A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study
Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare. Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,00...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1398-1409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1409 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1398 |
container_title | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | SCHIFFMAN, Mark GLASS, Andrew G LORINCZ, Attila T WACHOLDER, Sholom BURK, Robert D WENTZENSEN, Nicolas RUSH, Brenda B CASTLE, Philip E SCOTT, David R BUCKLAND, Julie SHERMAN, Mark E RYDZAK, Greg KIRK, Peter |
description | Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare.
Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,000 women in a prepaid health maintenance organization (median age = 34) were followed passively by recommended annual cytology. We tested archived cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected at enrollment, primarily by MY09-MY11 PCR-based methods, for carcinogenic HPV types. We calculated positive and negative predictive values for the entire study period, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative probability for ≥CIN3, up to 18 years of follow-up.
We observed 47 cases of invasive cervical cancer during the study period, and 156 cases of CIN3. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded the same conclusions. In women 30 and older, the reassurance against ≥CIN3 following a single negative HPV test was long-lasting (cumulative probability = 0.7% during follow-up). In this age group, a single HPV test (positive vs. negative, hazard ratio of 8.5, 95% CI = 4.8-15.1) provided greater long-term risk stratification than a single cytologic result (abnormal vs. normal, HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.2-6.6). The risk for ≥CIN3 was higher for HPV16 than for the average of the other carcinogenic types (hazard ratio = 2.7).
The data from this cohort study show the long-term predictive value of HPV testing, particularly in women ≥30, and a possible role for distinguishing particularly carcinogenic types like HPV16. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3156084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>904484106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ec2c75d1ec07a2e5bdc67f2ddc2774f44d72bc0fb270b3a7105123bd62262813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUcGO0zAUtBCIXRY-AeQL4oIX27Hj9IJUVQtbUUHFLuJoOc7L1pDYwU4q9Xv4URy1u8DJ1vPMvPEMQi8ZvWRMVu8YlZIsFqW8vNquCWOEclo-QudMFhVRSsrH-X6POUPPUvpBKVULKZ-iM85KygtGz9HvJd4Ef0dGiD3expAGsKPbA74Zp-aAQ4tvDwOQmzx2rbP4euqNx1szuK4Lvdm7OCW89u3MCh4b3-CvLv2ciSuIe2dNhz9DGDqTnMHLPu_CnL7NVvD30IPHzuNxB3gb4tjN7E_GJYh4FXZ5cnTxHD1pTZfgxem8QN8-XN2ursnmy8f1arkhVig-khIst0o2DCxVhoOsG1uqljeN5UqJVohG8drStuaK1oVROR7Gi7opOS95xYoL9P6oO0x1D40FP0bT6SG63sSDDsbp_1-82-m7sNcFkyWtRBZ4cxKI4dcEadS9Sxa6_DEIU9ILKkQlGC0zUh6RNkeeIrQPWxjVc7967k7P3encbx7pud_Me_WvxQfWfaEZ8PoEMCln30bjrUt_caKQlBWq-AM2YbBX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904484106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>SCHIFFMAN, Mark ; GLASS, Andrew G ; LORINCZ, Attila T ; WACHOLDER, Sholom ; BURK, Robert D ; WENTZENSEN, Nicolas ; RUSH, Brenda B ; CASTLE, Philip E ; SCOTT, David R ; BUCKLAND, Julie ; SHERMAN, Mark E ; RYDZAK, Greg ; KIRK, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHIFFMAN, Mark ; GLASS, Andrew G ; LORINCZ, Attila T ; WACHOLDER, Sholom ; BURK, Robert D ; WENTZENSEN, Nicolas ; RUSH, Brenda B ; CASTLE, Philip E ; SCOTT, David R ; BUCKLAND, Julie ; SHERMAN, Mark E ; RYDZAK, Greg ; KIRK, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare.
Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,000 women in a prepaid health maintenance organization (median age = 34) were followed passively by recommended annual cytology. We tested archived cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected at enrollment, primarily by MY09-MY11 PCR-based methods, for carcinogenic HPV types. We calculated positive and negative predictive values for the entire study period, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative probability for ≥CIN3, up to 18 years of follow-up.
We observed 47 cases of invasive cervical cancer during the study period, and 156 cases of CIN3. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded the same conclusions. In women 30 and older, the reassurance against ≥CIN3 following a single negative HPV test was long-lasting (cumulative probability = 0.7% during follow-up). In this age group, a single HPV test (positive vs. negative, hazard ratio of 8.5, 95% CI = 4.8-15.1) provided greater long-term risk stratification than a single cytologic result (abnormal vs. normal, HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.2-6.6). The risk for ≥CIN3 was higher for HPV16 than for the average of the other carcinogenic types (hazard ratio = 2.7).
The data from this cohort study show the long-term predictive value of HPV testing, particularly in women ≥30, and a possible role for distinguishing particularly carcinogenic types like HPV16.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21602310</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEBPE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology ; DNA, Viral - analysis ; DNA, Viral - isolation & purification ; Female ; Human papillomavirus ; Human papillomavirus 16 ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Oregon ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology ; Vaginal Smears ; Viral diseases</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1398-1409</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 AACR</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ec2c75d1ec07a2e5bdc67f2ddc2774f44d72bc0fb270b3a7105123bd62262813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ec2c75d1ec07a2e5bdc67f2ddc2774f44d72bc0fb270b3a7105123bd62262813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3343,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24350137$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21602310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHIFFMAN, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLASS, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LORINCZ, Attila T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WACHOLDER, Sholom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURK, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WENTZENSEN, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSH, Brenda B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CASTLE, Philip E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUCKLAND, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHERMAN, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYDZAK, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRK, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare.
Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,000 women in a prepaid health maintenance organization (median age = 34) were followed passively by recommended annual cytology. We tested archived cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected at enrollment, primarily by MY09-MY11 PCR-based methods, for carcinogenic HPV types. We calculated positive and negative predictive values for the entire study period, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative probability for ≥CIN3, up to 18 years of follow-up.
We observed 47 cases of invasive cervical cancer during the study period, and 156 cases of CIN3. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded the same conclusions. In women 30 and older, the reassurance against ≥CIN3 following a single negative HPV test was long-lasting (cumulative probability = 0.7% during follow-up). In this age group, a single HPV test (positive vs. negative, hazard ratio of 8.5, 95% CI = 4.8-15.1) provided greater long-term risk stratification than a single cytologic result (abnormal vs. normal, HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.2-6.6). The risk for ≥CIN3 was higher for HPV16 than for the average of the other carcinogenic types (hazard ratio = 2.7).
The data from this cohort study show the long-term predictive value of HPV testing, particularly in women ≥30, and a possible role for distinguishing particularly carcinogenic types like HPV16.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus 16</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUcGO0zAUtBCIXRY-AeQL4oIX27Hj9IJUVQtbUUHFLuJoOc7L1pDYwU4q9Xv4URy1u8DJ1vPMvPEMQi8ZvWRMVu8YlZIsFqW8vNquCWOEclo-QudMFhVRSsrH-X6POUPPUvpBKVULKZ-iM85KygtGz9HvJd4Ef0dGiD3expAGsKPbA74Zp-aAQ4tvDwOQmzx2rbP4euqNx1szuK4Lvdm7OCW89u3MCh4b3-CvLv2ciSuIe2dNhz9DGDqTnMHLPu_CnL7NVvD30IPHzuNxB3gb4tjN7E_GJYh4FXZ5cnTxHD1pTZfgxem8QN8-XN2ursnmy8f1arkhVig-khIst0o2DCxVhoOsG1uqljeN5UqJVohG8drStuaK1oVROR7Gi7opOS95xYoL9P6oO0x1D40FP0bT6SG63sSDDsbp_1-82-m7sNcFkyWtRBZ4cxKI4dcEadS9Sxa6_DEIU9ILKkQlGC0zUh6RNkeeIrQPWxjVc7967k7P3encbx7pud_Me_WvxQfWfaEZ8PoEMCln30bjrUt_caKQlBWq-AM2YbBX</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>SCHIFFMAN, Mark</creator><creator>GLASS, Andrew G</creator><creator>LORINCZ, Attila T</creator><creator>WACHOLDER, Sholom</creator><creator>BURK, Robert D</creator><creator>WENTZENSEN, Nicolas</creator><creator>RUSH, Brenda B</creator><creator>CASTLE, Philip E</creator><creator>SCOTT, David R</creator><creator>BUCKLAND, Julie</creator><creator>SHERMAN, Mark E</creator><creator>RYDZAK, Greg</creator><creator>KIRK, Peter</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study</title><author>SCHIFFMAN, Mark ; GLASS, Andrew G ; LORINCZ, Attila T ; WACHOLDER, Sholom ; BURK, Robert D ; WENTZENSEN, Nicolas ; RUSH, Brenda B ; CASTLE, Philip E ; SCOTT, David R ; BUCKLAND, Julie ; SHERMAN, Mark E ; RYDZAK, Greg ; KIRK, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ec2c75d1ec07a2e5bdc67f2ddc2774f44d72bc0fb270b3a7105123bd62262813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus 16</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHIFFMAN, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLASS, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LORINCZ, Attila T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WACHOLDER, Sholom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURK, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WENTZENSEN, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSH, Brenda B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CASTLE, Philip E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUCKLAND, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHERMAN, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYDZAK, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRK, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHIFFMAN, Mark</au><au>GLASS, Andrew G</au><au>LORINCZ, Attila T</au><au>WACHOLDER, Sholom</au><au>BURK, Robert D</au><au>WENTZENSEN, Nicolas</au><au>RUSH, Brenda B</au><au>CASTLE, Philip E</au><au>SCOTT, David R</au><au>BUCKLAND, Julie</au><au>SHERMAN, Mark E</au><au>RYDZAK, Greg</au><au>KIRK, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1398</spage><epage>1409</epage><pages>1398-1409</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><coden>CEBPE4</coden><abstract>Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare.
Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,000 women in a prepaid health maintenance organization (median age = 34) were followed passively by recommended annual cytology. We tested archived cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected at enrollment, primarily by MY09-MY11 PCR-based methods, for carcinogenic HPV types. We calculated positive and negative predictive values for the entire study period, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative probability for ≥CIN3, up to 18 years of follow-up.
We observed 47 cases of invasive cervical cancer during the study period, and 156 cases of CIN3. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded the same conclusions. In women 30 and older, the reassurance against ≥CIN3 following a single negative HPV test was long-lasting (cumulative probability = 0.7% during follow-up). In this age group, a single HPV test (positive vs. negative, hazard ratio of 8.5, 95% CI = 4.8-15.1) provided greater long-term risk stratification than a single cytologic result (abnormal vs. normal, HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.2-6.6). The risk for ≥CIN3 was higher for HPV16 than for the average of the other carcinogenic types (hazard ratio = 2.7).
The data from this cohort study show the long-term predictive value of HPV testing, particularly in women ≥30, and a possible role for distinguishing particularly carcinogenic types like HPV16.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>21602310</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-9965 |
ispartof | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1398-1409 |
issn | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3156084 |
source | MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology DNA, Viral - analysis DNA, Viral - isolation & purification Female Human papillomavirus Human papillomavirus 16 Humans Infectious diseases Mass Screening - methods Medical sciences Oregon Papillomavirus Infections - complications Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis Polymerase Chain Reaction Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Risk Factors Tumors Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology Vaginal Smears Viral diseases |
title | A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A52%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Long-term%20Prospective%20Study%20of%20Type-Specific%20Human%20Papillomavirus%20Infection%20and%20Risk%20of%20Cervical%20Neoplasia%20Among%2020,000%20Women%20in%20the%20Portland%20Kaiser%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=SCHIFFMAN,%20Mark&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1398&rft.epage=1409&rft.pages=1398-1409&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft.coden=CEBPE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E904484106%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904484106&rft_id=info:pmid/21602310&rfr_iscdi=true |