Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury

The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical therapy 2008-03, Vol.88 (3), p.387-396
Hauptverfasser: Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna, Shields, Richard K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 396
container_issue 3
container_start_page 387
container_title Physical therapy
container_volume 88
creator Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna
Shields, Richard K
description The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same issues. The purpose of this case report is to offer proof of the concepts that careful dose selection and surveillance of patient adherence should be integral components in rehabilitation interventions. A 21-year-old man with T4 complete paraplegia (7 weeks) enrolled in a unilateral soleus muscle electrical stimulation protocol. Compressive loads applied to the tibia approximated 1.4 times body weight. Over 4.8 years of home-based training, data logging software provided surveillance of adherence. Soleus muscle torque and fatigue index adaptations to training as well as bone mineral density (BMD) adaptations in the distal tibia were measured. The patient performed nearly 8,000 soleus muscle contractions per month, with occasional fluctuations. Adherence tracking permitted intervention when adherence fell below acceptable values. The soleus muscle torque and fatigue index increased rapidly in response to training. The BMD of the untrained tibia declined approximately 14% per year. The BMD of the trained tibia declined only approximately 7% per year. The BMD was preferentially preserved in the posterior half of the tibia; this region experienced only a 2.6% annual decline. Early administration of a load intervention, careful estimation of the loading dose, and detailed surveillance of patient adherence aided in the interpretation of a patient's adaptations to a mechanical load protocol. These concepts possess wider applicability to rehabilitation research and should be emphasized in future physical therapy investigations.
doi_str_mv 10.2522/ptj.20070224
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3270311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A176776916</galeid><sourcerecordid>A176776916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-aee409852babeb472bcb65c6d5a94baea9dd43a64db0659b19cf77c4c27c75093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9uL00AUxoMobl1981mCC4po69ySybwIta5robJg9XmYTCbp1HSmziSr-997YuulUlbJw0DO73x855YkDzGakIyQl9tuPSEIcUQIu5WMcEaLcc4Ju52MEKJ4LBChJ8m9GNcIIcyZuJuc4IIgggo0Sj6_8dGk57GzG9VZ71LlqnTZhytj21Y5bVJfp--NXilntWrThVeVdU06d50ByA05Ma19SF97ZyAcYzqtIZYut9ZBwsyHCuh1H67vJ3dq1UbzYP-eJp_enn-cvRsvLi_ms-lirDkW3VgZw5AoMlKq0pSMk1KXeabzKlOClcooUVWMqpxVJcozUWKha84104RrniFBT5NXO91tX25MpcFlUK3cBqgxXEuvrDyMOLuSjb-SlHDoGAaBp3uB4L_0JnZyY6M2Q0OM76PkHBdMgFkgn9xMIppjTPA_QSwYYZTkAD7-C1z7PkAnoyRkMEcZBehsBzWqNdK62kMdelCUU8xzznOBB6nxEaoxzkDRMK3awu8DfnKEh68yG6uPJjw7SACmM9-6RvUxyvnyw3-zxcXiJuN7Vvu2NY2RsCyzy0P-xY7XAfYvmPrXrDGSw5FIOBL580gAf_TnfvyG91cBwPMdsLLN6qsNRsaNalvAfyjt5lEUkkpacPodf98Y5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223113343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna ; Shields, Richard K</creator><creatorcontrib>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna ; Shields, Richard K</creatorcontrib><description>The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same issues. The purpose of this case report is to offer proof of the concepts that careful dose selection and surveillance of patient adherence should be integral components in rehabilitation interventions. A 21-year-old man with T4 complete paraplegia (7 weeks) enrolled in a unilateral soleus muscle electrical stimulation protocol. Compressive loads applied to the tibia approximated 1.4 times body weight. Over 4.8 years of home-based training, data logging software provided surveillance of adherence. Soleus muscle torque and fatigue index adaptations to training as well as bone mineral density (BMD) adaptations in the distal tibia were measured. The patient performed nearly 8,000 soleus muscle contractions per month, with occasional fluctuations. Adherence tracking permitted intervention when adherence fell below acceptable values. The soleus muscle torque and fatigue index increased rapidly in response to training. The BMD of the untrained tibia declined approximately 14% per year. The BMD of the trained tibia declined only approximately 7% per year. The BMD was preferentially preserved in the posterior half of the tibia; this region experienced only a 2.6% annual decline. Early administration of a load intervention, careful estimation of the loading dose, and detailed surveillance of patient adherence aided in the interpretation of a patient's adaptations to a mechanical load protocol. These concepts possess wider applicability to rehabilitation research and should be emphasized in future physical therapy investigations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-6724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20070224</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18202080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physical Therapy Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Adult ; Bone density ; Care and treatment ; Case studies ; Clinical outcomes ; Complications and side effects ; Data collection ; Diagnosis ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle Fatigue - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - physiopathology ; Osteoporosis - prevention &amp; control ; Outpatient care facilities ; Paraplegia - physiopathology ; Paraplegia - rehabilitation ; Patient Compliance ; Patients ; Physical therapy ; Protocol ; Risk factors ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation ; Studies ; Therapeutics, Physiological ; Tibia - physiopathology ; Tomography ; Torque</subject><ispartof>Physical therapy, 2008-03, Vol.88 (3), p.387-396</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION Mar 1, 2008</rights><rights>2008 American Physical Therapy Association 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-aee409852babeb472bcb65c6d5a94baea9dd43a64db0659b19cf77c4c27c75093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-aee409852babeb472bcb65c6d5a94baea9dd43a64db0659b19cf77c4c27c75093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18202080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Richard K</creatorcontrib><title>Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury</title><title>Physical therapy</title><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><description>The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same issues. The purpose of this case report is to offer proof of the concepts that careful dose selection and surveillance of patient adherence should be integral components in rehabilitation interventions. A 21-year-old man with T4 complete paraplegia (7 weeks) enrolled in a unilateral soleus muscle electrical stimulation protocol. Compressive loads applied to the tibia approximated 1.4 times body weight. Over 4.8 years of home-based training, data logging software provided surveillance of adherence. Soleus muscle torque and fatigue index adaptations to training as well as bone mineral density (BMD) adaptations in the distal tibia were measured. The patient performed nearly 8,000 soleus muscle contractions per month, with occasional fluctuations. Adherence tracking permitted intervention when adherence fell below acceptable values. The soleus muscle torque and fatigue index increased rapidly in response to training. The BMD of the untrained tibia declined approximately 14% per year. The BMD of the trained tibia declined only approximately 7% per year. The BMD was preferentially preserved in the posterior half of the tibia; this region experienced only a 2.6% annual decline. Early administration of a load intervention, careful estimation of the loading dose, and detailed surveillance of patient adherence aided in the interpretation of a patient's adaptations to a mechanical load protocol. These concepts possess wider applicability to rehabilitation research and should be emphasized in future physical therapy investigations.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Fatigue - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Outpatient care facilities</subject><subject>Paraplegia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Paraplegia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Therapeutics, Physiological</subject><subject>Tibia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Torque</subject><issn>0031-9023</issn><issn>1538-6724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9uL00AUxoMobl1981mCC4po69ySybwIta5robJg9XmYTCbp1HSmziSr-997YuulUlbJw0DO73x855YkDzGakIyQl9tuPSEIcUQIu5WMcEaLcc4Ju52MEKJ4LBChJ8m9GNcIIcyZuJuc4IIgggo0Sj6_8dGk57GzG9VZ71LlqnTZhytj21Y5bVJfp--NXilntWrThVeVdU06d50ByA05Ma19SF97ZyAcYzqtIZYut9ZBwsyHCuh1H67vJ3dq1UbzYP-eJp_enn-cvRsvLi_ms-lirDkW3VgZw5AoMlKq0pSMk1KXeabzKlOClcooUVWMqpxVJcozUWKha84104RrniFBT5NXO91tX25MpcFlUK3cBqgxXEuvrDyMOLuSjb-SlHDoGAaBp3uB4L_0JnZyY6M2Q0OM76PkHBdMgFkgn9xMIppjTPA_QSwYYZTkAD7-C1z7PkAnoyRkMEcZBehsBzWqNdK62kMdelCUU8xzznOBB6nxEaoxzkDRMK3awu8DfnKEh68yG6uPJjw7SACmM9-6RvUxyvnyw3-zxcXiJuN7Vvu2NY2RsCyzy0P-xY7XAfYvmPrXrDGSw5FIOBL580gAf_TnfvyG91cBwPMdsLLN6qsNRsaNalvAfyjt5lEUkkpacPodf98Y5Q</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna</creator><creator>Shields, Richard K</creator><general>American Physical Therapy Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury</title><author>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna ; Shields, Richard K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-aee409852babeb472bcb65c6d5a94baea9dd43a64db0659b19cf77c4c27c75093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Fatigue - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Outpatient care facilities</topic><topic>Paraplegia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Paraplegia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Therapeutics, Physiological</topic><topic>Tibia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Torque</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Richard K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna</au><au>Shields, Richard K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury</atitle><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>387-396</pages><issn>0031-9023</issn><eissn>1538-6724</eissn><abstract>The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same issues. The purpose of this case report is to offer proof of the concepts that careful dose selection and surveillance of patient adherence should be integral components in rehabilitation interventions. A 21-year-old man with T4 complete paraplegia (7 weeks) enrolled in a unilateral soleus muscle electrical stimulation protocol. Compressive loads applied to the tibia approximated 1.4 times body weight. Over 4.8 years of home-based training, data logging software provided surveillance of adherence. Soleus muscle torque and fatigue index adaptations to training as well as bone mineral density (BMD) adaptations in the distal tibia were measured. The patient performed nearly 8,000 soleus muscle contractions per month, with occasional fluctuations. Adherence tracking permitted intervention when adherence fell below acceptable values. The soleus muscle torque and fatigue index increased rapidly in response to training. The BMD of the untrained tibia declined approximately 14% per year. The BMD of the trained tibia declined only approximately 7% per year. The BMD was preferentially preserved in the posterior half of the tibia; this region experienced only a 2.6% annual decline. Early administration of a load intervention, careful estimation of the loading dose, and detailed surveillance of patient adherence aided in the interpretation of a patient's adaptations to a mechanical load protocol. These concepts possess wider applicability to rehabilitation research and should be emphasized in future physical therapy investigations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physical Therapy Association</pub><pmid>18202080</pmid><doi>10.2522/ptj.20070224</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9023
ispartof Physical therapy, 2008-03, Vol.88 (3), p.387-396
issn 0031-9023
1538-6724
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3270311
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adaptation, Physiological
Adult
Bone density
Care and treatment
Case studies
Clinical outcomes
Complications and side effects
Data collection
Diagnosis
Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods
Health aspects
Humans
Intervention
Male
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle Fatigue - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - physiopathology
Osteoporosis - prevention & control
Outpatient care facilities
Paraplegia - physiopathology
Paraplegia - rehabilitation
Patient Compliance
Patients
Physical therapy
Protocol
Risk factors
Spinal cord injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation
Studies
Therapeutics, Physiological
Tibia - physiopathology
Tomography
Torque
title Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%20Estimation%20and%20Surveillance%20of%20Mechanical%20Loading%20Interventions%20for%20Bone%20Loss%20After%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury&rft.jtitle=Physical%20therapy&rft.au=Dudley-Javoroski,%20Shauna&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=387-396&rft.issn=0031-9023&rft.eissn=1538-6724&rft_id=info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070224&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA176776916%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223113343&rft_id=info:pmid/18202080&rft_galeid=A176776916&rfr_iscdi=true