Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up
The aim was to study if postoperative rehabilitation improves functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Surgically treated LSS patients ( n = 102) were randomized to rehabilitation-group (A) and “standard postoperative treatment”—group (B). Intervention for A-group started 3 months postop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European spine journal 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1331-1340 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1340 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1331 |
container_title | European spine journal |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Aalto, Timo J. Leinonen, Ville Herno, Arto Alen, Markku Kröger, Heikki Turunen, Veli Savolainen, Sakari Saari, Tapani Airaksinen, Olavi |
description | The aim was to study if postoperative rehabilitation improves functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Surgically treated LSS patients (
n
= 102) were randomized to rehabilitation-group (A) and “standard postoperative treatment”—group (B). Intervention for A-group started 3 months postoperatively, consisting of once a week outpatient visits for 12 weeks (1.5 h per visit; 1–6 patients per one physiotherapist). Physiotherapist guided stretching and strengthening exercises. A-group performed individually estimated exercises at those visits with guiding and at home up to 24-month postoperative follow-up. Physiotherapeutic guidance (12 times) was repeated after 12 months, in order to update exercises and motivate patients to keep training. For B-group, the “standard treatment” thus included normal postoperative treatment, or no treatment/self-management.
Outcome measures
were measured at the start and the end of the first physiotherapeutic intervention (3 and 6 months postoperatively), and at 12- and 24-month postoperative follow-ups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0–100%) was the main outcome measure. The other outcome measures were back- and leg pain separately (NRS-11); satisfaction (7-point scale) and treadmill test (0–1,000 m; not at 6 month). The intervention consisting of 12 + 12 physiotherapeutic sessions with further home exercises did not influence the course ODI in the 24-month postoperative follow-up (
p
= 0.95 for ODI; “as-rehabilitated” analysis). No influence on any other outcome measures was observed. After LSS surgery, routinely performed outpatient rehabilitation did not improve functional outcome compared to standard treatment. In addition, it had no impact on the back and leg pain, satisfaction and walking ability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00586-011-1781-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3175851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>888102343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-edfeca867b32301d028e420329e83b516d00593ca5f6247d6a29b8d9fe68f2ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1rFjEUhQdR7Gv1B7iR4MZV9CaZj8SFUEr9gIIudB0ymTt9U2YmY5Jpmd_hH27Gt1YrCK5COM85yb2conjO4DUDaN5EgErWFBijrJGMrg-KHSsFp6AEf1jsQJVA64apo-JJjJcArFJQPy6OOKu4KCu1K3588TH5GYNJ7gpJwL1p3eBSvvqJdB4jmXwibpyDz3q_THZTzED8kqwfkbiJDMvYmkDi7DYhJpx8dPEtMSS74oz2Z3ZMS7eSa5f2hNMVs2G-93bvh8Ff02V-WjzqzRDx2e15XHx7f_b19CM9__zh0-nJObUVQKLY9WiNrJtWcAGsAy6x5CC4QinaitVdXo8S1lR9zcumqw1XrexUj7XsuTXiuHh3yJ2XdsTO4pSCGfQc3GjCqr1x-r4yub2-8FdasKaSFcsBr24Dgv--YEx6dNHiMJgJ_RK1lJJBXrT4DzJPAKBUJl_-RV76JeS9bhCHWkhVZogdIJv3GwP2d59moLdq6EM1dK6G3qqh1-x58ee0d45fXcgAPwAxS9MFht8v_zv1BnxSyYU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>882063894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Aalto, Timo J. ; Leinonen, Ville ; Herno, Arto ; Alen, Markku ; Kröger, Heikki ; Turunen, Veli ; Savolainen, Sakari ; Saari, Tapani ; Airaksinen, Olavi</creator><creatorcontrib>Aalto, Timo J. ; Leinonen, Ville ; Herno, Arto ; Alen, Markku ; Kröger, Heikki ; Turunen, Veli ; Savolainen, Sakari ; Saari, Tapani ; Airaksinen, Olavi</creatorcontrib><description>The aim was to study if postoperative rehabilitation improves functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Surgically treated LSS patients (
n
= 102) were randomized to rehabilitation-group (A) and “standard postoperative treatment”—group (B). Intervention for A-group started 3 months postoperatively, consisting of once a week outpatient visits for 12 weeks (1.5 h per visit; 1–6 patients per one physiotherapist). Physiotherapist guided stretching and strengthening exercises. A-group performed individually estimated exercises at those visits with guiding and at home up to 24-month postoperative follow-up. Physiotherapeutic guidance (12 times) was repeated after 12 months, in order to update exercises and motivate patients to keep training. For B-group, the “standard treatment” thus included normal postoperative treatment, or no treatment/self-management.
Outcome measures
were measured at the start and the end of the first physiotherapeutic intervention (3 and 6 months postoperatively), and at 12- and 24-month postoperative follow-ups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0–100%) was the main outcome measure. The other outcome measures were back- and leg pain separately (NRS-11); satisfaction (7-point scale) and treadmill test (0–1,000 m; not at 6 month). The intervention consisting of 12 + 12 physiotherapeutic sessions with further home exercises did not influence the course ODI in the 24-month postoperative follow-up (
p
= 0.95 for ODI; “as-rehabilitated” analysis). No influence on any other outcome measures was observed. After LSS surgery, routinely performed outpatient rehabilitation did not improve functional outcome compared to standard treatment. In addition, it had no impact on the back and leg pain, satisfaction and walking ability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1781-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21523459</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chronic Pain - physiopathology ; Chronic Pain - rehabilitation ; Chronic Pain - surgery ; Disability Evaluation ; Exercise Therapy - trends ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neurosurgery ; Original ; Original Article ; Physical Therapy Modalities - trends ; Prospective Studies ; Spinal Stenosis - physiopathology ; Spinal Stenosis - rehabilitation ; Spinal Stenosis - surgery ; Spondylosis - physiopathology ; Spondylosis - rehabilitation ; Spondylosis - surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1331-1340</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-edfeca867b32301d028e420329e83b516d00593ca5f6247d6a29b8d9fe68f2ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-edfeca867b32301d028e420329e83b516d00593ca5f6247d6a29b8d9fe68f2ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175851/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175851/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21523459$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aalto, Timo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinonen, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herno, Arto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alen, Markku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröger, Heikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turunen, Veli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savolainen, Sakari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saari, Tapani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Airaksinen, Olavi</creatorcontrib><title>Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>The aim was to study if postoperative rehabilitation improves functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Surgically treated LSS patients (
n
= 102) were randomized to rehabilitation-group (A) and “standard postoperative treatment”—group (B). Intervention for A-group started 3 months postoperatively, consisting of once a week outpatient visits for 12 weeks (1.5 h per visit; 1–6 patients per one physiotherapist). Physiotherapist guided stretching and strengthening exercises. A-group performed individually estimated exercises at those visits with guiding and at home up to 24-month postoperative follow-up. Physiotherapeutic guidance (12 times) was repeated after 12 months, in order to update exercises and motivate patients to keep training. For B-group, the “standard treatment” thus included normal postoperative treatment, or no treatment/self-management.
Outcome measures
were measured at the start and the end of the first physiotherapeutic intervention (3 and 6 months postoperatively), and at 12- and 24-month postoperative follow-ups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0–100%) was the main outcome measure. The other outcome measures were back- and leg pain separately (NRS-11); satisfaction (7-point scale) and treadmill test (0–1,000 m; not at 6 month). The intervention consisting of 12 + 12 physiotherapeutic sessions with further home exercises did not influence the course ODI in the 24-month postoperative follow-up (
p
= 0.95 for ODI; “as-rehabilitated” analysis). No influence on any other outcome measures was observed. After LSS surgery, routinely performed outpatient rehabilitation did not improve functional outcome compared to standard treatment. In addition, it had no impact on the back and leg pain, satisfaction and walking ability.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - surgery</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - trends</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities - trends</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spondylosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spondylosis - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Spondylosis - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1rFjEUhQdR7Gv1B7iR4MZV9CaZj8SFUEr9gIIudB0ymTt9U2YmY5Jpmd_hH27Gt1YrCK5COM85yb2conjO4DUDaN5EgErWFBijrJGMrg-KHSsFp6AEf1jsQJVA64apo-JJjJcArFJQPy6OOKu4KCu1K3588TH5GYNJ7gpJwL1p3eBSvvqJdB4jmXwibpyDz3q_THZTzED8kqwfkbiJDMvYmkDi7DYhJpx8dPEtMSS74oz2Z3ZMS7eSa5f2hNMVs2G-93bvh8Ff02V-WjzqzRDx2e15XHx7f_b19CM9__zh0-nJObUVQKLY9WiNrJtWcAGsAy6x5CC4QinaitVdXo8S1lR9zcumqw1XrexUj7XsuTXiuHh3yJ2XdsTO4pSCGfQc3GjCqr1x-r4yub2-8FdasKaSFcsBr24Dgv--YEx6dNHiMJgJ_RK1lJJBXrT4DzJPAKBUJl_-RV76JeS9bhCHWkhVZogdIJv3GwP2d59moLdq6EM1dK6G3qqh1-x58ee0d45fXcgAPwAxS9MFht8v_zv1BnxSyYU</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Aalto, Timo J.</creator><creator>Leinonen, Ville</creator><creator>Herno, Arto</creator><creator>Alen, Markku</creator><creator>Kröger, Heikki</creator><creator>Turunen, Veli</creator><creator>Savolainen, Sakari</creator><creator>Saari, Tapani</creator><creator>Airaksinen, Olavi</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up</title><author>Aalto, Timo J. ; Leinonen, Ville ; Herno, Arto ; Alen, Markku ; Kröger, Heikki ; Turunen, Veli ; Savolainen, Sakari ; Saari, Tapani ; Airaksinen, Olavi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-edfeca867b32301d028e420329e83b516d00593ca5f6247d6a29b8d9fe68f2ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - surgery</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - trends</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities - trends</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spondylosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spondylosis - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Spondylosis - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aalto, Timo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinonen, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herno, Arto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alen, Markku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröger, Heikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turunen, Veli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savolainen, Sakari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saari, Tapani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Airaksinen, Olavi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aalto, Timo J.</au><au>Leinonen, Ville</au><au>Herno, Arto</au><au>Alen, Markku</au><au>Kröger, Heikki</au><au>Turunen, Veli</au><au>Savolainen, Sakari</au><au>Saari, Tapani</au><au>Airaksinen, Olavi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1331</spage><epage>1340</epage><pages>1331-1340</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>The aim was to study if postoperative rehabilitation improves functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Surgically treated LSS patients (
n
= 102) were randomized to rehabilitation-group (A) and “standard postoperative treatment”—group (B). Intervention for A-group started 3 months postoperatively, consisting of once a week outpatient visits for 12 weeks (1.5 h per visit; 1–6 patients per one physiotherapist). Physiotherapist guided stretching and strengthening exercises. A-group performed individually estimated exercises at those visits with guiding and at home up to 24-month postoperative follow-up. Physiotherapeutic guidance (12 times) was repeated after 12 months, in order to update exercises and motivate patients to keep training. For B-group, the “standard treatment” thus included normal postoperative treatment, or no treatment/self-management.
Outcome measures
were measured at the start and the end of the first physiotherapeutic intervention (3 and 6 months postoperatively), and at 12- and 24-month postoperative follow-ups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0–100%) was the main outcome measure. The other outcome measures were back- and leg pain separately (NRS-11); satisfaction (7-point scale) and treadmill test (0–1,000 m; not at 6 month). The intervention consisting of 12 + 12 physiotherapeutic sessions with further home exercises did not influence the course ODI in the 24-month postoperative follow-up (
p
= 0.95 for ODI; “as-rehabilitated” analysis). No influence on any other outcome measures was observed. After LSS surgery, routinely performed outpatient rehabilitation did not improve functional outcome compared to standard treatment. In addition, it had no impact on the back and leg pain, satisfaction and walking ability.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21523459</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-011-1781-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
ispartof | European spine journal, 2011-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1331-1340 |
issn | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3175851 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Chronic Pain - physiopathology Chronic Pain - rehabilitation Chronic Pain - surgery Disability Evaluation Exercise Therapy - trends Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neurosurgery Original Original Article Physical Therapy Modalities - trends Prospective Studies Spinal Stenosis - physiopathology Spinal Stenosis - rehabilitation Spinal Stenosis - surgery Spondylosis - physiopathology Spondylosis - rehabilitation Spondylosis - surgery Surgical Orthopedics |
title | Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A31%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postoperative%20rehabilitation%20does%20not%20improve%20functional%20outcome%20in%20lumbar%20spinal%20stenosis:%20a%20prospective%20study%20with%202-year%20postoperative%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Aalto,%20Timo%20J.&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1331&rft.epage=1340&rft.pages=1331-1340&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-011-1781-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E888102343%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=882063894&rft_id=info:pmid/21523459&rfr_iscdi=true |