Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade

Objectives The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2011-12, Vol.104 (12), p.521-524
Hauptverfasser: Islam, Shofiq, Cole, Jennifer L, Taylor, Christopher J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 524
container_issue 12
container_start_page 521
container_title Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
container_volume 104
creator Islam, Shofiq
Cole, Jennifer L
Taylor, Christopher J
description Objectives The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors. Design A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed. Setting UK-registered doctors. Participants Doctors were identified from publicly available listings. Main outcome measures Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests. Results Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs (n = 142), Physicians (n = 100), Surgeons (n = 34) and Others (n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties (P < 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% (n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed (P < 0.05). Conclusions The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community.
doi_str_mv 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110188
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3241512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1258_jrsm.2011.110188</sage_id><sourcerecordid>912108505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc8a98940226375f21298d00536f6e97afec8796e38553af0ea094aef661f3203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT2PEzEQhi0E4kKgp0LbIKoN_lh7bQqk4_iUTqKBFsvnHSeOdtfB45wUfj0OCQcUVJbl550Zz0PIU0ZXjEv9cptxWnHK2IoxyrS-Rxasl7pl1Mj7ZEFZx1raK31BHiFuab0bJR6SC85Zb7iRC_LtbfIlZWwy-LSe4w8YmptDUzbQvMmxRNw0mzSnfSXwgAUmfNVcVrjkhDvwJd5C42Y3HjBik8Kv4OiwNAN4N8Bj8iC4EeHJ-VySr-_ffbn62F5__vDp6vK69Z0SpfVeO6NNRzlXopeBM270QKkUKigwvQvgdW8UCC2lcIGCo6ZzEJRiQXAqluT1qe5ufzPB4GEu2Y12l-Pk8sEmF-2_L3Pc2HW6tYJ3TDJeC7w4F8jp-x6w2Cmih3F0M6Q9WsM4o1rWiZaEnkhfV4AZwl0XRu3Rij1asUcr9mSlRp79Pd1d4LeGCjw_Aw69G0N2s4_4h5OiV0wev9meOHRrsNuqpa4e_9_4J6xTpao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912108505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Islam, Shofiq ; Cole, Jennifer L ; Taylor, Christopher J</creator><creatorcontrib>Islam, Shofiq ; Cole, Jennifer L ; Taylor, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors. Design A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed. Setting UK-registered doctors. Participants Doctors were identified from publicly available listings. Main outcome measures Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests. Results Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs (n = 142), Physicians (n = 100), Surgeons (n = 34) and Others (n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties (P &lt; 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% (n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22179295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Awards and Prizes ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence ; Female ; General aspects ; General Practice - standards ; General Surgery - standards ; Health participants ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Physicians - classification ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - standards ; Public Health Practice - standards ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Reward ; Teaching - standards ; Time Factors ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2011-12, Vol.104 (12), p.521-524</ispartof><rights>2011 The Royal Society of Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 The Royal Society of Medicine 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc8a98940226375f21298d00536f6e97afec8796e38553af0ea094aef661f3203</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241512/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241512/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25376150$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22179295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Islam, Shofiq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><title>Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade</title><title>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine</title><addtitle>J R Soc Med</addtitle><description>Objectives The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors. Design A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed. Setting UK-registered doctors. Participants Doctors were identified from publicly available listings. Main outcome measures Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests. Results Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs (n = 142), Physicians (n = 100), Surgeons (n = 34) and Others (n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties (P &lt; 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% (n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community.</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Awards and Prizes</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General Practice - standards</subject><subject>General Surgery - standards</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Physicians - classification</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - standards</subject><subject>Public Health Practice - standards</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Teaching - standards</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0141-0768</issn><issn>1758-1095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kT2PEzEQhi0E4kKgp0LbIKoN_lh7bQqk4_iUTqKBFsvnHSeOdtfB45wUfj0OCQcUVJbl550Zz0PIU0ZXjEv9cptxWnHK2IoxyrS-Rxasl7pl1Mj7ZEFZx1raK31BHiFuab0bJR6SC85Zb7iRC_LtbfIlZWwy-LSe4w8YmptDUzbQvMmxRNw0mzSnfSXwgAUmfNVcVrjkhDvwJd5C42Y3HjBik8Kv4OiwNAN4N8Bj8iC4EeHJ-VySr-_ffbn62F5__vDp6vK69Z0SpfVeO6NNRzlXopeBM270QKkUKigwvQvgdW8UCC2lcIGCo6ZzEJRiQXAqluT1qe5ufzPB4GEu2Y12l-Pk8sEmF-2_L3Pc2HW6tYJ3TDJeC7w4F8jp-x6w2Cmih3F0M6Q9WsM4o1rWiZaEnkhfV4AZwl0XRu3Rij1asUcr9mSlRp79Pd1d4LeGCjw_Aw69G0N2s4_4h5OiV0wev9meOHRrsNuqpa4e_9_4J6xTpao</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Islam, Shofiq</creator><creator>Cole, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Taylor, Christopher J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Royal Society of Medicine Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade</title><author>Islam, Shofiq ; Cole, Jennifer L ; Taylor, Christopher J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc8a98940226375f21298d00536f6e97afec8796e38553af0ea094aef661f3203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Awards and Prizes</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General Practice - standards</topic><topic>General Surgery - standards</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Physicians - classification</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - standards</topic><topic>Public Health Practice - standards</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Teaching - standards</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Islam, Shofiq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Islam, Shofiq</au><au>Cole, Jennifer L</au><au>Taylor, Christopher J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J R Soc Med</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>524</epage><pages>521-524</pages><issn>0141-0768</issn><eissn>1758-1095</eissn><abstract>Objectives The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors. Design A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed. Setting UK-registered doctors. Participants Doctors were identified from publicly available listings. Main outcome measures Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests. Results Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs (n = 142), Physicians (n = 100), Surgeons (n = 34) and Others (n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties (P &lt; 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% (n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22179295</pmid><doi>10.1258/jrsm.2011.110188</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0768
ispartof Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2011-12, Vol.104 (12), p.521-524
issn 0141-0768
1758-1095
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3241512
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Achievement
Awards and Prizes
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical Competence
Female
General aspects
General Practice - standards
General Surgery - standards
Health participants
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Physicians - classification
Physicians - psychology
Physicians - standards
Public Health Practice - standards
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Retrospective Studies
Reward
Teaching - standards
Time Factors
United Kingdom
title Doctors recognized by the British honours systems: A retrospective analysis of the last decade
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A01%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doctors%20recognized%20by%20the%20British%20honours%20systems:%20A%20retrospective%20analysis%20of%20the%20last%20decade&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20Medicine&rft.au=Islam,%20Shofiq&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=524&rft.pages=521-524&rft.issn=0141-0768&rft.eissn=1758-1095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110188&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E912108505%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912108505&rft_id=info:pmid/22179295&rft_sage_id=10.1258_jrsm.2011.110188&rfr_iscdi=true