Osteoinductivity of Demineralized Bone Matrix Is Independent of Donor Bisphosphonate Use

BACKGROUND:Demineralized bone matrix is commonly used as a bone graft substitute, either alone or to supplement an osteoconductive material, because of its osteoinductive properties. The aging of the population has led to an increase in the number of prospective donors of demineralized bone matrix w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2011-12, Vol.93 (24), p.2278-2286
Hauptverfasser: Schwartz, Zvi, Hyzy, Sharon L, Moore, Mark A, Hunter, Shawn A, Ronholdt, Chad J, Sunwoo, MoonHae, Boyan, Barbara D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2286
container_issue 24
container_start_page 2278
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 93
creator Schwartz, Zvi
Hyzy, Sharon L
Moore, Mark A
Hunter, Shawn A
Ronholdt, Chad J
Sunwoo, MoonHae
Boyan, Barbara D
description BACKGROUND:Demineralized bone matrix is commonly used as a bone graft substitute, either alone or to supplement an osteoconductive material, because of its osteoinductive properties. The aging of the population has led to an increase in the number of prospective donors of demineralized bone matrix who have taken bisphosphonates to prevent osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral bisphosphonate usage affects the osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix from donors. METHODS:Sex-matched and age-matched pairs of samples were provided by four tissue banks (three or four pairs per bank). Demineralized bone matrix donors without bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age (and standard deviation) of 69.1 ± 2.5 years, and donors with bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age of 68.9 ± 2.0 years. Each pair included one donor known to have taken bisphosphonates and one who had not taken bisphosphonates. Demineralized bone matrix previously confirmed as osteoinductive was the positive control, and heat-inactivated demineralized bone matrix was the negative control. Demineralized bone matrix incubated with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline solution containing 0, 0.002, 2.0, or 2000 ng/mL of alendronate was also tested. Gelatin capsules containing 15 mg of demineralized bone matrix were implanted bilaterally in the gastrocnemius muscle of male nude mice (eight implants per group). The mice were killed thirty-five days after implantation, and hind limbs were recovered and processed for histological analysis. Osteoinductivity was measured with use of a qualitative score and by histomorphometry. RESULTS:Nine of fifteen samples from donors who had had bisphosphonate treatment and ten of fifteen samples from patients who had not had bisphosphonate treatment were osteoinductive. Qualitative mean scores were comparable (1.7 ± 0.4 for those without bisphosphonates and 1.9 ± 0.7 for those with bisphosphonates). Osteoinductive demineralized bone matrix samples produced ossicles of comparable size, regardless of bisphosphonate usage. Histomorphometric measurements of the area of new bone formation and residual demineralized bone matrix were also comparable. The addition of alendronate to control demineralized bone matrix did not affect its osteoinductivity. CONCLUSIONS:Demineralized bone matrix samples from donors treated with bisphosphonates and donors not treated with bisphosphonates have the same ability to induce bone formation.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.J.01469
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3234347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>917155454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3737-2f7b9568c698851149da4e418c53d4467f21f834b575ebf7050ba9c31d4727eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1v1DAQxS0EotvCjTPKBXEhW3_GyQWpWyjsqqgHqMTNcpwJa8jai-30g7--Tncp5TAzkuenN09-CL0ieE4Jro5Xi9XX-WqOCa-aJ2hGBBMlYXX1FM0wpqRsmBAH6DDGnxhjzrF8jg4opaKWks_Q94uYwFvXjSbZK5tuC98XH2BjHQQ92D_QFQvvoPiiU7A3xTIWS9fBFnJz6Z71zodiYeN27adyOkFxGeEFetbrIcLL_TxCl2cfv51-Ls8vPi1PT85LwySTJe1l24iqNlVT14IQ3nSaAye1EazjvJI9JX3NeCukgLaXWOBWN4aRjksqoWVH6P1Odzu2G-hMtpWNq22wGx1ulddW_b9xdq1--CvFKOOMyyzwdi8Q_O8RYlIbGw0Mg3bgx6gaIokQXPBMvtuRJvgYA_QPVwhWUxZqykKt1H0WGX_92NkD_PfzM_BmD-ho9NAH7YyN_zjBaUMxzRzfcdd-SBDir2G8hqDWoIe0VniKtaKspJgQQrOPcnqS7A7khKHn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>917155454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Osteoinductivity of Demineralized Bone Matrix Is Independent of Donor Bisphosphonate Use</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schwartz, Zvi ; Hyzy, Sharon L ; Moore, Mark A ; Hunter, Shawn A ; Ronholdt, Chad J ; Sunwoo, MoonHae ; Boyan, Barbara D</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Zvi ; Hyzy, Sharon L ; Moore, Mark A ; Hunter, Shawn A ; Ronholdt, Chad J ; Sunwoo, MoonHae ; Boyan, Barbara D</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Demineralized bone matrix is commonly used as a bone graft substitute, either alone or to supplement an osteoconductive material, because of its osteoinductive properties. The aging of the population has led to an increase in the number of prospective donors of demineralized bone matrix who have taken bisphosphonates to prevent osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral bisphosphonate usage affects the osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix from donors. METHODS:Sex-matched and age-matched pairs of samples were provided by four tissue banks (three or four pairs per bank). Demineralized bone matrix donors without bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age (and standard deviation) of 69.1 ± 2.5 years, and donors with bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age of 68.9 ± 2.0 years. Each pair included one donor known to have taken bisphosphonates and one who had not taken bisphosphonates. Demineralized bone matrix previously confirmed as osteoinductive was the positive control, and heat-inactivated demineralized bone matrix was the negative control. Demineralized bone matrix incubated with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline solution containing 0, 0.002, 2.0, or 2000 ng/mL of alendronate was also tested. Gelatin capsules containing 15 mg of demineralized bone matrix were implanted bilaterally in the gastrocnemius muscle of male nude mice (eight implants per group). The mice were killed thirty-five days after implantation, and hind limbs were recovered and processed for histological analysis. Osteoinductivity was measured with use of a qualitative score and by histomorphometry. RESULTS:Nine of fifteen samples from donors who had had bisphosphonate treatment and ten of fifteen samples from patients who had not had bisphosphonate treatment were osteoinductive. Qualitative mean scores were comparable (1.7 ± 0.4 for those without bisphosphonates and 1.9 ± 0.7 for those with bisphosphonates). Osteoinductive demineralized bone matrix samples produced ossicles of comparable size, regardless of bisphosphonate usage. Histomorphometric measurements of the area of new bone formation and residual demineralized bone matrix were also comparable. The addition of alendronate to control demineralized bone matrix did not affect its osteoinductivity. CONCLUSIONS:Demineralized bone matrix samples from donors treated with bisphosphonates and donors not treated with bisphosphonates have the same ability to induce bone formation. However, it is not known if the quality of the new bone is affected, with subsequent consequences affecting bone remodeling. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:These results show that demineralized bone matrix can be safe and effective as an osteoinductive material, even when the original bone graft is obtained from donors who have used bisphosphonates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01469</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22258774</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBJSA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Aged, 80 and over ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Bone Matrix - pathology ; Bone Matrix - transplantation ; Bone Resorption ; Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents ; Diphosphonates - administration &amp; dosage ; Disease Models, Animal ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Implants, Experimental ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Nude ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osteogenesis - drug effects ; Osteogenesis - physiology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Random Allocation ; Risk Assessment ; Scientific ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Tissue Donors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2011-12, Vol.93 (24), p.2278-2286</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2011 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3737-2f7b9568c698851149da4e418c53d4467f21f834b575ebf7050ba9c31d4727eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3737-2f7b9568c698851149da4e418c53d4467f21f834b575ebf7050ba9c31d4727eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25429202$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22258774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyzy, Sharon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Shawn A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronholdt, Chad J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunwoo, MoonHae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyan, Barbara D</creatorcontrib><title>Osteoinductivity of Demineralized Bone Matrix Is Independent of Donor Bisphosphonate Use</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Demineralized bone matrix is commonly used as a bone graft substitute, either alone or to supplement an osteoconductive material, because of its osteoinductive properties. The aging of the population has led to an increase in the number of prospective donors of demineralized bone matrix who have taken bisphosphonates to prevent osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral bisphosphonate usage affects the osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix from donors. METHODS:Sex-matched and age-matched pairs of samples were provided by four tissue banks (three or four pairs per bank). Demineralized bone matrix donors without bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age (and standard deviation) of 69.1 ± 2.5 years, and donors with bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age of 68.9 ± 2.0 years. Each pair included one donor known to have taken bisphosphonates and one who had not taken bisphosphonates. Demineralized bone matrix previously confirmed as osteoinductive was the positive control, and heat-inactivated demineralized bone matrix was the negative control. Demineralized bone matrix incubated with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline solution containing 0, 0.002, 2.0, or 2000 ng/mL of alendronate was also tested. Gelatin capsules containing 15 mg of demineralized bone matrix were implanted bilaterally in the gastrocnemius muscle of male nude mice (eight implants per group). The mice were killed thirty-five days after implantation, and hind limbs were recovered and processed for histological analysis. Osteoinductivity was measured with use of a qualitative score and by histomorphometry. RESULTS:Nine of fifteen samples from donors who had had bisphosphonate treatment and ten of fifteen samples from patients who had not had bisphosphonate treatment were osteoinductive. Qualitative mean scores were comparable (1.7 ± 0.4 for those without bisphosphonates and 1.9 ± 0.7 for those with bisphosphonates). Osteoinductive demineralized bone matrix samples produced ossicles of comparable size, regardless of bisphosphonate usage. Histomorphometric measurements of the area of new bone formation and residual demineralized bone matrix were also comparable. The addition of alendronate to control demineralized bone matrix did not affect its osteoinductivity. CONCLUSIONS:Demineralized bone matrix samples from donors treated with bisphosphonates and donors not treated with bisphosphonates have the same ability to induce bone formation. However, it is not known if the quality of the new bone is affected, with subsequent consequences affecting bone remodeling. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:These results show that demineralized bone matrix can be safe and effective as an osteoinductive material, even when the original bone graft is obtained from donors who have used bisphosphonates.</description><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Bone Matrix - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Matrix - transplantation</subject><subject>Bone Resorption</subject><subject>Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents</subject><subject>Diphosphonates - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Implants, Experimental</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Nude</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - drug effects</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Scientific</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1v1DAQxS0EotvCjTPKBXEhW3_GyQWpWyjsqqgHqMTNcpwJa8jai-30g7--Tncp5TAzkuenN09-CL0ieE4Jro5Xi9XX-WqOCa-aJ2hGBBMlYXX1FM0wpqRsmBAH6DDGnxhjzrF8jg4opaKWks_Q94uYwFvXjSbZK5tuC98XH2BjHQQ92D_QFQvvoPiiU7A3xTIWS9fBFnJz6Z71zodiYeN27adyOkFxGeEFetbrIcLL_TxCl2cfv51-Ls8vPi1PT85LwySTJe1l24iqNlVT14IQ3nSaAye1EazjvJI9JX3NeCukgLaXWOBWN4aRjksqoWVH6P1Odzu2G-hMtpWNq22wGx1ulddW_b9xdq1--CvFKOOMyyzwdi8Q_O8RYlIbGw0Mg3bgx6gaIokQXPBMvtuRJvgYA_QPVwhWUxZqykKt1H0WGX_92NkD_PfzM_BmD-ho9NAH7YyN_zjBaUMxzRzfcdd-SBDir2G8hqDWoIe0VniKtaKspJgQQrOPcnqS7A7khKHn</recordid><startdate>20111221</startdate><enddate>20111221</enddate><creator>Schwartz, Zvi</creator><creator>Hyzy, Sharon L</creator><creator>Moore, Mark A</creator><creator>Hunter, Shawn A</creator><creator>Ronholdt, Chad J</creator><creator>Sunwoo, MoonHae</creator><creator>Boyan, Barbara D</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111221</creationdate><title>Osteoinductivity of Demineralized Bone Matrix Is Independent of Donor Bisphosphonate Use</title><author>Schwartz, Zvi ; Hyzy, Sharon L ; Moore, Mark A ; Hunter, Shawn A ; Ronholdt, Chad J ; Sunwoo, MoonHae ; Boyan, Barbara D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3737-2f7b9568c698851149da4e418c53d4467f21f834b575ebf7050ba9c31d4727eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Bone Matrix - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Matrix - transplantation</topic><topic>Bone Resorption</topic><topic>Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents</topic><topic>Diphosphonates - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Implants, Experimental</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Nude</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - drug effects</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Scientific</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyzy, Sharon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Shawn A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronholdt, Chad J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunwoo, MoonHae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyan, Barbara D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, Zvi</au><au>Hyzy, Sharon L</au><au>Moore, Mark A</au><au>Hunter, Shawn A</au><au>Ronholdt, Chad J</au><au>Sunwoo, MoonHae</au><au>Boyan, Barbara D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Osteoinductivity of Demineralized Bone Matrix Is Independent of Donor Bisphosphonate Use</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2011-12-21</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>2278</spage><epage>2286</epage><pages>2278-2286</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><coden>JBJSA3</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:Demineralized bone matrix is commonly used as a bone graft substitute, either alone or to supplement an osteoconductive material, because of its osteoinductive properties. The aging of the population has led to an increase in the number of prospective donors of demineralized bone matrix who have taken bisphosphonates to prevent osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral bisphosphonate usage affects the osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix from donors. METHODS:Sex-matched and age-matched pairs of samples were provided by four tissue banks (three or four pairs per bank). Demineralized bone matrix donors without bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age (and standard deviation) of 69.1 ± 2.5 years, and donors with bisphosphonate treatment had a mean age of 68.9 ± 2.0 years. Each pair included one donor known to have taken bisphosphonates and one who had not taken bisphosphonates. Demineralized bone matrix previously confirmed as osteoinductive was the positive control, and heat-inactivated demineralized bone matrix was the negative control. Demineralized bone matrix incubated with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline solution containing 0, 0.002, 2.0, or 2000 ng/mL of alendronate was also tested. Gelatin capsules containing 15 mg of demineralized bone matrix were implanted bilaterally in the gastrocnemius muscle of male nude mice (eight implants per group). The mice were killed thirty-five days after implantation, and hind limbs were recovered and processed for histological analysis. Osteoinductivity was measured with use of a qualitative score and by histomorphometry. RESULTS:Nine of fifteen samples from donors who had had bisphosphonate treatment and ten of fifteen samples from patients who had not had bisphosphonate treatment were osteoinductive. Qualitative mean scores were comparable (1.7 ± 0.4 for those without bisphosphonates and 1.9 ± 0.7 for those with bisphosphonates). Osteoinductive demineralized bone matrix samples produced ossicles of comparable size, regardless of bisphosphonate usage. Histomorphometric measurements of the area of new bone formation and residual demineralized bone matrix were also comparable. The addition of alendronate to control demineralized bone matrix did not affect its osteoinductivity. CONCLUSIONS:Demineralized bone matrix samples from donors treated with bisphosphonates and donors not treated with bisphosphonates have the same ability to induce bone formation. However, it is not known if the quality of the new bone is affected, with subsequent consequences affecting bone remodeling. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:These results show that demineralized bone matrix can be safe and effective as an osteoinductive material, even when the original bone graft is obtained from donors who have used bisphosphonates.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>22258774</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.J.01469</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2011-12, Vol.93 (24), p.2278-2286
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3234347
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged, 80 and over
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density Conservation Agents - administration & dosage
Bone Matrix - pathology
Bone Matrix - transplantation
Bone Resorption
Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents
Diphosphonates - administration & dosage
Disease Models, Animal
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Implants, Experimental
Male
Medical sciences
Mice
Mice, Nude
Orthopedic surgery
Osteogenesis - drug effects
Osteogenesis - physiology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Random Allocation
Risk Assessment
Scientific
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Tissue Donors
Treatment Outcome
title Osteoinductivity of Demineralized Bone Matrix Is Independent of Donor Bisphosphonate Use
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A27%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Osteoinductivity%20of%20Demineralized%20Bone%20Matrix%20Is%20Independent%20of%20Donor%20Bisphosphonate%20Use&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Schwartz,%20Zvi&rft.date=2011-12-21&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=2278&rft.epage=2286&rft.pages=2278-2286&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft.coden=JBJSA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.J.01469&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E917155454%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=917155454&rft_id=info:pmid/22258774&rfr_iscdi=true