The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest

Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricula...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2011-01, Vol.15 (1), p.R13-R13, Article R13
Hauptverfasser: Lah, Katja, Križmarić, Miljenko, Grmec, Stefek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page R13
container_issue 1
container_start_page R13
container_title Critical care (London, England)
container_volume 15
creator Lah, Katja
Križmarić, Miljenko
Grmec, Stefek
description Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest. In this study we sought to evaluate the pattern of PetCO2 changes in cardiac arrest caused by VF/VT and asphyxial cardiac arrest in patients who were resuscitated according to new 2005 guidelines. The study included two cohorts of patients: cardiac arrest due to asphyxia with initial rhythm asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia with initial rhythm VF or pulseless VT. PetCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation and repeatedly every minute, both for patients with or without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared the dynamic pattern of PetCO2 between groups. Between June 2006 and June 2009 resuscitation was attempted in 325 patients and in this study we included 51 patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and 63 patients with VF/VT cardiac arrest. The initial values of PetCO2 were significantly higher in the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest (6.74 ± 4.22 kilopascals (kPa) versus 4.51 ± 2.47 kPa; P = 0.004). In the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest, the initial values of PetCO2 did not show a significant difference when we compared patients with and without ROSC (6.96 ± 3.63 kPa versus 5.77 ± 4.64 kPa; P = 0.313). We confirmed significantly higher initial PetCO2 values for those with ROSC in the group with primary cardiac arrest (4.62 ± 2.46 kPa versus 3.29 ± 1.76 kPa; P = 0.041). A significant difference in PetCO2 values for those with and without ROSC was achieved after five minutes of CPR in both groups. In all patients with ROSC the initial PetCO2 was again higher than 1.33 kPa. The dynamic pattern of PetCO2 values during out-of-hospital CPR showed higher values of PetCO2 in the first two minutes of CPR in asphyxia, and a prognostic value of initial PetCO2 only in primary VF/VT cardiac arrest. A prognostic value of PetCO2 for ROSC was achieved after the fifth minute of CPR in both groups and remained present until final values. This difference seems to be a useful criterion in pre-hospital diagnostic procedures and attendance of cardiac arrest.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/cc9417
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A248215254</galeid><sourcerecordid>A248215254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3dcbd42b29e862efae24819d02bc404ffc4a9caeb9a59336f8b6e84059bf5413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9qFTEQxhdRbK36CBIQ9Grb_D-7XgilaCsUvKngXcgmk3Miu8ma7Naep_SVzLq1eERykTD5zTffJFNVLwk-JaSRZ8a0nGweVceES1lL3H59XM5M8roRTBxVz3L-hjHZNJI9rY4ooZQJgY-rnzc7QHYf9OANGvU0QQooOgTB1pO3ukdGpy4GZH2887awc_Jhu0RLZJz7IQad9ihBnrPxk558DO8K7RwkCAZQB9MPgIB0Hnf7O78qWq8N0qlkTUgHi24hTMmbudcJOd8l3_e_lc5KhQw95HyATNrs9qvMP2rPqydOl5QX9_tJ9eXjh5uLq_r68-Wni_Pr2nBGpxqYNZ3ltKMtNJKC00B5Q1qLaWc45s4ZrlujoWu1aBmTrukkNByLtnOCE3ZSvV91x7kbwJrFnO7VmPxQnkNF7dXhTfA7tY23ilFKMRdF4O29QIrf5-JcDT4bKH0HiHNWzaaVDSZiKfV6Jbe6B-WDi0XQLLQ6L6YpEVTwQp3-hyrLQvnaGMD5Ej9IeLMmmBRzTuAezBOslplS60wV8NXfrT5gf4aI_QKH087F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>879680151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lah, Katja ; Križmarić, Miljenko ; Grmec, Stefek</creator><creatorcontrib>Lah, Katja ; Križmarić, Miljenko ; Grmec, Stefek</creatorcontrib><description>Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest. In this study we sought to evaluate the pattern of PetCO2 changes in cardiac arrest caused by VF/VT and asphyxial cardiac arrest in patients who were resuscitated according to new 2005 guidelines. The study included two cohorts of patients: cardiac arrest due to asphyxia with initial rhythm asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia with initial rhythm VF or pulseless VT. PetCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation and repeatedly every minute, both for patients with or without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared the dynamic pattern of PetCO2 between groups. Between June 2006 and June 2009 resuscitation was attempted in 325 patients and in this study we included 51 patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and 63 patients with VF/VT cardiac arrest. The initial values of PetCO2 were significantly higher in the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest (6.74 ± 4.22 kilopascals (kPa) versus 4.51 ± 2.47 kPa; P = 0.004). In the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest, the initial values of PetCO2 did not show a significant difference when we compared patients with and without ROSC (6.96 ± 3.63 kPa versus 5.77 ± 4.64 kPa; P = 0.313). We confirmed significantly higher initial PetCO2 values for those with ROSC in the group with primary cardiac arrest (4.62 ± 2.46 kPa versus 3.29 ± 1.76 kPa; P = 0.041). A significant difference in PetCO2 values for those with and without ROSC was achieved after five minutes of CPR in both groups. In all patients with ROSC the initial PetCO2 was again higher than 1.33 kPa. The dynamic pattern of PetCO2 values during out-of-hospital CPR showed higher values of PetCO2 in the first two minutes of CPR in asphyxia, and a prognostic value of initial PetCO2 only in primary VF/VT cardiac arrest. A prognostic value of PetCO2 for ROSC was achieved after the fifth minute of CPR in both groups and remained present until final values. This difference seems to be a useful criterion in pre-hospital diagnostic procedures and attendance of cardiac arrest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc9417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21223550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Asphyxia - complications ; Asphyxia - physiopathology ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - physiology ; Cardiac arrest ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Care and treatment ; CPR (First aid) ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - physiopathology ; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy ; Partial Pressure ; Patient outcomes ; Physiological aspects ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology ; Tidal Volume - physiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Fibrillation - complications ; Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2011-01, Vol.15 (1), p.R13-R13, Article R13</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2011 Lah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Lah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3dcbd42b29e862efae24819d02bc404ffc4a9caeb9a59336f8b6e84059bf5413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3dcbd42b29e862efae24819d02bc404ffc4a9caeb9a59336f8b6e84059bf5413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222045/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3222045/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21223550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lah, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Križmarić, Miljenko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grmec, Stefek</creatorcontrib><title>The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest. In this study we sought to evaluate the pattern of PetCO2 changes in cardiac arrest caused by VF/VT and asphyxial cardiac arrest in patients who were resuscitated according to new 2005 guidelines. The study included two cohorts of patients: cardiac arrest due to asphyxia with initial rhythm asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia with initial rhythm VF or pulseless VT. PetCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation and repeatedly every minute, both for patients with or without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared the dynamic pattern of PetCO2 between groups. Between June 2006 and June 2009 resuscitation was attempted in 325 patients and in this study we included 51 patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and 63 patients with VF/VT cardiac arrest. The initial values of PetCO2 were significantly higher in the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest (6.74 ± 4.22 kilopascals (kPa) versus 4.51 ± 2.47 kPa; P = 0.004). In the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest, the initial values of PetCO2 did not show a significant difference when we compared patients with and without ROSC (6.96 ± 3.63 kPa versus 5.77 ± 4.64 kPa; P = 0.313). We confirmed significantly higher initial PetCO2 values for those with ROSC in the group with primary cardiac arrest (4.62 ± 2.46 kPa versus 3.29 ± 1.76 kPa; P = 0.041). A significant difference in PetCO2 values for those with and without ROSC was achieved after five minutes of CPR in both groups. In all patients with ROSC the initial PetCO2 was again higher than 1.33 kPa. The dynamic pattern of PetCO2 values during out-of-hospital CPR showed higher values of PetCO2 in the first two minutes of CPR in asphyxia, and a prognostic value of initial PetCO2 only in primary VF/VT cardiac arrest. A prognostic value of PetCO2 for ROSC was achieved after the fifth minute of CPR in both groups and remained present until final values. This difference seems to be a useful criterion in pre-hospital diagnostic procedures and attendance of cardiac arrest.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Asphyxia - complications</subject><subject>Asphyxia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>CPR (First aid)</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - physiopathology</subject><subject>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Partial Pressure</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tidal Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9qFTEQxhdRbK36CBIQ9Grb_D-7XgilaCsUvKngXcgmk3Miu8ma7Naep_SVzLq1eERykTD5zTffJFNVLwk-JaSRZ8a0nGweVceES1lL3H59XM5M8roRTBxVz3L-hjHZNJI9rY4ooZQJgY-rnzc7QHYf9OANGvU0QQooOgTB1pO3ukdGpy4GZH2887awc_Jhu0RLZJz7IQad9ihBnrPxk558DO8K7RwkCAZQB9MPgIB0Hnf7O78qWq8N0qlkTUgHi24hTMmbudcJOd8l3_e_lc5KhQw95HyATNrs9qvMP2rPqydOl5QX9_tJ9eXjh5uLq_r68-Wni_Pr2nBGpxqYNZ3ltKMtNJKC00B5Q1qLaWc45s4ZrlujoWu1aBmTrukkNByLtnOCE3ZSvV91x7kbwJrFnO7VmPxQnkNF7dXhTfA7tY23ilFKMRdF4O29QIrf5-JcDT4bKH0HiHNWzaaVDSZiKfV6Jbe6B-WDi0XQLLQ6L6YpEVTwQp3-hyrLQvnaGMD5Ej9IeLMmmBRzTuAezBOslplS60wV8NXfrT5gf4aI_QKH087F</recordid><startdate>20110111</startdate><enddate>20110111</enddate><creator>Lah, Katja</creator><creator>Križmarić, Miljenko</creator><creator>Grmec, Stefek</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110111</creationdate><title>The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest</title><author>Lah, Katja ; Križmarić, Miljenko ; Grmec, Stefek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-e3dcbd42b29e862efae24819d02bc404ffc4a9caeb9a59336f8b6e84059bf5413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Asphyxia - complications</topic><topic>Asphyxia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>CPR (First aid)</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - physiopathology</topic><topic>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Partial Pressure</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tidal Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lah, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Križmarić, Miljenko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grmec, Stefek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lah, Katja</au><au>Križmarić, Miljenko</au><au>Grmec, Stefek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2011-01-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>R13</spage><epage>R13</epage><pages>R13-R13</pages><artnum>R13</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><abstract>Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with cardiac output and consequently has a prognostic value in CPR. In our previous study we confirmed that initial PetCO2 value was significantly higher in asphyxial arrest than in ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest. In this study we sought to evaluate the pattern of PetCO2 changes in cardiac arrest caused by VF/VT and asphyxial cardiac arrest in patients who were resuscitated according to new 2005 guidelines. The study included two cohorts of patients: cardiac arrest due to asphyxia with initial rhythm asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia with initial rhythm VF or pulseless VT. PetCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation and repeatedly every minute, both for patients with or without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We compared the dynamic pattern of PetCO2 between groups. Between June 2006 and June 2009 resuscitation was attempted in 325 patients and in this study we included 51 patients with asphyxial cardiac arrest and 63 patients with VF/VT cardiac arrest. The initial values of PetCO2 were significantly higher in the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest (6.74 ± 4.22 kilopascals (kPa) versus 4.51 ± 2.47 kPa; P = 0.004). In the group with asphyxial cardiac arrest, the initial values of PetCO2 did not show a significant difference when we compared patients with and without ROSC (6.96 ± 3.63 kPa versus 5.77 ± 4.64 kPa; P = 0.313). We confirmed significantly higher initial PetCO2 values for those with ROSC in the group with primary cardiac arrest (4.62 ± 2.46 kPa versus 3.29 ± 1.76 kPa; P = 0.041). A significant difference in PetCO2 values for those with and without ROSC was achieved after five minutes of CPR in both groups. In all patients with ROSC the initial PetCO2 was again higher than 1.33 kPa. The dynamic pattern of PetCO2 values during out-of-hospital CPR showed higher values of PetCO2 in the first two minutes of CPR in asphyxia, and a prognostic value of initial PetCO2 only in primary VF/VT cardiac arrest. A prognostic value of PetCO2 for ROSC was achieved after the fifth minute of CPR in both groups and remained present until final values. This difference seems to be a useful criterion in pre-hospital diagnostic procedures and attendance of cardiac arrest.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>21223550</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc9417</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-8535
ispartof Critical care (London, England), 2011-01, Vol.15 (1), p.R13-R13, Article R13
issn 1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3222045
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Asphyxia - complications
Asphyxia - physiopathology
Carbon dioxide
Carbon Dioxide - physiology
Cardiac arrest
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Care and treatment
CPR (First aid)
Diagnosis
Female
Health aspects
Humans
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - etiology
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - physiopathology
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy
Partial Pressure
Patient outcomes
Physiological aspects
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications
Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology
Tidal Volume - physiology
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Fibrillation - complications
Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology
title The dynamic pattern of end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: difference between asphyxial cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20dynamic%20pattern%20of%20end-tidal%20carbon%20dioxide%20during%20cardiopulmonary%20resuscitation:%20difference%20between%20asphyxial%20cardiac%20arrest%20and%20ventricular%20fibrillation/pulseless%20ventricular%20tachycardia%20cardiac%20arrest&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Lah,%20Katja&rft.date=2011-01-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=R13&rft.epage=R13&rft.pages=R13-R13&rft.artnum=R13&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc9417&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA248215254%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=879680151&rft_id=info:pmid/21223550&rft_galeid=A248215254&rfr_iscdi=true