In vivo biostability of polymeric spine implants: retrieval analyses from a United States investigational device exemption study

The Dynesys System for stabilizing the lumbar spine was first surgically implanted in Europe in 1994. In 2003, a prospective, randomized, investigational device exemption clinical trial of the system for non-fusion dynamic stabilization began. Polycarbonate urethane (PCU) and polyethylene terephthal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2011-11, Vol.20 (11), p.1837-1849
Hauptverfasser: Shen, Ming, Zhang, Kai, Koettig, Petra, Welch, William C., Dawson, John M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1849
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1837
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 20
creator Shen, Ming
Zhang, Kai
Koettig, Petra
Welch, William C.
Dawson, John M.
description The Dynesys System for stabilizing the lumbar spine was first surgically implanted in Europe in 1994. In 2003, a prospective, randomized, investigational device exemption clinical trial of the system for non-fusion dynamic stabilization began. Polycarbonate urethane (PCU) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) components explanted from four patients who had participated in the study were analyzed for biostability. Components had been implanted 9–19 months. The explanted components were visually inspected and digitally photographed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze the surface of the spacers. The chemical and molecular properties of the retrieved spacers and cords were quantitatively compared with lot-matched, shelf-aged, components that had not been implanted using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). FTIR analyses suggested that the explanted spacers exhibited slight surface chemical changes but were chemically unchanged below the surface and in the center. New peaks that could be attributed to biodegradation of PCU were not observed. The spectral analyses for the cords revealed that the PET cords were chemically unchanged at both the surface and the interior. Peaks associated with the PET biodegradation were not detected. GPC results did not identify changes to the distributions of molecular weights that might be attributed to biodegradation of either PCU spacers or PET cords. The explanted condition of the retrieved components demonstrated the biostability of both PCU spacers and PET cords that had been in vivo for up to 19 months.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00586-011-1812-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3207333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>926891846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ea4ccea7fdeb86affec7d397b422e721565f2889ecb047e9582534d277b1953b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuL1TAUx4MozvXqB3AjwY2r6kn6SOJCkMHHwIALnXVI09NrhrapSVrszo9urnccHyBmEzjnd95_Qh4zeM4AxIsIUMumAMYKJhkv5B2yY1XJC1Alv0t2oCooGsHUGXkQ4zUAqxU098kZZ3UpOcgd-XYx0dWtnrbOx2RaN7i0Ud_T2Q_biMFZGmc3IXXjPJgpxZc0YAoOVzNQM5lhixhpH_xIDb2aXMKOfkwmZaObVozJHUxyPoO0w9VZpPgVx_loojEt3faQ3OvNEPHRzb8nV2_ffDp_X1x-eHdx_vqysDVAKtBU1qIRfYetbEzfoxVdqURbcY4iz9PUPZdSoW2hEqhqyeuy6rgQLVN12ZZ78uqUd17aETuLUwpm0HNwowmb9sbpPz2T-6wPftUlB1HmtyfPbhIE_2XJk-nRRYtD3gr6JWrFG6mYrJr_k5CvB3XDMvn0L_LaLyEv6wiBaFTzozA7QTb4GAP2t00z0Ecd6JMOdNaBPupAyxzz5PdpbyN-Hj4D_ATE7JoOGH5V_nfW73ZywXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900769633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo biostability of polymeric spine implants: retrieval analyses from a United States investigational device exemption study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shen, Ming ; Zhang, Kai ; Koettig, Petra ; Welch, William C. ; Dawson, John M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shen, Ming ; Zhang, Kai ; Koettig, Petra ; Welch, William C. ; Dawson, John M.</creatorcontrib><description>The Dynesys System for stabilizing the lumbar spine was first surgically implanted in Europe in 1994. In 2003, a prospective, randomized, investigational device exemption clinical trial of the system for non-fusion dynamic stabilization began. Polycarbonate urethane (PCU) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) components explanted from four patients who had participated in the study were analyzed for biostability. Components had been implanted 9–19 months. The explanted components were visually inspected and digitally photographed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze the surface of the spacers. The chemical and molecular properties of the retrieved spacers and cords were quantitatively compared with lot-matched, shelf-aged, components that had not been implanted using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). FTIR analyses suggested that the explanted spacers exhibited slight surface chemical changes but were chemically unchanged below the surface and in the center. New peaks that could be attributed to biodegradation of PCU were not observed. The spectral analyses for the cords revealed that the PET cords were chemically unchanged at both the surface and the interior. Peaks associated with the PET biodegradation were not detected. GPC results did not identify changes to the distributions of molecular weights that might be attributed to biodegradation of either PCU spacers or PET cords. The explanted condition of the retrieved components demonstrated the biostability of both PCU spacers and PET cords that had been in vivo for up to 19 months.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1812-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21538208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Biodegradation ; Chromatography ; Clinical trials ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Molecular weight ; Neurosurgery ; Original ; Original Article ; polycarbonate ; polyethylene terephthalate ; Polymers - chemistry ; Polyurethanes - chemistry ; Prostheses and Implants ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Spacer ; Spinal Stenosis - surgery ; Spine (lumbar) ; Surgical Orthopedics ; United States ; urethane</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2011-11, Vol.20 (11), p.1837-1849</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ea4ccea7fdeb86affec7d397b422e721565f2889ecb047e9582534d277b1953b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ea4ccea7fdeb86affec7d397b422e721565f2889ecb047e9582534d277b1953b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3207333/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3207333/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21538208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shen, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koettig, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, John M.</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo biostability of polymeric spine implants: retrieval analyses from a United States investigational device exemption study</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>The Dynesys System for stabilizing the lumbar spine was first surgically implanted in Europe in 1994. In 2003, a prospective, randomized, investigational device exemption clinical trial of the system for non-fusion dynamic stabilization began. Polycarbonate urethane (PCU) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) components explanted from four patients who had participated in the study were analyzed for biostability. Components had been implanted 9–19 months. The explanted components were visually inspected and digitally photographed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze the surface of the spacers. The chemical and molecular properties of the retrieved spacers and cords were quantitatively compared with lot-matched, shelf-aged, components that had not been implanted using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). FTIR analyses suggested that the explanted spacers exhibited slight surface chemical changes but were chemically unchanged below the surface and in the center. New peaks that could be attributed to biodegradation of PCU were not observed. The spectral analyses for the cords revealed that the PET cords were chemically unchanged at both the surface and the interior. Peaks associated with the PET biodegradation were not detected. GPC results did not identify changes to the distributions of molecular weights that might be attributed to biodegradation of either PCU spacers or PET cords. The explanted condition of the retrieved components demonstrated the biostability of both PCU spacers and PET cords that had been in vivo for up to 19 months.</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>polycarbonate</subject><subject>polyethylene terephthalate</subject><subject>Polymers - chemistry</subject><subject>Polyurethanes - chemistry</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Spacer</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>urethane</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuL1TAUx4MozvXqB3AjwY2r6kn6SOJCkMHHwIALnXVI09NrhrapSVrszo9urnccHyBmEzjnd95_Qh4zeM4AxIsIUMumAMYKJhkv5B2yY1XJC1Alv0t2oCooGsHUGXkQ4zUAqxU098kZZ3UpOcgd-XYx0dWtnrbOx2RaN7i0Ud_T2Q_biMFZGmc3IXXjPJgpxZc0YAoOVzNQM5lhixhpH_xIDb2aXMKOfkwmZaObVozJHUxyPoO0w9VZpPgVx_loojEt3faQ3OvNEPHRzb8nV2_ffDp_X1x-eHdx_vqysDVAKtBU1qIRfYetbEzfoxVdqURbcY4iz9PUPZdSoW2hEqhqyeuy6rgQLVN12ZZ78uqUd17aETuLUwpm0HNwowmb9sbpPz2T-6wPftUlB1HmtyfPbhIE_2XJk-nRRYtD3gr6JWrFG6mYrJr_k5CvB3XDMvn0L_LaLyEv6wiBaFTzozA7QTb4GAP2t00z0Ecd6JMOdNaBPupAyxzz5PdpbyN-Hj4D_ATE7JoOGH5V_nfW73ZywXg</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Shen, Ming</creator><creator>Zhang, Kai</creator><creator>Koettig, Petra</creator><creator>Welch, William C.</creator><creator>Dawson, John M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>In vivo biostability of polymeric spine implants: retrieval analyses from a United States investigational device exemption study</title><author>Shen, Ming ; Zhang, Kai ; Koettig, Petra ; Welch, William C. ; Dawson, John M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ea4ccea7fdeb86affec7d397b422e721565f2889ecb047e9582534d277b1953b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>polycarbonate</topic><topic>polyethylene terephthalate</topic><topic>Polymers - chemistry</topic><topic>Polyurethanes - chemistry</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Spacer</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>urethane</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shen, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koettig, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, John M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shen, Ming</au><au>Zhang, Kai</au><au>Koettig, Petra</au><au>Welch, William C.</au><au>Dawson, John M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo biostability of polymeric spine implants: retrieval analyses from a United States investigational device exemption study</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1837</spage><epage>1849</epage><pages>1837-1849</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>The Dynesys System for stabilizing the lumbar spine was first surgically implanted in Europe in 1994. In 2003, a prospective, randomized, investigational device exemption clinical trial of the system for non-fusion dynamic stabilization began. Polycarbonate urethane (PCU) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) components explanted from four patients who had participated in the study were analyzed for biostability. Components had been implanted 9–19 months. The explanted components were visually inspected and digitally photographed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze the surface of the spacers. The chemical and molecular properties of the retrieved spacers and cords were quantitatively compared with lot-matched, shelf-aged, components that had not been implanted using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). FTIR analyses suggested that the explanted spacers exhibited slight surface chemical changes but were chemically unchanged below the surface and in the center. New peaks that could be attributed to biodegradation of PCU were not observed. The spectral analyses for the cords revealed that the PET cords were chemically unchanged at both the surface and the interior. Peaks associated with the PET biodegradation were not detected. GPC results did not identify changes to the distributions of molecular weights that might be attributed to biodegradation of either PCU spacers or PET cords. The explanted condition of the retrieved components demonstrated the biostability of both PCU spacers and PET cords that had been in vivo for up to 19 months.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21538208</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-011-1812-8</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 2011-11, Vol.20 (11), p.1837-1849
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3207333
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biocompatible Materials - chemistry
Biodegradation
Chromatography
Clinical trials
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Molecular weight
Neurosurgery
Original
Original Article
polycarbonate
polyethylene terephthalate
Polymers - chemistry
Polyurethanes - chemistry
Prostheses and Implants
Scanning electron microscopy
Spacer
Spinal Stenosis - surgery
Spine (lumbar)
Surgical Orthopedics
United States
urethane
title In vivo biostability of polymeric spine implants: retrieval analyses from a United States investigational device exemption study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A18%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20biostability%20of%20polymeric%20spine%20implants:%20retrieval%20analyses%20from%20a%20United%20States%20investigational%20device%20exemption%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Shen,%20Ming&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1837&rft.epage=1849&rft.pages=1837-1849&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-011-1812-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E926891846%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900769633&rft_id=info:pmid/21538208&rfr_iscdi=true