Skewed Riskscapes and Gentrified Inequities: Environmental Exposure Disparities in Seattle, Washington
Few studies have considered the sociohistorical intersection of environmental injustice and gentrification; a gap addressed by this case study of Seattle, Washington. This study explored the advantages of integrating air toxic risk screening with gentrification research to enhance proximity and heal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of public health (1971) 2011-12, Vol.101 (S1), p.S246-S254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S254 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | S246 |
container_title | American journal of public health (1971) |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | ABEL, Troy D WHITE, Jonah |
description | Few studies have considered the sociohistorical intersection of environmental injustice and gentrification; a gap addressed by this case study of Seattle, Washington. This study explored the advantages of integrating air toxic risk screening with gentrification research to enhance proximity and health equity analysis methodologies. It was hypothesized that Seattle's industrial air toxic exposure risk was unevenly dispersed, that gentrification stratified the city's neighborhoods, and that the inequities of both converged.
Spatial characterizations of air toxic pollution risk exposures from 1990 to 2007 were combined with longitudinal cluster analysis of census block groups in Seattle, Washington, from 1990 to 2000.
A cluster of air toxic exposure inequality and socioeconomic inequity converged in 1 area of south central Seattle. Minority and working class residents were more concentrated in the same neighborhoods near Seattle's worst industrial pollution risks.
Not all pollution was distributed equally in a dynamic urban landscape. Using techniques to examine skewed riskscapes and socioeconomic urban geographies provided a foundation for future research on the connections among environmental health hazard sources, socially vulnerable neighborhoods, and health inequity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2521429401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1e0573036b04d00994a6983498dc72afe20a41b886e1e2ca5d3934e4b2b1f7563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1P3DAURS3UCqbAvqvKqsSuM_j5I3G6QEIwBSqkolLE0nKSFzBknGAnQP99PZ2B0pUtvfOur3UI-QhsxoGp_cPvF6czzgBmgjHI5QaZgJIwZUzqd2TCWMHSXWRb5EOMdwmBQsEm2eKgRQagJqS5vMcnrOlPF-9jZXuM1PqanqAfgmtcmpx5fBjd4DB-pXP_6ELnF2lqWzp_7rs4BqTHLvY2_GWo8_QS7TC0-IVe23jr_M3Q-R3yvrFtxN31uU2uvs1_HZ1Oz3-cnB0dnk8rqfgwBWQqF6lwyWSd2hfSZoUWstB1lXPbIGdWQql1hoC8sqoWhZAoS15Ck6tMbJODVW4_lgusq-U3bGv64BY2_Daddeb_iXe35qZ7NIJzLrVOAZ_XAaF7GDEO5q4bg0-dTcEyXjCQeYLYCqpCF2PA5vUBYGYpxizFmKUYsxKTVj69Lfa68GIiAXtrwCYPbROsr1z8x8lcg9Jc_AGG45cq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>906290147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skewed Riskscapes and Gentrified Inequities: Environmental Exposure Disparities in Seattle, Washington</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>ABEL, Troy D ; WHITE, Jonah</creator><creatorcontrib>ABEL, Troy D ; WHITE, Jonah</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies have considered the sociohistorical intersection of environmental injustice and gentrification; a gap addressed by this case study of Seattle, Washington. This study explored the advantages of integrating air toxic risk screening with gentrification research to enhance proximity and health equity analysis methodologies. It was hypothesized that Seattle's industrial air toxic exposure risk was unevenly dispersed, that gentrification stratified the city's neighborhoods, and that the inequities of both converged.
Spatial characterizations of air toxic pollution risk exposures from 1990 to 2007 were combined with longitudinal cluster analysis of census block groups in Seattle, Washington, from 1990 to 2000.
A cluster of air toxic exposure inequality and socioeconomic inequity converged in 1 area of south central Seattle. Minority and working class residents were more concentrated in the same neighborhoods near Seattle's worst industrial pollution risks.
Not all pollution was distributed equally in a dynamic urban landscape. Using techniques to examine skewed riskscapes and socioeconomic urban geographies provided a foundation for future research on the connections among environmental health hazard sources, socially vulnerable neighborhoods, and health inequity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21836115</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Public Health Association</publisher><subject>Air Pollution ; Biological and medical sciences ; Censuses ; Cluster Analysis ; Continental Population Groups ; Environment. Living conditions ; Environmental Exposure ; General aspects ; Gentrification ; Geography ; Health disparities ; Health hazards ; Health Status Disparities ; Housing ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Industry ; Inequality ; Injustice ; Longitudinal Studies ; Medical sciences ; Methods ; Miscellaneous ; Neighborhoods ; Outdoor air quality ; Principal components analysis ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research and Practice ; Risk ; Risk exposure ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Statistical methods ; Studies ; Urban Population - trends ; Washington</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 2011-12, Vol.101 (S1), p.S246-S254</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association 2011</rights><rights>American Public Health Association 2011 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1e0573036b04d00994a6983498dc72afe20a41b886e1e2ca5d3934e4b2b1f7563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1e0573036b04d00994a6983498dc72afe20a41b886e1e2ca5d3934e4b2b1f7563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222488/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222488/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27845,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24781582$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21836115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ABEL, Troy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, Jonah</creatorcontrib><title>Skewed Riskscapes and Gentrified Inequities: Environmental Exposure Disparities in Seattle, Washington</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>Few studies have considered the sociohistorical intersection of environmental injustice and gentrification; a gap addressed by this case study of Seattle, Washington. This study explored the advantages of integrating air toxic risk screening with gentrification research to enhance proximity and health equity analysis methodologies. It was hypothesized that Seattle's industrial air toxic exposure risk was unevenly dispersed, that gentrification stratified the city's neighborhoods, and that the inequities of both converged.
Spatial characterizations of air toxic pollution risk exposures from 1990 to 2007 were combined with longitudinal cluster analysis of census block groups in Seattle, Washington, from 1990 to 2000.
A cluster of air toxic exposure inequality and socioeconomic inequity converged in 1 area of south central Seattle. Minority and working class residents were more concentrated in the same neighborhoods near Seattle's worst industrial pollution risks.
Not all pollution was distributed equally in a dynamic urban landscape. Using techniques to examine skewed riskscapes and socioeconomic urban geographies provided a foundation for future research on the connections among environmental health hazard sources, socially vulnerable neighborhoods, and health inequity.</description><subject>Air Pollution</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Continental Population Groups</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gentrification</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Injustice</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research and Practice</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk exposure</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Urban Population - trends</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1P3DAURS3UCqbAvqvKqsSuM_j5I3G6QEIwBSqkolLE0nKSFzBknGAnQP99PZ2B0pUtvfOur3UI-QhsxoGp_cPvF6czzgBmgjHI5QaZgJIwZUzqd2TCWMHSXWRb5EOMdwmBQsEm2eKgRQagJqS5vMcnrOlPF-9jZXuM1PqanqAfgmtcmpx5fBjd4DB-pXP_6ELnF2lqWzp_7rs4BqTHLvY2_GWo8_QS7TC0-IVe23jr_M3Q-R3yvrFtxN31uU2uvs1_HZ1Oz3-cnB0dnk8rqfgwBWQqF6lwyWSd2hfSZoUWstB1lXPbIGdWQql1hoC8sqoWhZAoS15Ck6tMbJODVW4_lgusq-U3bGv64BY2_Daddeb_iXe35qZ7NIJzLrVOAZ_XAaF7GDEO5q4bg0-dTcEyXjCQeYLYCqpCF2PA5vUBYGYpxizFmKUYsxKTVj69Lfa68GIiAXtrwCYPbROsr1z8x8lcg9Jc_AGG45cq</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>ABEL, Troy D</creator><creator>WHITE, Jonah</creator><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Skewed Riskscapes and Gentrified Inequities: Environmental Exposure Disparities in Seattle, Washington</title><author>ABEL, Troy D ; WHITE, Jonah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1e0573036b04d00994a6983498dc72afe20a41b886e1e2ca5d3934e4b2b1f7563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Air Pollution</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Continental Population Groups</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gentrification</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Injustice</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research and Practice</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk exposure</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Urban Population - trends</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ABEL, Troy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, Jonah</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ABEL, Troy D</au><au>WHITE, Jonah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skewed Riskscapes and Gentrified Inequities: Environmental Exposure Disparities in Seattle, Washington</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S246</spage><epage>S254</epage><pages>S246-S254</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><coden>AJPEAG</coden><abstract>Few studies have considered the sociohistorical intersection of environmental injustice and gentrification; a gap addressed by this case study of Seattle, Washington. This study explored the advantages of integrating air toxic risk screening with gentrification research to enhance proximity and health equity analysis methodologies. It was hypothesized that Seattle's industrial air toxic exposure risk was unevenly dispersed, that gentrification stratified the city's neighborhoods, and that the inequities of both converged.
Spatial characterizations of air toxic pollution risk exposures from 1990 to 2007 were combined with longitudinal cluster analysis of census block groups in Seattle, Washington, from 1990 to 2000.
A cluster of air toxic exposure inequality and socioeconomic inequity converged in 1 area of south central Seattle. Minority and working class residents were more concentrated in the same neighborhoods near Seattle's worst industrial pollution risks.
Not all pollution was distributed equally in a dynamic urban landscape. Using techniques to examine skewed riskscapes and socioeconomic urban geographies provided a foundation for future research on the connections among environmental health hazard sources, socially vulnerable neighborhoods, and health inequity.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Public Health Association</pub><pmid>21836115</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-0036 |
ispartof | American journal of public health (1971), 2011-12, Vol.101 (S1), p.S246-S254 |
issn | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222488 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Education Source; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Air Pollution Biological and medical sciences Censuses Cluster Analysis Continental Population Groups Environment. Living conditions Environmental Exposure General aspects Gentrification Geography Health disparities Health hazards Health Status Disparities Housing Humans Hypotheses Industry Inequality Injustice Longitudinal Studies Medical sciences Methods Miscellaneous Neighborhoods Outdoor air quality Principal components analysis Public health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine R&D Research & development Research and Practice Risk Risk exposure Socioeconomic Factors Statistical methods Studies Urban Population - trends Washington |
title | Skewed Riskscapes and Gentrified Inequities: Environmental Exposure Disparities in Seattle, Washington |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A56%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skewed%20Riskscapes%20and%20Gentrified%20Inequities:%20Environmental%20Exposure%20Disparities%20in%20Seattle,%20Washington&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=ABEL,%20Troy%20D&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S246&rft.epage=S254&rft.pages=S246-S254&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft.coden=AJPEAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2521429401%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=906290147&rft_id=info:pmid/21836115&rfr_iscdi=true |