Creating a process to standardize regimen order sets within an electronic health record
US Oncology uses regimen order sets in clinical practice to treat patients. However, the process to assure accuracy and upkeep of these order sets has not been described. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the regimens housed in the electronic health record, iKnowMed, to determine their app...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oncology practice 2011-07, Vol.7 (4), p.e8-e14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e8 |
container_title | Journal of oncology practice |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Busby, Leslie T Sheth, Sheetal Garey, Jody Ginsburg, Aimee Flynn, Thomas Willen, Michael A Kruger, Scott Neubauer, Marcus A Kolodziej, Michael Chang, David Palmer, Eric Scott McGuinness, Margaret Egerton, Nancy J Merriman, Jan Herbeck, Eileen B Fetter, Alison Frisk, Linda Sitarik, Mark Anderson, Roger Beveridge, Roy |
description | US Oncology uses regimen order sets in clinical practice to treat patients. However, the process to assure accuracy and upkeep of these order sets has not been described. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the regimens housed in the electronic health record, iKnowMed, to determine their appropriateness and accuracy.
US Oncology conducted an audit of its standardized regimen library. A utilization review compared chemotherapy regimens in the library and consolidated order sets on the basis of past utilization. Next, internal and external clinical pharmacists were contracted to verify the accuracy, dose, duration, and cycle length of regimens. References cited in the regimen library were evaluated. New or updated references or clinical practice standards were added or modified when necessary. US Oncology corporate pharmacists reviewed the recommendations and discussed findings with an oversight committee. Final proposals were voted on before being incorporated into iKnowMed. An internal database tracking system tool for all reviewed recommendations was created to track and communicate needed changes to the electronic health record.
Out of 511 regimen order sets, 51 were recommended for removal or consolidation. Of the remaining 460 regimen order sets, all had some administrative changes. Specifically, 75% had title changes, 14% had cycle-related changes, 31% had reference updates, and 13% had dosing updates.
Electronic health records systems, such as iKnowMed, can provide standardized order sets for a large oncology network. However, the regimens need to be evaluated routinely using standardized procedures to ensure they are accurate and current. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JOP.2011.000275 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3140457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>901643687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9d232e3c1b5c86d0c2fea1c6fd7e33edc187b3375be40255dccfaa377892cb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctLAzEQxoMovs_eJDdPW_Pc7F4EKT4R9FDQW8hmZ9vINqlJquhf75ZW0dMMzG--Gb4PoRNKRpQRcn7_-DRihNIRIYQpuYX2ac1lIcr6ZXvopRSFEkrtoYOUXgkRsq7LXbTHGBGc1tU-eh5HMNn5KTZ4EYOFlHAOOGXjWxNb9wU4wtTNweMQW4g4QU74w-WZ89h4DD3YHIN3Fs_A9Hk24HYgj9BOZ_oEx5t6iCbXV5PxbfHweHM3vnworOBVLuqWcQbc0kbaqmyJZR0YasuuVcA5tJZWquFcyQYEYVK21nbGcKWqmtmm5IfoYi27WDbzAQefo-n1Irq5iZ86GKf_T7yb6Wl415yKwQ01CJxtBGJ4W0LKeu6Shb43HsIy6ZrQUvCyWpHna9LGkFKE7vcKJXoVhh7C0Ksw9DqMYeP073O__I_7_Bvalofl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>901643687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Creating a process to standardize regimen order sets within an electronic health record</title><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Busby, Leslie T ; Sheth, Sheetal ; Garey, Jody ; Ginsburg, Aimee ; Flynn, Thomas ; Willen, Michael A ; Kruger, Scott ; Neubauer, Marcus A ; Kolodziej, Michael ; Chang, David ; Palmer, Eric Scott ; McGuinness, Margaret ; Egerton, Nancy J ; Merriman, Jan ; Herbeck, Eileen B ; Fetter, Alison ; Frisk, Linda ; Sitarik, Mark ; Anderson, Roger ; Beveridge, Roy</creator><creatorcontrib>Busby, Leslie T ; Sheth, Sheetal ; Garey, Jody ; Ginsburg, Aimee ; Flynn, Thomas ; Willen, Michael A ; Kruger, Scott ; Neubauer, Marcus A ; Kolodziej, Michael ; Chang, David ; Palmer, Eric Scott ; McGuinness, Margaret ; Egerton, Nancy J ; Merriman, Jan ; Herbeck, Eileen B ; Fetter, Alison ; Frisk, Linda ; Sitarik, Mark ; Anderson, Roger ; Beveridge, Roy</creatorcontrib><description>US Oncology uses regimen order sets in clinical practice to treat patients. However, the process to assure accuracy and upkeep of these order sets has not been described. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the regimens housed in the electronic health record, iKnowMed, to determine their appropriateness and accuracy.
US Oncology conducted an audit of its standardized regimen library. A utilization review compared chemotherapy regimens in the library and consolidated order sets on the basis of past utilization. Next, internal and external clinical pharmacists were contracted to verify the accuracy, dose, duration, and cycle length of regimens. References cited in the regimen library were evaluated. New or updated references or clinical practice standards were added or modified when necessary. US Oncology corporate pharmacists reviewed the recommendations and discussed findings with an oversight committee. Final proposals were voted on before being incorporated into iKnowMed. An internal database tracking system tool for all reviewed recommendations was created to track and communicate needed changes to the electronic health record.
Out of 511 regimen order sets, 51 were recommended for removal or consolidation. Of the remaining 460 regimen order sets, all had some administrative changes. Specifically, 75% had title changes, 14% had cycle-related changes, 31% had reference updates, and 13% had dosing updates.
Electronic health records systems, such as iKnowMed, can provide standardized order sets for a large oncology network. However, the regimens need to be evaluated routinely using standardized procedures to ensure they are accurate and current.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-7477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-469X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000275</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22043198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Special Series</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology practice, 2011-07, Vol.7 (4), p.e8-e14</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 2011</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9d232e3c1b5c86d0c2fea1c6fd7e33edc187b3375be40255dccfaa377892cb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9d232e3c1b5c86d0c2fea1c6fd7e33edc187b3375be40255dccfaa377892cb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3715,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22043198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Busby, Leslie T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Sheetal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garey, Jody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Aimee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willen, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Marcus A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Eric Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuinness, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egerton, Nancy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merriman, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbeck, Eileen B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetter, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisk, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitarik, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beveridge, Roy</creatorcontrib><title>Creating a process to standardize regimen order sets within an electronic health record</title><title>Journal of oncology practice</title><addtitle>J Oncol Pract</addtitle><description>US Oncology uses regimen order sets in clinical practice to treat patients. However, the process to assure accuracy and upkeep of these order sets has not been described. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the regimens housed in the electronic health record, iKnowMed, to determine their appropriateness and accuracy.
US Oncology conducted an audit of its standardized regimen library. A utilization review compared chemotherapy regimens in the library and consolidated order sets on the basis of past utilization. Next, internal and external clinical pharmacists were contracted to verify the accuracy, dose, duration, and cycle length of regimens. References cited in the regimen library were evaluated. New or updated references or clinical practice standards were added or modified when necessary. US Oncology corporate pharmacists reviewed the recommendations and discussed findings with an oversight committee. Final proposals were voted on before being incorporated into iKnowMed. An internal database tracking system tool for all reviewed recommendations was created to track and communicate needed changes to the electronic health record.
Out of 511 regimen order sets, 51 were recommended for removal or consolidation. Of the remaining 460 regimen order sets, all had some administrative changes. Specifically, 75% had title changes, 14% had cycle-related changes, 31% had reference updates, and 13% had dosing updates.
Electronic health records systems, such as iKnowMed, can provide standardized order sets for a large oncology network. However, the regimens need to be evaluated routinely using standardized procedures to ensure they are accurate and current.</description><subject>Special Series</subject><issn>1554-7477</issn><issn>1935-469X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkctLAzEQxoMovs_eJDdPW_Pc7F4EKT4R9FDQW8hmZ9vINqlJquhf75ZW0dMMzG--Gb4PoRNKRpQRcn7_-DRihNIRIYQpuYX2ac1lIcr6ZXvopRSFEkrtoYOUXgkRsq7LXbTHGBGc1tU-eh5HMNn5KTZ4EYOFlHAOOGXjWxNb9wU4wtTNweMQW4g4QU74w-WZ89h4DD3YHIN3Fs_A9Hk24HYgj9BOZ_oEx5t6iCbXV5PxbfHweHM3vnworOBVLuqWcQbc0kbaqmyJZR0YasuuVcA5tJZWquFcyQYEYVK21nbGcKWqmtmm5IfoYi27WDbzAQefo-n1Irq5iZ86GKf_T7yb6Wl415yKwQ01CJxtBGJ4W0LKeu6Shb43HsIy6ZrQUvCyWpHna9LGkFKE7vcKJXoVhh7C0Ksw9DqMYeP073O__I_7_Bvalofl</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Busby, Leslie T</creator><creator>Sheth, Sheetal</creator><creator>Garey, Jody</creator><creator>Ginsburg, Aimee</creator><creator>Flynn, Thomas</creator><creator>Willen, Michael A</creator><creator>Kruger, Scott</creator><creator>Neubauer, Marcus A</creator><creator>Kolodziej, Michael</creator><creator>Chang, David</creator><creator>Palmer, Eric Scott</creator><creator>McGuinness, Margaret</creator><creator>Egerton, Nancy J</creator><creator>Merriman, Jan</creator><creator>Herbeck, Eileen B</creator><creator>Fetter, Alison</creator><creator>Frisk, Linda</creator><creator>Sitarik, Mark</creator><creator>Anderson, Roger</creator><creator>Beveridge, Roy</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Creating a process to standardize regimen order sets within an electronic health record</title><author>Busby, Leslie T ; Sheth, Sheetal ; Garey, Jody ; Ginsburg, Aimee ; Flynn, Thomas ; Willen, Michael A ; Kruger, Scott ; Neubauer, Marcus A ; Kolodziej, Michael ; Chang, David ; Palmer, Eric Scott ; McGuinness, Margaret ; Egerton, Nancy J ; Merriman, Jan ; Herbeck, Eileen B ; Fetter, Alison ; Frisk, Linda ; Sitarik, Mark ; Anderson, Roger ; Beveridge, Roy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9d232e3c1b5c86d0c2fea1c6fd7e33edc187b3375be40255dccfaa377892cb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Special Series</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Busby, Leslie T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Sheetal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garey, Jody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsburg, Aimee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willen, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Marcus A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Eric Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuinness, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egerton, Nancy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merriman, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbeck, Eileen B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fetter, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisk, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitarik, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beveridge, Roy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Busby, Leslie T</au><au>Sheth, Sheetal</au><au>Garey, Jody</au><au>Ginsburg, Aimee</au><au>Flynn, Thomas</au><au>Willen, Michael A</au><au>Kruger, Scott</au><au>Neubauer, Marcus A</au><au>Kolodziej, Michael</au><au>Chang, David</au><au>Palmer, Eric Scott</au><au>McGuinness, Margaret</au><au>Egerton, Nancy J</au><au>Merriman, Jan</au><au>Herbeck, Eileen B</au><au>Fetter, Alison</au><au>Frisk, Linda</au><au>Sitarik, Mark</au><au>Anderson, Roger</au><au>Beveridge, Roy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Creating a process to standardize regimen order sets within an electronic health record</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol Pract</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e8</spage><epage>e14</epage><pages>e8-e14</pages><issn>1554-7477</issn><eissn>1935-469X</eissn><abstract>US Oncology uses regimen order sets in clinical practice to treat patients. However, the process to assure accuracy and upkeep of these order sets has not been described. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the regimens housed in the electronic health record, iKnowMed, to determine their appropriateness and accuracy.
US Oncology conducted an audit of its standardized regimen library. A utilization review compared chemotherapy regimens in the library and consolidated order sets on the basis of past utilization. Next, internal and external clinical pharmacists were contracted to verify the accuracy, dose, duration, and cycle length of regimens. References cited in the regimen library were evaluated. New or updated references or clinical practice standards were added or modified when necessary. US Oncology corporate pharmacists reviewed the recommendations and discussed findings with an oversight committee. Final proposals were voted on before being incorporated into iKnowMed. An internal database tracking system tool for all reviewed recommendations was created to track and communicate needed changes to the electronic health record.
Out of 511 regimen order sets, 51 were recommended for removal or consolidation. Of the remaining 460 regimen order sets, all had some administrative changes. Specifically, 75% had title changes, 14% had cycle-related changes, 31% had reference updates, and 13% had dosing updates.
Electronic health records systems, such as iKnowMed, can provide standardized order sets for a large oncology network. However, the regimens need to be evaluated routinely using standardized procedures to ensure they are accurate and current.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>22043198</pmid><doi>10.1200/JOP.2011.000275</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1554-7477 |
ispartof | Journal of oncology practice, 2011-07, Vol.7 (4), p.e8-e14 |
issn | 1554-7477 1935-469X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3140457 |
source | American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Special Series |
title | Creating a process to standardize regimen order sets within an electronic health record |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A47%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Creating%20a%20process%20to%20standardize%20regimen%20order%20sets%20within%20an%20electronic%20health%20record&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology%20practice&rft.au=Busby,%20Leslie%20T&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e8&rft.epage=e14&rft.pages=e8-e14&rft.issn=1554-7477&rft.eissn=1935-469X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JOP.2011.000275&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E901643687%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=901643687&rft_id=info:pmid/22043198&rfr_iscdi=true |