Evaluating Translational Research: A Process Marker Model
Objective: We examine the concept of translational research from the perspective of evaluators charged with assessing translational efforts. One of the major tasks for evaluators involved in translational research is to help assess efforts that aim to reduce the time it takes to move research to pra...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and translational science 2011-06, Vol.4 (3), p.153-162 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 162 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 153 |
| container_title | Clinical and translational science |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Trochim, William Kane, Cathleen Graham, Mark J. Pincus, Harold A. |
| description | Objective: We examine the concept of translational research from the perspective of evaluators charged with assessing translational efforts. One of the major tasks for evaluators involved in translational research is to help assess efforts that aim to reduce the time it takes to move research to practice and health impacts. Another is to assess efforts that are intended to increase the rate and volume of translation. Methods: We offer an alternative to the dominant contemporary tendency to define translational research in terms of a series of discrete “phases.”Results: We contend that this phased approach has been confusing and that it is insufficient as a basis for evaluation. Instead, we argue for the identification of key operational and measurable markers along a generalized process pathway from research to practice. Conclusions: This model provides a foundation for the evaluation of interventions designed to improve translational research and the integration of these findings into a field of translational studies. Clin Trans Sci 2011; Volume 4: 153–162 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3125608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>883854092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5651-9047f65ececa0dc50b1403f051d9cc5de98112fe9a0e551e702c2a36a541047e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9P3DAQxa0KVP71K1S59ZQwdmInqSoklNIFCVrELuI4Ms4EsvUmYO_C8u3xshDBDV_8pHnvjfUzYxGHhIezP014LkVcgBKJAM4TAFHyZPmFbQ-DjUHLbIvteD8FUKkq5Fe2JXgOeZll26w8etB2oedtdxNNnO68DbrvtI0uyJN25vZndBidu96Q99GZdv_JRWd9TXaPbTbaevr2eu-yyz9Hk-o4Pv03OqkOT2MjleRxCVneKEmGjIbaSLjmGaQNSF6XxsiayoJz0VCpgaTklIMwQqdKy4yHKKW77GDde7e4nlFtqJs7bfHOtTPtnrDXLX6cdO0t3vQPmHIhFRSh4MdrgevvF-TnOGu9IWt1R_3CY1GkhcygFMFZrJ3G9d47aoYtHHAFHqe4YoorvrgCjy_gcRmi39-_cgi-kQ6GX2vDY2vp6dPFWE3GQYR4vI63fk7LIR7-A1We5hKv_o7wt6quYFSNcZw-A70LoHM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883854092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Translational Research: A Process Marker Model</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Trochim, William ; Kane, Cathleen ; Graham, Mark J. ; Pincus, Harold A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trochim, William ; Kane, Cathleen ; Graham, Mark J. ; Pincus, Harold A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: We examine the concept of translational research from the perspective of evaluators charged with assessing translational efforts. One of the major tasks for evaluators involved in translational research is to help assess efforts that aim to reduce the time it takes to move research to practice and health impacts. Another is to assess efforts that are intended to increase the rate and volume of translation. Methods: We offer an alternative to the dominant contemporary tendency to define translational research in terms of a series of discrete “phases.”Results: We contend that this phased approach has been confusing and that it is insufficient as a basis for evaluation. Instead, we argue for the identification of key operational and measurable markers along a generalized process pathway from research to practice. Conclusions: This model provides a foundation for the evaluation of interventions designed to improve translational research and the integration of these findings into a field of translational studies. Clin Trans Sci 2011; Volume 4: 153–162</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-8054</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-8062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21707944</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - trends ; clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Diffusion of Innovation ; evaluation ; Evidence-Based Medicine - organization & administration ; Humans ; Models, Theoretical ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - organization & administration ; process modeling ; Translational Medical Research - standards ; Translational Medical Research - trends ; translational research</subject><ispartof>Clinical and translational science, 2011-06, Vol.4 (3), p.153-162</ispartof><rights>2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5651-9047f65ececa0dc50b1403f051d9cc5de98112fe9a0e551e702c2a36a541047e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5651-9047f65ececa0dc50b1403f051d9cc5de98112fe9a0e551e702c2a36a541047e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125608/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125608/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,1414,11545,27907,27908,45557,45558,46035,46459,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1752-8062.2011.00291.x$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21707944$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trochim, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Cathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Harold A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Translational Research: A Process Marker Model</title><title>Clinical and translational science</title><addtitle>Clin Transl Sci</addtitle><description>Objective: We examine the concept of translational research from the perspective of evaluators charged with assessing translational efforts. One of the major tasks for evaluators involved in translational research is to help assess efforts that aim to reduce the time it takes to move research to practice and health impacts. Another is to assess efforts that are intended to increase the rate and volume of translation. Methods: We offer an alternative to the dominant contemporary tendency to define translational research in terms of a series of discrete “phases.”Results: We contend that this phased approach has been confusing and that it is insufficient as a basis for evaluation. Instead, we argue for the identification of key operational and measurable markers along a generalized process pathway from research to practice. Conclusions: This model provides a foundation for the evaluation of interventions designed to improve translational research and the integration of these findings into a field of translational studies. Clin Trans Sci 2011; Volume 4: 153–162</description><subject>Biomedical Research - trends</subject><subject>clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - organization & administration</subject><subject>process modeling</subject><subject>Translational Medical Research - standards</subject><subject>Translational Medical Research - trends</subject><subject>translational research</subject><issn>1752-8054</issn><issn>1752-8062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9P3DAQxa0KVP71K1S59ZQwdmInqSoklNIFCVrELuI4Ms4EsvUmYO_C8u3xshDBDV_8pHnvjfUzYxGHhIezP014LkVcgBKJAM4TAFHyZPmFbQ-DjUHLbIvteD8FUKkq5Fe2JXgOeZll26w8etB2oedtdxNNnO68DbrvtI0uyJN25vZndBidu96Q99GZdv_JRWd9TXaPbTbaevr2eu-yyz9Hk-o4Pv03OqkOT2MjleRxCVneKEmGjIbaSLjmGaQNSF6XxsiayoJz0VCpgaTklIMwQqdKy4yHKKW77GDde7e4nlFtqJs7bfHOtTPtnrDXLX6cdO0t3vQPmHIhFRSh4MdrgevvF-TnOGu9IWt1R_3CY1GkhcygFMFZrJ3G9d47aoYtHHAFHqe4YoorvrgCjy_gcRmi39-_cgi-kQ6GX2vDY2vp6dPFWE3GQYR4vI63fk7LIR7-A1We5hKv_o7wt6quYFSNcZw-A70LoHM</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Trochim, William</creator><creator>Kane, Cathleen</creator><creator>Graham, Mark J.</creator><creator>Pincus, Harold A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Evaluating Translational Research: A Process Marker Model</title><author>Trochim, William ; Kane, Cathleen ; Graham, Mark J. ; Pincus, Harold A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5651-9047f65ececa0dc50b1403f051d9cc5de98112fe9a0e551e702c2a36a541047e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - trends</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - organization & administration</topic><topic>process modeling</topic><topic>Translational Medical Research - standards</topic><topic>Translational Medical Research - trends</topic><topic>translational research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trochim, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Cathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Harold A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical and translational science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trochim, William</au><au>Kane, Cathleen</au><au>Graham, Mark J.</au><au>Pincus, Harold A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Translational Research: A Process Marker Model</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and translational science</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transl Sci</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>153-162</pages><issn>1752-8054</issn><eissn>1752-8062</eissn><abstract>Objective: We examine the concept of translational research from the perspective of evaluators charged with assessing translational efforts. One of the major tasks for evaluators involved in translational research is to help assess efforts that aim to reduce the time it takes to move research to practice and health impacts. Another is to assess efforts that are intended to increase the rate and volume of translation. Methods: We offer an alternative to the dominant contemporary tendency to define translational research in terms of a series of discrete “phases.”Results: We contend that this phased approach has been confusing and that it is insufficient as a basis for evaluation. Instead, we argue for the identification of key operational and measurable markers along a generalized process pathway from research to practice. Conclusions: This model provides a foundation for the evaluation of interventions designed to improve translational research and the integration of these findings into a field of translational studies. Clin Trans Sci 2011; Volume 4: 153–162</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21707944</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 1752-8054 |
| ispartof | Clinical and translational science, 2011-06, Vol.4 (3), p.153-162 |
| issn | 1752-8054 1752-8062 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3125608 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Open Access |
| subjects | Biomedical Research - trends clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic Diffusion of Innovation evaluation Evidence-Based Medicine - organization & administration Humans Models, Theoretical Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - organization & administration process modeling Translational Medical Research - standards Translational Medical Research - trends translational research |
| title | Evaluating Translational Research: A Process Marker Model |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A48%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Translational%20Research:%20A%20Process%20Marker%20Model&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20translational%20science&rft.au=Trochim,%20William&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=153-162&rft.issn=1752-8054&rft.eissn=1752-8062&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E883854092%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883854092&rft_id=info:pmid/21707944&rfr_iscdi=true |