A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS)

Clinical mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for the presence of germline inactivating mutations is used to identify individuals at elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Variants identified during screening are usually classified as pathogenic (increased risk of cancer) or not path...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human mutation 2012-01, Vol.33 (1), p.8-21
Hauptverfasser: Lindor, Noralane M., Guidugli, Lucia, Wang, Xianshu, Vallée, Maxime P., Monteiro, Alvaro N. A., Tavtigian, Sean, Goldgar, David E., Couch, Fergus J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title Human mutation
container_volume 33
creator Lindor, Noralane M.
Guidugli, Lucia
Wang, Xianshu
Vallée, Maxime P.
Monteiro, Alvaro N. A.
Tavtigian, Sean
Goldgar, David E.
Couch, Fergus J.
description Clinical mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for the presence of germline inactivating mutations is used to identify individuals at elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Variants identified during screening are usually classified as pathogenic (increased risk of cancer) or not pathogenic (no increased risk of cancer). However, a significant proportion of genetic tests yields variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that have undefined risk of cancer. Individuals carrying these VUS cannot benefit from individualized cancer risk assessment. Recently, a quantitative “posterior probability model” for assessing the clinical relevance of VUS in BRCA1 or BRCA2, which integrates multiple forms of genetic evidence has been developed. Here, we provide a detailed review of this model. We describe the components of the model and explain how these can be combined to calculate a posterior probability of pathogenicity for each VUS. We explain how the model can be applied to public data and provide tables that list the VUS that have been classified as not pathogenic or pathogenic using this method. While we use BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS as examples, the method can be used as a framework for classification of the pathogenicity of VUS in other cancer genes. Hum Mutat 33:8–21, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/humu.21627
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3242438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1776672154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5847-15a6debdf828db5fb5168557df8d513f58cd905c4d497e03748afe519d97c69e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEoqWw4QGQJRYUpBQ7_os3SMMIWkopUunA0nJsp3Wb2IOdTJk1L45nph0Bi658de93jnzsWxTPETxAEFZvL8d-PKgQq_iDYhdBUZe5TR6uaipKzgXZKZ6kdAUhrCnFj4udCgkBESa7xe8JiHbh7A0ILVCgH7vBtUoPITrVgXkMjWpc54Zl2ahkDeiDsR1oQwS6Uym51mk1uOBX8vdn0wkCypt1VYGFyiZ-SKvZ6LWNg3IeJHfh17LcAfvfZ99ePy0etapL9tntuVfMPn44nx6VJ18PP00nJ6WmNeEloooZ25i2rmrT0LahiOU8PDcMRbiltTYCUk0MEdxCzEmtWkuRMIJrJizeK95tfOdj01ujrR-i6uQ8ul7FpQzKyX8n3l3Ki7CQuCIVwXU2eHVrEMPP0aZB9i5p23XK2zAmKRAShAuGM7l_L4k4Z4xXiJKMvvwPvQpj9PkhMsVYXYkcJVNvNpSOIaVo2-21EZSrLZCrLZDrLcjwi7-DbtG7b88A2gA3rrPLe6zk0ezL7M603GhcGuyvrUbFa8k45lT-OD2U5_j48_EZO5UI_wHDOszK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766829037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lindor, Noralane M. ; Guidugli, Lucia ; Wang, Xianshu ; Vallée, Maxime P. ; Monteiro, Alvaro N. A. ; Tavtigian, Sean ; Goldgar, David E. ; Couch, Fergus J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindor, Noralane M. ; Guidugli, Lucia ; Wang, Xianshu ; Vallée, Maxime P. ; Monteiro, Alvaro N. A. ; Tavtigian, Sean ; Goldgar, David E. ; Couch, Fergus J.</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for the presence of germline inactivating mutations is used to identify individuals at elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Variants identified during screening are usually classified as pathogenic (increased risk of cancer) or not pathogenic (no increased risk of cancer). However, a significant proportion of genetic tests yields variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that have undefined risk of cancer. Individuals carrying these VUS cannot benefit from individualized cancer risk assessment. Recently, a quantitative “posterior probability model” for assessing the clinical relevance of VUS in BRCA1 or BRCA2, which integrates multiple forms of genetic evidence has been developed. Here, we provide a detailed review of this model. We describe the components of the model and explain how these can be combined to calculate a posterior probability of pathogenicity for each VUS. We explain how the model can be applied to public data and provide tables that list the VUS that have been classified as not pathogenic or pathogenic using this method. While we use BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS as examples, the method can be used as a framework for classification of the pathogenicity of VUS in other cancer genes. Hum Mutat 33:8–21, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/humu.21627</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21990134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alleles ; BRCA1 ; BRCA2 ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Codon ; Exons ; Female ; Genes, BRCA1 ; Genes, BRCA2 ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genetic Testing ; Genetic Variation ; Germ-Line Mutation ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; missense mutations ; Models, Statistical ; Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics ; Probability ; Prognosis ; Risk Factors ; Uncertainty ; VUS classification ; VUS classification; missense mutations</subject><ispartof>Human mutation, 2012-01, Vol.33 (1), p.8-21</ispartof><rights>2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5847-15a6debdf828db5fb5168557df8d513f58cd905c4d497e03748afe519d97c69e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5847-15a6debdf828db5fb5168557df8d513f58cd905c4d497e03748afe519d97c69e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhumu.21627$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhumu.21627$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21990134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindor, Noralane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidugli, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xianshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallée, Maxime P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Alvaro N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavtigian, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldgar, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couch, Fergus J.</creatorcontrib><title>A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS)</title><title>Human mutation</title><addtitle>Hum. Mutat</addtitle><description>Clinical mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for the presence of germline inactivating mutations is used to identify individuals at elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Variants identified during screening are usually classified as pathogenic (increased risk of cancer) or not pathogenic (no increased risk of cancer). However, a significant proportion of genetic tests yields variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that have undefined risk of cancer. Individuals carrying these VUS cannot benefit from individualized cancer risk assessment. Recently, a quantitative “posterior probability model” for assessing the clinical relevance of VUS in BRCA1 or BRCA2, which integrates multiple forms of genetic evidence has been developed. Here, we provide a detailed review of this model. We describe the components of the model and explain how these can be combined to calculate a posterior probability of pathogenicity for each VUS. We explain how the model can be applied to public data and provide tables that list the VUS that have been classified as not pathogenic or pathogenic using this method. While we use BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS as examples, the method can be used as a framework for classification of the pathogenicity of VUS in other cancer genes. Hum Mutat 33:8–21, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>BRCA1</subject><subject>BRCA2</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Codon</subject><subject>Exons</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA1</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA2</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Germ-Line Mutation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>missense mutations</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>VUS classification</subject><subject>VUS classification; missense mutations</subject><issn>1059-7794</issn><issn>1098-1004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEoqWw4QGQJRYUpBQ7_os3SMMIWkopUunA0nJsp3Wb2IOdTJk1L45nph0Bi658de93jnzsWxTPETxAEFZvL8d-PKgQq_iDYhdBUZe5TR6uaipKzgXZKZ6kdAUhrCnFj4udCgkBESa7xe8JiHbh7A0ILVCgH7vBtUoPITrVgXkMjWpc54Zl2ahkDeiDsR1oQwS6Uym51mk1uOBX8vdn0wkCypt1VYGFyiZ-SKvZ6LWNg3IeJHfh17LcAfvfZ99ePy0etapL9tntuVfMPn44nx6VJ18PP00nJ6WmNeEloooZ25i2rmrT0LahiOU8PDcMRbiltTYCUk0MEdxCzEmtWkuRMIJrJizeK95tfOdj01ujrR-i6uQ8ul7FpQzKyX8n3l3Ki7CQuCIVwXU2eHVrEMPP0aZB9i5p23XK2zAmKRAShAuGM7l_L4k4Z4xXiJKMvvwPvQpj9PkhMsVYXYkcJVNvNpSOIaVo2-21EZSrLZCrLZDrLcjwi7-DbtG7b88A2gA3rrPLe6zk0ezL7M603GhcGuyvrUbFa8k45lT-OD2U5_j48_EZO5UI_wHDOszK</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Lindor, Noralane M.</creator><creator>Guidugli, Lucia</creator><creator>Wang, Xianshu</creator><creator>Vallée, Maxime P.</creator><creator>Monteiro, Alvaro N. A.</creator><creator>Tavtigian, Sean</creator><creator>Goldgar, David E.</creator><creator>Couch, Fergus J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS)</title><author>Lindor, Noralane M. ; Guidugli, Lucia ; Wang, Xianshu ; Vallée, Maxime P. ; Monteiro, Alvaro N. A. ; Tavtigian, Sean ; Goldgar, David E. ; Couch, Fergus J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5847-15a6debdf828db5fb5168557df8d513f58cd905c4d497e03748afe519d97c69e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>BRCA1</topic><topic>BRCA2</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Codon</topic><topic>Exons</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA1</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA2</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Germ-Line Mutation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>missense mutations</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>VUS classification</topic><topic>VUS classification; missense mutations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindor, Noralane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidugli, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xianshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallée, Maxime P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Alvaro N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavtigian, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldgar, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couch, Fergus J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human mutation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindor, Noralane M.</au><au>Guidugli, Lucia</au><au>Wang, Xianshu</au><au>Vallée, Maxime P.</au><au>Monteiro, Alvaro N. A.</au><au>Tavtigian, Sean</au><au>Goldgar, David E.</au><au>Couch, Fergus J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS)</atitle><jtitle>Human mutation</jtitle><addtitle>Hum. Mutat</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>8-21</pages><issn>1059-7794</issn><eissn>1098-1004</eissn><abstract>Clinical mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for the presence of germline inactivating mutations is used to identify individuals at elevated risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Variants identified during screening are usually classified as pathogenic (increased risk of cancer) or not pathogenic (no increased risk of cancer). However, a significant proportion of genetic tests yields variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that have undefined risk of cancer. Individuals carrying these VUS cannot benefit from individualized cancer risk assessment. Recently, a quantitative “posterior probability model” for assessing the clinical relevance of VUS in BRCA1 or BRCA2, which integrates multiple forms of genetic evidence has been developed. Here, we provide a detailed review of this model. We describe the components of the model and explain how these can be combined to calculate a posterior probability of pathogenicity for each VUS. We explain how the model can be applied to public data and provide tables that list the VUS that have been classified as not pathogenic or pathogenic using this method. While we use BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS as examples, the method can be used as a framework for classification of the pathogenicity of VUS in other cancer genes. Hum Mutat 33:8–21, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21990134</pmid><doi>10.1002/humu.21627</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-7794
ispartof Human mutation, 2012-01, Vol.33 (1), p.8-21
issn 1059-7794
1098-1004
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3242438
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Alleles
BRCA1
BRCA2
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Codon
Exons
Female
Genes, BRCA1
Genes, BRCA2
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic Testing
Genetic Variation
Germ-Line Mutation
Humans
Middle Aged
missense mutations
Models, Statistical
Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis
Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics
Probability
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Uncertainty
VUS classification
VUS classification
missense mutations
title A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T23%3A47%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20a%20multifactorial%20probability-based%20model%20for%20classification%20of%20BRCA1%20and%20BRCA2%20variants%20of%20uncertain%20significance%20(VUS)&rft.jtitle=Human%20mutation&rft.au=Lindor,%20Noralane%20M.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=8-21&rft.issn=1059-7794&rft.eissn=1098-1004&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/humu.21627&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1776672154%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766829037&rft_id=info:pmid/21990134&rfr_iscdi=true