opiates did not benefit. No differences were seen in total crime, re‐arrests or parole revocations. Conclusions  Collaborative behavioral management may reduce substance use among primary marijuana or other ‘non‐hard’ drug‐using parolees without increasing revocations. Because the majority of drug violation arrests in the United States are for marijuana, these findings have important implications for the management of a substantial proportion of the US community correctional population.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22175445</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03769.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-2140
ispartof Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012-06, Vol.107 (6), p.1099-1108
issn 0965-2140
1360-0443
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3321077
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Addiction
Addictive behaviors
Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Alcohol
Arrest
Behavior modification
Behavior Therapy - methods
Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Community reinforcement approach
contingency management
Crime
Crime - prevention & control
Crime - statistics & numerical data
Criminal justice
Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal
Drug abuse
Drug users
Female
Humans
Interprofessional Relations
Law Enforcement
Male
Marijuana
Medical sciences
Medical treatment
Miscellaneous
Offenders
Parole
Parole & probation
Population
Prisoner rehabilitation
Prisoners - statistics & numerical data
probation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
role induction
Secondary Prevention
substance abuse treatment
Substance-Related Disorders - rehabilitation
Treatment Outcome
Treatments
Trials
U.S.A
United States
title Collaborative behavioral management among parolees: drug use, crime and re-arrest in the Step'n Out randomized trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A07%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collaborative%20behavioral%20management%20among%20parolees:%20drug%20use,%20crime%20and%20re-arrest%20in%20the%20Step'n%20Out%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Friedmann,%20Peter%20D.&rft.aucorp=Step'n%20Out%20Research%20Group%20of%20CJ-DATS&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1099&rft.epage=1108&rft.pages=1099-1108&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03769.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1024212412%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010969522&rft_id=info:pmid/22175445&rfr_iscdi=true