Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10
The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical bioinformatics 2011-09, Vol.1 (1), p.25-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Journal of clinical bioinformatics |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Soltermann, Alex Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra Behnke, Silvia Storz, Martina Moch, Holger Bode, Beata |
description | The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic effusion samples. Therefore, we evaluated the staining quality of monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibodies 8F1 and D-10 on microarrays of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions by automated immunochemistry.
Cores from effusion cell blocks of 117 patients with > 40 malignant cell clusters per whole section (pleural n = 75, peritoneal n = 42) were assembled together with 30 histologic control cores from large tissue blocks (lung, breast and ovarian carcinoma, each n = 10) on hybrid cytology-tissue microarrays (C/TMA). Four immunochemistry protocols (Mab 8F1 and D-10, CC1-mono Ventana and H2-60 Bond automat) were performed. Immunoreactivity was semi-quantitatively scored for intensity and intensity multiplied by percentage staining (H-score).
Tumors were classified into female genital tract carcinoma (n = 39), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 23), mesothelioma (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 14), breast carcinoma (n = 10), gastro-intestinal carcinoma (n = 12) and other (n = 4). On both platforms, reproducible nuclear ERCC1 immunoreactivity was achieved with both antibodies, although D-10 was slightly weaker and presented more background staining as well as more variation in the low expression range. No significant differences were found between cytologic and histologic cores. Using the 8F1 CC1-mono protocol, lung and breast carcinomas had lower ERCC1 expression in comparison to the other entities (p-value < 0.05).
Cytology microarrays (CMA) are suitable for investigation of clinical biomarkers and can be combined with conventional TMA's. Dichotomization of ERCC1 immunoreactivity scores is most suitable for patient stratification since definition of negativity is antibody-dependent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/2043-9113-1-25 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3198679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A270409004</galeid><sourcerecordid>A270409004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4295-841ddb8d7bf62c591852a854acd3204b723f4df535e3be58401ebdeaba4e5a703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks9rFTEQx4Motjx79SgBD562TTbJ210PwuPZ2kJBED2H_Ji8F9lNarJb2Kt_uVlefbRYk0MyM598mckMQm8pOae0XV_UhLOqo5RVtKrFC3R6dLx8dD9BZzn_JGXxYjbta3RS025NBWOn6PdmGuOgRrD48tt2S7EfhilEs4fB5zHNOAa8n3XyFpt5jH3czRejz3kCPHiTokpJFcjhQfV-F1QYMTg3ZR9D_ojhXvWTGouxICXodbQeMm6vaDEt_lxR8ga9cqrPcPZwrtCPq8vv2-vq9uuXm-3mttK87kTVcmqtbm2j3bo2oqOtqFUruDKWlVp1UzPHrRNMANMgWk4oaAtKKw5CNYSt0KeD7t2kB7AGwphUL--SH1SaZVRePo0Ev5e7eC8Z7dp10xWBzUFA-_gfgacREwe5tEEubZBU1qJofHhIIsVfE-RRln820PcqQJyy7AhZM8FKMSv0_kDuVA_SBxeLpllouakbwklBeaHOn6HKtqWBJgZwvvife1Cal3MCd8yfErlM1b8Zv3v8bUf87wyxP_zNyMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900635372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Soltermann, Alex ; Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra ; Behnke, Silvia ; Storz, Martina ; Moch, Holger ; Bode, Beata</creator><creatorcontrib>Soltermann, Alex ; Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra ; Behnke, Silvia ; Storz, Martina ; Moch, Holger ; Bode, Beata</creatorcontrib><description>The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic effusion samples. Therefore, we evaluated the staining quality of monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibodies 8F1 and D-10 on microarrays of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions by automated immunochemistry.
Cores from effusion cell blocks of 117 patients with > 40 malignant cell clusters per whole section (pleural n = 75, peritoneal n = 42) were assembled together with 30 histologic control cores from large tissue blocks (lung, breast and ovarian carcinoma, each n = 10) on hybrid cytology-tissue microarrays (C/TMA). Four immunochemistry protocols (Mab 8F1 and D-10, CC1-mono Ventana and H2-60 Bond automat) were performed. Immunoreactivity was semi-quantitatively scored for intensity and intensity multiplied by percentage staining (H-score).
Tumors were classified into female genital tract carcinoma (n = 39), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 23), mesothelioma (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 14), breast carcinoma (n = 10), gastro-intestinal carcinoma (n = 12) and other (n = 4). On both platforms, reproducible nuclear ERCC1 immunoreactivity was achieved with both antibodies, although D-10 was slightly weaker and presented more background staining as well as more variation in the low expression range. No significant differences were found between cytologic and histologic cores. Using the 8F1 CC1-mono protocol, lung and breast carcinomas had lower ERCC1 expression in comparison to the other entities (p-value < 0.05).
Cytology microarrays (CMA) are suitable for investigation of clinical biomarkers and can be combined with conventional TMA's. Dichotomization of ERCC1 immunoreactivity scores is most suitable for patient stratification since definition of negativity is antibody-dependent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2043-9113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-9113</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-25</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21961533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Diagnosis ; DNA microarrays ; Genetic aspects ; Physiological aspects ; Tumors ; Viral antibodies</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2011-09, Vol.1 (1), p.25-25</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright ©2011 Soltermann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011 Soltermann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4295-841ddb8d7bf62c591852a854acd3204b723f4df535e3be58401ebdeaba4e5a703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4295-841ddb8d7bf62c591852a854acd3204b723f4df535e3be58401ebdeaba4e5a703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198679/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198679/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21961533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soltermann, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storz, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, Beata</creatorcontrib><title>Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10</title><title>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</title><addtitle>J Clin Bioinforma</addtitle><description>The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic effusion samples. Therefore, we evaluated the staining quality of monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibodies 8F1 and D-10 on microarrays of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions by automated immunochemistry.
Cores from effusion cell blocks of 117 patients with > 40 malignant cell clusters per whole section (pleural n = 75, peritoneal n = 42) were assembled together with 30 histologic control cores from large tissue blocks (lung, breast and ovarian carcinoma, each n = 10) on hybrid cytology-tissue microarrays (C/TMA). Four immunochemistry protocols (Mab 8F1 and D-10, CC1-mono Ventana and H2-60 Bond automat) were performed. Immunoreactivity was semi-quantitatively scored for intensity and intensity multiplied by percentage staining (H-score).
Tumors were classified into female genital tract carcinoma (n = 39), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 23), mesothelioma (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 14), breast carcinoma (n = 10), gastro-intestinal carcinoma (n = 12) and other (n = 4). On both platforms, reproducible nuclear ERCC1 immunoreactivity was achieved with both antibodies, although D-10 was slightly weaker and presented more background staining as well as more variation in the low expression range. No significant differences were found between cytologic and histologic cores. Using the 8F1 CC1-mono protocol, lung and breast carcinomas had lower ERCC1 expression in comparison to the other entities (p-value < 0.05).
Cytology microarrays (CMA) are suitable for investigation of clinical biomarkers and can be combined with conventional TMA's. Dichotomization of ERCC1 immunoreactivity scores is most suitable for patient stratification since definition of negativity is antibody-dependent.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>DNA microarrays</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Viral antibodies</subject><issn>2043-9113</issn><issn>2043-9113</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1ks9rFTEQx4Motjx79SgBD562TTbJ210PwuPZ2kJBED2H_Ji8F9lNarJb2Kt_uVlefbRYk0MyM598mckMQm8pOae0XV_UhLOqo5RVtKrFC3R6dLx8dD9BZzn_JGXxYjbta3RS025NBWOn6PdmGuOgRrD48tt2S7EfhilEs4fB5zHNOAa8n3XyFpt5jH3czRejz3kCPHiTokpJFcjhQfV-F1QYMTg3ZR9D_ojhXvWTGouxICXodbQeMm6vaDEt_lxR8ga9cqrPcPZwrtCPq8vv2-vq9uuXm-3mttK87kTVcmqtbm2j3bo2oqOtqFUruDKWlVp1UzPHrRNMANMgWk4oaAtKKw5CNYSt0KeD7t2kB7AGwphUL--SH1SaZVRePo0Ev5e7eC8Z7dp10xWBzUFA-_gfgacREwe5tEEubZBU1qJofHhIIsVfE-RRln820PcqQJyy7AhZM8FKMSv0_kDuVA_SBxeLpllouakbwklBeaHOn6HKtqWBJgZwvvife1Cal3MCd8yfErlM1b8Zv3v8bUf87wyxP_zNyMo</recordid><startdate>20110930</startdate><enddate>20110930</enddate><creator>Soltermann, Alex</creator><creator>Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra</creator><creator>Behnke, Silvia</creator><creator>Storz, Martina</creator><creator>Moch, Holger</creator><creator>Bode, Beata</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110930</creationdate><title>Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10</title><author>Soltermann, Alex ; Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra ; Behnke, Silvia ; Storz, Martina ; Moch, Holger ; Bode, Beata</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4295-841ddb8d7bf62c591852a854acd3204b723f4df535e3be58401ebdeaba4e5a703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>DNA microarrays</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Viral antibodies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soltermann, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storz, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moch, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, Beata</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soltermann, Alex</au><au>Kilgus-Hawelski, Sandra</au><au>Behnke, Silvia</au><au>Storz, Martina</au><au>Moch, Holger</au><au>Bode, Beata</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Bioinforma</addtitle><date>2011-09-30</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>25-25</pages><issn>2043-9113</issn><eissn>2043-9113</eissn><abstract>The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein is the key enzyme of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry is predictive for platinum-based chemotherapy response. Frequently, the diagnosis of malignancy is made on cytologic effusion samples. Therefore, we evaluated the staining quality of monoclonal anti-ERCC1 antibodies 8F1 and D-10 on microarrays of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions by automated immunochemistry.
Cores from effusion cell blocks of 117 patients with > 40 malignant cell clusters per whole section (pleural n = 75, peritoneal n = 42) were assembled together with 30 histologic control cores from large tissue blocks (lung, breast and ovarian carcinoma, each n = 10) on hybrid cytology-tissue microarrays (C/TMA). Four immunochemistry protocols (Mab 8F1 and D-10, CC1-mono Ventana and H2-60 Bond automat) were performed. Immunoreactivity was semi-quantitatively scored for intensity and intensity multiplied by percentage staining (H-score).
Tumors were classified into female genital tract carcinoma (n = 39), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 23), mesothelioma (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 14), breast carcinoma (n = 10), gastro-intestinal carcinoma (n = 12) and other (n = 4). On both platforms, reproducible nuclear ERCC1 immunoreactivity was achieved with both antibodies, although D-10 was slightly weaker and presented more background staining as well as more variation in the low expression range. No significant differences were found between cytologic and histologic cores. Using the 8F1 CC1-mono protocol, lung and breast carcinomas had lower ERCC1 expression in comparison to the other entities (p-value < 0.05).
Cytology microarrays (CMA) are suitable for investigation of clinical biomarkers and can be combined with conventional TMA's. Dichotomization of ERCC1 immunoreactivity scores is most suitable for patient stratification since definition of negativity is antibody-dependent.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>21961533</pmid><doi>10.1186/2043-9113-1-25</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2043-9113 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2011-09, Vol.1 (1), p.25-25 |
issn | 2043-9113 2043-9113 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3198679 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibodies Diagnosis DNA microarrays Genetic aspects Physiological aspects Tumors Viral antibodies |
title | Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T01%3A21%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20ERCC1%20immunochemistry%20on%20hybrid%20cytology/tissue%20microarray%20of%20malignant%20effusions:%20evaluation%20of%20antibodies%208F1%20and%20D-10&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20bioinformatics&rft.au=Soltermann,%20Alex&rft.date=2011-09-30&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=25-25&rft.issn=2043-9113&rft.eissn=2043-9113&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/2043-9113-1-25&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA270409004%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900635372&rft_id=info:pmid/21961533&rft_galeid=A270409004&rfr_iscdi=true |