Effects of an Office-Based Carotid Ultrasound Screening Intervention

Background Carotid ultrasound screening (CUS) has been recommended for cardiovascular disease risk prediction, but its effectiveness in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the effects of office-based CUS on physician decision making and patient heal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2011-07, Vol.24 (7), p.738-747
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Heather M., MD, Turke, Terry L., MD, Grossklaus, Mark, MD, Dall, Tara, MD, Carimi, Sanford, MD, Koenig, Laura M., MD, Aeschlimann, Susan E, Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE, Stein, James H., MD, FASE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 747
container_issue 7
container_start_page 738
container_title Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
container_volume 24
creator Johnson, Heather M., MD
Turke, Terry L., MD
Grossklaus, Mark, MD
Dall, Tara, MD
Carimi, Sanford, MD
Koenig, Laura M., MD
Aeschlimann, Susan E
Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE
Stein, James H., MD, FASE
description Background Carotid ultrasound screening (CUS) has been recommended for cardiovascular disease risk prediction, but its effectiveness in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the effects of office-based CUS on physician decision making and patient health-related behaviors. Methods Physicians from five nonacademic, community practices recruited patients aged ≥40 years with ≥1 cardiovascular disease risk factor. Abnormal results on CUS (AbnlCUS) were defined as carotid intima-media thickness >75th percentile or carotid plaque presence. Subjects completed questionnaires before and immediately after CUS and then 30 days later to determine self-reported behavioral changes. Odds ratios (ORs) for changes in physician management and patient health-related behaviors were determined from multivariate hierarchical logistic regression models. Results There were 355 subjects (mean age, 53.6 ± 7.9 years; mean number of risk factors, 2.3 ± 0.9; 58% women); 266 (74.9%) had AbnlCUS. The presence of AbnlCUS altered physicians’ prescription of aspirin ( P < .001) and cholesterol medications ( P < .001). Immediately after CUS, subjects reported increased ability to change health-related behaviors ( P  = .002), regardless of their test results. Subjects with AbnlCUS reported increased cardiovascular disease risk perception (OR, 4.14; P < .001) and intentions to exercise (OR, 2.28; P  = .008), make dietary changes (OR, 2.95; P < .001), and quit smoking (OR, 4.98; P  = .022). After 30 days, 34% increased exercise frequency and 37% reported weight loss, but these changes were not predicted by the CUS results. AbnlCUS modestly predicted reduced dietary sodium (OR, 1.45; P  = .002) and increased fiber (OR, 1.55; P  = .022) intake. Conclusions Finding abnormal results on CUS had major effects on physician but not patient behaviors.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3279118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0894731711001465</els_id><sourcerecordid>873704175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-8f4a82f6791f7ea0a75b4bf32b1eba5cb6fc4c8207cfbec790fac8ee72f7b833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BA2bFKuHaSsSOhSnRooVKlLlrWV45z3XrI2MVORurb42hKBSxYeeHzc_Udxt5xqDjw9cdtReY-VAI4r0BUwOsXbMWhk-Vadu1LtgLVNaWsuTxixyltAaBVAK_ZkeCNlJ3qVuzLubVkplQEW2hfXFvrDJVnOtFQbHQMkxuK7-MUdQqzH4obE4m883fFpZ8o7slPLvg37JXVY6K3T-8Ju704v918K6-uv15uPl-VpoVuKpVttBI2H8etJA1atn3T21r0nHrdmn5tTWOUAGlsT0Z2YLVRRFJY2au6PmGnh9iHud_RYHJ51CM-RLfT8RGDdvj3j3f3eBf2WItcyVUO-PAUEMPPmdKEO5cMjaP2FOaEStYSGi7brBQHpYkhpUj2uYUDLvBxiwt8XOAjCMzws-n9n_c9W37TzoJPBwFlSHtHEZNx5A0NLuYRcAju__mn_9jN6LwzevxBj5S2YY4-40eOKRvwZpl_WZ9zAN6s2_oXa0Csuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>873704175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of an Office-Based Carotid Ultrasound Screening Intervention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Johnson, Heather M., MD ; Turke, Terry L., MD ; Grossklaus, Mark, MD ; Dall, Tara, MD ; Carimi, Sanford, MD ; Koenig, Laura M., MD ; Aeschlimann, Susan E ; Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE ; Stein, James H., MD, FASE</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Heather M., MD ; Turke, Terry L., MD ; Grossklaus, Mark, MD ; Dall, Tara, MD ; Carimi, Sanford, MD ; Koenig, Laura M., MD ; Aeschlimann, Susan E ; Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE ; Stein, James H., MD, FASE</creatorcontrib><description>Background Carotid ultrasound screening (CUS) has been recommended for cardiovascular disease risk prediction, but its effectiveness in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the effects of office-based CUS on physician decision making and patient health-related behaviors. Methods Physicians from five nonacademic, community practices recruited patients aged ≥40 years with ≥1 cardiovascular disease risk factor. Abnormal results on CUS (AbnlCUS) were defined as carotid intima-media thickness &gt;75th percentile or carotid plaque presence. Subjects completed questionnaires before and immediately after CUS and then 30 days later to determine self-reported behavioral changes. Odds ratios (ORs) for changes in physician management and patient health-related behaviors were determined from multivariate hierarchical logistic regression models. Results There were 355 subjects (mean age, 53.6 ± 7.9 years; mean number of risk factors, 2.3 ± 0.9; 58% women); 266 (74.9%) had AbnlCUS. The presence of AbnlCUS altered physicians’ prescription of aspirin ( P &lt; .001) and cholesterol medications ( P &lt; .001). Immediately after CUS, subjects reported increased ability to change health-related behaviors ( P  = .002), regardless of their test results. Subjects with AbnlCUS reported increased cardiovascular disease risk perception (OR, 4.14; P &lt; .001) and intentions to exercise (OR, 2.28; P  = .008), make dietary changes (OR, 2.95; P &lt; .001), and quit smoking (OR, 4.98; P  = .022). After 30 days, 34% increased exercise frequency and 37% reported weight loss, but these changes were not predicted by the CUS results. AbnlCUS modestly predicted reduced dietary sodium (OR, 1.45; P  = .002) and increased fiber (OR, 1.55; P  = .022) intake. Conclusions Finding abnormal results on CUS had major effects on physician but not patient behaviors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-7317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21477989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Atherosclerosis ; Cardiovascular ; Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology ; Carotid arteries ; Carotid Arteries - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Artery Diseases - complications ; Carotid Artery Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Middle Aged ; Office Visits ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography, Doppler - methods ; Ultrasound ; Wisconsin - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2011-07, Vol.24 (7), p.738-747</ispartof><rights>American Society of Echocardiography</rights><rights>2011 American Society of Echocardiography</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-8f4a82f6791f7ea0a75b4bf32b1eba5cb6fc4c8207cfbec790fac8ee72f7b833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-8f4a82f6791f7ea0a75b4bf32b1eba5cb6fc4c8207cfbec790fac8ee72f7b833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Heather M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turke, Terry L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossklaus, Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dall, Tara, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carimi, Sanford, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Laura M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aeschlimann, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, James H., MD, FASE</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of an Office-Based Carotid Ultrasound Screening Intervention</title><title>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</title><addtitle>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</addtitle><description>Background Carotid ultrasound screening (CUS) has been recommended for cardiovascular disease risk prediction, but its effectiveness in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the effects of office-based CUS on physician decision making and patient health-related behaviors. Methods Physicians from five nonacademic, community practices recruited patients aged ≥40 years with ≥1 cardiovascular disease risk factor. Abnormal results on CUS (AbnlCUS) were defined as carotid intima-media thickness &gt;75th percentile or carotid plaque presence. Subjects completed questionnaires before and immediately after CUS and then 30 days later to determine self-reported behavioral changes. Odds ratios (ORs) for changes in physician management and patient health-related behaviors were determined from multivariate hierarchical logistic regression models. Results There were 355 subjects (mean age, 53.6 ± 7.9 years; mean number of risk factors, 2.3 ± 0.9; 58% women); 266 (74.9%) had AbnlCUS. The presence of AbnlCUS altered physicians’ prescription of aspirin ( P &lt; .001) and cholesterol medications ( P &lt; .001). Immediately after CUS, subjects reported increased ability to change health-related behaviors ( P  = .002), regardless of their test results. Subjects with AbnlCUS reported increased cardiovascular disease risk perception (OR, 4.14; P &lt; .001) and intentions to exercise (OR, 2.28; P  = .008), make dietary changes (OR, 2.95; P &lt; .001), and quit smoking (OR, 4.98; P  = .022). After 30 days, 34% increased exercise frequency and 37% reported weight loss, but these changes were not predicted by the CUS results. AbnlCUS modestly predicted reduced dietary sodium (OR, 1.45; P  = .002) and increased fiber (OR, 1.55; P  = .022) intake. Conclusions Finding abnormal results on CUS had major effects on physician but not patient behaviors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Atherosclerosis</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Carotid arteries</subject><subject>Carotid Arteries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Artery Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Carotid Artery Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Intima-Media Thickness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Office Visits</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Wisconsin - epidemiology</subject><issn>0894-7317</issn><issn>1097-6795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCC7BA2bFKuHaSsSOhSnRooVKlLlrWV45z3XrI2MVORurb42hKBSxYeeHzc_Udxt5xqDjw9cdtReY-VAI4r0BUwOsXbMWhk-Vadu1LtgLVNaWsuTxixyltAaBVAK_ZkeCNlJ3qVuzLubVkplQEW2hfXFvrDJVnOtFQbHQMkxuK7-MUdQqzH4obE4m883fFpZ8o7slPLvg37JXVY6K3T-8Ju704v918K6-uv15uPl-VpoVuKpVttBI2H8etJA1atn3T21r0nHrdmn5tTWOUAGlsT0Z2YLVRRFJY2au6PmGnh9iHud_RYHJ51CM-RLfT8RGDdvj3j3f3eBf2WItcyVUO-PAUEMPPmdKEO5cMjaP2FOaEStYSGi7brBQHpYkhpUj2uYUDLvBxiwt8XOAjCMzws-n9n_c9W37TzoJPBwFlSHtHEZNx5A0NLuYRcAju__mn_9jN6LwzevxBj5S2YY4-40eOKRvwZpl_WZ9zAN6s2_oXa0Csuw</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Johnson, Heather M., MD</creator><creator>Turke, Terry L., MD</creator><creator>Grossklaus, Mark, MD</creator><creator>Dall, Tara, MD</creator><creator>Carimi, Sanford, MD</creator><creator>Koenig, Laura M., MD</creator><creator>Aeschlimann, Susan E</creator><creator>Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE</creator><creator>Stein, James H., MD, FASE</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Effects of an Office-Based Carotid Ultrasound Screening Intervention</title><author>Johnson, Heather M., MD ; Turke, Terry L., MD ; Grossklaus, Mark, MD ; Dall, Tara, MD ; Carimi, Sanford, MD ; Koenig, Laura M., MD ; Aeschlimann, Susan E ; Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE ; Stein, James H., MD, FASE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-8f4a82f6791f7ea0a75b4bf32b1eba5cb6fc4c8207cfbec790fac8ee72f7b833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Atherosclerosis</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Carotid arteries</topic><topic>Carotid Arteries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Artery Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Carotid Artery Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Intima-Media Thickness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Office Visits</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Wisconsin - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Heather M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turke, Terry L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossklaus, Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dall, Tara, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carimi, Sanford, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Laura M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aeschlimann, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, James H., MD, FASE</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Heather M., MD</au><au>Turke, Terry L., MD</au><au>Grossklaus, Mark, MD</au><au>Dall, Tara, MD</au><au>Carimi, Sanford, MD</au><au>Koenig, Laura M., MD</au><au>Aeschlimann, Susan E</au><au>Korcarz, Claudia E., DVM, FASE</au><au>Stein, James H., MD, FASE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of an Office-Based Carotid Ultrasound Screening Intervention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>747</epage><pages>738-747</pages><issn>0894-7317</issn><eissn>1097-6795</eissn><abstract>Background Carotid ultrasound screening (CUS) has been recommended for cardiovascular disease risk prediction, but its effectiveness in clinical practice is unknown. The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the effects of office-based CUS on physician decision making and patient health-related behaviors. Methods Physicians from five nonacademic, community practices recruited patients aged ≥40 years with ≥1 cardiovascular disease risk factor. Abnormal results on CUS (AbnlCUS) were defined as carotid intima-media thickness &gt;75th percentile or carotid plaque presence. Subjects completed questionnaires before and immediately after CUS and then 30 days later to determine self-reported behavioral changes. Odds ratios (ORs) for changes in physician management and patient health-related behaviors were determined from multivariate hierarchical logistic regression models. Results There were 355 subjects (mean age, 53.6 ± 7.9 years; mean number of risk factors, 2.3 ± 0.9; 58% women); 266 (74.9%) had AbnlCUS. The presence of AbnlCUS altered physicians’ prescription of aspirin ( P &lt; .001) and cholesterol medications ( P &lt; .001). Immediately after CUS, subjects reported increased ability to change health-related behaviors ( P  = .002), regardless of their test results. Subjects with AbnlCUS reported increased cardiovascular disease risk perception (OR, 4.14; P &lt; .001) and intentions to exercise (OR, 2.28; P  = .008), make dietary changes (OR, 2.95; P &lt; .001), and quit smoking (OR, 4.98; P  = .022). After 30 days, 34% increased exercise frequency and 37% reported weight loss, but these changes were not predicted by the CUS results. AbnlCUS modestly predicted reduced dietary sodium (OR, 1.45; P  = .002) and increased fiber (OR, 1.55; P  = .022) intake. Conclusions Finding abnormal results on CUS had major effects on physician but not patient behaviors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21477989</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.013</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-7317
ispartof Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2011-07, Vol.24 (7), p.738-747
issn 0894-7317
1097-6795
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3279118
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Atherosclerosis
Cardiovascular
Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology
Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology
Carotid arteries
Carotid Arteries - diagnostic imaging
Carotid Artery Diseases - complications
Carotid Artery Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
Female
Humans
Incidence
Male
Mass Screening - methods
Middle Aged
Office Visits
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Factors
Ultrasonography, Doppler - methods
Ultrasound
Wisconsin - epidemiology
title Effects of an Office-Based Carotid Ultrasound Screening Intervention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20an%20Office-Based%20Carotid%20Ultrasound%20Screening%20Intervention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Echocardiography&rft.au=Johnson,%20Heather%20M.,%20MD&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=747&rft.pages=738-747&rft.issn=0894-7317&rft.eissn=1097-6795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E873704175%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=873704175&rft_id=info:pmid/21477989&rft_els_id=S0894731711001465&rfr_iscdi=true