Neonatal resuscitation skills among pediatricians and family physicians: is residency training preparing for postresidency practice?

Pediatricians and family physicians are responsible for providing newborn resuscitation, yet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for training in this area during residency differ markedly for the two specialties. Our objectives were to determine (1) the extent to which...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of graduate medical education 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.475-480
Hauptverfasser: Wood, Amy M, Jones, Jr, M Douglas, Wood, James H, Pan, Zhaoxing, Parker, Thomas A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 480
container_issue 4
container_start_page 475
container_title Journal of graduate medical education
container_volume 3
creator Wood, Amy M
Jones, Jr, M Douglas
Wood, James H
Pan, Zhaoxing
Parker, Thomas A
description Pediatricians and family physicians are responsible for providing newborn resuscitation, yet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for training in this area during residency differ markedly for the two specialties. Our objectives were to determine (1) the extent to which neonatal resuscitation training differs for pediatric and family medicine residents; (2) the extent to which general pediatricians and family physicians engage in newborn resuscitation in their practice; and (3) whether use of resuscitation skills differs between urban/suburban and rural providers. We surveyed a national cohort of pediatricians and family physicians who obtained board certification between 2001 and 2005. Data were analyzed based on type of physician and setting of current practice. Survey response rate was 22% (382 of 1736). Compared with family medicine physicians, pediatricians received more neonatal resuscitation training during residency. Most members of both groups had attended no deliveries in the year prior to the survey (75% [111 of 148] versus 74% [114 of 154]). In their current practice, the groups were equally likely to have provided a newborn bag and mask ventilation, chest compressions, and resuscitation medications. Pediatricians were more likely than family physicians to have attempted to either intubate a newborn (20% [28 of 148] versus 10% [16 of 153]; P  =  .0495) or insert umbilical catheters (15% [22 of 148] versus 5% [8 of 153]; P  =  .005). Regardless of specialty, rural physicians were much more likely to report that they attended deliveries (61% [41 of 67] versus 15% [36 of 234]; P < .001). Among rural pediatricians attending deliveries, 44% (7 of 16) reported feeling inadequately prepared for at least one delivery in the past year. Few primary care pediatricians and family physicians provide newborn resuscitation after residency. For those who do attend deliveries, current training 5 provide insufficient preparation. Flexible, individualized residency curricula could target intensive resuscitation training to individuals who plan to practice in rural areas and/or attend deliveries after graduation.
doi_str_mv 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00234.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3244311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1221850524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2441-dca1c90f0126959a83e2019202593e4d6561d2a11f5acd65ca0a619392bc00963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFO3DAQhq0KVNCWB-gF-cgldMZO0jUHEIItpYL20p6twXHANLGDnUXaOw-O06UL-OKZ8T_fjPUz9hnhsJQAX35cXC-K8wKhABCyPMQPbBdVqYq5rL5ubeJS7bC9lO4hH6nEHMVHtiOkgCoLdtnTTxs8jdTxaNMyGTfS6ILn6a_rusSpD_6WD7ZxNEZnHPlc8w1vqXfdig93q7SuHnGXJoRrrDcrPkZy3k2t0Q4Up6gNkQ8hja-iIZIZnbEnn9h2S12yey_3jP35tvh99r24-nVxeXZ6VRhRllg0htAoaAFFrSpFc2kFoBIgKiVt2dRVjY0gxLYikzNDQDWq_OsbA6BqOWPHa-6wvOltY6zPe3Z6iK6nuNKBnH7_4t2dvg2PWub5EjEDDl4AMTwsbRp175KxXUfehmXSKATOK6hEmaW4lpoYUoq23YxB0JOBejJQn0_pPwP1hN9_u9-m479d8hkzgJpL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221850524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neonatal resuscitation skills among pediatricians and family physicians: is residency training preparing for postresidency practice?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wood, Amy M ; Jones, Jr, M Douglas ; Wood, James H ; Pan, Zhaoxing ; Parker, Thomas A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wood, Amy M ; Jones, Jr, M Douglas ; Wood, James H ; Pan, Zhaoxing ; Parker, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><description>Pediatricians and family physicians are responsible for providing newborn resuscitation, yet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for training in this area during residency differ markedly for the two specialties. Our objectives were to determine (1) the extent to which neonatal resuscitation training differs for pediatric and family medicine residents; (2) the extent to which general pediatricians and family physicians engage in newborn resuscitation in their practice; and (3) whether use of resuscitation skills differs between urban/suburban and rural providers. We surveyed a national cohort of pediatricians and family physicians who obtained board certification between 2001 and 2005. Data were analyzed based on type of physician and setting of current practice. Survey response rate was 22% (382 of 1736). Compared with family medicine physicians, pediatricians received more neonatal resuscitation training during residency. Most members of both groups had attended no deliveries in the year prior to the survey (75% [111 of 148] versus 74% [114 of 154]). In their current practice, the groups were equally likely to have provided a newborn bag and mask ventilation, chest compressions, and resuscitation medications. Pediatricians were more likely than family physicians to have attempted to either intubate a newborn (20% [28 of 148] versus 10% [16 of 153]; P  =  .0495) or insert umbilical catheters (15% [22 of 148] versus 5% [8 of 153]; P  =  .005). Regardless of specialty, rural physicians were much more likely to report that they attended deliveries (61% [41 of 67] versus 15% [36 of 234]; P &lt; .001). Among rural pediatricians attending deliveries, 44% (7 of 16) reported feeling inadequately prepared for at least one delivery in the past year. Few primary care pediatricians and family physicians provide newborn resuscitation after residency. For those who do attend deliveries, current training 5 provide insufficient preparation. Flexible, individualized residency curricula could target intensive resuscitation training to individuals who plan to practice in rural areas and/or attend deliveries after graduation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-8349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-8357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00234.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23205194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>Journal of graduate medical education, 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.475-480</ispartof><rights>Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2441-dca1c90f0126959a83e2019202593e4d6561d2a11f5acd65ca0a619392bc00963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2441-dca1c90f0126959a83e2019202593e4d6561d2a11f5acd65ca0a619392bc00963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3244311/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3244311/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23205194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wood, Amy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Jr, M Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhaoxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><title>Neonatal resuscitation skills among pediatricians and family physicians: is residency training preparing for postresidency practice?</title><title>Journal of graduate medical education</title><addtitle>J Grad Med Educ</addtitle><description>Pediatricians and family physicians are responsible for providing newborn resuscitation, yet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for training in this area during residency differ markedly for the two specialties. Our objectives were to determine (1) the extent to which neonatal resuscitation training differs for pediatric and family medicine residents; (2) the extent to which general pediatricians and family physicians engage in newborn resuscitation in their practice; and (3) whether use of resuscitation skills differs between urban/suburban and rural providers. We surveyed a national cohort of pediatricians and family physicians who obtained board certification between 2001 and 2005. Data were analyzed based on type of physician and setting of current practice. Survey response rate was 22% (382 of 1736). Compared with family medicine physicians, pediatricians received more neonatal resuscitation training during residency. Most members of both groups had attended no deliveries in the year prior to the survey (75% [111 of 148] versus 74% [114 of 154]). In their current practice, the groups were equally likely to have provided a newborn bag and mask ventilation, chest compressions, and resuscitation medications. Pediatricians were more likely than family physicians to have attempted to either intubate a newborn (20% [28 of 148] versus 10% [16 of 153]; P  =  .0495) or insert umbilical catheters (15% [22 of 148] versus 5% [8 of 153]; P  =  .005). Regardless of specialty, rural physicians were much more likely to report that they attended deliveries (61% [41 of 67] versus 15% [36 of 234]; P &lt; .001). Among rural pediatricians attending deliveries, 44% (7 of 16) reported feeling inadequately prepared for at least one delivery in the past year. Few primary care pediatricians and family physicians provide newborn resuscitation after residency. For those who do attend deliveries, current training 5 provide insufficient preparation. Flexible, individualized residency curricula could target intensive resuscitation training to individuals who plan to practice in rural areas and/or attend deliveries after graduation.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>1949-8349</issn><issn>1949-8357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkcFO3DAQhq0KVNCWB-gF-cgldMZO0jUHEIItpYL20p6twXHANLGDnUXaOw-O06UL-OKZ8T_fjPUz9hnhsJQAX35cXC-K8wKhABCyPMQPbBdVqYq5rL5ubeJS7bC9lO4hH6nEHMVHtiOkgCoLdtnTTxs8jdTxaNMyGTfS6ILn6a_rusSpD_6WD7ZxNEZnHPlc8w1vqXfdig93q7SuHnGXJoRrrDcrPkZy3k2t0Q4Up6gNkQ8hja-iIZIZnbEnn9h2S12yey_3jP35tvh99r24-nVxeXZ6VRhRllg0htAoaAFFrSpFc2kFoBIgKiVt2dRVjY0gxLYikzNDQDWq_OsbA6BqOWPHa-6wvOltY6zPe3Z6iK6nuNKBnH7_4t2dvg2PWub5EjEDDl4AMTwsbRp175KxXUfehmXSKATOK6hEmaW4lpoYUoq23YxB0JOBejJQn0_pPwP1hN9_u9-m479d8hkzgJpL</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Wood, Amy M</creator><creator>Jones, Jr, M Douglas</creator><creator>Wood, James H</creator><creator>Pan, Zhaoxing</creator><creator>Parker, Thomas A</creator><general>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Neonatal resuscitation skills among pediatricians and family physicians: is residency training preparing for postresidency practice?</title><author>Wood, Amy M ; Jones, Jr, M Douglas ; Wood, James H ; Pan, Zhaoxing ; Parker, Thomas A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2441-dca1c90f0126959a83e2019202593e4d6561d2a11f5acd65ca0a619392bc00963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wood, Amy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Jr, M Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhaoxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of graduate medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wood, Amy M</au><au>Jones, Jr, M Douglas</au><au>Wood, James H</au><au>Pan, Zhaoxing</au><au>Parker, Thomas A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neonatal resuscitation skills among pediatricians and family physicians: is residency training preparing for postresidency practice?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of graduate medical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Grad Med Educ</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>475-480</pages><issn>1949-8349</issn><eissn>1949-8357</eissn><abstract>Pediatricians and family physicians are responsible for providing newborn resuscitation, yet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for training in this area during residency differ markedly for the two specialties. Our objectives were to determine (1) the extent to which neonatal resuscitation training differs for pediatric and family medicine residents; (2) the extent to which general pediatricians and family physicians engage in newborn resuscitation in their practice; and (3) whether use of resuscitation skills differs between urban/suburban and rural providers. We surveyed a national cohort of pediatricians and family physicians who obtained board certification between 2001 and 2005. Data were analyzed based on type of physician and setting of current practice. Survey response rate was 22% (382 of 1736). Compared with family medicine physicians, pediatricians received more neonatal resuscitation training during residency. Most members of both groups had attended no deliveries in the year prior to the survey (75% [111 of 148] versus 74% [114 of 154]). In their current practice, the groups were equally likely to have provided a newborn bag and mask ventilation, chest compressions, and resuscitation medications. Pediatricians were more likely than family physicians to have attempted to either intubate a newborn (20% [28 of 148] versus 10% [16 of 153]; P  =  .0495) or insert umbilical catheters (15% [22 of 148] versus 5% [8 of 153]; P  =  .005). Regardless of specialty, rural physicians were much more likely to report that they attended deliveries (61% [41 of 67] versus 15% [36 of 234]; P &lt; .001). Among rural pediatricians attending deliveries, 44% (7 of 16) reported feeling inadequately prepared for at least one delivery in the past year. Few primary care pediatricians and family physicians provide newborn resuscitation after residency. For those who do attend deliveries, current training 5 provide insufficient preparation. Flexible, individualized residency curricula could target intensive resuscitation training to individuals who plan to practice in rural areas and/or attend deliveries after graduation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education</pub><pmid>23205194</pmid><doi>10.4300/JGME-D-10-00234.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1949-8349
ispartof Journal of graduate medical education, 2011-12, Vol.3 (4), p.475-480
issn 1949-8349
1949-8357
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3244311
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original Research
title Neonatal resuscitation skills among pediatricians and family physicians: is residency training preparing for postresidency practice?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A59%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neonatal%20resuscitation%20skills%20among%20pediatricians%20and%20family%20physicians:%20is%20residency%20training%20preparing%20for%20postresidency%20practice?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20graduate%20medical%20education&rft.au=Wood,%20Amy%20M&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=475-480&rft.issn=1949-8349&rft.eissn=1949-8357&rft_id=info:doi/10.4300/JGME-D-10-00234.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1221850524%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221850524&rft_id=info:pmid/23205194&rfr_iscdi=true