Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry
Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but fa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of psychophysiology 2012-01, Vol.83 (1), p.56-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 56 |
container_title | International journal of psychophysiology |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Papesh, Megan H. Goldinger, Stephen D. Hout, Michael C. |
description | Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory.
► We examined recognition memory for spoken words while tracking pupillary changes. ► Words were heard in different voices; half changed in the recognition test. ► Pupil dilation during learning predicted later memory accuracy and confidence. ► Study-to-test voice changes were reflected in pupil dilation during test. ► Pupillometry reveals cognitive effort during memory encoding and retrieval. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3251658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167876011003023</els_id><sourcerecordid>918063390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-a5b7de777a7e22fb1e9592f7dcfaa53309f0fb3c31b6826ee41eea1f41eb951b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV6hyQZyyHdub2L4gUEX_SK24wNlynHHXqyQOdnalfHu83W2BU3saaeb3nmbmEXJOYUmB1hebpd-MabbrsGRAaW4uAdgbsqBSsFLUSrwliwyKUooaTshpShsAEFSp9-SEZY1aSVgQeY99iHORpojDw7QuzNAWaUTrnbd-mouIOzQdtkUzF-N29F0Xepzi_IG8c6ZL-PFYz8ivq-8_L2_Kux_Xt5ff7kpbKTmVpmpEi0III5Ax11BUlWJOtNYZU3EOyoFruOW0qSWrEVcU0VCXS6Mq2vAz8uXgO26bHluLwxRNp8foexNnHYzX_08Gv9YPYac5q2hdyWzw-WgQw-8tpkn3PlnsOjNg2CatqISacwWvILlgjALLZH0gbQwpRXTP-1DQ-3z0Rj_lo_f57PvwKDz_95pn2VMgGfh0BEyypnPRDNanv1y1kpyueOa-HjjMv995jDpZj4PF1ke0k26Df2mXP3P7s9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>913722102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Papesh, Megan H. ; Goldinger, Stephen D. ; Hout, Michael C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Papesh, Megan H. ; Goldinger, Stephen D. ; Hout, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><description>Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory.
► We examined recognition memory for spoken words while tracking pupillary changes. ► Words were heard in different voices; half changed in the recognition test. ► Pupil dilation during learning predicted later memory accuracy and confidence. ► Study-to-test voice changes were reflected in pupil dilation during test. ► Pupillometry reveals cognitive effort during memory encoding and retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22019480</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPSEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Analysis of Variance ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Pupil - physiology ; Pupillometry ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Recognition memory ; ROC Curve ; Specificity effects ; Speech Perception ; Verbal Learning ; Voice ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychophysiology, 2012-01, Vol.83 (1), p.56-64</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-a5b7de777a7e22fb1e9592f7dcfaa53309f0fb3c31b6826ee41eea1f41eb951b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-a5b7de777a7e22fb1e9592f7dcfaa53309f0fb3c31b6826ee41eea1f41eb951b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876011003023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25483143$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22019480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papesh, Megan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldinger, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hout, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><title>Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry</title><title>International journal of psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><description>Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory.
► We examined recognition memory for spoken words while tracking pupillary changes. ► Words were heard in different voices; half changed in the recognition test. ► Pupil dilation during learning predicted later memory accuracy and confidence. ► Study-to-test voice changes were reflected in pupil dilation during test. ► Pupillometry reveals cognitive effort during memory encoding and retrieval.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Pupil - physiology</subject><subject>Pupillometry</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition memory</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Specificity effects</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Voice</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-8760</issn><issn>1872-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV6hyQZyyHdub2L4gUEX_SK24wNlynHHXqyQOdnalfHu83W2BU3saaeb3nmbmEXJOYUmB1hebpd-MabbrsGRAaW4uAdgbsqBSsFLUSrwliwyKUooaTshpShsAEFSp9-SEZY1aSVgQeY99iHORpojDw7QuzNAWaUTrnbd-mouIOzQdtkUzF-N29F0Xepzi_IG8c6ZL-PFYz8ivq-8_L2_Kux_Xt5ff7kpbKTmVpmpEi0III5Ax11BUlWJOtNYZU3EOyoFruOW0qSWrEVcU0VCXS6Mq2vAz8uXgO26bHluLwxRNp8foexNnHYzX_08Gv9YPYac5q2hdyWzw-WgQw-8tpkn3PlnsOjNg2CatqISacwWvILlgjALLZH0gbQwpRXTP-1DQ-3z0Rj_lo_f57PvwKDz_95pn2VMgGfh0BEyypnPRDNanv1y1kpyueOa-HjjMv995jDpZj4PF1ke0k26Df2mXP3P7s9w</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Papesh, Megan H.</creator><creator>Goldinger, Stephen D.</creator><creator>Hout, Michael C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry</title><author>Papesh, Megan H. ; Goldinger, Stephen D. ; Hout, Michael C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-a5b7de777a7e22fb1e9592f7dcfaa53309f0fb3c31b6826ee41eea1f41eb951b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Pupil - physiology</topic><topic>Pupillometry</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition memory</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Specificity effects</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Voice</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papesh, Megan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldinger, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hout, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papesh, Megan H.</au><au>Goldinger, Stephen D.</au><au>Hout, Michael C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>56-64</pages><issn>0167-8760</issn><eissn>1872-7697</eissn><coden>IJPSEE</coden><abstract>Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory.
► We examined recognition memory for spoken words while tracking pupillary changes. ► Words were heard in different voices; half changed in the recognition test. ► Pupil dilation during learning predicted later memory accuracy and confidence. ► Study-to-test voice changes were reflected in pupil dilation during test. ► Pupillometry reveals cognitive effort during memory encoding and retrieval.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22019480</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8760 |
ispartof | International journal of psychophysiology, 2012-01, Vol.83 (1), p.56-64 |
issn | 0167-8760 1872-7697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3251658 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Analysis of Variance Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Neuropsychological Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Pupil - physiology Pupillometry Reaction Time - physiology Recognition (Psychology) - physiology Recognition memory ROC Curve Specificity effects Speech Perception Verbal Learning Voice Young Adult |
title | Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Memory%20strength%20and%20specificity%20revealed%20by%20pupillometry&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychophysiology&rft.au=Papesh,%20Megan%20H.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=56-64&rft.issn=0167-8760&rft.eissn=1872-7697&rft.coden=IJPSEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E918063390%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=913722102&rft_id=info:pmid/22019480&rft_els_id=S0167876011003023&rfr_iscdi=true |