Integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine into Family Practices in Germany : Results of a National Survey
More than two-thirds of patients in Germany use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) provided either by physicians or non-medical practitioners (“Heilpraktiker”). There is little information about the number of family physicians (FPs) providing CAM. Given the widespread public interest in th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2011 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine |
container_volume | 2011 |
creator | Joos, Stefanie Musselmann, Berthold Szecsenyi, Joachim |
description | More than two-thirds of patients in Germany use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) provided either by physicians or non-medical practitioners (“Heilpraktiker”). There is little information about the number of family physicians (FPs) providing CAM. Given the widespread public interest in the use of CAM, this study aimed to ascertain the use of and attitude toward CAM among FPs in Germany. A postal questionnaire developed based on qualitatively derived data was sent to 3000 randomly selected FPs in Germany. A reminder letter including a postcard (containing a single question about CAM use in practice and reasons for non-particpation in the survey) was sent to all FPs who had not returned the questionnaire. Of the 3000 FPs, 1027 (34%) returned the questionnaire and 444 (15%) returned the postcard. Altogether, 886 of the 1471 responding FPs (60%) reported using CAM in their practice. A positive attitude toward CAM was indicated by 503 FPs (55%), a rather negative attitude by 127 FPs (14%). Chirotherapy, relaxation and neural therapy were rated as most beneficial CAM therapies by FPs, whereas neural therapy, phytotherapy and acupuncture were the most commonly used therapies in German family practices. This survey clearly demonstrates that CAM is highly valued by many FPs and is already making a substantial contribution to first-contact primary care in Germany. Therefore, education and research about CAM should be increased. Furthermore, with the provision of CAM by FPs, the role of non-medical CAM practitioners within the German healthcare system is to be questioned. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ecam/nep019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3140199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1017981273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-69f7f2f833400b43f3b8d6bc80f9dfef056bbf8b019eda2874d57e1fa3fd93bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUmLFDEYhgtRnEVPnpWAl0FpJ0tVpeJBGBpnHBgXXMBbSCVfZjKkkjapaul_b9pq2uWgp4Tk4cn35q2qRwS_IFiwU9BqOA2wwkTcqQ4Jr8mipl13d7_nXw-qo5xvMaaCc36_OiCCCkYbelhNl2GE66RGFwOKFi3jsPIwQBhV2iAVDDrzI6RQgDWgt2CcdgGQC2NE52pwfoM-JKVHpyGXU3QBaVBhg16ij5AnP-atVKF3Px9QHn2a0ho2D6p7VvkMD3frcfXl_PXn5ZvF1fuLy-XZ1ULXoh4XrbDcUtsxVmPc18yyvjNtrztshbFgcdP2ve36khyMoh2vTcOBWMWsEazX7Lh6NXtXUz-A0SVWUl6ukhtKPBmVk3_eBHcjr-NaMlIXqSiCk50gxW8T5FEOLmvwXgWIU5YEEy46Qjkr6NO_0Ns4lY_zWVLcUi5EJ-i_KMIJ5gw3bOt6PlM6xZwT2P3IBMtt6XJbupxLL_ST31P-YnctF-DZDNy4YNR39x_b4xmGgoBVe7jmLW0w-wH708Mi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1710730533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine into Family Practices in Germany : Results of a National Survey</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Joos, Stefanie ; Musselmann, Berthold ; Szecsenyi, Joachim</creator><creatorcontrib>Joos, Stefanie ; Musselmann, Berthold ; Szecsenyi, Joachim</creatorcontrib><description>More than two-thirds of patients in Germany use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) provided either by physicians or non-medical practitioners (“Heilpraktiker”). There is little information about the number of family physicians (FPs) providing CAM. Given the widespread public interest in the use of CAM, this study aimed to ascertain the use of and attitude toward CAM among FPs in Germany. A postal questionnaire developed based on qualitatively derived data was sent to 3000 randomly selected FPs in Germany. A reminder letter including a postcard (containing a single question about CAM use in practice and reasons for non-particpation in the survey) was sent to all FPs who had not returned the questionnaire. Of the 3000 FPs, 1027 (34%) returned the questionnaire and 444 (15%) returned the postcard. Altogether, 886 of the 1471 responding FPs (60%) reported using CAM in their practice. A positive attitude toward CAM was indicated by 503 FPs (55%), a rather negative attitude by 127 FPs (14%). Chirotherapy, relaxation and neural therapy were rated as most beneficial CAM therapies by FPs, whereas neural therapy, phytotherapy and acupuncture were the most commonly used therapies in German family practices. This survey clearly demonstrates that CAM is highly valued by many FPs and is already making a substantial contribution to first-contact primary care in Germany. Therefore, education and research about CAM should be increased. Furthermore, with the provision of CAM by FPs, the role of non-medical CAM practitioners within the German healthcare system is to be questioned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-427X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-4288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19293252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Acupuncture ; Alternative medicine ; Attitudes ; Back pain ; Curricula ; Family physicians ; Health care ; Homeopathic medicine ; Internal medicine ; Medical personnel ; Naturopathy ; Original ; Patients ; Physicians ; Phytotherapy ; Primary care ; Public concern ; Questionnaires ; Spinal manipulation ; Systematic review ; Yoga</subject><ispartof>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine, 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Stefanie Joos et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Stefanie Joos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Stefanie Joos et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-69f7f2f833400b43f3b8d6bc80f9dfef056bbf8b019eda2874d57e1fa3fd93bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-69f7f2f833400b43f3b8d6bc80f9dfef056bbf8b019eda2874d57e1fa3fd93bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140199/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140199/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19293252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joos, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musselmann, Berthold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szecsenyi, Joachim</creatorcontrib><title>Integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine into Family Practices in Germany : Results of a National Survey</title><title>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine</title><addtitle>Evid Based Complement Alternat Med</addtitle><description>More than two-thirds of patients in Germany use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) provided either by physicians or non-medical practitioners (“Heilpraktiker”). There is little information about the number of family physicians (FPs) providing CAM. Given the widespread public interest in the use of CAM, this study aimed to ascertain the use of and attitude toward CAM among FPs in Germany. A postal questionnaire developed based on qualitatively derived data was sent to 3000 randomly selected FPs in Germany. A reminder letter including a postcard (containing a single question about CAM use in practice and reasons for non-particpation in the survey) was sent to all FPs who had not returned the questionnaire. Of the 3000 FPs, 1027 (34%) returned the questionnaire and 444 (15%) returned the postcard. Altogether, 886 of the 1471 responding FPs (60%) reported using CAM in their practice. A positive attitude toward CAM was indicated by 503 FPs (55%), a rather negative attitude by 127 FPs (14%). Chirotherapy, relaxation and neural therapy were rated as most beneficial CAM therapies by FPs, whereas neural therapy, phytotherapy and acupuncture were the most commonly used therapies in German family practices. This survey clearly demonstrates that CAM is highly valued by many FPs and is already making a substantial contribution to first-contact primary care in Germany. Therefore, education and research about CAM should be increased. Furthermore, with the provision of CAM by FPs, the role of non-medical CAM practitioners within the German healthcare system is to be questioned.</description><subject>Acupuncture</subject><subject>Alternative medicine</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Homeopathic medicine</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Naturopathy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Phytotherapy</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public concern</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Spinal manipulation</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Yoga</subject><issn>1741-427X</issn><issn>1741-4288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUmLFDEYhgtRnEVPnpWAl0FpJ0tVpeJBGBpnHBgXXMBbSCVfZjKkkjapaul_b9pq2uWgp4Tk4cn35q2qRwS_IFiwU9BqOA2wwkTcqQ4Jr8mipl13d7_nXw-qo5xvMaaCc36_OiCCCkYbelhNl2GE66RGFwOKFi3jsPIwQBhV2iAVDDrzI6RQgDWgt2CcdgGQC2NE52pwfoM-JKVHpyGXU3QBaVBhg16ij5AnP-atVKF3Px9QHn2a0ho2D6p7VvkMD3frcfXl_PXn5ZvF1fuLy-XZ1ULXoh4XrbDcUtsxVmPc18yyvjNtrztshbFgcdP2ve36khyMoh2vTcOBWMWsEazX7Lh6NXtXUz-A0SVWUl6ukhtKPBmVk3_eBHcjr-NaMlIXqSiCk50gxW8T5FEOLmvwXgWIU5YEEy46Qjkr6NO_0Ns4lY_zWVLcUi5EJ-i_KMIJ5gw3bOt6PlM6xZwT2P3IBMtt6XJbupxLL_ST31P-YnctF-DZDNy4YNR39x_b4xmGgoBVe7jmLW0w-wH708Mi</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Joos, Stefanie</creator><creator>Musselmann, Berthold</creator><creator>Szecsenyi, Joachim</creator><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AEEDL</scope><scope>AFFIF</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine into Family Practices in Germany : Results of a National Survey</title><author>Joos, Stefanie ; Musselmann, Berthold ; Szecsenyi, Joachim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-69f7f2f833400b43f3b8d6bc80f9dfef056bbf8b019eda2874d57e1fa3fd93bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acupuncture</topic><topic>Alternative medicine</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Homeopathic medicine</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Naturopathy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Phytotherapy</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public concern</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Spinal manipulation</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Yoga</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joos, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musselmann, Berthold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szecsenyi, Joachim</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>قاعدة الخدمة الاجتماعية والعمل الخيري والأوقاف - e-Marefa Social & Charitable Work and Endowments</collection><collection>قاعدة دراسات المرأة - e-Marefa Women Studies</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joos, Stefanie</au><au>Musselmann, Berthold</au><au>Szecsenyi, Joachim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine into Family Practices in Germany : Results of a National Survey</atitle><jtitle>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Evid Based Complement Alternat Med</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>2011</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1741-427X</issn><eissn>1741-4288</eissn><abstract>More than two-thirds of patients in Germany use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) provided either by physicians or non-medical practitioners (“Heilpraktiker”). There is little information about the number of family physicians (FPs) providing CAM. Given the widespread public interest in the use of CAM, this study aimed to ascertain the use of and attitude toward CAM among FPs in Germany. A postal questionnaire developed based on qualitatively derived data was sent to 3000 randomly selected FPs in Germany. A reminder letter including a postcard (containing a single question about CAM use in practice and reasons for non-particpation in the survey) was sent to all FPs who had not returned the questionnaire. Of the 3000 FPs, 1027 (34%) returned the questionnaire and 444 (15%) returned the postcard. Altogether, 886 of the 1471 responding FPs (60%) reported using CAM in their practice. A positive attitude toward CAM was indicated by 503 FPs (55%), a rather negative attitude by 127 FPs (14%). Chirotherapy, relaxation and neural therapy were rated as most beneficial CAM therapies by FPs, whereas neural therapy, phytotherapy and acupuncture were the most commonly used therapies in German family practices. This survey clearly demonstrates that CAM is highly valued by many FPs and is already making a substantial contribution to first-contact primary care in Germany. Therefore, education and research about CAM should be increased. Furthermore, with the provision of CAM by FPs, the role of non-medical CAM practitioners within the German healthcare system is to be questioned.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</pub><pmid>19293252</pmid><doi>10.1093/ecam/nep019</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1741-427X |
ispartof | Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine, 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-8 |
issn | 1741-427X 1741-4288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3140199 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acupuncture Alternative medicine Attitudes Back pain Curricula Family physicians Health care Homeopathic medicine Internal medicine Medical personnel Naturopathy Original Patients Physicians Phytotherapy Primary care Public concern Questionnaires Spinal manipulation Systematic review Yoga |
title | Integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine into Family Practices in Germany : Results of a National Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A06%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integration%20of%20Complementary%20and%20Alternative%20Medicine%20into%20Family%20Practices%20in%20Germany%20:%20Results%20of%20a%20National%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Evidence-based%20complementary%20and%20alternative%20medicine&rft.au=Joos,%20Stefanie&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=2011&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1741-427X&rft.eissn=1741-4288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ecam/nep019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1017981273%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1710730533&rft_id=info:pmid/19293252&rfr_iscdi=true |