Association of hip strength estimates by finite‐element analysis with fractures in women and men

Finite‐element analysis (FEA) of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans can estimate site‐specific whole‐bone strength. However, it is uncertain whether the site‐specific detail included in FEA‐estimated proximal femur (hip) strength can determine fracture risk at sites with different biomecha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and mineral research 2011-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1593-1600
Hauptverfasser: Amin, Shreyasee, Kopperdhal, David L, Melton, L Joseph, Achenbach, Sara J, Therneau, Terry M, Riggs, B Lawrence, Keaveny, Tony M, Khosla, Sundeep
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1600
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1593
container_title Journal of bone and mineral research
container_volume 26
creator Amin, Shreyasee
Kopperdhal, David L
Melton, L Joseph
Achenbach, Sara J
Therneau, Terry M
Riggs, B Lawrence
Keaveny, Tony M
Khosla, Sundeep
description Finite‐element analysis (FEA) of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans can estimate site‐specific whole‐bone strength. However, it is uncertain whether the site‐specific detail included in FEA‐estimated proximal femur (hip) strength can determine fracture risk at sites with different biomechanical characteristics. To address this question, we used FEA of proximal femur QCT scans to estimate hip strength and load‐to‐strength ratio during a simulated sideways fall and measured total hip areal and volumetric bone mineral density (aBMD and vBMD) from QCT images in an age‐stratified random sample of community‐dwelling adults age 35 years or older. Among 314 women (mean age ± SD: 61 ± 15 years; 235 postmenopausal) and 266 men (62 ± 16 years), 139 women and 104 men had any prevalent fracture, whereas 55 Women and 28 men had a prevalent osteoporotic fracture that had occurred at age 35 years or older. Odds ratios by age‐adjusted logistic regression analysis for prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures each were similar for FEA hip strength and load‐to‐strength ratio, as well as for total hip aBMD and vBMD. C‐statistics (estimated areas under ROC curves) also were similar [eg, 0.84 to 0.85 (women) and 0.75 to 0.78 (men) for osteoporotic fractures]. In women and men, the association with prevalent osteoporotic fractures increased below an estimated hip strength of approximately 3000 N. Despite its site‐specific nature, FEA‐estimated hip strength worked equally well at predicting prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures. Furthermore, an estimated hip strength below 3000 N may represent a critical level of systemic skeletal fragility in both sexes that warrants further investigation. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbmr.347
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3201782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4313015831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-da5492d15567f55753934b69b66819d91282f54f60d49f955c0a6b370857b6223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0suKFDEUANAgitOOgl8gARHd1Jj3YyOMg09GBNF1SKWS6TRVlTapsumdn-A3-iWmmHZGBcXVXeRwb-4DgPsYnWCEyNNNO-QTyuQNsMKc0IYJhW-CFVKKNYhRfATulLJBCAkuxG1wRDBFXCC-Au1pKclFO8U0whTgOm5hmbIfL6Y19GWKg518ge0ehjjGyX__-s33fvDjBO1o-32JBe5itSFbN8252jjCXaqigg7WeBfcCrYv_t4hHoNPL198PHvdnL9_9ebs9LxxnBLZdJYzTTrMuZCBc8mppqwVuhW1Gd1pTBQJnAWBOqaD5twhK1oqkeKyFYTQY_DsMu92bgffufrHbHuzzbWHvDfJRvP7yxjX5iJ9MZQgLNWS4PEhQU6f59q8GWJxvu_t6NNcjJKaKSIl_g9JmZaEiiqf_FNiJYlihBBV6cM_6CbNuQ55UUJwojlm1wldTqVkH64axMgsx2CWYzD1GCp98OtAruDP7Vfw6ABscbavKxxdLNeOEVW_p6trLt0u9n7_14Lm7fN3H5bCPwDgIcs2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1866529514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association of hip strength estimates by finite‐element analysis with fractures in women and men</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Amin, Shreyasee ; Kopperdhal, David L ; Melton, L Joseph ; Achenbach, Sara J ; Therneau, Terry M ; Riggs, B Lawrence ; Keaveny, Tony M ; Khosla, Sundeep</creator><creatorcontrib>Amin, Shreyasee ; Kopperdhal, David L ; Melton, L Joseph ; Achenbach, Sara J ; Therneau, Terry M ; Riggs, B Lawrence ; Keaveny, Tony M ; Khosla, Sundeep</creatorcontrib><description>Finite‐element analysis (FEA) of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans can estimate site‐specific whole‐bone strength. However, it is uncertain whether the site‐specific detail included in FEA‐estimated proximal femur (hip) strength can determine fracture risk at sites with different biomechanical characteristics. To address this question, we used FEA of proximal femur QCT scans to estimate hip strength and load‐to‐strength ratio during a simulated sideways fall and measured total hip areal and volumetric bone mineral density (aBMD and vBMD) from QCT images in an age‐stratified random sample of community‐dwelling adults age 35 years or older. Among 314 women (mean age ± SD: 61 ± 15 years; 235 postmenopausal) and 266 men (62 ± 16 years), 139 women and 104 men had any prevalent fracture, whereas 55 Women and 28 men had a prevalent osteoporotic fracture that had occurred at age 35 years or older. Odds ratios by age‐adjusted logistic regression analysis for prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures each were similar for FEA hip strength and load‐to‐strength ratio, as well as for total hip aBMD and vBMD. C‐statistics (estimated areas under ROC curves) also were similar [eg, 0.84 to 0.85 (women) and 0.75 to 0.78 (men) for osteoporotic fractures]. In women and men, the association with prevalent osteoporotic fractures increased below an estimated hip strength of approximately 3000 N. Despite its site‐specific nature, FEA‐estimated hip strength worked equally well at predicting prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures. Furthermore, an estimated hip strength below 3000 N may represent a critical level of systemic skeletal fragility in both sexes that warrants further investigation. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-0431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.347</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21305605</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBMREJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging - pathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Bone Density - physiology ; Female ; Femur - physiopathology ; Finite Element Analysis ; Fractures ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hip ; Hip - physiopathology ; Hip Fractures - epidemiology ; Hip Fractures - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minnesota - epidemiology ; Odds Ratio ; Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology ; Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology ; Prevalence ; Proximal Femur ; Quantitative Computed Tomography ; ROC Curve ; Sex Characteristics ; Skeleton and joints ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and mineral research, 2011-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1593-1600</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</rights><rights>2009 Mayo Foundation 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-da5492d15567f55753934b69b66819d91282f54f60d49f955c0a6b370857b6223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-da5492d15567f55753934b69b66819d91282f54f60d49f955c0a6b370857b6223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbmr.347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbmr.347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24288729$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21305605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amin, Shreyasee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopperdhal, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melton, L Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achenbach, Sara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therneau, Terry M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggs, B Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keaveny, Tony M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khosla, Sundeep</creatorcontrib><title>Association of hip strength estimates by finite‐element analysis with fractures in women and men</title><title>Journal of bone and mineral research</title><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><description>Finite‐element analysis (FEA) of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans can estimate site‐specific whole‐bone strength. However, it is uncertain whether the site‐specific detail included in FEA‐estimated proximal femur (hip) strength can determine fracture risk at sites with different biomechanical characteristics. To address this question, we used FEA of proximal femur QCT scans to estimate hip strength and load‐to‐strength ratio during a simulated sideways fall and measured total hip areal and volumetric bone mineral density (aBMD and vBMD) from QCT images in an age‐stratified random sample of community‐dwelling adults age 35 years or older. Among 314 women (mean age ± SD: 61 ± 15 years; 235 postmenopausal) and 266 men (62 ± 16 years), 139 women and 104 men had any prevalent fracture, whereas 55 Women and 28 men had a prevalent osteoporotic fracture that had occurred at age 35 years or older. Odds ratios by age‐adjusted logistic regression analysis for prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures each were similar for FEA hip strength and load‐to‐strength ratio, as well as for total hip aBMD and vBMD. C‐statistics (estimated areas under ROC curves) also were similar [eg, 0.84 to 0.85 (women) and 0.75 to 0.78 (men) for osteoporotic fractures]. In women and men, the association with prevalent osteoporotic fractures increased below an estimated hip strength of approximately 3000 N. Despite its site‐specific nature, FEA‐estimated hip strength worked equally well at predicting prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures. Furthermore, an estimated hip strength below 3000 N may represent a critical level of systemic skeletal fragility in both sexes that warrants further investigation. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging - pathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - physiopathology</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Hip - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minnesota - epidemiology</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Proximal Femur</subject><subject>Quantitative Computed Tomography</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0884-0431</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0suKFDEUANAgitOOgl8gARHd1Jj3YyOMg09GBNF1SKWS6TRVlTapsumdn-A3-iWmmHZGBcXVXeRwb-4DgPsYnWCEyNNNO-QTyuQNsMKc0IYJhW-CFVKKNYhRfATulLJBCAkuxG1wRDBFXCC-Au1pKclFO8U0whTgOm5hmbIfL6Y19GWKg518ge0ehjjGyX__-s33fvDjBO1o-32JBe5itSFbN8252jjCXaqigg7WeBfcCrYv_t4hHoNPL198PHvdnL9_9ebs9LxxnBLZdJYzTTrMuZCBc8mppqwVuhW1Gd1pTBQJnAWBOqaD5twhK1oqkeKyFYTQY_DsMu92bgffufrHbHuzzbWHvDfJRvP7yxjX5iJ9MZQgLNWS4PEhQU6f59q8GWJxvu_t6NNcjJKaKSIl_g9JmZaEiiqf_FNiJYlihBBV6cM_6CbNuQ55UUJwojlm1wldTqVkH64axMgsx2CWYzD1GCp98OtAruDP7Vfw6ABscbavKxxdLNeOEVW_p6trLt0u9n7_14Lm7fN3H5bCPwDgIcs2</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Amin, Shreyasee</creator><creator>Kopperdhal, David L</creator><creator>Melton, L Joseph</creator><creator>Achenbach, Sara J</creator><creator>Therneau, Terry M</creator><creator>Riggs, B Lawrence</creator><creator>Keaveny, Tony M</creator><creator>Khosla, Sundeep</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Association of hip strength estimates by finite‐element analysis with fractures in women and men</title><author>Amin, Shreyasee ; Kopperdhal, David L ; Melton, L Joseph ; Achenbach, Sara J ; Therneau, Terry M ; Riggs, B Lawrence ; Keaveny, Tony M ; Khosla, Sundeep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-da5492d15567f55753934b69b66819d91282f54f60d49f955c0a6b370857b6223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging - pathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - physiopathology</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Hip - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minnesota - epidemiology</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Proximal Femur</topic><topic>Quantitative Computed Tomography</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amin, Shreyasee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopperdhal, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melton, L Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achenbach, Sara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therneau, Terry M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggs, B Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keaveny, Tony M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khosla, Sundeep</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amin, Shreyasee</au><au>Kopperdhal, David L</au><au>Melton, L Joseph</au><au>Achenbach, Sara J</au><au>Therneau, Terry M</au><au>Riggs, B Lawrence</au><au>Keaveny, Tony M</au><au>Khosla, Sundeep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association of hip strength estimates by finite‐element analysis with fractures in women and men</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1593</spage><epage>1600</epage><pages>1593-1600</pages><issn>0884-0431</issn><eissn>1523-4681</eissn><coden>JBMREJ</coden><abstract>Finite‐element analysis (FEA) of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans can estimate site‐specific whole‐bone strength. However, it is uncertain whether the site‐specific detail included in FEA‐estimated proximal femur (hip) strength can determine fracture risk at sites with different biomechanical characteristics. To address this question, we used FEA of proximal femur QCT scans to estimate hip strength and load‐to‐strength ratio during a simulated sideways fall and measured total hip areal and volumetric bone mineral density (aBMD and vBMD) from QCT images in an age‐stratified random sample of community‐dwelling adults age 35 years or older. Among 314 women (mean age ± SD: 61 ± 15 years; 235 postmenopausal) and 266 men (62 ± 16 years), 139 women and 104 men had any prevalent fracture, whereas 55 Women and 28 men had a prevalent osteoporotic fracture that had occurred at age 35 years or older. Odds ratios by age‐adjusted logistic regression analysis for prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures each were similar for FEA hip strength and load‐to‐strength ratio, as well as for total hip aBMD and vBMD. C‐statistics (estimated areas under ROC curves) also were similar [eg, 0.84 to 0.85 (women) and 0.75 to 0.78 (men) for osteoporotic fractures]. In women and men, the association with prevalent osteoporotic fractures increased below an estimated hip strength of approximately 3000 N. Despite its site‐specific nature, FEA‐estimated hip strength worked equally well at predicting prevalent overall and osteoporotic fractures. Furthermore, an estimated hip strength below 3000 N may represent a critical level of systemic skeletal fragility in both sexes that warrants further investigation. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21305605</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbmr.347</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-0431
ispartof Journal of bone and mineral research, 2011-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1593-1600
issn 0884-0431
1523-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3201782
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging - pathology
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density
Bone Density - physiology
Female
Femur - physiopathology
Finite Element Analysis
Fractures
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hip
Hip - physiopathology
Hip Fractures - epidemiology
Hip Fractures - physiopathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Minnesota - epidemiology
Odds Ratio
Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology
Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology
Prevalence
Proximal Femur
Quantitative Computed Tomography
ROC Curve
Sex Characteristics
Skeleton and joints
Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system
Young Adult
title Association of hip strength estimates by finite‐element analysis with fractures in women and men
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A27%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20of%20hip%20strength%20estimates%20by%20finite%E2%80%90element%20analysis%20with%20fractures%20in%20women%20and%20men&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20mineral%20research&rft.au=Amin,%20Shreyasee&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1593&rft.epage=1600&rft.pages=1593-1600&rft.issn=0884-0431&rft.eissn=1523-4681&rft.coden=JBMREJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbmr.347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4313015831%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1866529514&rft_id=info:pmid/21305605&rfr_iscdi=true