Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults
In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2011-11, Vol.73 (8), p.2606-2623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2606 |
container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Nittrouer, Susan Tarr, Eric |
description | In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target. Adults and children (8 and 5 years old) heard stimuli that were either synthetic speech or hybrids consisting of sine wave targets and synthetic cosignals. The target and cosignal either shared a common harmonic structure or did not. An adaptive procedure located listeners’ thresholds for accurate labeling. Lower thresholds when the cosignal is present indicate CMP. Younger children demonstrated CMP effects that were both larger in magnitude and less susceptible to disruptions in harmonicity than those observed for adults. The conclusion was that children are obliged to integrate spectral components of speech signals, a perceptual strategy based on their recognition of when all components come from the same generator. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580970821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-bb7f0f6296c7a6d341ef62a6f4a3e90bc39bf9c6ffa28444688fb358382242d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rHCEYhaW0NB_tD-hNGQoluZlUXx1HbwJhSZtCIDcp9E4cR3dNZ3WjM4H993XZ7aYJJFcq53mPRw9Cnwg-o20jvmVCGWE1JqTGQHC9foMOiWS0ppL-frvfAzlARznfYcwpb_F7dABFESCaQ3Q-iwubbDC2Wur8x4d5tUpxtGb0MVQupiqvrDWLyofKLPzQF7bSoa90Pw1j_oDeOT1k-3G3HqNf3y9vZ1f19c2Pn7OL69o0lIx117UOOw6Sm1bzvqS25aS5Y5paiTtDZeek4c5pEIwxLoTraCOoAGDQt_QYnW99V1O3tL2xYUx6UKvklzqtVdRePVWCX6h5fFAUAAQhxeBkZ5Di_WTzqJY-GzsMOtg4ZSVxIznnUhby9FWSUKCUccKgoF-eoXdxSqF8hJKAoZGYiwKRLWRSzDlZt09NsNrUqLY1qlKj2tSo1mXm8__P3U_8660AX3eAzkYPLulgfH7kGhCY4U1C2HK5SGFu02PCl2__C-g1tTY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>920259068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Nittrouer, Susan ; Tarr, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Nittrouer, Susan ; Tarr, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target. Adults and children (8 and 5 years old) heard stimuli that were either synthetic speech or hybrids consisting of sine wave targets and synthetic cosignals. The target and cosignal either shared a common harmonic structure or did not. An adaptive procedure located listeners’ thresholds for accurate labeling. Lower thresholds when the cosignal is present indicate CMP. Younger children demonstrated CMP effects that were both larger in magnitude and less susceptible to disruptions in harmonicity than those observed for adults. The conclusion was that children are obliged to integrate spectral components of speech signals, a perceptual strategy based on their recognition of when all components come from the same generator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21948285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Artificial Speech ; Audition ; Auditory Perception ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Child, Preschool ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Developmental psychology ; Experimental Psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gestalt Theory ; Humans ; Inspection ; Labeling ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perception ; Perceptual Masking ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Principles ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition, Psychology ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Stimuli ; Studies ; Visual Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2011-11, Vol.73 (8), p.2606-2623</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Nov 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-bb7f0f6296c7a6d341ef62a6f4a3e90bc39bf9c6ffa28444688fb358382242d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-bb7f0f6296c7a6d341ef62a6f4a3e90bc39bf9c6ffa28444688fb358382242d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25280402$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21948285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nittrouer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarr, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target. Adults and children (8 and 5 years old) heard stimuli that were either synthetic speech or hybrids consisting of sine wave targets and synthetic cosignals. The target and cosignal either shared a common harmonic structure or did not. An adaptive procedure located listeners’ thresholds for accurate labeling. Lower thresholds when the cosignal is present indicate CMP. Younger children demonstrated CMP effects that were both larger in magnitude and less susceptible to disruptions in harmonicity than those observed for adults. The conclusion was that children are obliged to integrate spectral components of speech signals, a perceptual strategy based on their recognition of when all components come from the same generator.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Artificial Speech</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gestalt Theory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rHCEYhaW0NB_tD-hNGQoluZlUXx1HbwJhSZtCIDcp9E4cR3dNZ3WjM4H993XZ7aYJJFcq53mPRw9Cnwg-o20jvmVCGWE1JqTGQHC9foMOiWS0ppL-frvfAzlARznfYcwpb_F7dABFESCaQ3Q-iwubbDC2Wur8x4d5tUpxtGb0MVQupiqvrDWLyofKLPzQF7bSoa90Pw1j_oDeOT1k-3G3HqNf3y9vZ1f19c2Pn7OL69o0lIx117UOOw6Sm1bzvqS25aS5Y5paiTtDZeek4c5pEIwxLoTraCOoAGDQt_QYnW99V1O3tL2xYUx6UKvklzqtVdRePVWCX6h5fFAUAAQhxeBkZ5Di_WTzqJY-GzsMOtg4ZSVxIznnUhby9FWSUKCUccKgoF-eoXdxSqF8hJKAoZGYiwKRLWRSzDlZt09NsNrUqLY1qlKj2tSo1mXm8__P3U_8660AX3eAzkYPLulgfH7kGhCY4U1C2HK5SGFu02PCl2__C-g1tTY</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Nittrouer, Susan</creator><creator>Tarr, Eric</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults</title><author>Nittrouer, Susan ; Tarr, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-bb7f0f6296c7a6d341ef62a6f4a3e90bc39bf9c6ffa28444688fb358382242d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Artificial Speech</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gestalt Theory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nittrouer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarr, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nittrouer, Susan</au><au>Tarr, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2606</spage><epage>2623</epage><pages>2606-2623</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target. Adults and children (8 and 5 years old) heard stimuli that were either synthetic speech or hybrids consisting of sine wave targets and synthetic cosignals. The target and cosignal either shared a common harmonic structure or did not. An adaptive procedure located listeners’ thresholds for accurate labeling. Lower thresholds when the cosignal is present indicate CMP. Younger children demonstrated CMP effects that were both larger in magnitude and less susceptible to disruptions in harmonicity than those observed for adults. The conclusion was that children are obliged to integrate spectral components of speech signals, a perceptual strategy based on their recognition of when all components come from the same generator.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21948285</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2011-11, Vol.73 (8), p.2606-2623 |
issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222811 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Artificial Speech Audition Auditory Perception Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological and medical sciences Child Child development Child, Preschool Cognitive Psychology Cues Developmental psychology Experimental Psychology Experiments Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gestalt Theory Humans Inspection Labeling Linguistics Listening Comprehension Male Pattern Recognition, Visual Perception Perceptual Masking Phonetics Phonology Principles Psycholinguistics Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition, Psychology Resistance (Psychology) Sound Spectrography Speech Speech Acoustics Speech Perception Stimuli Studies Visual Perception Young Adult |
title | Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coherence%20masking%20protection%20for%20speech%20in%20children%20and%20adults&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Nittrouer,%20Susan&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2606&rft.epage=2623&rft.pages=2606-2623&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2580970821%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=920259068&rft_id=info:pmid/21948285&rfr_iscdi=true |