Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST)

To elucidate the differences in chemosensitivity to anticancer drugs between primary and metastatic lesions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we examined the in vitro chemosensitivities of surgically resected NSCLC tissues. A total of 32 specimens were enrolled: 26 specimens of primary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic disease 2012-02, Vol.4 (1), p.40-47
Hauptverfasser: Higashiyama, Masahiko, Okami, Jiro, Maeda, Jun, Tokunaga, Toshiteru, Fujiwara, Ayako, Kodama, Ken, Imamura, Fumio, Kobayashi, Hisayuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 40
container_title Journal of thoracic disease
container_volume 4
creator Higashiyama, Masahiko
Okami, Jiro
Maeda, Jun
Tokunaga, Toshiteru
Fujiwara, Ayako
Kodama, Ken
Imamura, Fumio
Kobayashi, Hisayuki
description To elucidate the differences in chemosensitivity to anticancer drugs between primary and metastatic lesions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we examined the in vitro chemosensitivities of surgically resected NSCLC tissues. A total of 32 specimens were enrolled: 26 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lymph node, 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the adrenal gland, and 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lung. The collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST) was applied to examine the sensitivity of the tissues to anticancer drugs, including cisplatin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil. The degree of in vitro sensitivity to each anticancer drug varied between the primary and metastatic lesions. The sensitivity of the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that of the primary lesions only for gemcitabine (P=0.029), vinorelbine (P=0.012), and docetaxel (P=0.009). The incidence of cases diagnosed as CD-DST-sensitive among the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that for the primary lesions for vinorelbine (P=0.035) or docetaxel (P=0.022). The difference in the sensitivity to gemcitabine between the primary and paired non-lymphatic metastases was clearer than that between the primary lesion and paired lymph node metastases. The sensitivities of the paired metastatic lesions to some anticancer drugs were significantly lower than those of the primary lesions. When performing chemotherapy based on CD-DST data using primary tumors from patients with postoperative recurrence, an appropriate regimen can be selected by carefully considering these differences.
doi_str_mv 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.05.02
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3256540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>919650549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-b38b48ac36555a446775278b9580093124a1e596e9f4084912ad0617d38d7b053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9u1DAQxiMEolXpK6CROACHBP93zAEJ7VKoVIkD5Rw5zmzWVeIstlO0r8UTYtEtgrl45Pnm99kzVfWKkoYb3b67a3xKoWFEs5oKbkpGaUNkQ9iT6rxc61opJp7-yR8kZ9VlSnekhCKMaf28OmOMGUmVOq9-bf1uhxGDwwQ-gNvjvCQMyWd_7_MResw_EQMcop9tPIINAxysjzjAjNmmbLN3MK1hBGcLJUIuL1wxvYfrAAURl9Jjp2PyCXqbSt8SIO8R3DJNdizoEScY4nKYMAPOPQ5DEbl1ymvEUlhHyJgyvNls6-2327cvqmc7OyW8PJ0X1ferT7ebL_XN18_Xm483teOM57rnbS9a67iSUlohlNaS6bY3siXEcMqEpSiNQrMTpBWGMjsQRfXA20H3RPKL6sMD97D2Mw4OQ4526k6D6Bbru_8rwe-7cbnvOJNKClIAr0-AuPwoE8nd7JPD8uuAy5o6Q42SRApTlC__tfrr8bgn_hthF5v_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919650549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST)</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Higashiyama, Masahiko ; Okami, Jiro ; Maeda, Jun ; Tokunaga, Toshiteru ; Fujiwara, Ayako ; Kodama, Ken ; Imamura, Fumio ; Kobayashi, Hisayuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Higashiyama, Masahiko ; Okami, Jiro ; Maeda, Jun ; Tokunaga, Toshiteru ; Fujiwara, Ayako ; Kodama, Ken ; Imamura, Fumio ; Kobayashi, Hisayuki</creatorcontrib><description>To elucidate the differences in chemosensitivity to anticancer drugs between primary and metastatic lesions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we examined the in vitro chemosensitivities of surgically resected NSCLC tissues. A total of 32 specimens were enrolled: 26 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lymph node, 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the adrenal gland, and 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lung. The collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST) was applied to examine the sensitivity of the tissues to anticancer drugs, including cisplatin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil. The degree of in vitro sensitivity to each anticancer drug varied between the primary and metastatic lesions. The sensitivity of the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that of the primary lesions only for gemcitabine (P=0.029), vinorelbine (P=0.012), and docetaxel (P=0.009). The incidence of cases diagnosed as CD-DST-sensitive among the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that for the primary lesions for vinorelbine (P=0.035) or docetaxel (P=0.022). The difference in the sensitivity to gemcitabine between the primary and paired non-lymphatic metastases was clearer than that between the primary lesion and paired lymph node metastases. The sensitivities of the paired metastatic lesions to some anticancer drugs were significantly lower than those of the primary lesions. When performing chemotherapy based on CD-DST data using primary tumors from patients with postoperative recurrence, an appropriate regimen can be selected by carefully considering these differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-6624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.05.02</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22295166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic disease, 2012-02, Vol.4 (1), p.40-47</ispartof><rights>2012 Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company. All rights reserved. 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-b38b48ac36555a446775278b9580093124a1e596e9f4084912ad0617d38d7b053</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3256540/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3256540/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22295166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higashiyama, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okami, Jiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokunaga, Toshiteru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiwara, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imamura, Fumio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Hisayuki</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST)</title><title>Journal of thoracic disease</title><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><description>To elucidate the differences in chemosensitivity to anticancer drugs between primary and metastatic lesions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we examined the in vitro chemosensitivities of surgically resected NSCLC tissues. A total of 32 specimens were enrolled: 26 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lymph node, 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the adrenal gland, and 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lung. The collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST) was applied to examine the sensitivity of the tissues to anticancer drugs, including cisplatin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil. The degree of in vitro sensitivity to each anticancer drug varied between the primary and metastatic lesions. The sensitivity of the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that of the primary lesions only for gemcitabine (P=0.029), vinorelbine (P=0.012), and docetaxel (P=0.009). The incidence of cases diagnosed as CD-DST-sensitive among the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that for the primary lesions for vinorelbine (P=0.035) or docetaxel (P=0.022). The difference in the sensitivity to gemcitabine between the primary and paired non-lymphatic metastases was clearer than that between the primary lesion and paired lymph node metastases. The sensitivities of the paired metastatic lesions to some anticancer drugs were significantly lower than those of the primary lesions. When performing chemotherapy based on CD-DST data using primary tumors from patients with postoperative recurrence, an appropriate regimen can be selected by carefully considering these differences.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2072-1439</issn><issn>2077-6624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc9u1DAQxiMEolXpK6CROACHBP93zAEJ7VKoVIkD5Rw5zmzWVeIstlO0r8UTYtEtgrl45Pnm99kzVfWKkoYb3b67a3xKoWFEs5oKbkpGaUNkQ9iT6rxc61opJp7-yR8kZ9VlSnekhCKMaf28OmOMGUmVOq9-bf1uhxGDwwQ-gNvjvCQMyWd_7_MResw_EQMcop9tPIINAxysjzjAjNmmbLN3MK1hBGcLJUIuL1wxvYfrAAURl9Jjp2PyCXqbSt8SIO8R3DJNdizoEScY4nKYMAPOPQ5DEbl1ymvEUlhHyJgyvNls6-2327cvqmc7OyW8PJ0X1ferT7ebL_XN18_Xm483teOM57rnbS9a67iSUlohlNaS6bY3siXEcMqEpSiNQrMTpBWGMjsQRfXA20H3RPKL6sMD97D2Mw4OQ4526k6D6Bbru_8rwe-7cbnvOJNKClIAr0-AuPwoE8nd7JPD8uuAy5o6Q42SRApTlC__tfrr8bgn_hthF5v_</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Higashiyama, Masahiko</creator><creator>Okami, Jiro</creator><creator>Maeda, Jun</creator><creator>Tokunaga, Toshiteru</creator><creator>Fujiwara, Ayako</creator><creator>Kodama, Ken</creator><creator>Imamura, Fumio</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Hisayuki</creator><general>Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST)</title><author>Higashiyama, Masahiko ; Okami, Jiro ; Maeda, Jun ; Tokunaga, Toshiteru ; Fujiwara, Ayako ; Kodama, Ken ; Imamura, Fumio ; Kobayashi, Hisayuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-b38b48ac36555a446775278b9580093124a1e596e9f4084912ad0617d38d7b053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higashiyama, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okami, Jiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokunaga, Toshiteru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiwara, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imamura, Fumio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Hisayuki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higashiyama, Masahiko</au><au>Okami, Jiro</au><au>Maeda, Jun</au><au>Tokunaga, Toshiteru</au><au>Fujiwara, Ayako</au><au>Kodama, Ken</au><au>Imamura, Fumio</au><au>Kobayashi, Hisayuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>40-47</pages><issn>2072-1439</issn><eissn>2077-6624</eissn><abstract>To elucidate the differences in chemosensitivity to anticancer drugs between primary and metastatic lesions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we examined the in vitro chemosensitivities of surgically resected NSCLC tissues. A total of 32 specimens were enrolled: 26 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lymph node, 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the adrenal gland, and 3 specimens of primary lesions paired with metastases in the lung. The collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST) was applied to examine the sensitivity of the tissues to anticancer drugs, including cisplatin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil. The degree of in vitro sensitivity to each anticancer drug varied between the primary and metastatic lesions. The sensitivity of the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that of the primary lesions only for gemcitabine (P=0.029), vinorelbine (P=0.012), and docetaxel (P=0.009). The incidence of cases diagnosed as CD-DST-sensitive among the paired metastatic lesions was significantly lower than that for the primary lesions for vinorelbine (P=0.035) or docetaxel (P=0.022). The difference in the sensitivity to gemcitabine between the primary and paired non-lymphatic metastases was clearer than that between the primary lesion and paired lymph node metastases. The sensitivities of the paired metastatic lesions to some anticancer drugs were significantly lower than those of the primary lesions. When performing chemotherapy based on CD-DST data using primary tumors from patients with postoperative recurrence, an appropriate regimen can be selected by carefully considering these differences.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company</pub><pmid>22295166</pmid><doi>10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.05.02</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-1439
ispartof Journal of thoracic disease, 2012-02, Vol.4 (1), p.40-47
issn 2072-1439
2077-6624
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3256540
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A47%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20chemosensitivity%20between%20primary%20and%20paired%20metastatic%20lung%20cancer%20tissues:%20In%20vitro%20analysis%20based%20on%20the%20collagen%20gel%20droplet%20embedded%20culture%20drug%20test%20(CD-DST)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20disease&rft.au=Higashiyama,%20Masahiko&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=40-47&rft.issn=2072-1439&rft.eissn=2077-6624&rft_id=info:doi/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.05.02&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E919650549%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919650549&rft_id=info:pmid/22295166&rfr_iscdi=true