Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade
Objectives The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2011-12, Vol.104 (12), p.521-524 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 524 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 521 |
container_title | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Islam, Shofiq Cole, Jennifer L Taylor, Christopher J |
description | Objectives
The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors.
Design
A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed.
Setting
UK-registered doctors.
Participants
Doctors were identified from publicly available listings.
Main outcome measures
Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests.
Results
Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs (n = 142), Physicians (n = 100), Surgeons (n = 34) and Others (n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties (P < 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% (n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110188 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3241512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1258_jrsm.2011.110188</sage_id><sourcerecordid>912108505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc8a98940226375f21298d00536f6e97afec8796e38553af0ea094aef661f3203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT2PEzEQhi0E4kKgp0LbIKoN_lh7bQqk4_iUTqKBFsvnHSeOdtfB45wUfj0OCQcUVJbl550Zz0PIU0ZXjEv9cptxWnHK2IoxyrS-Rxasl7pl1Mj7ZEFZx1raK31BHiFuab0bJR6SC85Zb7iRC_LtbfIlZWwy-LSe4w8YmptDUzbQvMmxRNw0mzSnfSXwgAUmfNVcVrjkhDvwJd5C42Y3HjBik8Kv4OiwNAN4N8Bj8iC4EeHJ-VySr-_ffbn62F5__vDp6vK69Z0SpfVeO6NNRzlXopeBM270QKkUKigwvQvgdW8UCC2lcIGCo6ZzEJRiQXAqluT1qe5ufzPB4GEu2Y12l-Pk8sEmF-2_L3Pc2HW6tYJ3TDJeC7w4F8jp-x6w2Cmih3F0M6Q9WsM4o1rWiZaEnkhfV4AZwl0XRu3Rij1asUcr9mSlRp79Pd1d4LeGCjw_Aw69G0N2s4_4h5OiV0wev9meOHRrsNuqpa4e_9_4J6xTpao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912108505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Islam, Shofiq ; Cole, Jennifer L ; Taylor, Christopher J</creator><creatorcontrib>Islam, Shofiq ; Cole, Jennifer L ; Taylor, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors.
Design
A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed.
Setting
UK-registered doctors.
Participants
Doctors were identified from publicly available listings.
Main outcome measures
Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests.
Results
Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs (n = 142), Physicians (n = 100), Surgeons (n = 34) and Others (n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties (P < 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% (n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22179295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Awards and Prizes ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence ; Female ; General aspects ; General Practice - standards ; General Surgery - standards ; Health participants ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Physicians - classification ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - standards ; Public Health Practice - standards ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Reward ; Teaching - standards ; Time Factors ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2011-12, Vol.104 (12), p.521-524</ispartof><rights>2011 The Royal Society of Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 The Royal Society of Medicine 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc8a98940226375f21298d00536f6e97afec8796e38553af0ea094aef661f3203</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241512/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241512/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25376150$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22179295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Islam, Shofiq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><title>Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade</title><title>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine</title><addtitle>J R Soc Med</addtitle><description>Objectives
The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors.
Design
A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed.
Setting
UK-registered doctors.
Participants
Doctors were identified from publicly available listings.
Main outcome measures
Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests.
Results
Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs (n = 142), Physicians (n = 100), Surgeons (n = 34) and Others (n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties (P < 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% (n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community.</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Awards and Prizes</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General Practice - standards</subject><subject>General Surgery - standards</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Physicians - classification</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - standards</subject><subject>Public Health Practice - standards</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Teaching - standards</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0141-0768</issn><issn>1758-1095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kT2PEzEQhi0E4kKgp0LbIKoN_lh7bQqk4_iUTqKBFsvnHSeOdtfB45wUfj0OCQcUVJbl550Zz0PIU0ZXjEv9cptxWnHK2IoxyrS-Rxasl7pl1Mj7ZEFZx1raK31BHiFuab0bJR6SC85Zb7iRC_LtbfIlZWwy-LSe4w8YmptDUzbQvMmxRNw0mzSnfSXwgAUmfNVcVrjkhDvwJd5C42Y3HjBik8Kv4OiwNAN4N8Bj8iC4EeHJ-VySr-_ffbn62F5__vDp6vK69Z0SpfVeO6NNRzlXopeBM270QKkUKigwvQvgdW8UCC2lcIGCo6ZzEJRiQXAqluT1qe5ufzPB4GEu2Y12l-Pk8sEmF-2_L3Pc2HW6tYJ3TDJeC7w4F8jp-x6w2Cmih3F0M6Q9WsM4o1rWiZaEnkhfV4AZwl0XRu3Rij1asUcr9mSlRp79Pd1d4LeGCjw_Aw69G0N2s4_4h5OiV0wev9meOHRrsNuqpa4e_9_4J6xTpao</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Islam, Shofiq</creator><creator>Cole, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Taylor, Christopher J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Royal Society of Medicine Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade</title><author>Islam, Shofiq ; Cole, Jennifer L ; Taylor, Christopher J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc8a98940226375f21298d00536f6e97afec8796e38553af0ea094aef661f3203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Awards and Prizes</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General Practice - standards</topic><topic>General Surgery - standards</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Physicians - classification</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - standards</topic><topic>Public Health Practice - standards</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Teaching - standards</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Islam, Shofiq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Islam, Shofiq</au><au>Cole, Jennifer L</au><au>Taylor, Christopher J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J R Soc Med</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>524</epage><pages>521-524</pages><issn>0141-0768</issn><eissn>1758-1095</eissn><abstract>Objectives
The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors.
Design
A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed.
Setting
UK-registered doctors.
Participants
Doctors were identified from publicly available listings.
Main outcome measures
Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests.
Results
Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs (n = 142), Physicians (n = 100), Surgeons (n = 34) and Others (n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties (P < 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% (n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22179295</pmid><doi>10.1258/jrsm.2011.110188</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-0768 |
ispartof | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2011-12, Vol.104 (12), p.521-524 |
issn | 0141-0768 1758-1095 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3241512 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Achievement Awards and Prizes Biological and medical sciences Clinical Competence Female General aspects General Practice - standards General Surgery - standards Health participants Humans Male Medical sciences Physicians - classification Physicians - psychology Physicians - standards Public Health Practice - standards Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Retrospective Studies Reward Teaching - standards Time Factors United Kingdom |
title | Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A01%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doctors%20recognized%20by%20the%20British%20honours%20systems:%20A%20retrospective%20analysis%20of%20the%20last%20decade&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20Medicine&rft.au=Islam,%20Shofiq&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=524&rft.pages=521-524&rft.issn=0141-0768&rft.eissn=1758-1095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110188&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E912108505%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912108505&rft_id=info:pmid/22179295&rft_sage_id=10.1258_jrsm.2011.110188&rfr_iscdi=true |