The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest
Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricula...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care (London, England) England), 2011-01, Vol.15 (1), p.R13-R13, Article R13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | R13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | R13 |
container_title | Critical care (London, England) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Lah, Katja Križmarić, Miljenko Grmec, Stefek |
description | Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest. In this study we sought to evaluate the pattern of PetCO2 changes in cardiac arrest caused by VF/VT and asphyxial cardiac arrest in patients who were resuscitated according to new 2005 guidelines.
The study included two cohorts of patients: cardiac arrest due to asphyxia with initial rhythm asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia with initial rhythm VF or pulseless VT. PetCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation and repeatedly every minute, both for patients with or without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared the dynamic pattern of PetCO2 between groups.
Between June 2006 and June 2009 resuscitation was attempted in 325 patients and in this study we included 51 patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and 63 patients with VF/VT cardiac arrest. The initial values of PetCO2 were significantly higher in the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest (6.74 ± 4.22 kilopascals (kPa) versus 4.51 ± 2.47 kPa; P = 0.004). In the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest, the initial values of PetCO2 did not show a significant difference when we compared patients with and without ROSC (6.96 ± 3.63 kPa versus 5.77 ± 4.64 kPa; P = 0.313). We confirmed significantly higher initial PetCO2 values for those with ROSC in the group with primary cardiac arrest (4.62 ± 2.46 kPa versus 3.29 ± 1.76 kPa; P = 0.041). A significant difference in PetCO2 values for those with and without ROSC was achieved after five minutes of CPR in both groups. In all patients with ROSC the initial PetCO2 was again higher than 1.33 kPa.
The dynamic pattern of PetCO2 values during out-of-hospital CPR showed higher values of PetCO2 in the first two minutes of CPR in asphyxia, and a prognostic value of initial PetCO2 only in primary VF/VT cardiac arrest. A prognostic value of PetCO2 for ROSC was achieved after the fifth minute of CPR in both groups and remained present until final values. This difference seems to be a useful criterion in pre-hospital diagnostic procedures and attendance of cardiac arrest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/cc9417 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A248215254</galeid><sourcerecordid>A248215254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3dcbd42b29e862efae24819d02bc404ffc4a9caeb9a59336f8b6e84059bf5413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9qFTEQxhdRbK36CBIQ9Grb_D-7XgilaCsUvKngXcgmk3Miu8ma7Naep_SVzLq1eERykTD5zTffJFNVLwk-JaSRZ8a0nGweVceES1lL3H59XM5M8roRTBxVz3L-hjHZNJI9rY4ooZQJgY-rnzc7QHYf9OANGvU0QQooOgTB1pO3ukdGpy4GZH2887awc_Jhu0RLZJz7IQad9ihBnrPxk558DO8K7RwkCAZQB9MPgIB0Hnf7O78qWq8N0qlkTUgHi24hTMmbudcJOd8l3_e_lc5KhQw95HyATNrs9qvMP2rPqydOl5QX9_tJ9eXjh5uLq_r68-Wni_Pr2nBGpxqYNZ3ltKMtNJKC00B5Q1qLaWc45s4ZrlujoWu1aBmTrukkNByLtnOCE3ZSvV91x7kbwJrFnO7VmPxQnkNF7dXhTfA7tY23ilFKMRdF4O29QIrf5-JcDT4bKH0HiHNWzaaVDSZiKfV6Jbe6B-WDi0XQLLQ6L6YpEVTwQp3-hyrLQvnaGMD5Ej9IeLMmmBRzTuAezBOslplS60wV8NXfrT5gf4aI_QKH087F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>879680151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lah, Katja ; Križmarić, Miljenko ; Grmec, Stefek</creator><creatorcontrib>Lah, Katja ; Križmarić, Miljenko ; Grmec, Stefek</creatorcontrib><description>Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest. In this study we sought to evaluate the pattern of PetCO2 changes in cardiac arrest caused by VF/VT and asphyxial cardiac arrest in patients who were resuscitated according to new 2005 guidelines.
The study included two cohorts of patients: cardiac arrest due to asphyxia with initial rhythm asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia with initial rhythm VF or pulseless VT. PetCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation and repeatedly every minute, both for patients with or without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared the dynamic pattern of PetCO2 between groups.
Between June 2006 and June 2009 resuscitation was attempted in 325 patients and in this study we included 51 patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and 63 patients with VF/VT cardiac arrest. The initial values of PetCO2 were significantly higher in the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest (6.74 ± 4.22 kilopascals (kPa) versus 4.51 ± 2.47 kPa; P = 0.004). In the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest, the initial values of PetCO2 did not show a significant difference when we compared patients with and without ROSC (6.96 ± 3.63 kPa versus 5.77 ± 4.64 kPa; P = 0.313). We confirmed significantly higher initial PetCO2 values for those with ROSC in the group with primary cardiac arrest (4.62 ± 2.46 kPa versus 3.29 ± 1.76 kPa; P = 0.041). A significant difference in PetCO2 values for those with and without ROSC was achieved after five minutes of CPR in both groups. In all patients with ROSC the initial PetCO2 was again higher than 1.33 kPa.
The dynamic pattern of PetCO2 values during out-of-hospital CPR showed higher values of PetCO2 in the first two minutes of CPR in asphyxia, and a prognostic value of initial PetCO2 only in primary VF/VT cardiac arrest. A prognostic value of PetCO2 for ROSC was achieved after the fifth minute of CPR in both groups and remained present until final values. This difference seems to be a useful criterion in pre-hospital diagnostic procedures and attendance of cardiac arrest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc9417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21223550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Asphyxia - complications ; Asphyxia - physiopathology ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - physiology ; Cardiac arrest ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Care and treatment ; CPR (First aid) ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - physiopathology ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy ; Partial Pressure ; Patient outcomes ; Physiological aspects ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology ; Tidal Volume - physiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Fibrillation - complications ; Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2011-01, Vol.15 (1), p.R13-R13, Article R13</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2011 Lah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Lah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3dcbd42b29e862efae24819d02bc404ffc4a9caeb9a59336f8b6e84059bf5413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3dcbd42b29e862efae24819d02bc404ffc4a9caeb9a59336f8b6e84059bf5413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222045/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222045/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21223550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lah, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Križmarić, Miljenko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grmec, Stefek</creatorcontrib><title>The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest. In this study we sought to evaluate the pattern of PetCO2 changes in cardiac arrest caused by VF/VT and asphyxial cardiac arrest in patients who were resuscitated according to new 2005 guidelines.
The study included two cohorts of patients: cardiac arrest due to asphyxia with initial rhythm asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia with initial rhythm VF or pulseless VT. PetCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation and repeatedly every minute, both for patients with or without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared the dynamic pattern of PetCO2 between groups.
Between June 2006 and June 2009 resuscitation was attempted in 325 patients and in this study we included 51 patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and 63 patients with VF/VT cardiac arrest. The initial values of PetCO2 were significantly higher in the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest (6.74 ± 4.22 kilopascals (kPa) versus 4.51 ± 2.47 kPa; P = 0.004). In the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest, the initial values of PetCO2 did not show a significant difference when we compared patients with and without ROSC (6.96 ± 3.63 kPa versus 5.77 ± 4.64 kPa; P = 0.313). We confirmed significantly higher initial PetCO2 values for those with ROSC in the group with primary cardiac arrest (4.62 ± 2.46 kPa versus 3.29 ± 1.76 kPa; P = 0.041). A significant difference in PetCO2 values for those with and without ROSC was achieved after five minutes of CPR in both groups. In all patients with ROSC the initial PetCO2 was again higher than 1.33 kPa.
The dynamic pattern of PetCO2 values during out-of-hospital CPR showed higher values of PetCO2 in the first two minutes of CPR in asphyxia, and a prognostic value of initial PetCO2 only in primary VF/VT cardiac arrest. A prognostic value of PetCO2 for ROSC was achieved after the fifth minute of CPR in both groups and remained present until final values. This difference seems to be a useful criterion in pre-hospital diagnostic procedures and attendance of cardiac arrest.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Asphyxia - complications</subject><subject>Asphyxia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>CPR (First aid)</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - physiopathology</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Partial Pressure</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tidal Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9qFTEQxhdRbK36CBIQ9Grb_D-7XgilaCsUvKngXcgmk3Miu8ma7Naep_SVzLq1eERykTD5zTffJFNVLwk-JaSRZ8a0nGweVceES1lL3H59XM5M8roRTBxVz3L-hjHZNJI9rY4ooZQJgY-rnzc7QHYf9OANGvU0QQooOgTB1pO3ukdGpy4GZH2887awc_Jhu0RLZJz7IQad9ihBnrPxk558DO8K7RwkCAZQB9MPgIB0Hnf7O78qWq8N0qlkTUgHi24hTMmbudcJOd8l3_e_lc5KhQw95HyATNrs9qvMP2rPqydOl5QX9_tJ9eXjh5uLq_r68-Wni_Pr2nBGpxqYNZ3ltKMtNJKC00B5Q1qLaWc45s4ZrlujoWu1aBmTrukkNByLtnOCE3ZSvV91x7kbwJrFnO7VmPxQnkNF7dXhTfA7tY23ilFKMRdF4O29QIrf5-JcDT4bKH0HiHNWzaaVDSZiKfV6Jbe6B-WDi0XQLLQ6L6YpEVTwQp3-hyrLQvnaGMD5Ej9IeLMmmBRzTuAezBOslplS60wV8NXfrT5gf4aI_QKH087F</recordid><startdate>20110111</startdate><enddate>20110111</enddate><creator>Lah, Katja</creator><creator>Križmarić, Miljenko</creator><creator>Grmec, Stefek</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110111</creationdate><title>The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest</title><author>Lah, Katja ; Križmarić, Miljenko ; Grmec, Stefek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3dcbd42b29e862efae24819d02bc404ffc4a9caeb9a59336f8b6e84059bf5413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Asphyxia - complications</topic><topic>Asphyxia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>CPR (First aid)</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - physiopathology</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Partial Pressure</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tidal Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lah, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Križmarić, Miljenko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grmec, Stefek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lah, Katja</au><au>Križmarić, Miljenko</au><au>Grmec, Stefek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2011-01-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>R13</spage><epage>R13</epage><pages>R13-R13</pages><artnum>R13</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><abstract>Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest. In this study we sought to evaluate the pattern of PetCO2 changes in cardiac arrest caused by VF/VT and asphyxial cardiac arrest in patients who were resuscitated according to new 2005 guidelines.
The study included two cohorts of patients: cardiac arrest due to asphyxia with initial rhythm asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia with initial rhythm VF or pulseless VT. PetCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation and repeatedly every minute, both for patients with or without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared the dynamic pattern of PetCO2 between groups.
Between June 2006 and June 2009 resuscitation was attempted in 325 patients and in this study we included 51 patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and 63 patients with VF/VT cardiac arrest. The initial values of PetCO2 were significantly higher in the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest (6.74 ± 4.22 kilopascals (kPa) versus 4.51 ± 2.47 kPa; P = 0.004). In the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest, the initial values of PetCO2 did not show a significant difference when we compared patients with and without ROSC (6.96 ± 3.63 kPa versus 5.77 ± 4.64 kPa; P = 0.313). We confirmed significantly higher initial PetCO2 values for those with ROSC in the group with primary cardiac arrest (4.62 ± 2.46 kPa versus 3.29 ± 1.76 kPa; P = 0.041). A significant difference in PetCO2 values for those with and without ROSC was achieved after five minutes of CPR in both groups. In all patients with ROSC the initial PetCO2 was again higher than 1.33 kPa.
The dynamic pattern of PetCO2 values during out-of-hospital CPR showed higher values of PetCO2 in the first two minutes of CPR in asphyxia, and a prognostic value of initial PetCO2 only in primary VF/VT cardiac arrest. A prognostic value of PetCO2 for ROSC was achieved after the fifth minute of CPR in both groups and remained present until final values. This difference seems to be a useful criterion in pre-hospital diagnostic procedures and attendance of cardiac arrest.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>21223550</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc9417</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-8535 |
ispartof | Critical care (London, England), 2011-01, Vol.15 (1), p.R13-R13, Article R13 |
issn | 1364-8535 1466-609X 1364-8535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222045 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Asphyxia - complications Asphyxia - physiopathology Carbon dioxide Carbon Dioxide - physiology Cardiac arrest Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Care and treatment CPR (First aid) Diagnosis Female Health aspects Humans Male Methods Middle Aged Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - physiopathology Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy Partial Pressure Patient outcomes Physiological aspects Practice Guidelines as Topic Prognosis Prospective Studies Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology Tidal Volume - physiology Treatment Outcome Ventricular Fibrillation - complications Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology |
title | The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20dynamic%20pattern%20of%20end-tidal%20carbon%20dioxide%20during%20cardiopulmonary%20resuscitation:%20difference%20between%20asphyxial%20cardiac%20arrest%20and%20ventricular%20fibrillation/pulseless%20ventricular%20tachycardia%20cardiac%20arrest&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Lah,%20Katja&rft.date=2011-01-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=R13&rft.epage=R13&rft.pages=R13-R13&rft.artnum=R13&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc9417&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA248215254%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=879680151&rft_id=info:pmid/21223550&rft_galeid=A248215254&rfr_iscdi=true |