Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior
Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure activity in three frontal cortical areas, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC), medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC)/ventromedial frontal cortex (vmPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), when expectations about type of reward, and not ju...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of neuroscience 2011-10, Vol.31 (40), p.14399-14412 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14412 |
---|---|
container_issue | 40 |
container_start_page | 14399 |
container_title | The Journal of neuroscience |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Noonan, M P Mars, R B Rushworth, M F S |
description | Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure activity in three frontal cortical areas, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC), medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC)/ventromedial frontal cortex (vmPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), when expectations about type of reward, and not just reward presence or absence, could be learned. Two groups of human subjects learned 12 stimulus-response pairings. In one group (Consistent), correct performances of a given pairing were always reinforced with a specific reward outcome, whereas in the other group (Inconsistent), correct performances were reinforced with randomly selected rewards. The mOFC/vmPFC and lOFC were not distinguished by simple differences in relative preference for positive and negative outcomes. Instead lOFC activity reflected updating of reward-related associations specific to reward type; lOFC was active whenever informative outcomes allowed updating of reward-related associations, regardless of whether the outcomes were positive or negative, and the effects were greater when consistent stimulus-outcome and response-outcome mappings were present. A psychophysiological interaction analysis demonstrated changed coupling between lOFC and brain areas for visual object representation, such as perirhinal cortex, and reward-guided learning, such as the amygdala, ventral striatum, and habenula/mediodorsal thalamus. In contrast, mOFC/vmPFC activity reflected expected values of outcomes and occurrence of positive outcomes, regardless of consistency of outcome mappings. The third frontal cortical region, the ACC, reflected the use of reward type information to guide response selection. ACC activity reflected the probability of selecting the correct response, was greater when consistent outcome mappings were present, and was related to individual differences in propensity to select the correct response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6456-10.2011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3224993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>896825829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-aeff79ca0a4c6590e518730dd0bb1c3800245f2746f23e465fe30f9d2d274c933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUclOwzAQtRAIyvILKDdOgfGa-IKEStmEQGI5W64zpkZpDHYK4u9JWSo4zei9N29G8wjZp3BIJeNHVzeTx7vb-_HloRJSlQPMgNI1MhpYXTIBdJ2MgFVQKlGJLbKd8zMAVECrTbLFqK6UZHJELk5D7kPn-iLFFnMRfdHPEmLhU-x62xYupj64obEJbS5CVyR8t6kpnxahwaaY4sy-hZh2yYa3bca9n7pDHs8mD-OL8vr2_HJ8cl06Wcu-tOh9pZ0FK5ySGlDSuuLQNDCdUsdrACakZ5VQnnEUSnrk4HXDmgFzmvMdcvzt-7KYzrFx2PXJtuYlhblNHybaYP4zXZiZp_hmOGNCfxkc_Bik-LrA3Jt5yA7b1nYYF9nUWtVM1kwPSvWtdCnmnNCvtlAwyxTMKgWzTGEJL1MYBvf_3rga-307_wQmJYWH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896825829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Noonan, M P ; Mars, R B ; Rushworth, M F S</creator><creatorcontrib>Noonan, M P ; Mars, R B ; Rushworth, M F S</creatorcontrib><description>Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure activity in three frontal cortical areas, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC), medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC)/ventromedial frontal cortex (vmPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), when expectations about type of reward, and not just reward presence or absence, could be learned. Two groups of human subjects learned 12 stimulus-response pairings. In one group (Consistent), correct performances of a given pairing were always reinforced with a specific reward outcome, whereas in the other group (Inconsistent), correct performances were reinforced with randomly selected rewards. The mOFC/vmPFC and lOFC were not distinguished by simple differences in relative preference for positive and negative outcomes. Instead lOFC activity reflected updating of reward-related associations specific to reward type; lOFC was active whenever informative outcomes allowed updating of reward-related associations, regardless of whether the outcomes were positive or negative, and the effects were greater when consistent stimulus-outcome and response-outcome mappings were present. A psychophysiological interaction analysis demonstrated changed coupling between lOFC and brain areas for visual object representation, such as perirhinal cortex, and reward-guided learning, such as the amygdala, ventral striatum, and habenula/mediodorsal thalamus. In contrast, mOFC/vmPFC activity reflected expected values of outcomes and occurrence of positive outcomes, regardless of consistency of outcome mappings. The third frontal cortical region, the ACC, reflected the use of reward type information to guide response selection. ACC activity reflected the probability of selecting the correct response, was greater when consistent outcome mappings were present, and was related to individual differences in propensity to select the correct response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6456-10.2011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21976525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Female ; Frontal Lobe - physiology ; Humans ; Learning - physiology ; Male ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reward ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2011-10, Vol.31 (40), p.14399-14412</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 the authors 0270-6474/11/3114399-14$15.00/0 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-aeff79ca0a4c6590e518730dd0bb1c3800245f2746f23e465fe30f9d2d274c933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-aeff79ca0a4c6590e518730dd0bb1c3800245f2746f23e465fe30f9d2d274c933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224993/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3224993/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noonan, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mars, R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rushworth, M F S</creatorcontrib><title>Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure activity in three frontal cortical areas, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC), medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC)/ventromedial frontal cortex (vmPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), when expectations about type of reward, and not just reward presence or absence, could be learned. Two groups of human subjects learned 12 stimulus-response pairings. In one group (Consistent), correct performances of a given pairing were always reinforced with a specific reward outcome, whereas in the other group (Inconsistent), correct performances were reinforced with randomly selected rewards. The mOFC/vmPFC and lOFC were not distinguished by simple differences in relative preference for positive and negative outcomes. Instead lOFC activity reflected updating of reward-related associations specific to reward type; lOFC was active whenever informative outcomes allowed updating of reward-related associations, regardless of whether the outcomes were positive or negative, and the effects were greater when consistent stimulus-outcome and response-outcome mappings were present. A psychophysiological interaction analysis demonstrated changed coupling between lOFC and brain areas for visual object representation, such as perirhinal cortex, and reward-guided learning, such as the amygdala, ventral striatum, and habenula/mediodorsal thalamus. In contrast, mOFC/vmPFC activity reflected expected values of outcomes and occurrence of positive outcomes, regardless of consistency of outcome mappings. The third frontal cortical region, the ACC, reflected the use of reward type information to guide response selection. ACC activity reflected the probability of selecting the correct response, was greater when consistent outcome mappings were present, and was related to individual differences in propensity to select the correct response.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUclOwzAQtRAIyvILKDdOgfGa-IKEStmEQGI5W64zpkZpDHYK4u9JWSo4zei9N29G8wjZp3BIJeNHVzeTx7vb-_HloRJSlQPMgNI1MhpYXTIBdJ2MgFVQKlGJLbKd8zMAVECrTbLFqK6UZHJELk5D7kPn-iLFFnMRfdHPEmLhU-x62xYupj64obEJbS5CVyR8t6kpnxahwaaY4sy-hZh2yYa3bca9n7pDHs8mD-OL8vr2_HJ8cl06Wcu-tOh9pZ0FK5ySGlDSuuLQNDCdUsdrACakZ5VQnnEUSnrk4HXDmgFzmvMdcvzt-7KYzrFx2PXJtuYlhblNHybaYP4zXZiZp_hmOGNCfxkc_Bik-LrA3Jt5yA7b1nYYF9nUWtVM1kwPSvWtdCnmnNCvtlAwyxTMKgWzTGEJL1MYBvf_3rga-307_wQmJYWH</recordid><startdate>20111005</startdate><enddate>20111005</enddate><creator>Noonan, M P</creator><creator>Mars, R B</creator><creator>Rushworth, M F S</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111005</creationdate><title>Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior</title><author>Noonan, M P ; Mars, R B ; Rushworth, M F S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-aeff79ca0a4c6590e518730dd0bb1c3800245f2746f23e465fe30f9d2d274c933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noonan, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mars, R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rushworth, M F S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noonan, M P</au><au>Mars, R B</au><au>Rushworth, M F S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2011-10-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>40</issue><spage>14399</spage><epage>14412</epage><pages>14399-14412</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure activity in three frontal cortical areas, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC), medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC)/ventromedial frontal cortex (vmPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), when expectations about type of reward, and not just reward presence or absence, could be learned. Two groups of human subjects learned 12 stimulus-response pairings. In one group (Consistent), correct performances of a given pairing were always reinforced with a specific reward outcome, whereas in the other group (Inconsistent), correct performances were reinforced with randomly selected rewards. The mOFC/vmPFC and lOFC were not distinguished by simple differences in relative preference for positive and negative outcomes. Instead lOFC activity reflected updating of reward-related associations specific to reward type; lOFC was active whenever informative outcomes allowed updating of reward-related associations, regardless of whether the outcomes were positive or negative, and the effects were greater when consistent stimulus-outcome and response-outcome mappings were present. A psychophysiological interaction analysis demonstrated changed coupling between lOFC and brain areas for visual object representation, such as perirhinal cortex, and reward-guided learning, such as the amygdala, ventral striatum, and habenula/mediodorsal thalamus. In contrast, mOFC/vmPFC activity reflected expected values of outcomes and occurrence of positive outcomes, regardless of consistency of outcome mappings. The third frontal cortical region, the ACC, reflected the use of reward type information to guide response selection. ACC activity reflected the probability of selecting the correct response, was greater when consistent outcome mappings were present, and was related to individual differences in propensity to select the correct response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>21976525</pmid><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6456-10.2011</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-6474 |
ispartof | The Journal of neuroscience, 2011-10, Vol.31 (40), p.14399-14412 |
issn | 0270-6474 1529-2401 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3224993 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Brain Mapping - methods Female Frontal Lobe - physiology Humans Learning - physiology Male Photic Stimulation - methods Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reward Young Adult |
title | Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A08%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinct%20roles%20of%20three%20frontal%20cortical%20areas%20in%20reward-guided%20behavior&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Noonan,%20M%20P&rft.date=2011-10-05&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=40&rft.spage=14399&rft.epage=14412&rft.pages=14399-14412&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6456-10.2011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E896825829%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896825829&rft_id=info:pmid/21976525&rfr_iscdi=true |