Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury
The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical therapy 2008-03, Vol.88 (3), p.387-396 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 396 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 387 |
container_title | Physical therapy |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna Shields, Richard K |
description | The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same issues. The purpose of this case report is to offer proof of the concepts that careful dose selection and surveillance of patient adherence should be integral components in rehabilitation interventions.
A 21-year-old man with T4 complete paraplegia (7 weeks) enrolled in a unilateral soleus muscle electrical stimulation protocol. Compressive loads applied to the tibia approximated 1.4 times body weight. Over 4.8 years of home-based training, data logging software provided surveillance of adherence. Soleus muscle torque and fatigue index adaptations to training as well as bone mineral density (BMD) adaptations in the distal tibia were measured.
The patient performed nearly 8,000 soleus muscle contractions per month, with occasional fluctuations. Adherence tracking permitted intervention when adherence fell below acceptable values. The soleus muscle torque and fatigue index increased rapidly in response to training. The BMD of the untrained tibia declined approximately 14% per year. The BMD of the trained tibia declined only approximately 7% per year. The BMD was preferentially preserved in the posterior half of the tibia; this region experienced only a 2.6% annual decline.
Early administration of a load intervention, careful estimation of the loading dose, and detailed surveillance of patient adherence aided in the interpretation of a patient's adaptations to a mechanical load protocol. These concepts possess wider applicability to rehabilitation research and should be emphasized in future physical therapy investigations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2522/ptj.20070224 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3270311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A176776916</galeid><sourcerecordid>A176776916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-aee409852babeb472bcb65c6d5a94baea9dd43a64db0659b19cf77c4c27c75093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9uL00AUxoMobl1981mCC4po69ySybwIta5robJg9XmYTCbp1HSmziSr-997YuulUlbJw0DO73x855YkDzGakIyQl9tuPSEIcUQIu5WMcEaLcc4Ju52MEKJ4LBChJ8m9GNcIIcyZuJuc4IIgggo0Sj6_8dGk57GzG9VZ71LlqnTZhytj21Y5bVJfp--NXilntWrThVeVdU06d50ByA05Ma19SF97ZyAcYzqtIZYut9ZBwsyHCuh1H67vJ3dq1UbzYP-eJp_enn-cvRsvLi_ms-lirDkW3VgZw5AoMlKq0pSMk1KXeabzKlOClcooUVWMqpxVJcozUWKha84104RrniFBT5NXO91tX25MpcFlUK3cBqgxXEuvrDyMOLuSjb-SlHDoGAaBp3uB4L_0JnZyY6M2Q0OM76PkHBdMgFkgn9xMIppjTPA_QSwYYZTkAD7-C1z7PkAnoyRkMEcZBehsBzWqNdK62kMdelCUU8xzznOBB6nxEaoxzkDRMK3awu8DfnKEh68yG6uPJjw7SACmM9-6RvUxyvnyw3-zxcXiJuN7Vvu2NY2RsCyzy0P-xY7XAfYvmPrXrDGSw5FIOBL580gAf_TnfvyG91cBwPMdsLLN6qsNRsaNalvAfyjt5lEUkkpacPodf98Y5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223113343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna ; Shields, Richard K</creator><creatorcontrib>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna ; Shields, Richard K</creatorcontrib><description>The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same issues. The purpose of this case report is to offer proof of the concepts that careful dose selection and surveillance of patient adherence should be integral components in rehabilitation interventions.
A 21-year-old man with T4 complete paraplegia (7 weeks) enrolled in a unilateral soleus muscle electrical stimulation protocol. Compressive loads applied to the tibia approximated 1.4 times body weight. Over 4.8 years of home-based training, data logging software provided surveillance of adherence. Soleus muscle torque and fatigue index adaptations to training as well as bone mineral density (BMD) adaptations in the distal tibia were measured.
The patient performed nearly 8,000 soleus muscle contractions per month, with occasional fluctuations. Adherence tracking permitted intervention when adherence fell below acceptable values. The soleus muscle torque and fatigue index increased rapidly in response to training. The BMD of the untrained tibia declined approximately 14% per year. The BMD of the trained tibia declined only approximately 7% per year. The BMD was preferentially preserved in the posterior half of the tibia; this region experienced only a 2.6% annual decline.
Early administration of a load intervention, careful estimation of the loading dose, and detailed surveillance of patient adherence aided in the interpretation of a patient's adaptations to a mechanical load protocol. These concepts possess wider applicability to rehabilitation research and should be emphasized in future physical therapy investigations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-6724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20070224</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18202080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physical Therapy Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Adult ; Bone density ; Care and treatment ; Case studies ; Clinical outcomes ; Complications and side effects ; Data collection ; Diagnosis ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle Fatigue - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - physiopathology ; Osteoporosis - prevention & control ; Outpatient care facilities ; Paraplegia - physiopathology ; Paraplegia - rehabilitation ; Patient Compliance ; Patients ; Physical therapy ; Protocol ; Risk factors ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation ; Studies ; Therapeutics, Physiological ; Tibia - physiopathology ; Tomography ; Torque</subject><ispartof>Physical therapy, 2008-03, Vol.88 (3), p.387-396</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION Mar 1, 2008</rights><rights>2008 American Physical Therapy Association 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-aee409852babeb472bcb65c6d5a94baea9dd43a64db0659b19cf77c4c27c75093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-aee409852babeb472bcb65c6d5a94baea9dd43a64db0659b19cf77c4c27c75093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18202080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Richard K</creatorcontrib><title>Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury</title><title>Physical therapy</title><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><description>The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same issues. The purpose of this case report is to offer proof of the concepts that careful dose selection and surveillance of patient adherence should be integral components in rehabilitation interventions.
A 21-year-old man with T4 complete paraplegia (7 weeks) enrolled in a unilateral soleus muscle electrical stimulation protocol. Compressive loads applied to the tibia approximated 1.4 times body weight. Over 4.8 years of home-based training, data logging software provided surveillance of adherence. Soleus muscle torque and fatigue index adaptations to training as well as bone mineral density (BMD) adaptations in the distal tibia were measured.
The patient performed nearly 8,000 soleus muscle contractions per month, with occasional fluctuations. Adherence tracking permitted intervention when adherence fell below acceptable values. The soleus muscle torque and fatigue index increased rapidly in response to training. The BMD of the untrained tibia declined approximately 14% per year. The BMD of the trained tibia declined only approximately 7% per year. The BMD was preferentially preserved in the posterior half of the tibia; this region experienced only a 2.6% annual decline.
Early administration of a load intervention, careful estimation of the loading dose, and detailed surveillance of patient adherence aided in the interpretation of a patient's adaptations to a mechanical load protocol. These concepts possess wider applicability to rehabilitation research and should be emphasized in future physical therapy investigations.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Fatigue - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Outpatient care facilities</subject><subject>Paraplegia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Paraplegia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Therapeutics, Physiological</subject><subject>Tibia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Torque</subject><issn>0031-9023</issn><issn>1538-6724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9uL00AUxoMobl1981mCC4po69ySybwIta5robJg9XmYTCbp1HSmziSr-997YuulUlbJw0DO73x855YkDzGakIyQl9tuPSEIcUQIu5WMcEaLcc4Ju52MEKJ4LBChJ8m9GNcIIcyZuJuc4IIgggo0Sj6_8dGk57GzG9VZ71LlqnTZhytj21Y5bVJfp--NXilntWrThVeVdU06d50ByA05Ma19SF97ZyAcYzqtIZYut9ZBwsyHCuh1H67vJ3dq1UbzYP-eJp_enn-cvRsvLi_ms-lirDkW3VgZw5AoMlKq0pSMk1KXeabzKlOClcooUVWMqpxVJcozUWKha84104RrniFBT5NXO91tX25MpcFlUK3cBqgxXEuvrDyMOLuSjb-SlHDoGAaBp3uB4L_0JnZyY6M2Q0OM76PkHBdMgFkgn9xMIppjTPA_QSwYYZTkAD7-C1z7PkAnoyRkMEcZBehsBzWqNdK62kMdelCUU8xzznOBB6nxEaoxzkDRMK3awu8DfnKEh68yG6uPJjw7SACmM9-6RvUxyvnyw3-zxcXiJuN7Vvu2NY2RsCyzy0P-xY7XAfYvmPrXrDGSw5FIOBL580gAf_TnfvyG91cBwPMdsLLN6qsNRsaNalvAfyjt5lEUkkpacPodf98Y5Q</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna</creator><creator>Shields, Richard K</creator><general>American Physical Therapy Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury</title><author>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna ; Shields, Richard K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-aee409852babeb472bcb65c6d5a94baea9dd43a64db0659b19cf77c4c27c75093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Fatigue - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Outpatient care facilities</topic><topic>Paraplegia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Paraplegia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Therapeutics, Physiological</topic><topic>Tibia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Torque</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shields, Richard K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dudley-Javoroski, Shauna</au><au>Shields, Richard K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury</atitle><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>387-396</pages><issn>0031-9023</issn><eissn>1538-6724</eissn><abstract>The interpretation of the results of previous anti-osteoporosis interventions after spinal cord injury (SCI) is undermined by incomplete information about the intervention dose or patient adherence to dose requirements. Rehabilitation research as a whole traditionally has struggled with these same issues. The purpose of this case report is to offer proof of the concepts that careful dose selection and surveillance of patient adherence should be integral components in rehabilitation interventions.
A 21-year-old man with T4 complete paraplegia (7 weeks) enrolled in a unilateral soleus muscle electrical stimulation protocol. Compressive loads applied to the tibia approximated 1.4 times body weight. Over 4.8 years of home-based training, data logging software provided surveillance of adherence. Soleus muscle torque and fatigue index adaptations to training as well as bone mineral density (BMD) adaptations in the distal tibia were measured.
The patient performed nearly 8,000 soleus muscle contractions per month, with occasional fluctuations. Adherence tracking permitted intervention when adherence fell below acceptable values. The soleus muscle torque and fatigue index increased rapidly in response to training. The BMD of the untrained tibia declined approximately 14% per year. The BMD of the trained tibia declined only approximately 7% per year. The BMD was preferentially preserved in the posterior half of the tibia; this region experienced only a 2.6% annual decline.
Early administration of a load intervention, careful estimation of the loading dose, and detailed surveillance of patient adherence aided in the interpretation of a patient's adaptations to a mechanical load protocol. These concepts possess wider applicability to rehabilitation research and should be emphasized in future physical therapy investigations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physical Therapy Association</pub><pmid>18202080</pmid><doi>10.2522/ptj.20070224</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9023 |
ispartof | Physical therapy, 2008-03, Vol.88 (3), p.387-396 |
issn | 0031-9023 1538-6724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3270311 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adaptation, Physiological Adult Bone density Care and treatment Case studies Clinical outcomes Complications and side effects Data collection Diagnosis Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods Health aspects Humans Intervention Male Muscle Contraction - physiology Muscle Fatigue - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - physiopathology Osteoporosis - prevention & control Outpatient care facilities Paraplegia - physiopathology Paraplegia - rehabilitation Patient Compliance Patients Physical therapy Protocol Risk factors Spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation Studies Therapeutics, Physiological Tibia - physiopathology Tomography Torque |
title | Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%20Estimation%20and%20Surveillance%20of%20Mechanical%20Loading%20Interventions%20for%20Bone%20Loss%20After%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury&rft.jtitle=Physical%20therapy&rft.au=Dudley-Javoroski,%20Shauna&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=387-396&rft.issn=0031-9023&rft.eissn=1538-6724&rft_id=info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20070224&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA176776916%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223113343&rft_id=info:pmid/18202080&rft_galeid=A176776916&rfr_iscdi=true |