Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist

ObjectiveImplementation of a surgical checklist depends on many organisational factors and on socio-cultural patterns. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of a surgical checklist and to develop a best use strategy.Setting18 cancer centres in France.Design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ quality & safety 2012-03, Vol.21 (3), p.191-197
Hauptverfasser: Fourcade, Aude, Blache, Jean-Louis, Grenier, Catherine, Bourgain, Jean-Louis, Minvielle, Etienne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 197
container_issue 3
container_start_page 191
container_title BMJ quality & safety
container_volume 21
creator Fourcade, Aude
Blache, Jean-Louis
Grenier, Catherine
Bourgain, Jean-Louis
Minvielle, Etienne
description ObjectiveImplementation of a surgical checklist depends on many organisational factors and on socio-cultural patterns. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of a surgical checklist and to develop a best use strategy.Setting18 cancer centres in France.DesignThe authors first assessed use compliance and completeness rates of the surgical checklist on a random sample of 80 surgical procedures performed under general or loco-regional anaesthesia in each of the 18 centres. They then developed a typology of the organisational and cultural barriers to effective checklist implementation and defined each barrier's contents using data from collective and semi-structured individual interviews of key staff, the results of an email questionnaire sent to the 18 centres, and direct observations over 20 h in two centres.ResultsThe study consisted of 1440 surgical procedures, 1299 checklists, and 28 578 items. The mean compliance rate was 90.2% (0, 100). The mean completion rate was 61% (0, 84). 11 barriers to effective checklist implementation were identified. Their incidence varied widely across centres. The main barriers were duplication of items within existing checklists (16/18 centres), poor communication between surgeon and anaesthetist (10/18), time spent completing the checklist for no perceived benefit, and lack of understanding and timing of item checks (9/18), ambiguity (8/18), unaccounted risks (7/18) and a time-honoured hierarchy (6/18).ConclusionsSeveral of the barriers to the successful implementation of the surgical checklist depended on organisational and cultural factors within each centre. The authors propose a strategy for change for checklist design, use and assessment, which could be used to construct a feedback loop for local team organisation and national initiatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000094
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3285141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>922757382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b634t-19459fd0061f1c51b2ebc869db5df25c914be2730570421ccd7197a08f422f1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAQgC1ERavSH8AFReIASE3x-BHHF6Q2LW2lFUiI181yHLubbTbe2klF_z0OKSvaA8IXjzzfzFjzIfQC8BEALd7V69VNzAkGyHE6kj1BewQzlnNG6NNtDHwXHcS4mhgqpcT0GdolBBcSgOwheaJDaG2I2eCzOGjnMt34zdD6PvMpzuIYrlqjuyxqZ4e7zCytue7aODxHO0530R7c3_vo64ezL9VFvvh0flkdL_K6oGzIQTIuXYNxAQ4Mh5rY2pSFbGreOMKNBFZbIijmAjMCxjQCpNC4dIwQB47uo_dz381Yr21jbD8E3alNaNc63CmvW_Uw07dLdeVvFSUlBwapwdu5wfJR2cXxQk1vmDIhBCW3E_v6fljwN6ONg1q30diu0731Y1SSEMEFLUki3_yThCSmZCx5SeirR-jKj6FPS1MgRFliKXiRKJgpE3yMwbrtXwGrybj6bVxNxtVsPNW8_Hs324o_fhOQz0ASZn9u8zpcq0JQwdXHb5Wqvp9-Pv1xcq6qxB_OfJr1H_N_AV5ZwiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778809756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Fourcade, Aude ; Blache, Jean-Louis ; Grenier, Catherine ; Bourgain, Jean-Louis ; Minvielle, Etienne</creator><creatorcontrib>Fourcade, Aude ; Blache, Jean-Louis ; Grenier, Catherine ; Bourgain, Jean-Louis ; Minvielle, Etienne</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveImplementation of a surgical checklist depends on many organisational factors and on socio-cultural patterns. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of a surgical checklist and to develop a best use strategy.Setting18 cancer centres in France.DesignThe authors first assessed use compliance and completeness rates of the surgical checklist on a random sample of 80 surgical procedures performed under general or loco-regional anaesthesia in each of the 18 centres. They then developed a typology of the organisational and cultural barriers to effective checklist implementation and defined each barrier's contents using data from collective and semi-structured individual interviews of key staff, the results of an email questionnaire sent to the 18 centres, and direct observations over 20 h in two centres.ResultsThe study consisted of 1440 surgical procedures, 1299 checklists, and 28 578 items. The mean compliance rate was 90.2% (0, 100). The mean completion rate was 61% (0, 84). 11 barriers to effective checklist implementation were identified. Their incidence varied widely across centres. The main barriers were duplication of items within existing checklists (16/18 centres), poor communication between surgeon and anaesthetist (10/18), time spent completing the checklist for no perceived benefit, and lack of understanding and timing of item checks (9/18), ambiguity (8/18), unaccounted risks (7/18) and a time-honoured hierarchy (6/18).ConclusionsSeveral of the barriers to the successful implementation of the surgical checklist depended on organisational and cultural factors within each centre. The authors propose a strategy for change for checklist design, use and assessment, which could be used to construct a feedback loop for local team organisation and national initiatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-5415</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-5423</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22069112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Checklist ; Collaboration ; communication ; Compliance ; Health administration ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Interviews ; Medical records ; Medical research ; Medical Staff, Hospital ; Nurses ; operating room ; Original Research ; Patient Safety ; quality improvement ; Questionnaires ; safety ; Surgeons ; Surgery Department, Hospital - standards ; work organisation</subject><ispartof>BMJ quality &amp; safety, 2012-03, Vol.21 (3), p.191-197</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b634t-19459fd0061f1c51b2ebc869db5df25c914be2730570421ccd7197a08f422f1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b634t-19459fd0061f1c51b2ebc869db5df25c914be2730570421ccd7197a08f422f1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/21/3/191.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/21/3/191.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,315,781,785,886,3197,23576,27929,27930,77605,77636</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://cnrs.hal.science/hal-03477732$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fourcade, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blache, Jean-Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenier, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourgain, Jean-Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minvielle, Etienne</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist</title><title>BMJ quality &amp; safety</title><addtitle>BMJ Qual Saf</addtitle><description>ObjectiveImplementation of a surgical checklist depends on many organisational factors and on socio-cultural patterns. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of a surgical checklist and to develop a best use strategy.Setting18 cancer centres in France.DesignThe authors first assessed use compliance and completeness rates of the surgical checklist on a random sample of 80 surgical procedures performed under general or loco-regional anaesthesia in each of the 18 centres. They then developed a typology of the organisational and cultural barriers to effective checklist implementation and defined each barrier's contents using data from collective and semi-structured individual interviews of key staff, the results of an email questionnaire sent to the 18 centres, and direct observations over 20 h in two centres.ResultsThe study consisted of 1440 surgical procedures, 1299 checklists, and 28 578 items. The mean compliance rate was 90.2% (0, 100). The mean completion rate was 61% (0, 84). 11 barriers to effective checklist implementation were identified. Their incidence varied widely across centres. The main barriers were duplication of items within existing checklists (16/18 centres), poor communication between surgeon and anaesthetist (10/18), time spent completing the checklist for no perceived benefit, and lack of understanding and timing of item checks (9/18), ambiguity (8/18), unaccounted risks (7/18) and a time-honoured hierarchy (6/18).ConclusionsSeveral of the barriers to the successful implementation of the surgical checklist depended on organisational and cultural factors within each centre. The authors propose a strategy for change for checklist design, use and assessment, which could be used to construct a feedback loop for local team organisation and national initiatives.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>communication</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>operating room</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>quality improvement</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery Department, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>work organisation</subject><issn>2044-5415</issn><issn>2044-5423</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAQgC1ERavSH8AFReIASE3x-BHHF6Q2LW2lFUiI181yHLubbTbe2klF_z0OKSvaA8IXjzzfzFjzIfQC8BEALd7V69VNzAkGyHE6kj1BewQzlnNG6NNtDHwXHcS4mhgqpcT0GdolBBcSgOwheaJDaG2I2eCzOGjnMt34zdD6PvMpzuIYrlqjuyxqZ4e7zCytue7aODxHO0530R7c3_vo64ezL9VFvvh0flkdL_K6oGzIQTIuXYNxAQ4Mh5rY2pSFbGreOMKNBFZbIijmAjMCxjQCpNC4dIwQB47uo_dz381Yr21jbD8E3alNaNc63CmvW_Uw07dLdeVvFSUlBwapwdu5wfJR2cXxQk1vmDIhBCW3E_v6fljwN6ONg1q30diu0731Y1SSEMEFLUki3_yThCSmZCx5SeirR-jKj6FPS1MgRFliKXiRKJgpE3yMwbrtXwGrybj6bVxNxtVsPNW8_Hs324o_fhOQz0ASZn9u8zpcq0JQwdXHb5Wqvp9-Pv1xcq6qxB_OfJr1H_N_AV5ZwiQ</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Fourcade, Aude</creator><creator>Blache, Jean-Louis</creator><creator>Grenier, Catherine</creator><creator>Bourgain, Jean-Louis</creator><creator>Minvielle, Etienne</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist</title><author>Fourcade, Aude ; Blache, Jean-Louis ; Grenier, Catherine ; Bourgain, Jean-Louis ; Minvielle, Etienne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b634t-19459fd0061f1c51b2ebc869db5df25c914be2730570421ccd7197a08f422f1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>communication</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>operating room</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>quality improvement</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery Department, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>work organisation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fourcade, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blache, Jean-Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenier, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourgain, Jean-Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minvielle, Etienne</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ quality &amp; safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fourcade, Aude</au><au>Blache, Jean-Louis</au><au>Grenier, Catherine</au><au>Bourgain, Jean-Louis</au><au>Minvielle, Etienne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist</atitle><jtitle>BMJ quality &amp; safety</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Qual Saf</addtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>191-197</pages><issn>2044-5415</issn><eissn>2044-5423</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveImplementation of a surgical checklist depends on many organisational factors and on socio-cultural patterns. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to effective implementation of a surgical checklist and to develop a best use strategy.Setting18 cancer centres in France.DesignThe authors first assessed use compliance and completeness rates of the surgical checklist on a random sample of 80 surgical procedures performed under general or loco-regional anaesthesia in each of the 18 centres. They then developed a typology of the organisational and cultural barriers to effective checklist implementation and defined each barrier's contents using data from collective and semi-structured individual interviews of key staff, the results of an email questionnaire sent to the 18 centres, and direct observations over 20 h in two centres.ResultsThe study consisted of 1440 surgical procedures, 1299 checklists, and 28 578 items. The mean compliance rate was 90.2% (0, 100). The mean completion rate was 61% (0, 84). 11 barriers to effective checklist implementation were identified. Their incidence varied widely across centres. The main barriers were duplication of items within existing checklists (16/18 centres), poor communication between surgeon and anaesthetist (10/18), time spent completing the checklist for no perceived benefit, and lack of understanding and timing of item checks (9/18), ambiguity (8/18), unaccounted risks (7/18) and a time-honoured hierarchy (6/18).ConclusionsSeveral of the barriers to the successful implementation of the surgical checklist depended on organisational and cultural factors within each centre. The authors propose a strategy for change for checklist design, use and assessment, which could be used to construct a feedback loop for local team organisation and national initiatives.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>22069112</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000094</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-5415
ispartof BMJ quality & safety, 2012-03, Vol.21 (3), p.191-197
issn 2044-5415
2044-5423
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3285141
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Anesthesia
Checklist
Collaboration
communication
Compliance
Health administration
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Interviews
Medical records
Medical research
Medical Staff, Hospital
Nurses
operating room
Original Research
Patient Safety
quality improvement
Questionnaires
safety
Surgeons
Surgery Department, Hospital - standards
work organisation
title Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T23%3A11%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20to%20staff%20adoption%20of%20a%20surgical%20safety%20checklist&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20quality%20&%20safety&rft.au=Fourcade,%20Aude&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=191-197&rft.issn=2044-5415&rft.eissn=2044-5423&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E922757382%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778809756&rft_id=info:pmid/22069112&rfr_iscdi=true