A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare. Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,00...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1398-1409
Hauptverfasser: SCHIFFMAN, Mark, GLASS, Andrew G, LORINCZ, Attila T, WACHOLDER, Sholom, BURK, Robert D, WENTZENSEN, Nicolas, RUSH, Brenda B, CASTLE, Philip E, SCOTT, David R, BUCKLAND, Julie, SHERMAN, Mark E, RYDZAK, Greg, KIRK, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1409
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1398
container_title Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention
container_volume 20
creator SCHIFFMAN, Mark
GLASS, Andrew G
LORINCZ, Attila T
WACHOLDER, Sholom
BURK, Robert D
WENTZENSEN, Nicolas
RUSH, Brenda B
CASTLE, Philip E
SCOTT, David R
BUCKLAND, Julie
SHERMAN, Mark E
RYDZAK, Greg
KIRK, Peter
description Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare. Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,000 women in a prepaid health maintenance organization (median age = 34) were followed passively by recommended annual cytology. We tested archived cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected at enrollment, primarily by MY09-MY11 PCR-based methods, for carcinogenic HPV types. We calculated positive and negative predictive values for the entire study period, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative probability for ≥CIN3, up to 18 years of follow-up. We observed 47 cases of invasive cervical cancer during the study period, and 156 cases of CIN3. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded the same conclusions. In women 30 and older, the reassurance against ≥CIN3 following a single negative HPV test was long-lasting (cumulative probability = 0.7% during follow-up). In this age group, a single HPV test (positive vs. negative, hazard ratio of 8.5, 95% CI = 4.8-15.1) provided greater long-term risk stratification than a single cytologic result (abnormal vs. normal, HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.2-6.6). The risk for ≥CIN3 was higher for HPV16 than for the average of the other carcinogenic types (hazard ratio = 2.7). The data from this cohort study show the long-term predictive value of HPV testing, particularly in women ≥30, and a possible role for distinguishing particularly carcinogenic types like HPV16.
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3156084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>904484106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ec2c75d1ec07a2e5bdc67f2ddc2774f44d72bc0fb270b3a7105123bd62262813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUcGO0zAUtBCIXRY-AeQL4oIX27Hj9IJUVQtbUUHFLuJoOc7L1pDYwU4q9Xv4URy1u8DJ1vPMvPEMQi8ZvWRMVu8YlZIsFqW8vNquCWOEclo-QudMFhVRSsrH-X6POUPPUvpBKVULKZ-iM85KygtGz9HvJd4Ef0dGiD3expAGsKPbA74Zp-aAQ4tvDwOQmzx2rbP4euqNx1szuK4Lvdm7OCW89u3MCh4b3-CvLv2ciSuIe2dNhz9DGDqTnMHLPu_CnL7NVvD30IPHzuNxB3gb4tjN7E_GJYh4FXZ5cnTxHD1pTZfgxem8QN8-XN2ursnmy8f1arkhVig-khIst0o2DCxVhoOsG1uqljeN5UqJVohG8drStuaK1oVROR7Gi7opOS95xYoL9P6oO0x1D40FP0bT6SG63sSDDsbp_1-82-m7sNcFkyWtRBZ4cxKI4dcEadS9Sxa6_DEIU9ILKkQlGC0zUh6RNkeeIrQPWxjVc7967k7P3encbx7pud_Me_WvxQfWfaEZ8PoEMCln30bjrUt_caKQlBWq-AM2YbBX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904484106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>SCHIFFMAN, Mark ; GLASS, Andrew G ; LORINCZ, Attila T ; WACHOLDER, Sholom ; BURK, Robert D ; WENTZENSEN, Nicolas ; RUSH, Brenda B ; CASTLE, Philip E ; SCOTT, David R ; BUCKLAND, Julie ; SHERMAN, Mark E ; RYDZAK, Greg ; KIRK, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHIFFMAN, Mark ; GLASS, Andrew G ; LORINCZ, Attila T ; WACHOLDER, Sholom ; BURK, Robert D ; WENTZENSEN, Nicolas ; RUSH, Brenda B ; CASTLE, Philip E ; SCOTT, David R ; BUCKLAND, Julie ; SHERMAN, Mark E ; RYDZAK, Greg ; KIRK, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare. Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,000 women in a prepaid health maintenance organization (median age = 34) were followed passively by recommended annual cytology. We tested archived cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected at enrollment, primarily by MY09-MY11 PCR-based methods, for carcinogenic HPV types. We calculated positive and negative predictive values for the entire study period, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative probability for ≥CIN3, up to 18 years of follow-up. We observed 47 cases of invasive cervical cancer during the study period, and 156 cases of CIN3. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded the same conclusions. In women 30 and older, the reassurance against ≥CIN3 following a single negative HPV test was long-lasting (cumulative probability = 0.7% during follow-up). In this age group, a single HPV test (positive vs. negative, hazard ratio of 8.5, 95% CI = 4.8-15.1) provided greater long-term risk stratification than a single cytologic result (abnormal vs. normal, HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.2-6.6). The risk for ≥CIN3 was higher for HPV16 than for the average of the other carcinogenic types (hazard ratio = 2.7). The data from this cohort study show the long-term predictive value of HPV testing, particularly in women ≥30, and a possible role for distinguishing particularly carcinogenic types like HPV16.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21602310</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEBPE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology ; DNA, Viral - analysis ; DNA, Viral - isolation &amp; purification ; Female ; Human papillomavirus ; Human papillomavirus 16 ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Oregon ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology ; Vaginal Smears ; Viral diseases</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1398-1409</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 AACR</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ec2c75d1ec07a2e5bdc67f2ddc2774f44d72bc0fb270b3a7105123bd62262813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ec2c75d1ec07a2e5bdc67f2ddc2774f44d72bc0fb270b3a7105123bd62262813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3343,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24350137$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21602310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHIFFMAN, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLASS, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LORINCZ, Attila T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WACHOLDER, Sholom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURK, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WENTZENSEN, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSH, Brenda B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CASTLE, Philip E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUCKLAND, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHERMAN, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYDZAK, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRK, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare. Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,000 women in a prepaid health maintenance organization (median age = 34) were followed passively by recommended annual cytology. We tested archived cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected at enrollment, primarily by MY09-MY11 PCR-based methods, for carcinogenic HPV types. We calculated positive and negative predictive values for the entire study period, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative probability for ≥CIN3, up to 18 years of follow-up. We observed 47 cases of invasive cervical cancer during the study period, and 156 cases of CIN3. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded the same conclusions. In women 30 and older, the reassurance against ≥CIN3 following a single negative HPV test was long-lasting (cumulative probability = 0.7% during follow-up). In this age group, a single HPV test (positive vs. negative, hazard ratio of 8.5, 95% CI = 4.8-15.1) provided greater long-term risk stratification than a single cytologic result (abnormal vs. normal, HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.2-6.6). The risk for ≥CIN3 was higher for HPV16 than for the average of the other carcinogenic types (hazard ratio = 2.7). The data from this cohort study show the long-term predictive value of HPV testing, particularly in women ≥30, and a possible role for distinguishing particularly carcinogenic types like HPV16.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus 16</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUcGO0zAUtBCIXRY-AeQL4oIX27Hj9IJUVQtbUUHFLuJoOc7L1pDYwU4q9Xv4URy1u8DJ1vPMvPEMQi8ZvWRMVu8YlZIsFqW8vNquCWOEclo-QudMFhVRSsrH-X6POUPPUvpBKVULKZ-iM85KygtGz9HvJd4Ef0dGiD3expAGsKPbA74Zp-aAQ4tvDwOQmzx2rbP4euqNx1szuK4Lvdm7OCW89u3MCh4b3-CvLv2ciSuIe2dNhz9DGDqTnMHLPu_CnL7NVvD30IPHzuNxB3gb4tjN7E_GJYh4FXZ5cnTxHD1pTZfgxem8QN8-XN2ursnmy8f1arkhVig-khIst0o2DCxVhoOsG1uqljeN5UqJVohG8drStuaK1oVROR7Gi7opOS95xYoL9P6oO0x1D40FP0bT6SG63sSDDsbp_1-82-m7sNcFkyWtRBZ4cxKI4dcEadS9Sxa6_DEIU9ILKkQlGC0zUh6RNkeeIrQPWxjVc7967k7P3encbx7pud_Me_WvxQfWfaEZ8PoEMCln30bjrUt_caKQlBWq-AM2YbBX</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>SCHIFFMAN, Mark</creator><creator>GLASS, Andrew G</creator><creator>LORINCZ, Attila T</creator><creator>WACHOLDER, Sholom</creator><creator>BURK, Robert D</creator><creator>WENTZENSEN, Nicolas</creator><creator>RUSH, Brenda B</creator><creator>CASTLE, Philip E</creator><creator>SCOTT, David R</creator><creator>BUCKLAND, Julie</creator><creator>SHERMAN, Mark E</creator><creator>RYDZAK, Greg</creator><creator>KIRK, Peter</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study</title><author>SCHIFFMAN, Mark ; GLASS, Andrew G ; LORINCZ, Attila T ; WACHOLDER, Sholom ; BURK, Robert D ; WENTZENSEN, Nicolas ; RUSH, Brenda B ; CASTLE, Philip E ; SCOTT, David R ; BUCKLAND, Julie ; SHERMAN, Mark E ; RYDZAK, Greg ; KIRK, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ec2c75d1ec07a2e5bdc67f2ddc2774f44d72bc0fb270b3a7105123bd62262813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus 16</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHIFFMAN, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLASS, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LORINCZ, Attila T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WACHOLDER, Sholom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURK, Robert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WENTZENSEN, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSH, Brenda B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CASTLE, Philip E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCOTT, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUCKLAND, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHERMAN, Mark E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYDZAK, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRK, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHIFFMAN, Mark</au><au>GLASS, Andrew G</au><au>LORINCZ, Attila T</au><au>WACHOLDER, Sholom</au><au>BURK, Robert D</au><au>WENTZENSEN, Nicolas</au><au>RUSH, Brenda B</au><au>CASTLE, Philip E</au><au>SCOTT, David R</au><au>BUCKLAND, Julie</au><au>SHERMAN, Mark E</au><au>RYDZAK, Greg</au><au>KIRK, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1398</spage><epage>1409</epage><pages>1398-1409</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><coden>CEBPE4</coden><abstract>Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer (≥CIN3). Adding HPV testing to cytology is recommended for women ≥30 but long-term prospective studies of HPV testing are rare. Beginning in 1989-1990, ~20,000 women in a prepaid health maintenance organization (median age = 34) were followed passively by recommended annual cytology. We tested archived cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected at enrollment, primarily by MY09-MY11 PCR-based methods, for carcinogenic HPV types. We calculated positive and negative predictive values for the entire study period, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative probability for ≥CIN3, up to 18 years of follow-up. We observed 47 cases of invasive cervical cancer during the study period, and 156 cases of CIN3. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded the same conclusions. In women 30 and older, the reassurance against ≥CIN3 following a single negative HPV test was long-lasting (cumulative probability = 0.7% during follow-up). In this age group, a single HPV test (positive vs. negative, hazard ratio of 8.5, 95% CI = 4.8-15.1) provided greater long-term risk stratification than a single cytologic result (abnormal vs. normal, HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.2-6.6). The risk for ≥CIN3 was higher for HPV16 than for the average of the other carcinogenic types (hazard ratio = 2.7). The data from this cohort study show the long-term predictive value of HPV testing, particularly in women ≥30, and a possible role for distinguishing particularly carcinogenic types like HPV16.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>21602310</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-9965
ispartof Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1398-1409
issn 1055-9965
1538-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3156084
source MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology
DNA, Viral - analysis
DNA, Viral - isolation & purification
Female
Human papillomavirus
Human papillomavirus 16
Humans
Infectious diseases
Mass Screening - methods
Medical sciences
Oregon
Papillomavirus Infections - complications
Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Tumors
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology
Vaginal Smears
Viral diseases
title A Long-term Prospective Study of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk of Cervical Neoplasia Among 20,000 Women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A52%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Long-term%20Prospective%20Study%20of%20Type-Specific%20Human%20Papillomavirus%20Infection%20and%20Risk%20of%20Cervical%20Neoplasia%20Among%2020,000%20Women%20in%20the%20Portland%20Kaiser%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=SCHIFFMAN,%20Mark&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1398&rft.epage=1409&rft.pages=1398-1409&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft.coden=CEBPE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E904484106%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904484106&rft_id=info:pmid/21602310&rfr_iscdi=true