Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair
Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. An...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews Reviews, 2010-02, Vol.16 (1), p.15-115 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 115 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Chu, Constance R. Szczodry, Michal Bruno, Stephen |
description | Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic
in vivo
study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning
in vivo
studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3121784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A219449530</galeid><sourcerecordid>A219449530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-aeb14bfea4810ec06d987b6bbe7268736ca11515895f7c5736c1a97cfd85722f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluLFDEQhYMo7jr6A3yRRkGfps2lO5cXYRi8wYog-hySdGXMkknGpEfw35tmhtUVEQkhofKdQ6U4CD0muCdYqpczpH4G21OMVY-Hkd5Bl0QxsWZM8Ls3dy4v0INarzHmmAt5H10QJRnhA7lEbJPC3sTuQ54g1s7n0m1NmUM0O-g-wQ4SFDOHnDqTplY4mFAeonvexAqPzucKfXnz-vP23frq49v3283V2vFhnNcGLBmsBzNIgsFhPikpLLcWBOVSMO4MISMZpRq9cONSIEYJ5yc5Cko9W6FXJ9_D0e5hcpDmYqI-lNZx-aGzCfr2Swpf9S5_14xQIuTQDF6cDUr-doQ6632oDmI0CfKxasGYVIrjhXz-T5KS5tlm18Cnf4DX-VhSG4OmmFEqRfvZCj07QTsTQYfkc2vPLY56Q4kaBjUy3Kj-L1RbE-yDywl8aPVbAnISuJJrLeBvRkGwXgKhWyDatnoJhF4C0TRPfp_hL8U5AQ0QJ2Apm5RiAAtl_g_rn80AwyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203228787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair</title><source>Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chu, Constance R. ; Szczodry, Michal ; Bruno, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Chu, Constance R. ; Szczodry, Michal ; Bruno, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic
in vivo
study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning
in vivo
studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-3368</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-3376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19831641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal models in research ; Animals ; Articular cartilage ; Biomedical research ; Care and treatment ; Cartilage ; Cartilage, Articular - physiology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Humans ; Laboratory animals ; Osteoarthritis ; Regeneration - physiology ; Special Focus ; Tissue engineering ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2010-02, Vol.16 (1), p.15-115</ispartof><rights>2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>(©) Copyright 2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-aeb14bfea4810ec06d987b6bbe7268736ca11515895f7c5736c1a97cfd85722f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-aeb14bfea4810ec06d987b6bbe7268736ca11515895f7c5736c1a97cfd85722f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/epdf/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmaryannliebert$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmaryannliebert$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3031,21706,27907,27908,55274,55286</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19831641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chu, Constance R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczodry, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair</title><title>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</title><addtitle>Tissue Eng Part B Rev</addtitle><description>Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic
in vivo
study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning
in vivo
studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal models in research</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Articular cartilage</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory animals</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Special Focus</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>1937-3368</issn><issn>1937-3376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluLFDEQhYMo7jr6A3yRRkGfps2lO5cXYRi8wYog-hySdGXMkknGpEfw35tmhtUVEQkhofKdQ6U4CD0muCdYqpczpH4G21OMVY-Hkd5Bl0QxsWZM8Ls3dy4v0INarzHmmAt5H10QJRnhA7lEbJPC3sTuQ54g1s7n0m1NmUM0O-g-wQ4SFDOHnDqTplY4mFAeonvexAqPzucKfXnz-vP23frq49v3283V2vFhnNcGLBmsBzNIgsFhPikpLLcWBOVSMO4MISMZpRq9cONSIEYJ5yc5Cko9W6FXJ9_D0e5hcpDmYqI-lNZx-aGzCfr2Swpf9S5_14xQIuTQDF6cDUr-doQ6632oDmI0CfKxasGYVIrjhXz-T5KS5tlm18Cnf4DX-VhSG4OmmFEqRfvZCj07QTsTQYfkc2vPLY56Q4kaBjUy3Kj-L1RbE-yDywl8aPVbAnISuJJrLeBvRkGwXgKhWyDatnoJhF4C0TRPfp_hL8U5AQ0QJ2Apm5RiAAtl_g_rn80AwyM</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Chu, Constance R.</creator><creator>Szczodry, Michal</creator><creator>Bruno, Stephen</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair</title><author>Chu, Constance R. ; Szczodry, Michal ; Bruno, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-aeb14bfea4810ec06d987b6bbe7268736ca11515895f7c5736c1a97cfd85722f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal models in research</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Articular cartilage</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory animals</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Special Focus</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chu, Constance R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczodry, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chu, Constance R.</au><au>Szczodry, Michal</au><au>Bruno, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair</atitle><jtitle>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Tissue Eng Part B Rev</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>15-115</pages><issn>1937-3368</issn><eissn>1937-3376</eissn><abstract>Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic
in vivo
study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning
in vivo
studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>19831641</pmid><doi>10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452</doi><tpages>101</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1937-3368 |
ispartof | Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2010-02, Vol.16 (1), p.15-115 |
issn | 1937-3368 1937-3376 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3121784 |
source | Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis Animal models in research Animals Articular cartilage Biomedical research Care and treatment Cartilage Cartilage, Articular - physiology Disease Models, Animal Humans Laboratory animals Osteoarthritis Regeneration - physiology Special Focus Tissue engineering Wound Healing - physiology |
title | Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A29%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Animal%20Models%20for%20Cartilage%20Regeneration%20and%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Tissue%20engineering.%20Part%20B,%20Reviews&rft.au=Chu,%20Constance%20R.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=15-115&rft.issn=1937-3368&rft.eissn=1937-3376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA219449530%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203228787&rft_id=info:pmid/19831641&rft_galeid=A219449530&rfr_iscdi=true |