Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased

Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers. A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1543-1551
Hauptverfasser: GONZALEZ, Rachel M, DALY, Don S, TAN, Ruimin, MARKS, Jeffrey R, ZANGAR, Richard C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1551
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1543
container_title Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention
container_volume 20
creator GONZALEZ, Rachel M
DALY, Don S
TAN, Ruimin
MARKS, Jeffrey R
ZANGAR, Richard C
description Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers. A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses. Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P < 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets. Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer. Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3132300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21586622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-6b5c7afc71d61244845a323f0b91c980d662628ca6000f9c6fcc4bc0e633c2053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUdtOGzEUtBAVt_YTQBZSH5f6svbuvlSCkLaREESFPlveszYxbOzIdirl73EaoO2TL2dmzjkzCJ1SckGpaL9QIkTVdVJcTOezipKKsrrdQ0dU8LZqGiH2y_0Nc4iOU3oihDSdEAfokBUFKRk7Qov5qNNS4ysXljo-m4jnMVg3moSvnbXlfW1Wxg_OP-Lg8VU0OmU80R5K6X7d583K4H6d8c_L24fpPZ4lPAk-uZSNz-MGzzxsKWb4iD5YPSbz6fU8Qb--TR8mP6qbu--zyeVNBbVsciV7AY220NBBlo3qthaaM25J31HoWjKUsSVrQcuyje1AWoC6B2Ik58CI4Cfo6053te6XZoAyRtSjWkVX9tuooJ36v-LdQj2G34rT0oeQInC-EwgpO5XAZQMLCN4byIoSRllDC0jsQBBDStHY9waUqG0-auu92nqvSj5_fks-hXf273TvrLdACuDzK0An0KONxWmX_uJqLggVjL8AWWSZVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>GONZALEZ, Rachel M ; DALY, Don S ; TAN, Ruimin ; MARKS, Jeffrey R ; ZANGAR, Richard C</creator><creatorcontrib>GONZALEZ, Rachel M ; DALY, Don S ; TAN, Ruimin ; MARKS, Jeffrey R ; ZANGAR, Richard C ; Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers. A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses. Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P &lt; 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets. Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer. Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21586622</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEBPE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; ACCURACY ; Area Under Curve ; BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ; Biological and medical sciences ; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; BIOPSY ; Breast Neoplasms - blood ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; CELL-LINES ; Chemokine CCL5 - blood ; DETECTION ; DISEASES ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; ESTROGEN ; ESTROGENS ; FEATURES ; Female ; GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS ; GROWTH FACTORS ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; LIGANDS ; LYMPHOKINES ; Mammary gland diseases ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; MAMMOGRAPHY ; Medical sciences ; MICROARRAYS ; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES ; NEOPLASMS ; PLASMA ; Protein Array Analysis ; PROTEINS ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; TUMOR SUBTYPES ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1543-1551</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 AACR</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-6b5c7afc71d61244845a323f0b91c980d662628ca6000f9c6fcc4bc0e633c2053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-6b5c7afc71d61244845a323f0b91c980d662628ca6000f9c6fcc4bc0e633c2053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3343,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24350152$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21586622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1021271$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GONZALEZ, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALY, Don S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Ruimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKS, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZANGAR, Richard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers. A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses. Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P &lt; 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets. Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer. Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL MARKERS</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>BIOPSY</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>CELL-LINES</subject><subject>Chemokine CCL5 - blood</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>DISEASES</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>ESTROGEN</subject><subject>ESTROGENS</subject><subject>FEATURES</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS</subject><subject>GROWTH FACTORS</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LIGANDS</subject><subject>LYMPHOKINES</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>MAMMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>MICROARRAYS</subject><subject>MOLECULAR SUBTYPES</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>PLASMA</subject><subject>Protein Array Analysis</subject><subject>PROTEINS</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>TUMOR SUBTYPES</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUdtOGzEUtBAVt_YTQBZSH5f6svbuvlSCkLaREESFPlveszYxbOzIdirl73EaoO2TL2dmzjkzCJ1SckGpaL9QIkTVdVJcTOezipKKsrrdQ0dU8LZqGiH2y_0Nc4iOU3oihDSdEAfokBUFKRk7Qov5qNNS4ysXljo-m4jnMVg3moSvnbXlfW1Wxg_OP-Lg8VU0OmU80R5K6X7d583K4H6d8c_L24fpPZ4lPAk-uZSNz-MGzzxsKWb4iD5YPSbz6fU8Qb--TR8mP6qbu--zyeVNBbVsciV7AY220NBBlo3qthaaM25J31HoWjKUsSVrQcuyje1AWoC6B2Ik58CI4Cfo6053te6XZoAyRtSjWkVX9tuooJ36v-LdQj2G34rT0oeQInC-EwgpO5XAZQMLCN4byIoSRllDC0jsQBBDStHY9waUqG0-auu92nqvSj5_fks-hXf273TvrLdACuDzK0An0KONxWmX_uJqLggVjL8AWWSZVw</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>GONZALEZ, Rachel M</creator><creator>DALY, Don S</creator><creator>TAN, Ruimin</creator><creator>MARKS, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>ZANGAR, Richard C</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased</title><author>GONZALEZ, Rachel M ; DALY, Don S ; TAN, Ruimin ; MARKS, Jeffrey R ; ZANGAR, Richard C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-6b5c7afc71d61244845a323f0b91c980d662628ca6000f9c6fcc4bc0e633c2053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL MARKERS</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>BIOPSY</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>CELL-LINES</topic><topic>Chemokine CCL5 - blood</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>DISEASES</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>ESTROGEN</topic><topic>ESTROGENS</topic><topic>FEATURES</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS</topic><topic>GROWTH FACTORS</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LIGANDS</topic><topic>LYMPHOKINES</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>MAMMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>MICROARRAYS</topic><topic>MOLECULAR SUBTYPES</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>PLASMA</topic><topic>Protein Array Analysis</topic><topic>PROTEINS</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>TUMOR SUBTYPES</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GONZALEZ, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALY, Don S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Ruimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKS, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZANGAR, Richard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GONZALEZ, Rachel M</au><au>DALY, Don S</au><au>TAN, Ruimin</au><au>MARKS, Jeffrey R</au><au>ZANGAR, Richard C</au><aucorp>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1543</spage><epage>1551</epage><pages>1543-1551</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><coden>CEBPE4</coden><abstract>Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers. A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses. Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P &lt; 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets. Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer. Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>21586622</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-9965
ispartof Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1543-1551
issn 1055-9965
1538-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3132300
source MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
ACCURACY
Area Under Curve
BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Biological and medical sciences
BIOLOGICAL MARKERS
Biomarkers, Tumor - blood
BIOPSY
Breast Neoplasms - blood
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
CELL-LINES
Chemokine CCL5 - blood
DETECTION
DISEASES
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
ESTROGEN
ESTROGENS
FEATURES
Female
GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS
GROWTH FACTORS
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
LIGANDS
LYMPHOKINES
Mammary gland diseases
MAMMARY GLANDS
MAMMOGRAPHY
Medical sciences
MICROARRAYS
MOLECULAR SUBTYPES
NEOPLASMS
PLASMA
Protein Array Analysis
PROTEINS
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
TUMOR SUBTYPES
Tumors
title Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A47%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plasma%20Biomarker%20Profiles%20Differ%20Depending%20on%20Breast%20Cancer%20Subtype%20but%20RANTES%20Is%20Consistently%20Increased&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=GONZALEZ,%20Rachel%20M&rft.aucorp=Pacific%20Northwest%20National%20Lab.%20(PNNL),%20Richland,%20WA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1543&rft.epage=1551&rft.pages=1543-1551&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft.coden=CEBPE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_osti_%3E21586622%3C/pubmed_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/21586622&rfr_iscdi=true