Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Retrospective Microbiologic and Pathologic Review of 400 Patients at a Single University Medical Center

Fungal Rhinosinusitis (FRS) is a well known entity, but only in more recent times have the types of FRS been more fully defined. In this study, we evaluate the diagnosis of FRS in a single medical center. Cases were divided into 2 main categories, non-invasive and invasive. Non-invasive FRS included...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Otolaryngology 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.324-332
Hauptverfasser: Montone, Kathleen T., Livolsi, Virginia A., Feldman, Michael D., Palmer, James, Chiu, Alexander G., Lanza, Donald C., Kennedy, David W., Loevner, Laurie A., Nachamkin, Irving
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 332
container_issue 2012
container_start_page 324
container_title International Journal of Otolaryngology
container_volume 2012
creator Montone, Kathleen T.
Livolsi, Virginia A.
Feldman, Michael D.
Palmer, James
Chiu, Alexander G.
Lanza, Donald C.
Kennedy, David W.
Loevner, Laurie A.
Nachamkin, Irving
description Fungal Rhinosinusitis (FRS) is a well known entity, but only in more recent times have the types of FRS been more fully defined. In this study, we evaluate the diagnosis of FRS in a single medical center. Cases were divided into 2 main categories, non-invasive and invasive. Non-invasive FRS included fungus ball (FB) and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Invasive FRS included acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS), chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (CIFRS), and chronic invasive granulomatous fungal rhinosinusitis (CGFRS). Fungal culture data, if available was reviewed. 400 patients with FRS were identified. 87.25% were non-invasive (45% AFRS, 40% FB, and 2% combined AFRS and FB and 12.5% were invasive 11% AIFRS 1.2% CIFRS 0.5% CGFRS. One patient (0.25%) had combined FB/CGFRS. Aspergillus sp. or dematiaceous species were the most common fungi isolated in AFS while Aspergillus sp. was most common in FB and AIFRS. In our experience, most FRS is non-invasive. In our patient population, invasive FRS is rare with AIFRS representing >90% of cases. Culture data supports that a variety of fungal agents are responsible for FRS, but Aspergillus sp. appears to be one of the most common organisms in patients with FRS.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2012/684835
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3299344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>P20151224009_201212_201706120037_201706120037_324_332</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>1008830142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4185-702da86e676ffeaccef7d38ea48f6fdf0d863de25dc51880f7ea90b3c79f82c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktvEzEURkcIRKvSFWuQlwgU6sc8PCyQqogCUiqqQCV2lmNfJ64mdmrPpOquP703TIjoCm9s6x6da_tzUbxm9CNjVXXGKeNntSylqJ4Vx6yWzaTl7Pfzw5qyo-I05xu6Gw2tK_6yOOK8YpLV9Lh4uBjCUndkvvIhZh-G7HufP5FzMoc-xbwB0_stkEtvUlz42MWlN0QHS650v9pv57D1cEeiIyWlu4KH0Geie6LJTx-WHZDrgJaE8ntyCdYbbDlFCNKr4oXTXYbT_XxSXF98-TX9Npn9-Pp9ej6b6JLJatJQbrWsoW5q50AbA66xQoIupaudddTKWljglTV4NUldA7qlC2Ga1kluKnFSfB69m2GxBmuwedKd2iS_1uleRe3V00rwK7WMWyV424qyRMG7vSDF2wFyr9Y-G-g6HSAOWTFKpRSUlRzRDyOKb5ZzAndow6jaxaZ2sakxNqTf_nuyA_s3JATejwBmZPWd_4_tzQgDIuD0AS5bKlqB9dlY1z5h1OomDingw6srtFSMc4yw_WNEJ074ZRinVDRPN4KXSgguHgExGL_h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1008830142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Retrospective Microbiologic and Pathologic Review of 400 Patients at a Single University Medical Center</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Montone, Kathleen T. ; Livolsi, Virginia A. ; Feldman, Michael D. ; Palmer, James ; Chiu, Alexander G. ; Lanza, Donald C. ; Kennedy, David W. ; Loevner, Laurie A. ; Nachamkin, Irving</creator><contributor>Dejonckere, P. H.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Montone, Kathleen T. ; Livolsi, Virginia A. ; Feldman, Michael D. ; Palmer, James ; Chiu, Alexander G. ; Lanza, Donald C. ; Kennedy, David W. ; Loevner, Laurie A. ; Nachamkin, Irving ; Dejonckere, P. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Fungal Rhinosinusitis (FRS) is a well known entity, but only in more recent times have the types of FRS been more fully defined. In this study, we evaluate the diagnosis of FRS in a single medical center. Cases were divided into 2 main categories, non-invasive and invasive. Non-invasive FRS included fungus ball (FB) and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Invasive FRS included acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS), chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (CIFRS), and chronic invasive granulomatous fungal rhinosinusitis (CGFRS). Fungal culture data, if available was reviewed. 400 patients with FRS were identified. 87.25% were non-invasive (45% AFRS, 40% FB, and 2% combined AFRS and FB and 12.5% were invasive 11% AIFRS 1.2% CIFRS 0.5% CGFRS. One patient (0.25%) had combined FB/CGFRS. Aspergillus sp. or dematiaceous species were the most common fungi isolated in AFS while Aspergillus sp. was most common in FB and AIFRS. In our experience, most FRS is non-invasive. In our patient population, invasive FRS is rare with AIFRS representing &gt;90% of cases. Culture data supports that a variety of fungal agents are responsible for FRS, but Aspergillus sp. appears to be one of the most common organisms in patients with FRS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-9201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-921X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2012/684835</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22518160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><ispartof>International Journal of Otolaryngology, 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.324-332</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Kathleen T. Montone et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Kathleen T. Montone et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4185-702da86e676ffeaccef7d38ea48f6fdf0d863de25dc51880f7ea90b3c79f82c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4185-702da86e676ffeaccef7d38ea48f6fdf0d863de25dc51880f7ea90b3c79f82c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7535-9339 ; 0000-0002-2354-0611</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3299344/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3299344/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22518160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Dejonckere, P. H.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Montone, Kathleen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livolsi, Virginia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Alexander G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanza, Donald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loevner, Laurie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachamkin, Irving</creatorcontrib><title>Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Retrospective Microbiologic and Pathologic Review of 400 Patients at a Single University Medical Center</title><title>International Journal of Otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Fungal Rhinosinusitis (FRS) is a well known entity, but only in more recent times have the types of FRS been more fully defined. In this study, we evaluate the diagnosis of FRS in a single medical center. Cases were divided into 2 main categories, non-invasive and invasive. Non-invasive FRS included fungus ball (FB) and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Invasive FRS included acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS), chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (CIFRS), and chronic invasive granulomatous fungal rhinosinusitis (CGFRS). Fungal culture data, if available was reviewed. 400 patients with FRS were identified. 87.25% were non-invasive (45% AFRS, 40% FB, and 2% combined AFRS and FB and 12.5% were invasive 11% AIFRS 1.2% CIFRS 0.5% CGFRS. One patient (0.25%) had combined FB/CGFRS. Aspergillus sp. or dematiaceous species were the most common fungi isolated in AFS while Aspergillus sp. was most common in FB and AIFRS. In our experience, most FRS is non-invasive. In our patient population, invasive FRS is rare with AIFRS representing &gt;90% of cases. Culture data supports that a variety of fungal agents are responsible for FRS, but Aspergillus sp. appears to be one of the most common organisms in patients with FRS.</description><issn>1687-9201</issn><issn>1687-921X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktvEzEURkcIRKvSFWuQlwgU6sc8PCyQqogCUiqqQCV2lmNfJ64mdmrPpOquP703TIjoCm9s6x6da_tzUbxm9CNjVXXGKeNntSylqJ4Vx6yWzaTl7Pfzw5qyo-I05xu6Gw2tK_6yOOK8YpLV9Lh4uBjCUndkvvIhZh-G7HufP5FzMoc-xbwB0_stkEtvUlz42MWlN0QHS650v9pv57D1cEeiIyWlu4KH0Geie6LJTx-WHZDrgJaE8ntyCdYbbDlFCNKr4oXTXYbT_XxSXF98-TX9Npn9-Pp9ej6b6JLJatJQbrWsoW5q50AbA66xQoIupaudddTKWljglTV4NUldA7qlC2Ga1kluKnFSfB69m2GxBmuwedKd2iS_1uleRe3V00rwK7WMWyV424qyRMG7vSDF2wFyr9Y-G-g6HSAOWTFKpRSUlRzRDyOKb5ZzAndow6jaxaZ2sakxNqTf_nuyA_s3JATejwBmZPWd_4_tzQgDIuD0AS5bKlqB9dlY1z5h1OomDingw6srtFSMc4yw_WNEJ074ZRinVDRPN4KXSgguHgExGL_h</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Montone, Kathleen T.</creator><creator>Livolsi, Virginia A.</creator><creator>Feldman, Michael D.</creator><creator>Palmer, James</creator><creator>Chiu, Alexander G.</creator><creator>Lanza, Donald C.</creator><creator>Kennedy, David W.</creator><creator>Loevner, Laurie A.</creator><creator>Nachamkin, Irving</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><scope>188</scope><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7535-9339</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-0611</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Retrospective Microbiologic and Pathologic Review of 400 Patients at a Single University Medical Center</title><author>Montone, Kathleen T. ; Livolsi, Virginia A. ; Feldman, Michael D. ; Palmer, James ; Chiu, Alexander G. ; Lanza, Donald C. ; Kennedy, David W. ; Loevner, Laurie A. ; Nachamkin, Irving</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4185-702da86e676ffeaccef7d38ea48f6fdf0d863de25dc51880f7ea90b3c79f82c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montone, Kathleen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livolsi, Virginia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Alexander G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanza, Donald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loevner, Laurie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachamkin, Irving</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montone, Kathleen T.</au><au>Livolsi, Virginia A.</au><au>Feldman, Michael D.</au><au>Palmer, James</au><au>Chiu, Alexander G.</au><au>Lanza, Donald C.</au><au>Kennedy, David W.</au><au>Loevner, Laurie A.</au><au>Nachamkin, Irving</au><au>Dejonckere, P. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Retrospective Microbiologic and Pathologic Review of 400 Patients at a Single University Medical Center</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>2012</issue><spage>324</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>324-332</pages><issn>1687-9201</issn><eissn>1687-921X</eissn><abstract>Fungal Rhinosinusitis (FRS) is a well known entity, but only in more recent times have the types of FRS been more fully defined. In this study, we evaluate the diagnosis of FRS in a single medical center. Cases were divided into 2 main categories, non-invasive and invasive. Non-invasive FRS included fungus ball (FB) and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Invasive FRS included acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS), chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (CIFRS), and chronic invasive granulomatous fungal rhinosinusitis (CGFRS). Fungal culture data, if available was reviewed. 400 patients with FRS were identified. 87.25% were non-invasive (45% AFRS, 40% FB, and 2% combined AFRS and FB and 12.5% were invasive 11% AIFRS 1.2% CIFRS 0.5% CGFRS. One patient (0.25%) had combined FB/CGFRS. Aspergillus sp. or dematiaceous species were the most common fungi isolated in AFS while Aspergillus sp. was most common in FB and AIFRS. In our experience, most FRS is non-invasive. In our patient population, invasive FRS is rare with AIFRS representing &gt;90% of cases. Culture data supports that a variety of fungal agents are responsible for FRS, but Aspergillus sp. appears to be one of the most common organisms in patients with FRS.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>22518160</pmid><doi>10.1155/2012/684835</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7535-9339</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-0611</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1687-9201
ispartof International Journal of Otolaryngology, 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.324-332
issn 1687-9201
1687-921X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3299344
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; PubMed Central Open Access
title Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Retrospective Microbiologic and Pathologic Review of 400 Patients at a Single University Medical Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A58%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fungal%20Rhinosinusitis:%20A%20Retrospective%20Microbiologic%20and%20Pathologic%20Review%20of%20400%20Patients%20at%20a%20Single%20University%20Medical%20Center&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Otolaryngology&rft.au=Montone,%20Kathleen%20T.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=2012&rft.spage=324&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=324-332&rft.issn=1687-9201&rft.eissn=1687-921X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2012/684835&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1008830142%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1008830142&rft_id=info:pmid/22518160&rft_airiti_id=P20151224009_201212_201706120037_201706120037_324_332&rfr_iscdi=true