Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults

In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2011-11, Vol.73 (8), p.2606-2623
Hauptverfasser: Nittrouer, Susan, Tarr, Eric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2623
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2606
container_title Attention, perception & psychophysics
container_volume 73
creator Nittrouer, Susan
Tarr, Eric
description In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target. Adults and children (8 and 5 years old) heard stimuli that were either synthetic speech or hybrids consisting of sine wave targets and synthetic cosignals. The target and cosignal either shared a common harmonic structure or did not. An adaptive procedure located listeners’ thresholds for accurate labeling. Lower thresholds when the cosignal is present indicate CMP. Younger children demonstrated CMP effects that were both larger in magnitude and less susceptible to disruptions in harmonicity than those observed for adults. The conclusion was that children are obliged to integrate spectral components of speech signals, a perceptual strategy based on their recognition of when all components come from the same generator.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580970821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-bb7f0f6296c7a6d341ef62a6f4a3e90bc39bf9c6ffa28444688fb358382242d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rHCEYhaW0NB_tD-hNGQoluZlUXx1HbwJhSZtCIDcp9E4cR3dNZ3WjM4H993XZ7aYJJFcq53mPRw9Cnwg-o20jvmVCGWE1JqTGQHC9foMOiWS0ppL-frvfAzlARznfYcwpb_F7dABFESCaQ3Q-iwubbDC2Wur8x4d5tUpxtGb0MVQupiqvrDWLyofKLPzQF7bSoa90Pw1j_oDeOT1k-3G3HqNf3y9vZ1f19c2Pn7OL69o0lIx117UOOw6Sm1bzvqS25aS5Y5paiTtDZeek4c5pEIwxLoTraCOoAGDQt_QYnW99V1O3tL2xYUx6UKvklzqtVdRePVWCX6h5fFAUAAQhxeBkZ5Di_WTzqJY-GzsMOtg4ZSVxIznnUhby9FWSUKCUccKgoF-eoXdxSqF8hJKAoZGYiwKRLWRSzDlZt09NsNrUqLY1qlKj2tSo1mXm8__P3U_8660AX3eAzkYPLulgfH7kGhCY4U1C2HK5SGFu02PCl2__C-g1tTY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>920259068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Nittrouer, Susan ; Tarr, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Nittrouer, Susan ; Tarr, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target. Adults and children (8 and 5 years old) heard stimuli that were either synthetic speech or hybrids consisting of sine wave targets and synthetic cosignals. The target and cosignal either shared a common harmonic structure or did not. An adaptive procedure located listeners’ thresholds for accurate labeling. Lower thresholds when the cosignal is present indicate CMP. Younger children demonstrated CMP effects that were both larger in magnitude and less susceptible to disruptions in harmonicity than those observed for adults. The conclusion was that children are obliged to integrate spectral components of speech signals, a perceptual strategy based on their recognition of when all components come from the same generator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21948285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Artificial Speech ; Audition ; Auditory Perception ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Child, Preschool ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Developmental psychology ; Experimental Psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gestalt Theory ; Humans ; Inspection ; Labeling ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perception ; Perceptual Masking ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Principles ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition, Psychology ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Perception ; Stimuli ; Studies ; Visual Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics, 2011-11, Vol.73 (8), p.2606-2623</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Nov 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-bb7f0f6296c7a6d341ef62a6f4a3e90bc39bf9c6ffa28444688fb358382242d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-bb7f0f6296c7a6d341ef62a6f4a3e90bc39bf9c6ffa28444688fb358382242d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25280402$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21948285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nittrouer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarr, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults</title><title>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target. Adults and children (8 and 5 years old) heard stimuli that were either synthetic speech or hybrids consisting of sine wave targets and synthetic cosignals. The target and cosignal either shared a common harmonic structure or did not. An adaptive procedure located listeners’ thresholds for accurate labeling. Lower thresholds when the cosignal is present indicate CMP. Younger children demonstrated CMP effects that were both larger in magnitude and less susceptible to disruptions in harmonicity than those observed for adults. The conclusion was that children are obliged to integrate spectral components of speech signals, a perceptual strategy based on their recognition of when all components come from the same generator.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Artificial Speech</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gestalt Theory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rHCEYhaW0NB_tD-hNGQoluZlUXx1HbwJhSZtCIDcp9E4cR3dNZ3WjM4H993XZ7aYJJFcq53mPRw9Cnwg-o20jvmVCGWE1JqTGQHC9foMOiWS0ppL-frvfAzlARznfYcwpb_F7dABFESCaQ3Q-iwubbDC2Wur8x4d5tUpxtGb0MVQupiqvrDWLyofKLPzQF7bSoa90Pw1j_oDeOT1k-3G3HqNf3y9vZ1f19c2Pn7OL69o0lIx117UOOw6Sm1bzvqS25aS5Y5paiTtDZeek4c5pEIwxLoTraCOoAGDQt_QYnW99V1O3tL2xYUx6UKvklzqtVdRePVWCX6h5fFAUAAQhxeBkZ5Di_WTzqJY-GzsMOtg4ZSVxIznnUhby9FWSUKCUccKgoF-eoXdxSqF8hJKAoZGYiwKRLWRSzDlZt09NsNrUqLY1qlKj2tSo1mXm8__P3U_8660AX3eAzkYPLulgfH7kGhCY4U1C2HK5SGFu02PCl2__C-g1tTY</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Nittrouer, Susan</creator><creator>Tarr, Eric</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults</title><author>Nittrouer, Susan ; Tarr, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-bb7f0f6296c7a6d341ef62a6f4a3e90bc39bf9c6ffa28444688fb358382242d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Artificial Speech</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gestalt Theory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nittrouer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarr, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nittrouer, Susan</au><au>Tarr, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2606</spage><epage>2623</epage><pages>2606-2623</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>In three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that children are more obliged than adults to fuse components of speech signals and asked whether the principle of harmonicity could explain the effect or whether it is, instead, due to children’s implementing speech-based mechanisms. Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target. Adults and children (8 and 5 years old) heard stimuli that were either synthetic speech or hybrids consisting of sine wave targets and synthetic cosignals. The target and cosignal either shared a common harmonic structure or did not. An adaptive procedure located listeners’ thresholds for accurate labeling. Lower thresholds when the cosignal is present indicate CMP. Younger children demonstrated CMP effects that were both larger in magnitude and less susceptible to disruptions in harmonicity than those observed for adults. The conclusion was that children are obliged to integrate spectral components of speech signals, a perceptual strategy based on their recognition of when all components come from the same generator.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21948285</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-3921
ispartof Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2011-11, Vol.73 (8), p.2606-2623
issn 1943-3921
1943-393X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222811
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Artificial Speech
Audition
Auditory Perception
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child development
Child, Preschool
Cognitive Psychology
Cues
Developmental psychology
Experimental Psychology
Experiments
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gestalt Theory
Humans
Inspection
Labeling
Linguistics
Listening Comprehension
Male
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Perception
Perceptual Masking
Phonetics
Phonology
Principles
Psycholinguistics
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recognition, Psychology
Resistance (Psychology)
Sound Spectrography
Speech
Speech Acoustics
Speech Perception
Stimuli
Studies
Visual Perception
Young Adult
title Coherence masking protection for speech in children and adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coherence%20masking%20protection%20for%20speech%20in%20children%20and%20adults&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Nittrouer,%20Susan&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2606&rft.epage=2623&rft.pages=2606-2623&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-011-0210-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2580970821%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=920259068&rft_id=info:pmid/21948285&rfr_iscdi=true