Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased
Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers. A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1543-1551 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1551 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1543 |
container_title | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | GONZALEZ, Rachel M DALY, Don S TAN, Ruimin MARKS, Jeffrey R ZANGAR, Richard C |
description | Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers.
A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses.
Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P < 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets.
Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer.
Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3132300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21586622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-6b5c7afc71d61244845a323f0b91c980d662628ca6000f9c6fcc4bc0e633c2053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUdtOGzEUtBAVt_YTQBZSH5f6svbuvlSCkLaREESFPlveszYxbOzIdirl73EaoO2TL2dmzjkzCJ1SckGpaL9QIkTVdVJcTOezipKKsrrdQ0dU8LZqGiH2y_0Nc4iOU3oihDSdEAfokBUFKRk7Qov5qNNS4ysXljo-m4jnMVg3moSvnbXlfW1Wxg_OP-Lg8VU0OmU80R5K6X7d583K4H6d8c_L24fpPZ4lPAk-uZSNz-MGzzxsKWb4iD5YPSbz6fU8Qb--TR8mP6qbu--zyeVNBbVsciV7AY220NBBlo3qthaaM25J31HoWjKUsSVrQcuyje1AWoC6B2Ik58CI4Cfo6053te6XZoAyRtSjWkVX9tuooJ36v-LdQj2G34rT0oeQInC-EwgpO5XAZQMLCN4byIoSRllDC0jsQBBDStHY9waUqG0-auu92nqvSj5_fks-hXf273TvrLdACuDzK0An0KONxWmX_uJqLggVjL8AWWSZVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>GONZALEZ, Rachel M ; DALY, Don S ; TAN, Ruimin ; MARKS, Jeffrey R ; ZANGAR, Richard C</creator><creatorcontrib>GONZALEZ, Rachel M ; DALY, Don S ; TAN, Ruimin ; MARKS, Jeffrey R ; ZANGAR, Richard C ; Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers.
A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses.
Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P < 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets.
Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer.
Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21586622</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEBPE4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; ACCURACY ; Area Under Curve ; BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ; Biological and medical sciences ; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; BIOPSY ; Breast Neoplasms - blood ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; CELL-LINES ; Chemokine CCL5 - blood ; DETECTION ; DISEASES ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; ESTROGEN ; ESTROGENS ; FEATURES ; Female ; GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS ; GROWTH FACTORS ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; LIGANDS ; LYMPHOKINES ; Mammary gland diseases ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; MAMMOGRAPHY ; Medical sciences ; MICROARRAYS ; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES ; NEOPLASMS ; PLASMA ; Protein Array Analysis ; PROTEINS ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; TUMOR SUBTYPES ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1543-1551</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 AACR</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-6b5c7afc71d61244845a323f0b91c980d662628ca6000f9c6fcc4bc0e633c2053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-6b5c7afc71d61244845a323f0b91c980d662628ca6000f9c6fcc4bc0e633c2053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3343,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24350152$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21586622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1021271$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GONZALEZ, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALY, Don S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Ruimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKS, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZANGAR, Richard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers.
A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses.
Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P < 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets.
Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer.
Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL MARKERS</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>BIOPSY</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>CELL-LINES</subject><subject>Chemokine CCL5 - blood</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>DISEASES</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>ESTROGEN</subject><subject>ESTROGENS</subject><subject>FEATURES</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS</subject><subject>GROWTH FACTORS</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LIGANDS</subject><subject>LYMPHOKINES</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>MAMMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>MICROARRAYS</subject><subject>MOLECULAR SUBTYPES</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>PLASMA</subject><subject>Protein Array Analysis</subject><subject>PROTEINS</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>TUMOR SUBTYPES</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUdtOGzEUtBAVt_YTQBZSH5f6svbuvlSCkLaREESFPlveszYxbOzIdirl73EaoO2TL2dmzjkzCJ1SckGpaL9QIkTVdVJcTOezipKKsrrdQ0dU8LZqGiH2y_0Nc4iOU3oihDSdEAfokBUFKRk7Qov5qNNS4ysXljo-m4jnMVg3moSvnbXlfW1Wxg_OP-Lg8VU0OmU80R5K6X7d583K4H6d8c_L24fpPZ4lPAk-uZSNz-MGzzxsKWb4iD5YPSbz6fU8Qb--TR8mP6qbu--zyeVNBbVsciV7AY220NBBlo3qthaaM25J31HoWjKUsSVrQcuyje1AWoC6B2Ik58CI4Cfo6053te6XZoAyRtSjWkVX9tuooJ36v-LdQj2G34rT0oeQInC-EwgpO5XAZQMLCN4byIoSRllDC0jsQBBDStHY9waUqG0-auu92nqvSj5_fks-hXf273TvrLdACuDzK0An0KONxWmX_uJqLggVjL8AWWSZVw</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>GONZALEZ, Rachel M</creator><creator>DALY, Don S</creator><creator>TAN, Ruimin</creator><creator>MARKS, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>ZANGAR, Richard C</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased</title><author>GONZALEZ, Rachel M ; DALY, Don S ; TAN, Ruimin ; MARKS, Jeffrey R ; ZANGAR, Richard C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-6b5c7afc71d61244845a323f0b91c980d662628ca6000f9c6fcc4bc0e633c2053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL MARKERS</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>BIOPSY</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>CELL-LINES</topic><topic>Chemokine CCL5 - blood</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>DISEASES</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>ESTROGEN</topic><topic>ESTROGENS</topic><topic>FEATURES</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS</topic><topic>GROWTH FACTORS</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LIGANDS</topic><topic>LYMPHOKINES</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>MAMMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>MICROARRAYS</topic><topic>MOLECULAR SUBTYPES</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>PLASMA</topic><topic>Protein Array Analysis</topic><topic>PROTEINS</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>TUMOR SUBTYPES</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GONZALEZ, Rachel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALY, Don S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAN, Ruimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKS, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZANGAR, Richard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GONZALEZ, Rachel M</au><au>DALY, Don S</au><au>TAN, Ruimin</au><au>MARKS, Jeffrey R</au><au>ZANGAR, Richard C</au><aucorp>Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1543</spage><epage>1551</epage><pages>1543-1551</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><coden>CEBPE4</coden><abstract>Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers.
A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses.
Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P < 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets.
Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer.
Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>21586622</pmid><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-9965 |
ispartof | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2011-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1543-1551 |
issn | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3132300 |
source | MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ACCURACY Area Under Curve BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Biological and medical sciences BIOLOGICAL MARKERS Biomarkers, Tumor - blood BIOPSY Breast Neoplasms - blood Breast Neoplasms - pathology CELL-LINES Chemokine CCL5 - blood DETECTION DISEASES Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ESTROGEN ESTROGENS FEATURES Female GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS GROWTH FACTORS Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans LIGANDS LYMPHOKINES Mammary gland diseases MAMMARY GLANDS MAMMOGRAPHY Medical sciences MICROARRAYS MOLECULAR SUBTYPES NEOPLASMS PLASMA Protein Array Analysis PROTEINS ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity TUMOR SUBTYPES Tumors |
title | Plasma Biomarker Profiles Differ Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype but RANTES Is Consistently Increased |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A47%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plasma%20Biomarker%20Profiles%20Differ%20Depending%20on%20Breast%20Cancer%20Subtype%20but%20RANTES%20Is%20Consistently%20Increased&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=GONZALEZ,%20Rachel%20M&rft.aucorp=Pacific%20Northwest%20National%20Lab.%20(PNNL),%20Richland,%20WA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1543&rft.epage=1551&rft.pages=1543-1551&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft.coden=CEBPE4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_osti_%3E21586622%3C/pubmed_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/21586622&rfr_iscdi=true |