Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses
Previous research has suggested that adding active learning to traditional college science lectures substantially improves student learning. However, this research predominantly studied courses taught by science education researchers, who are likely to have exceptional teaching expertise. The presen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | CBE life sciences education 2011-12, Vol.10 (4), p.394-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 394 |
container_title | CBE life sciences education |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Andrews, T. M Leonard, M. J Colgrove, C. A Kalinowski, S. T |
description | Previous research has suggested that adding active learning to traditional college science lectures substantially improves student learning. However, this research predominantly studied courses taught by science education researchers, who are likely to have exceptional teaching expertise. The present study investigated introductory biology courses randomly selected from a list of prominent colleges and universities to include instructors representing a broader population. We examined the relationship between active learning and student learning in the subject area of natural selection. We found no association between student learning gains and the use of active-learning instruction. Although active learning has the potential to substantially improve student learning, this research suggests that active learning, as used by typical college biology instructors, is not associated with greater learning gains. We contend that most instructors lack the rich and nuanced understanding of teaching and learning that science education researchers have developed. Therefore, active learning as designed and implemented by typical college biology instructors may superficially resemble active learning used by education researchers, but lacks the constructivist elements necessary for improving learning. (Contains 6 tables, 3 figures and 1 footnote.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3228657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ962666</ericid><sourcerecordid>908012984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-f903b33f74e8941d9d5d7a03325eadff52818b18fe6d57f74edcebbaa169045d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtv1DAUhS0EoqWwZYWQN4hVWr8SxxukYVQe1ahIFNaWE99kjJx4aieN-u_r0ZShrHys891zr3QQekvJOaW1vGgbyKIgsiCkos_QKVWcFlJR_vyJPkGvUvpDiKgILV-iE8YoL7nkp6hZtZO7A7wBE0c39vg6THiVUmidmcDixU1bfDPNFsbpH-RGbPBPM9ow4Bsz7Dzg0OF18B56wJ9d8KG_z_85Jkiv0YvO-ARvHt8z9PvL5a_1t2Lz4-v39WpTtEKQqegU4Q3nnRRQK0GtsqWVhnDOSjC260pW07qhdQeVLeUesy00jTG0UkSUlp-hT4fc3dwMe3OcovF6F91g4r0Oxun_ndFtdR_uNGesrkqZAz4-BsRwO0Oa9OBSC96bEcKctCI1oUzVIpPnB7KNIaUI3XELJXrfi869ZKGJ1Pte8sD7p7cd8b9FZODdAYDo2qN9eaUqVlVVtj8c7K3rt4uLoNNgvM9pTC_LkrcKzZXgDwwYoQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>908012984</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Andrews, T. M ; Leonard, M. J ; Colgrove, C. A ; Kalinowski, S. T</creator><contributor>Klionsky, Daniel J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Andrews, T. M ; Leonard, M. J ; Colgrove, C. A ; Kalinowski, S. T ; Klionsky, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has suggested that adding active learning to traditional college science lectures substantially improves student learning. However, this research predominantly studied courses taught by science education researchers, who are likely to have exceptional teaching expertise. The present study investigated introductory biology courses randomly selected from a list of prominent colleges and universities to include instructors representing a broader population. We examined the relationship between active learning and student learning in the subject area of natural selection. We found no association between student learning gains and the use of active-learning instruction. Although active learning has the potential to substantially improve student learning, this research suggests that active learning, as used by typical college biology instructors, is not associated with greater learning gains. We contend that most instructors lack the rich and nuanced understanding of teaching and learning that science education researchers have developed. Therefore, active learning as designed and implemented by typical college biology instructors may superficially resemble active learning used by education researchers, but lacks the constructivist elements necessary for improving learning. (Contains 6 tables, 3 figures and 1 footnote.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22135373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Cell Biology</publisher><subject>Active Learning ; Biology ; Biology - education ; College Faculty ; College Science ; Constructivism (Learning) ; Correlation ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Expertise ; Faculty ; Humans ; Introductory Courses ; Investigations ; Learning ; Problem-Based Learning ; Researchers ; Science Education ; Science Instruction ; Selection, Genetic ; Students - statistics & numerical data ; Teaching - methods ; Universities</subject><ispartof>CBE life sciences education, 2011-12, Vol.10 (4), p.394-405</ispartof><rights>2011 T. M. Andrews © 2011 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( ). 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-f903b33f74e8941d9d5d7a03325eadff52818b18fe6d57f74edcebbaa169045d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-f903b33f74e8941d9d5d7a03325eadff52818b18fe6d57f74edcebbaa169045d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228657/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228657/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ962666$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22135373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Klionsky, Daniel J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Andrews, T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colgrove, C. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalinowski, S. T</creatorcontrib><title>Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses</title><title>CBE life sciences education</title><addtitle>CBE Life Sci Educ</addtitle><description>Previous research has suggested that adding active learning to traditional college science lectures substantially improves student learning. However, this research predominantly studied courses taught by science education researchers, who are likely to have exceptional teaching expertise. The present study investigated introductory biology courses randomly selected from a list of prominent colleges and universities to include instructors representing a broader population. We examined the relationship between active learning and student learning in the subject area of natural selection. We found no association between student learning gains and the use of active-learning instruction. Although active learning has the potential to substantially improve student learning, this research suggests that active learning, as used by typical college biology instructors, is not associated with greater learning gains. We contend that most instructors lack the rich and nuanced understanding of teaching and learning that science education researchers have developed. Therefore, active learning as designed and implemented by typical college biology instructors may superficially resemble active learning used by education researchers, but lacks the constructivist elements necessary for improving learning. (Contains 6 tables, 3 figures and 1 footnote.)</description><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology - education</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Constructivism (Learning)</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Faculty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Problem-Based Learning</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Students - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Teaching - methods</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>1931-7913</issn><issn>1931-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtv1DAUhS0EoqWwZYWQN4hVWr8SxxukYVQe1ahIFNaWE99kjJx4aieN-u_r0ZShrHys891zr3QQekvJOaW1vGgbyKIgsiCkos_QKVWcFlJR_vyJPkGvUvpDiKgILV-iE8YoL7nkp6hZtZO7A7wBE0c39vg6THiVUmidmcDixU1bfDPNFsbpH-RGbPBPM9ow4Bsz7Dzg0OF18B56wJ9d8KG_z_85Jkiv0YvO-ARvHt8z9PvL5a_1t2Lz4-v39WpTtEKQqegU4Q3nnRRQK0GtsqWVhnDOSjC260pW07qhdQeVLeUesy00jTG0UkSUlp-hT4fc3dwMe3OcovF6F91g4r0Oxun_ndFtdR_uNGesrkqZAz4-BsRwO0Oa9OBSC96bEcKctCI1oUzVIpPnB7KNIaUI3XELJXrfi869ZKGJ1Pte8sD7p7cd8b9FZODdAYDo2qN9eaUqVlVVtj8c7K3rt4uLoNNgvM9pTC_LkrcKzZXgDwwYoQ8</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Andrews, T. M</creator><creator>Leonard, M. J</creator><creator>Colgrove, C. A</creator><creator>Kalinowski, S. T</creator><general>American Society for Cell Biology</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses</title><author>Andrews, T. M ; Leonard, M. J ; Colgrove, C. A ; Kalinowski, S. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-f903b33f74e8941d9d5d7a03325eadff52818b18fe6d57f74edcebbaa169045d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology - education</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Constructivism (Learning)</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Faculty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Problem-Based Learning</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Students - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Teaching - methods</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrews, T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colgrove, C. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalinowski, S. T</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrews, T. M</au><au>Leonard, M. J</au><au>Colgrove, C. A</au><au>Kalinowski, S. T</au><au>Klionsky, Daniel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ962666</ericid><atitle>Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses</atitle><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>CBE Life Sci Educ</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>394-405</pages><issn>1931-7913</issn><eissn>1931-7913</eissn><abstract>Previous research has suggested that adding active learning to traditional college science lectures substantially improves student learning. However, this research predominantly studied courses taught by science education researchers, who are likely to have exceptional teaching expertise. The present study investigated introductory biology courses randomly selected from a list of prominent colleges and universities to include instructors representing a broader population. We examined the relationship between active learning and student learning in the subject area of natural selection. We found no association between student learning gains and the use of active-learning instruction. Although active learning has the potential to substantially improve student learning, this research suggests that active learning, as used by typical college biology instructors, is not associated with greater learning gains. We contend that most instructors lack the rich and nuanced understanding of teaching and learning that science education researchers have developed. Therefore, active learning as designed and implemented by typical college biology instructors may superficially resemble active learning used by education researchers, but lacks the constructivist elements necessary for improving learning. (Contains 6 tables, 3 figures and 1 footnote.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Cell Biology</pub><pmid>22135373</pmid><doi>10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1931-7913 |
ispartof | CBE life sciences education, 2011-12, Vol.10 (4), p.394-405 |
issn | 1931-7913 1931-7913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3228657 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Active Learning Biology Biology - education College Faculty College Science Constructivism (Learning) Correlation Educational Measurement - methods Expertise Faculty Humans Introductory Courses Investigations Learning Problem-Based Learning Researchers Science Education Science Instruction Selection, Genetic Students - statistics & numerical data Teaching - methods Universities |
title | Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A14%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Active%20Learning%20Not%20Associated%20with%20Student%20Learning%20in%20a%20Random%20Sample%20of%20College%20Biology%20Courses&rft.jtitle=CBE%20life%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Andrews,%20T.%20M&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=394-405&rft.issn=1931-7913&rft.eissn=1931-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E908012984%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=908012984&rft_id=info:pmid/22135373&rft_ericid=EJ962666&rfr_iscdi=true |