Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10

The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical bioinformatics 2011-09, Vol.1 (1), p.25-25
Hauptverfasser: Soltermann, Alex, Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra, Behnke, Silvia, Storz, Martina, Moch, Holger, Bode, Beata
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Journal of clinical bioinformatics
container_volume 1
creator Soltermann, Alex
Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra
Behnke, Silvia
Storz, Martina
Moch, Holger
Bode, Beata
description The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic effusion samples. Therefore, we evaluated the staining quality of monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibodies 8F1 and D-10 on microarrays of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions by automated immunochemistry. Cores from effusion cell blocks of 117 patients with > 40 malignant cell clusters per whole section (pleural n = 75, peritoneal n = 42) were assembled together with 30 histologic control cores from large tissue blocks (lung, breast and ovarian carcinoma, each n = 10) on hybrid cytology-tissue microarrays (C/TMA). Four immunochemistry protocols (Mab 8F1 and D-10, CC1-mono Ventana and H2-60 Bond automat) were performed. Immunoreactivity was semi-quantitatively scored for intensity and intensity multiplied by percentage staining (H-score). Tumors were classified into female genital tract carcinoma (n = 39), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 23), mesothelioma (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 14), breast carcinoma (n = 10), gastro-intestinal carcinoma (n = 12) and other (n = 4). On both platforms, reproducible nuclear ERCC1 immunoreactivity was achieved with both antibodies, although D-10 was slightly weaker and presented more background staining as well as more variation in the low expression range. No significant differences were found between cytologic and histologic cores. Using the 8F1 CC1-mono protocol, lung and breast carcinomas had lower ERCC1 expression in comparison to the other entities (p-value < 0.05). Cytology microarrays (CMA) are suitable for investigation of clinical biomarkers and can be combined with conventional TMA's. Dichotomization of ERCC1 immunoreactivity scores is most suitable for patient stratification since definition of negativity is antibody-dependent.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/2043-9113-1-25
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3198679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A270409004</galeid><sourcerecordid>A270409004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4295-841ddb8d7bf62c591852a854acd3204b723f4df535e3be58401ebdeaba4e5a703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks9rFTEQx4Motjx79SgBD562TTbJ210PwuPZ2kJBED2H_Ji8F9lNarJb2Kt_uVlefbRYk0MyM598mckMQm8pOae0XV_UhLOqo5RVtKrFC3R6dLx8dD9BZzn_JGXxYjbta3RS025NBWOn6PdmGuOgRrD48tt2S7EfhilEs4fB5zHNOAa8n3XyFpt5jH3czRejz3kCPHiTokpJFcjhQfV-F1QYMTg3ZR9D_ojhXvWTGouxICXodbQeMm6vaDEt_lxR8ga9cqrPcPZwrtCPq8vv2-vq9uuXm-3mttK87kTVcmqtbm2j3bo2oqOtqFUruDKWlVp1UzPHrRNMANMgWk4oaAtKKw5CNYSt0KeD7t2kB7AGwphUL--SH1SaZVRePo0Ev5e7eC8Z7dp10xWBzUFA-_gfgacREwe5tEEubZBU1qJofHhIIsVfE-RRln820PcqQJyy7AhZM8FKMSv0_kDuVA_SBxeLpllouakbwklBeaHOn6HKtqWBJgZwvvife1Cal3MCd8yfErlM1b8Zv3v8bUf87wyxP_zNyMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900635372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Soltermann, Alex ; Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra ; Behnke, Silvia ; Storz, Martina ; Moch, Holger ; Bode, Beata</creator><creatorcontrib>Soltermann, Alex ; Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra ; Behnke, Silvia ; Storz, Martina ; Moch, Holger ; Bode, Beata</creatorcontrib><description>The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic effusion samples. Therefore, we evaluated the staining quality of monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibodies 8F1 and D-10 on microarrays of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions by automated immunochemistry. Cores from effusion cell blocks of 117 patients with &gt; 40 malignant cell clusters per whole section (pleural n = 75, peritoneal n = 42) were assembled together with 30 histologic control cores from large tissue blocks (lung, breast and ovarian carcinoma, each n = 10) on hybrid cytology-tissue microarrays (C/TMA). Four immunochemistry protocols (Mab 8F1 and D-10, CC1-mono Ventana and H2-60 Bond automat) were performed. Immunoreactivity was semi-quantitatively scored for intensity and intensity multiplied by percentage staining (H-score). Tumors were classified into female genital tract carcinoma (n = 39), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 23), mesothelioma (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 14), breast carcinoma (n = 10), gastro-intestinal carcinoma (n = 12) and other (n = 4). On both platforms, reproducible nuclear ERCC1 immunoreactivity was achieved with both antibodies, although D-10 was slightly weaker and presented more background staining as well as more variation in the low expression range. No significant differences were found between cytologic and histologic cores. Using the 8F1 CC1-mono protocol, lung and breast carcinomas had lower ERCC1 expression in comparison to the other entities (p-value &lt; 0.05). Cytology microarrays (CMA) are suitable for investigation of clinical biomarkers and can be combined with conventional TMA's. Dichotomization of ERCC1 immunoreactivity scores is most suitable for patient stratification since definition of negativity is antibody-dependent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2043-9113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-9113</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-25</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21961533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Diagnosis ; DNA microarrays ; Genetic aspects ; Physiological aspects ; Tumors ; Viral antibodies</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2011-09, Vol.1 (1), p.25-25</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2011 Soltermann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Soltermann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4295-841ddb8d7bf62c591852a854acd3204b723f4df535e3be58401ebdeaba4e5a703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4295-841ddb8d7bf62c591852a854acd3204b723f4df535e3be58401ebdeaba4e5a703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198679/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198679/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21961533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soltermann, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storz, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, Beata</creatorcontrib><title>Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10</title><title>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</title><addtitle>J Clin Bioinforma</addtitle><description>The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic effusion samples. Therefore, we evaluated the staining quality of monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibodies 8F1 and D-10 on microarrays of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions by automated immunochemistry. Cores from effusion cell blocks of 117 patients with &gt; 40 malignant cell clusters per whole section (pleural n = 75, peritoneal n = 42) were assembled together with 30 histologic control cores from large tissue blocks (lung, breast and ovarian carcinoma, each n = 10) on hybrid cytology-tissue microarrays (C/TMA). Four immunochemistry protocols (Mab 8F1 and D-10, CC1-mono Ventana and H2-60 Bond automat) were performed. Immunoreactivity was semi-quantitatively scored for intensity and intensity multiplied by percentage staining (H-score). Tumors were classified into female genital tract carcinoma (n = 39), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 23), mesothelioma (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 14), breast carcinoma (n = 10), gastro-intestinal carcinoma (n = 12) and other (n = 4). On both platforms, reproducible nuclear ERCC1 immunoreactivity was achieved with both antibodies, although D-10 was slightly weaker and presented more background staining as well as more variation in the low expression range. No significant differences were found between cytologic and histologic cores. Using the 8F1 CC1-mono protocol, lung and breast carcinomas had lower ERCC1 expression in comparison to the other entities (p-value &lt; 0.05). Cytology microarrays (CMA) are suitable for investigation of clinical biomarkers and can be combined with conventional TMA's. Dichotomization of ERCC1 immunoreactivity scores is most suitable for patient stratification since definition of negativity is antibody-dependent.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>DNA microarrays</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Viral antibodies</subject><issn>2043-9113</issn><issn>2043-9113</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1ks9rFTEQx4Motjx79SgBD562TTbJ210PwuPZ2kJBED2H_Ji8F9lNarJb2Kt_uVlefbRYk0MyM598mckMQm8pOae0XV_UhLOqo5RVtKrFC3R6dLx8dD9BZzn_JGXxYjbta3RS025NBWOn6PdmGuOgRrD48tt2S7EfhilEs4fB5zHNOAa8n3XyFpt5jH3czRejz3kCPHiTokpJFcjhQfV-F1QYMTg3ZR9D_ojhXvWTGouxICXodbQeMm6vaDEt_lxR8ga9cqrPcPZwrtCPq8vv2-vq9uuXm-3mttK87kTVcmqtbm2j3bo2oqOtqFUruDKWlVp1UzPHrRNMANMgWk4oaAtKKw5CNYSt0KeD7t2kB7AGwphUL--SH1SaZVRePo0Ev5e7eC8Z7dp10xWBzUFA-_gfgacREwe5tEEubZBU1qJofHhIIsVfE-RRln820PcqQJyy7AhZM8FKMSv0_kDuVA_SBxeLpllouakbwklBeaHOn6HKtqWBJgZwvvife1Cal3MCd8yfErlM1b8Zv3v8bUf87wyxP_zNyMo</recordid><startdate>20110930</startdate><enddate>20110930</enddate><creator>Soltermann, Alex</creator><creator>Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra</creator><creator>Behnke, Silvia</creator><creator>Storz, Martina</creator><creator>Moch, Holger</creator><creator>Bode, Beata</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110930</creationdate><title>Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10</title><author>Soltermann, Alex ; Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra ; Behnke, Silvia ; Storz, Martina ; Moch, Holger ; Bode, Beata</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4295-841ddb8d7bf62c591852a854acd3204b723f4df535e3be58401ebdeaba4e5a703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>DNA microarrays</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Viral antibodies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soltermann, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storz, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, Beata</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soltermann, Alex</au><au>Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra</au><au>Behnke, Silvia</au><au>Storz, Martina</au><au>Moch, Holger</au><au>Bode, Beata</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Bioinforma</addtitle><date>2011-09-30</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>25-25</pages><issn>2043-9113</issn><eissn>2043-9113</eissn><abstract>The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic effusion samples. Therefore, we evaluated the staining quality of monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibodies 8F1 and D-10 on microarrays of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions by automated immunochemistry. Cores from effusion cell blocks of 117 patients with &gt; 40 malignant cell clusters per whole section (pleural n = 75, peritoneal n = 42) were assembled together with 30 histologic control cores from large tissue blocks (lung, breast and ovarian carcinoma, each n = 10) on hybrid cytology-tissue microarrays (C/TMA). Four immunochemistry protocols (Mab 8F1 and D-10, CC1-mono Ventana and H2-60 Bond automat) were performed. Immunoreactivity was semi-quantitatively scored for intensity and intensity multiplied by percentage staining (H-score). Tumors were classified into female genital tract carcinoma (n = 39), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 23), mesothelioma (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 14), breast carcinoma (n = 10), gastro-intestinal carcinoma (n = 12) and other (n = 4). On both platforms, reproducible nuclear ERCC1 immunoreactivity was achieved with both antibodies, although D-10 was slightly weaker and presented more background staining as well as more variation in the low expression range. No significant differences were found between cytologic and histologic cores. Using the 8F1 CC1-mono protocol, lung and breast carcinomas had lower ERCC1 expression in comparison to the other entities (p-value &lt; 0.05). Cytology microarrays (CMA) are suitable for investigation of clinical biomarkers and can be combined with conventional TMA's. Dichotomization of ERCC1 immunoreactivity scores is most suitable for patient stratification since definition of negativity is antibody-dependent.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>21961533</pmid><doi>10.1186/2043-9113-1-25</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2043-9113
ispartof Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2011-09, Vol.1 (1), p.25-25
issn 2043-9113
2043-9113
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3198679
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Antibodies
Diagnosis
DNA microarrays
Genetic aspects
Physiological aspects
Tumors
Viral antibodies
title Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T01%3A21%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20ERCC1%20immunochemistry%20on%20hybrid%20cytology/tissue%20microarray%20of%20malignant%20effusions:%20evaluation%20of%20antibodies%208F1%20and%20D-10&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20bioinformatics&rft.au=Soltermann,%20Alex&rft.date=2011-09-30&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=25-25&rft.issn=2043-9113&rft.eissn=2043-9113&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2043-9113-1-25&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA270409004%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900635372&rft_id=info:pmid/21961533&rft_galeid=A270409004&rfr_iscdi=true