Maps of interaural time difference in the chicken's brainstem nucleus laminaris
Animals, including humans, use interaural time differences (ITDs) that arise from different sound path lengths to the two ears as a cue of horizontal sound source location. The nature of the neural code for ITD is still controversial. Current models differentiate between two population codes: either...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological cybernetics 2008-06, Vol.98 (6), p.541-559 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 559 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 541 |
container_title | Biological cybernetics |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Köppl, Christine Carr, Catherine E |
description | Animals, including humans, use interaural time differences (ITDs) that arise from different sound path lengths to the two ears as a cue of horizontal sound source location. The nature of the neural code for ITD is still controversial. Current models differentiate between two population codes: either a map-like rate-place code of ITD along an array of neurons, consistent with a large body of data in the barn owl, or a population rate code, consistent with data from small mammals. Recently, it was proposed that these different codes reflect optimal coding strategies that depend on head size and sound frequency. The chicken makes an excellent test case of this proposal because its physical prerequisites are similar to small mammals, yet it shares a more recent common ancestry with the owl. We show here that, like in the barn owl, the brainstem nucleus laminaris in mature chickens displayed the major features of a place code of ITD. ITD was topographically represented in the maximal responses of neurons along each isofrequency band, covering approximately the contralateral acoustic hemisphere. Furthermore, the represented ITD range appeared to change with frequency, consistent with a pressure gradient receiver mechanism in the avian middle ear. At very low frequencies, below 400Hz, maximal neural responses were symmetrically distributed around zero ITD and it remained unclear whether there was a topographic representation. These findings do not agree with the above predictions for optimal coding and thus revive the discussion as to what determines the neural coding strategies for ITDs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00422-008-0220-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3170859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896138011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c681t-80ccd0abf62c0f0c4ba481d6c67c57290f07505d64b4244e49daf6796aa6abb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3CBiAOcAjO2Y8eXSqjin1TUA_RsOY6965I4i50g8e3xKisKHGhPlmZ-8zx-foQ8RXiNAPJNBuCU1gBtDZRCLe6RDXJWKlLCfbIBxqFGCnBCHuV8DQCKNuohOcGWK0TRbMjlZ7PP1eSrEGeXzJLMUM1hdFUfvHfJRetKq5p3rrK7YL-5-CpXXTIh5tmNVVzs4JZcDWYM0aSQH5MH3gzZPTmep-Tq_buv5x_ri8sPn87fXtRWtDjXLVjbg-m8oBY8WN4Z3mIvrJC2kVSVmmyg6QXvOOXccdUbL6QSxgjTdZSdkrNVd790o-uti3NZXe9TGE36qScT9N-dGHZ6O_3QDCW0jSoCL48Cafq-uDzrMWTrhsFENy1Zy7JAcYjdCjLBlALR3gpSLO8STN4FFIVr7gIybOHgxot_wOtpSbF8gKbAJIJCKBCukE1Tzsn5324h6EOe9JonXfKkD3nSosw8-9Pmm4ljgApAVyCXVty6dHPz_1Sfr0PeTNpsS2z01RcKyAAlxWIT-wXWhd4l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203710910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maps of interaural time difference in the chicken's brainstem nucleus laminaris</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Köppl, Christine ; Carr, Catherine E</creator><creatorcontrib>Köppl, Christine ; Carr, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><description>Animals, including humans, use interaural time differences (ITDs) that arise from different sound path lengths to the two ears as a cue of horizontal sound source location. The nature of the neural code for ITD is still controversial. Current models differentiate between two population codes: either a map-like rate-place code of ITD along an array of neurons, consistent with a large body of data in the barn owl, or a population rate code, consistent with data from small mammals. Recently, it was proposed that these different codes reflect optimal coding strategies that depend on head size and sound frequency. The chicken makes an excellent test case of this proposal because its physical prerequisites are similar to small mammals, yet it shares a more recent common ancestry with the owl. We show here that, like in the barn owl, the brainstem nucleus laminaris in mature chickens displayed the major features of a place code of ITD. ITD was topographically represented in the maximal responses of neurons along each isofrequency band, covering approximately the contralateral acoustic hemisphere. Furthermore, the represented ITD range appeared to change with frequency, consistent with a pressure gradient receiver mechanism in the avian middle ear. At very low frequencies, below 400Hz, maximal neural responses were symmetrically distributed around zero ITD and it remained unclear whether there was a topographic representation. These findings do not agree with the above predictions for optimal coding and thus revive the discussion as to what determines the neural coding strategies for ITDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-1200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0770</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00422-008-0220-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18491165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Action Potentials - physiology ; Animals ; Auditory ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Bioinformatics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain Stem - cytology ; Brain Stem - physiology ; Chickens ; Chickens - anatomy & histology ; Chickens - physiology ; Complex Systems ; Computer Appl. in Life Sciences ; Cybernetics ; Ears & hearing ; Functional Laterality ; hearing ; Mammals ; Neurobiology ; Neurology ; Neurons ; Neurons, Afferent - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Original Paper ; Poultry ; Psychophysics ; Sensory ; Sound localization ; Sound Localization - physiology ; Time Factors ; Time Perception - physiology ; Tyto alba</subject><ispartof>Biological cybernetics, 2008-06, Vol.98 (6), p.541-559</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2008</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2008 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c681t-80ccd0abf62c0f0c4ba481d6c67c57290f07505d64b4244e49daf6796aa6abb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c681t-80ccd0abf62c0f0c4ba481d6c67c57290f07505d64b4244e49daf6796aa6abb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00422-008-0220-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00422-008-0220-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18491165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Köppl, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><title>Maps of interaural time difference in the chicken's brainstem nucleus laminaris</title><title>Biological cybernetics</title><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><description>Animals, including humans, use interaural time differences (ITDs) that arise from different sound path lengths to the two ears as a cue of horizontal sound source location. The nature of the neural code for ITD is still controversial. Current models differentiate between two population codes: either a map-like rate-place code of ITD along an array of neurons, consistent with a large body of data in the barn owl, or a population rate code, consistent with data from small mammals. Recently, it was proposed that these different codes reflect optimal coding strategies that depend on head size and sound frequency. The chicken makes an excellent test case of this proposal because its physical prerequisites are similar to small mammals, yet it shares a more recent common ancestry with the owl. We show here that, like in the barn owl, the brainstem nucleus laminaris in mature chickens displayed the major features of a place code of ITD. ITD was topographically represented in the maximal responses of neurons along each isofrequency band, covering approximately the contralateral acoustic hemisphere. Furthermore, the represented ITD range appeared to change with frequency, consistent with a pressure gradient receiver mechanism in the avian middle ear. At very low frequencies, below 400Hz, maximal neural responses were symmetrically distributed around zero ITD and it remained unclear whether there was a topographic representation. These findings do not agree with the above predictions for optimal coding and thus revive the discussion as to what determines the neural coding strategies for ITDs.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain Stem - cytology</subject><subject>Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Chickens - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Chickens - physiology</subject><subject>Complex Systems</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cybernetics</subject><subject>Ears & hearing</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>hearing</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Neurons, Afferent - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Sensory</subject><subject>Sound localization</subject><subject>Sound Localization - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Tyto alba</subject><issn>0340-1200</issn><issn>1432-0770</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3CBiAOcAjO2Y8eXSqjin1TUA_RsOY6965I4i50g8e3xKisKHGhPlmZ-8zx-foQ8RXiNAPJNBuCU1gBtDZRCLe6RDXJWKlLCfbIBxqFGCnBCHuV8DQCKNuohOcGWK0TRbMjlZ7PP1eSrEGeXzJLMUM1hdFUfvHfJRetKq5p3rrK7YL-5-CpXXTIh5tmNVVzs4JZcDWYM0aSQH5MH3gzZPTmep-Tq_buv5x_ri8sPn87fXtRWtDjXLVjbg-m8oBY8WN4Z3mIvrJC2kVSVmmyg6QXvOOXccdUbL6QSxgjTdZSdkrNVd790o-uti3NZXe9TGE36qScT9N-dGHZ6O_3QDCW0jSoCL48Cafq-uDzrMWTrhsFENy1Zy7JAcYjdCjLBlALR3gpSLO8STN4FFIVr7gIybOHgxot_wOtpSbF8gKbAJIJCKBCukE1Tzsn5324h6EOe9JonXfKkD3nSosw8-9Pmm4ljgApAVyCXVty6dHPz_1Sfr0PeTNpsS2z01RcKyAAlxWIT-wXWhd4l</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Köppl, Christine</creator><creator>Carr, Catherine E</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Maps of interaural time difference in the chicken's brainstem nucleus laminaris</title><author>Köppl, Christine ; Carr, Catherine E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c681t-80ccd0abf62c0f0c4ba481d6c67c57290f07505d64b4244e49daf6796aa6abb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain Stem - cytology</topic><topic>Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Chickens - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Chickens - physiology</topic><topic>Complex Systems</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cybernetics</topic><topic>Ears & hearing</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>hearing</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Neurons, Afferent - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Sensory</topic><topic>Sound localization</topic><topic>Sound Localization - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Tyto alba</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Köppl, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biological cybernetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Köppl, Christine</au><au>Carr, Catherine E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maps of interaural time difference in the chicken's brainstem nucleus laminaris</atitle><jtitle>Biological cybernetics</jtitle><stitle>Biol Cybern</stitle><addtitle>Biol Cybern</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>541</spage><epage>559</epage><pages>541-559</pages><issn>0340-1200</issn><eissn>1432-0770</eissn><abstract>Animals, including humans, use interaural time differences (ITDs) that arise from different sound path lengths to the two ears as a cue of horizontal sound source location. The nature of the neural code for ITD is still controversial. Current models differentiate between two population codes: either a map-like rate-place code of ITD along an array of neurons, consistent with a large body of data in the barn owl, or a population rate code, consistent with data from small mammals. Recently, it was proposed that these different codes reflect optimal coding strategies that depend on head size and sound frequency. The chicken makes an excellent test case of this proposal because its physical prerequisites are similar to small mammals, yet it shares a more recent common ancestry with the owl. We show here that, like in the barn owl, the brainstem nucleus laminaris in mature chickens displayed the major features of a place code of ITD. ITD was topographically represented in the maximal responses of neurons along each isofrequency band, covering approximately the contralateral acoustic hemisphere. Furthermore, the represented ITD range appeared to change with frequency, consistent with a pressure gradient receiver mechanism in the avian middle ear. At very low frequencies, below 400Hz, maximal neural responses were symmetrically distributed around zero ITD and it remained unclear whether there was a topographic representation. These findings do not agree with the above predictions for optimal coding and thus revive the discussion as to what determines the neural coding strategies for ITDs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18491165</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00422-008-0220-6</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-1200 |
ispartof | Biological cybernetics, 2008-06, Vol.98 (6), p.541-559 |
issn | 0340-1200 1432-0770 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3170859 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Action Potentials - physiology Animals Auditory Auditory Threshold - physiology Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain Stem - cytology Brain Stem - physiology Chickens Chickens - anatomy & histology Chickens - physiology Complex Systems Computer Appl. in Life Sciences Cybernetics Ears & hearing Functional Laterality hearing Mammals Neurobiology Neurology Neurons Neurons, Afferent - physiology Neurosciences Original Paper Poultry Psychophysics Sensory Sound localization Sound Localization - physiology Time Factors Time Perception - physiology Tyto alba |
title | Maps of interaural time difference in the chicken's brainstem nucleus laminaris |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A44%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maps%20of%20interaural%20time%20difference%20in%20the%20chicken's%20brainstem%20nucleus%20laminaris&rft.jtitle=Biological%20cybernetics&rft.au=K%C3%B6ppl,%20Christine&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=559&rft.pages=541-559&rft.issn=0340-1200&rft.eissn=1432-0770&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00422-008-0220-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1896138011%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203710910&rft_id=info:pmid/18491165&rfr_iscdi=true |