Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry

Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of psychophysiology 2012-01, Vol.83 (1), p.56-64
Hauptverfasser: Papesh, Megan H., Goldinger, Stephen D., Hout, Michael C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue 1
container_start_page 56
container_title International journal of psychophysiology
container_volume 83
creator Papesh, Megan H.
Goldinger, Stephen D.
Hout, Michael C.
description Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory. ► We examined recognition memory for spoken words while tracking pupillary changes. ► Words were heard in different voices; half changed in the recognition test. ► Pupil dilation during learning predicted later memory accuracy and confidence. ► Study-to-test voice changes were reflected in pupil dilation during test. ► Pupillometry reveals cognitive effort during memory encoding and retrieval.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3251658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167876011003023</els_id><sourcerecordid>918063390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-a5b7de777a7e22fb1e9592f7dcfaa53309f0fb3c31b6826ee41eea1f41eb951b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV6hyQZyyHdub2L4gUEX_SK24wNlynHHXqyQOdnalfHu83W2BU3saaeb3nmbmEXJOYUmB1hebpd-MabbrsGRAaW4uAdgbsqBSsFLUSrwliwyKUooaTshpShsAEFSp9-SEZY1aSVgQeY99iHORpojDw7QuzNAWaUTrnbd-mouIOzQdtkUzF-N29F0Xepzi_IG8c6ZL-PFYz8ivq-8_L2_Kux_Xt5ff7kpbKTmVpmpEi0III5Ax11BUlWJOtNYZU3EOyoFruOW0qSWrEVcU0VCXS6Mq2vAz8uXgO26bHluLwxRNp8foexNnHYzX_08Gv9YPYac5q2hdyWzw-WgQw-8tpkn3PlnsOjNg2CatqISacwWvILlgjALLZH0gbQwpRXTP-1DQ-3z0Rj_lo_f57PvwKDz_95pn2VMgGfh0BEyypnPRDNanv1y1kpyueOa-HjjMv995jDpZj4PF1ke0k26Df2mXP3P7s9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>913722102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Papesh, Megan H. ; Goldinger, Stephen D. ; Hout, Michael C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Papesh, Megan H. ; Goldinger, Stephen D. ; Hout, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><description>Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory. ► We examined recognition memory for spoken words while tracking pupillary changes. ► Words were heard in different voices; half changed in the recognition test. ► Pupil dilation during learning predicted later memory accuracy and confidence. ► Study-to-test voice changes were reflected in pupil dilation during test. ► Pupillometry reveals cognitive effort during memory encoding and retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22019480</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPSEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Analysis of Variance ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Pupil - physiology ; Pupillometry ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Recognition memory ; ROC Curve ; Specificity effects ; Speech Perception ; Verbal Learning ; Voice ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychophysiology, 2012-01, Vol.83 (1), p.56-64</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-a5b7de777a7e22fb1e9592f7dcfaa53309f0fb3c31b6826ee41eea1f41eb951b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-a5b7de777a7e22fb1e9592f7dcfaa53309f0fb3c31b6826ee41eea1f41eb951b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876011003023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25483143$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22019480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papesh, Megan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldinger, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hout, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><title>Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry</title><title>International journal of psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><description>Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory. ► We examined recognition memory for spoken words while tracking pupillary changes. ► Words were heard in different voices; half changed in the recognition test. ► Pupil dilation during learning predicted later memory accuracy and confidence. ► Study-to-test voice changes were reflected in pupil dilation during test. ► Pupillometry reveals cognitive effort during memory encoding and retrieval.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Pupil - physiology</subject><subject>Pupillometry</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition memory</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Specificity effects</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Voice</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-8760</issn><issn>1872-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV6hyQZyyHdub2L4gUEX_SK24wNlynHHXqyQOdnalfHu83W2BU3saaeb3nmbmEXJOYUmB1hebpd-MabbrsGRAaW4uAdgbsqBSsFLUSrwliwyKUooaTshpShsAEFSp9-SEZY1aSVgQeY99iHORpojDw7QuzNAWaUTrnbd-mouIOzQdtkUzF-N29F0Xepzi_IG8c6ZL-PFYz8ivq-8_L2_Kux_Xt5ff7kpbKTmVpmpEi0III5Ax11BUlWJOtNYZU3EOyoFruOW0qSWrEVcU0VCXS6Mq2vAz8uXgO26bHluLwxRNp8foexNnHYzX_08Gv9YPYac5q2hdyWzw-WgQw-8tpkn3PlnsOjNg2CatqISacwWvILlgjALLZH0gbQwpRXTP-1DQ-3z0Rj_lo_f57PvwKDz_95pn2VMgGfh0BEyypnPRDNanv1y1kpyueOa-HjjMv995jDpZj4PF1ke0k26Df2mXP3P7s9w</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Papesh, Megan H.</creator><creator>Goldinger, Stephen D.</creator><creator>Hout, Michael C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry</title><author>Papesh, Megan H. ; Goldinger, Stephen D. ; Hout, Michael C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-a5b7de777a7e22fb1e9592f7dcfaa53309f0fb3c31b6826ee41eea1f41eb951b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Pupil - physiology</topic><topic>Pupillometry</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition memory</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Specificity effects</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Voice</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papesh, Megan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldinger, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hout, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papesh, Megan H.</au><au>Goldinger, Stephen D.</au><au>Hout, Michael C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>56-64</pages><issn>0167-8760</issn><eissn>1872-7697</eissn><coden>IJPSEE</coden><abstract>Voice-specificity effects in recognition memory were investigated using both behavioral data and pupillometry. Volunteers initially heard spoken words and nonwords in two voices; they later provided confidence-based old/new classifications to items presented in their original voices, changed (but familiar) voices, or entirely new voices. Recognition was more accurate for old-voice items, replicating prior research. Pupillometry was used to gauge cognitive demand during both encoding and testing: enlarged pupils revealed that participants devoted greater effort to encoding items that were subsequently recognized. Further, pupil responses were sensitive to the cue match between encoding and retrieval voices, as well as memory strength. Strong memories, and those with the closest encoding-retrieval voice matches, resulted in the highest peak pupil diameters. The results are discussed with respect to episodic memory models and Whittlesea's (1997) SCAPE framework for recognition memory. ► We examined recognition memory for spoken words while tracking pupillary changes. ► Words were heard in different voices; half changed in the recognition test. ► Pupil dilation during learning predicted later memory accuracy and confidence. ► Study-to-test voice changes were reflected in pupil dilation during test. ► Pupillometry reveals cognitive effort during memory encoding and retrieval.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22019480</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8760
ispartof International journal of psychophysiology, 2012-01, Vol.83 (1), p.56-64
issn 0167-8760
1872-7697
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3251658
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Analysis of Variance
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Pupil - physiology
Pupillometry
Reaction Time - physiology
Recognition (Psychology) - physiology
Recognition memory
ROC Curve
Specificity effects
Speech Perception
Verbal Learning
Voice
Young Adult
title Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Memory%20strength%20and%20specificity%20revealed%20by%20pupillometry&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychophysiology&rft.au=Papesh,%20Megan%20H.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=56-64&rft.issn=0167-8760&rft.eissn=1872-7697&rft.coden=IJPSEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E918063390%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=913722102&rft_id=info:pmid/22019480&rft_els_id=S0167876011003023&rfr_iscdi=true