Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck, shaft and distal end: long-term outcome of five cases
Out of 52 cases of ipsilateral femoral fractures treated at a level I trauma centre between June 1994 and March 2008, the diaphyseal fracture was accompanied by a intracapsular neck fracture in only 20 cases. In the rest of the cases, the diaphyseal fracture was combined with either an extracapsular...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2011-07, Vol.35 (7), p.1083-1088 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1088 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1083 |
container_title | International orthopaedics |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Douša, Pavel Bartoníček, Jan Luňáček, Libor Pavelka, Tomáš Kušíková, Eva |
description | Out of 52 cases of ipsilateral femoral fractures treated at a level I trauma centre between June 1994 and March 2008, the diaphyseal fracture was accompanied by a intracapsular neck fracture in only 20 cases. In the rest of the cases, the diaphyseal fracture was combined with either an extracapsular or pertrochanteric fracture. Five of these patients also had fractures of the distal femur. In three of those patients we began treatment with osteosynthesis of the femoral neck and shaft, using a reconstruction nail, then stabilized the distal fracture with a 95° blade plate or with lag screws. In the other two cases, initial treatment dealt with the distal femoral fracture, stabilizing it with a 95° blade plate, which was also used for stabilization of the diaphyseal fracture. In these patients, the proximal fracture was treated using dynamic hip screws (DHS). All fractures healed, two after initial treatment, while the other three needed one reoperation. The follow-up period was 2–13 years after the injury. The order in which fractures are treated is best left to the discretion of the physician and the circumstances. In our experience, two implants are sufficient for osteosynthesis, one for stabilizing one end of the femur together with the shaft, and the other is used for treating the other end of the femur. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00264-010-1108-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3167402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>874296635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-92adf6f838c402f14f3c0580005e3e5f8a9bd6429898d1a3024343f49a03619f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotvCD-CCfIMDgRnbcRwOSKiiUKkSFzgb1xnvpiT2YieV-Pd4taWCS0-WPd97M-PH2AuEtwjQvSsAQqsGEBpEMI18xDaopGha7NvHbANSYSN0356w01JuALDTBp-yEwEdYifaDftxuS_j5BbKbuIhO7-smQpPgS874oHmdChE8j_f8LJzYeEuDnwYy1KfKQ7v-ZTitqn6mad18WmmgziMt8S9K1SesSfBTYWe351n7PvFp2_nX5qrr58vzz9eNV51aml64Yagg5HGKxABVZAeWgMALUlqg3H99aCV6E1vBnQShJJKBtU7kBr7IM_Yh6Pvfr2eafAUlzq53edxdvm3TW60_1fiuLPbdGsl6q62rAav7gxy-rVSWew8Fk_T5CKltVjT1e5ay7aSrx8kEYSBzrSAFcUj6nMqJVO4HwjBHjK0xwwtHO41Qyur5uW_m9wr_oZWAXEESi3FLWV7k9Yc6-8-4PoHLFGmxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1028078501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck, shaft and distal end: long-term outcome of five cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Douša, Pavel ; Bartoníček, Jan ; Luňáček, Libor ; Pavelka, Tomáš ; Kušíková, Eva</creator><creatorcontrib>Douša, Pavel ; Bartoníček, Jan ; Luňáček, Libor ; Pavelka, Tomáš ; Kušíková, Eva</creatorcontrib><description>Out of 52 cases of ipsilateral femoral fractures treated at a level I trauma centre between June 1994 and March 2008, the diaphyseal fracture was accompanied by a intracapsular neck fracture in only 20 cases. In the rest of the cases, the diaphyseal fracture was combined with either an extracapsular or pertrochanteric fracture. Five of these patients also had fractures of the distal femur. In three of those patients we began treatment with osteosynthesis of the femoral neck and shaft, using a reconstruction nail, then stabilized the distal fracture with a 95° blade plate or with lag screws. In the other two cases, initial treatment dealt with the distal femoral fracture, stabilizing it with a 95° blade plate, which was also used for stabilization of the diaphyseal fracture. In these patients, the proximal fracture was treated using dynamic hip screws (DHS). All fractures healed, two after initial treatment, while the other three needed one reoperation. The follow-up period was 2–13 years after the injury. The order in which fractures are treated is best left to the discretion of the physician and the circumstances. In our experience, two implants are sufficient for osteosynthesis, one for stabilizing one end of the femur together with the shaft, and the other is used for treating the other end of the femur.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-2695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1108-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20711725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Accidents, Traffic ; Adult ; Bone Nails ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology ; Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery ; Femur ; Femur Head - injuries ; Femur Head - surgery ; Femur Neck - injuries ; Femur Neck - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fracture Healing ; Fractures ; Hip ; Humans ; Injuries ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Trauma ; Original Paper ; Orthopedics ; Osteosynthesis ; Reconstruction ; Trauma ; Trauma Severity Indices</subject><ispartof>International orthopaedics, 2011-07, Vol.35 (7), p.1083-1088</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-92adf6f838c402f14f3c0580005e3e5f8a9bd6429898d1a3024343f49a03619f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-92adf6f838c402f14f3c0580005e3e5f8a9bd6429898d1a3024343f49a03619f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3167402/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3167402/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20711725$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douša, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartoníček, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luňáček, Libor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavelka, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kušíková, Eva</creatorcontrib><title>Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck, shaft and distal end: long-term outcome of five cases</title><title>International orthopaedics</title><addtitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</addtitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><description>Out of 52 cases of ipsilateral femoral fractures treated at a level I trauma centre between June 1994 and March 2008, the diaphyseal fracture was accompanied by a intracapsular neck fracture in only 20 cases. In the rest of the cases, the diaphyseal fracture was combined with either an extracapsular or pertrochanteric fracture. Five of these patients also had fractures of the distal femur. In three of those patients we began treatment with osteosynthesis of the femoral neck and shaft, using a reconstruction nail, then stabilized the distal fracture with a 95° blade plate or with lag screws. In the other two cases, initial treatment dealt with the distal femoral fracture, stabilizing it with a 95° blade plate, which was also used for stabilization of the diaphyseal fracture. In these patients, the proximal fracture was treated using dynamic hip screws (DHS). All fractures healed, two after initial treatment, while the other three needed one reoperation. The follow-up period was 2–13 years after the injury. The order in which fractures are treated is best left to the discretion of the physician and the circumstances. In our experience, two implants are sufficient for osteosynthesis, one for stabilizing one end of the femur together with the shaft, and the other is used for treating the other end of the femur.</description><subject>Accidents, Traffic</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Femur Head - injuries</subject><subject>Femur Head - surgery</subject><subject>Femur Neck - injuries</subject><subject>Femur Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fracture Healing</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple Trauma</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteosynthesis</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Trauma Severity Indices</subject><issn>0341-2695</issn><issn>1432-5195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotvCD-CCfIMDgRnbcRwOSKiiUKkSFzgb1xnvpiT2YieV-Pd4taWCS0-WPd97M-PH2AuEtwjQvSsAQqsGEBpEMI18xDaopGha7NvHbANSYSN0356w01JuALDTBp-yEwEdYifaDftxuS_j5BbKbuIhO7-smQpPgS874oHmdChE8j_f8LJzYeEuDnwYy1KfKQ7v-ZTitqn6mad18WmmgziMt8S9K1SesSfBTYWe351n7PvFp2_nX5qrr58vzz9eNV51aml64Yagg5HGKxABVZAeWgMALUlqg3H99aCV6E1vBnQShJJKBtU7kBr7IM_Yh6Pvfr2eafAUlzq53edxdvm3TW60_1fiuLPbdGsl6q62rAav7gxy-rVSWew8Fk_T5CKltVjT1e5ay7aSrx8kEYSBzrSAFcUj6nMqJVO4HwjBHjK0xwwtHO41Qyur5uW_m9wr_oZWAXEESi3FLWV7k9Yc6-8-4PoHLFGmxw</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Douša, Pavel</creator><creator>Bartoníček, Jan</creator><creator>Luňáček, Libor</creator><creator>Pavelka, Tomáš</creator><creator>Kušíková, Eva</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck, shaft and distal end: long-term outcome of five cases</title><author>Douša, Pavel ; Bartoníček, Jan ; Luňáček, Libor ; Pavelka, Tomáš ; Kušíková, Eva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-92adf6f838c402f14f3c0580005e3e5f8a9bd6429898d1a3024343f49a03619f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Traffic</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Femur Head - injuries</topic><topic>Femur Head - surgery</topic><topic>Femur Neck - injuries</topic><topic>Femur Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fracture Healing</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple Trauma</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteosynthesis</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Trauma Severity Indices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douša, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartoníček, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luňáček, Libor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavelka, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kušíková, Eva</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douša, Pavel</au><au>Bartoníček, Jan</au><au>Luňáček, Libor</au><au>Pavelka, Tomáš</au><au>Kušíková, Eva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck, shaft and distal end: long-term outcome of five cases</atitle><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle><stitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</stitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1088</epage><pages>1083-1088</pages><issn>0341-2695</issn><eissn>1432-5195</eissn><abstract>Out of 52 cases of ipsilateral femoral fractures treated at a level I trauma centre between June 1994 and March 2008, the diaphyseal fracture was accompanied by a intracapsular neck fracture in only 20 cases. In the rest of the cases, the diaphyseal fracture was combined with either an extracapsular or pertrochanteric fracture. Five of these patients also had fractures of the distal femur. In three of those patients we began treatment with osteosynthesis of the femoral neck and shaft, using a reconstruction nail, then stabilized the distal fracture with a 95° blade plate or with lag screws. In the other two cases, initial treatment dealt with the distal femoral fracture, stabilizing it with a 95° blade plate, which was also used for stabilization of the diaphyseal fracture. In these patients, the proximal fracture was treated using dynamic hip screws (DHS). All fractures healed, two after initial treatment, while the other three needed one reoperation. The follow-up period was 2–13 years after the injury. The order in which fractures are treated is best left to the discretion of the physician and the circumstances. In our experience, two implants are sufficient for osteosynthesis, one for stabilizing one end of the femur together with the shaft, and the other is used for treating the other end of the femur.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20711725</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00264-010-1108-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0341-2695 |
ispartof | International orthopaedics, 2011-07, Vol.35 (7), p.1083-1088 |
issn | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3167402 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accidents, Traffic Adult Bone Nails Bone Plates Bone Screws Female Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery Femur Femur Head - injuries Femur Head - surgery Femur Neck - injuries Femur Neck - surgery Follow-Up Studies Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Fracture Healing Fractures Hip Humans Injuries Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Multiple Trauma Original Paper Orthopedics Osteosynthesis Reconstruction Trauma Trauma Severity Indices |
title | Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck, shaft and distal end: long-term outcome of five cases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A21%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ipsilateral%20fractures%20of%20the%20femoral%20neck,%20shaft%20and%20distal%20end:%20long-term%20outcome%20of%20five%20cases&rft.jtitle=International%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Dou%C5%A1a,%20Pavel&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1088&rft.pages=1083-1088&rft.issn=0341-2695&rft.eissn=1432-5195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00264-010-1108-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E874296635%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1028078501&rft_id=info:pmid/20711725&rfr_iscdi=true |