Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair

Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. An...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews Reviews, 2010-02, Vol.16 (1), p.15-115
Hauptverfasser: Chu, Constance R., Szczodry, Michal, Bruno, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 115
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews
container_volume 16
creator Chu, Constance R.
Szczodry, Michal
Bruno, Stephen
description Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic in vivo study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning in vivo studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3121784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A219449530</galeid><sourcerecordid>A219449530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-aeb14bfea4810ec06d987b6bbe7268736ca11515895f7c5736c1a97cfd85722f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluLFDEQhYMo7jr6A3yRRkGfps2lO5cXYRi8wYog-hySdGXMkknGpEfw35tmhtUVEQkhofKdQ6U4CD0muCdYqpczpH4G21OMVY-Hkd5Bl0QxsWZM8Ls3dy4v0INarzHmmAt5H10QJRnhA7lEbJPC3sTuQ54g1s7n0m1NmUM0O-g-wQ4SFDOHnDqTplY4mFAeonvexAqPzucKfXnz-vP23frq49v3283V2vFhnNcGLBmsBzNIgsFhPikpLLcWBOVSMO4MISMZpRq9cONSIEYJ5yc5Cko9W6FXJ9_D0e5hcpDmYqI-lNZx-aGzCfr2Swpf9S5_14xQIuTQDF6cDUr-doQ6632oDmI0CfKxasGYVIrjhXz-T5KS5tlm18Cnf4DX-VhSG4OmmFEqRfvZCj07QTsTQYfkc2vPLY56Q4kaBjUy3Kj-L1RbE-yDywl8aPVbAnISuJJrLeBvRkGwXgKhWyDatnoJhF4C0TRPfp_hL8U5AQ0QJ2Apm5RiAAtl_g_rn80AwyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203228787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair</title><source>Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chu, Constance R. ; Szczodry, Michal ; Bruno, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Chu, Constance R. ; Szczodry, Michal ; Bruno, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic in vivo study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning in vivo studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-3368</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-3376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19831641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal models in research ; Animals ; Articular cartilage ; Biomedical research ; Care and treatment ; Cartilage ; Cartilage, Articular - physiology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Humans ; Laboratory animals ; Osteoarthritis ; Regeneration - physiology ; Special Focus ; Tissue engineering ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2010-02, Vol.16 (1), p.15-115</ispartof><rights>2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>(©) Copyright 2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-aeb14bfea4810ec06d987b6bbe7268736ca11515895f7c5736c1a97cfd85722f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-aeb14bfea4810ec06d987b6bbe7268736ca11515895f7c5736c1a97cfd85722f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/epdf/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmaryannliebert$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmaryannliebert$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3031,21706,27907,27908,55274,55286</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19831641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chu, Constance R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczodry, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair</title><title>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</title><addtitle>Tissue Eng Part B Rev</addtitle><description>Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic in vivo study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning in vivo studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal models in research</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Articular cartilage</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory animals</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Special Focus</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>1937-3368</issn><issn>1937-3376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluLFDEQhYMo7jr6A3yRRkGfps2lO5cXYRi8wYog-hySdGXMkknGpEfw35tmhtUVEQkhofKdQ6U4CD0muCdYqpczpH4G21OMVY-Hkd5Bl0QxsWZM8Ls3dy4v0INarzHmmAt5H10QJRnhA7lEbJPC3sTuQ54g1s7n0m1NmUM0O-g-wQ4SFDOHnDqTplY4mFAeonvexAqPzucKfXnz-vP23frq49v3283V2vFhnNcGLBmsBzNIgsFhPikpLLcWBOVSMO4MISMZpRq9cONSIEYJ5yc5Cko9W6FXJ9_D0e5hcpDmYqI-lNZx-aGzCfr2Swpf9S5_14xQIuTQDF6cDUr-doQ6632oDmI0CfKxasGYVIrjhXz-T5KS5tlm18Cnf4DX-VhSG4OmmFEqRfvZCj07QTsTQYfkc2vPLY56Q4kaBjUy3Kj-L1RbE-yDywl8aPVbAnISuJJrLeBvRkGwXgKhWyDatnoJhF4C0TRPfp_hL8U5AQ0QJ2Apm5RiAAtl_g_rn80AwyM</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Chu, Constance R.</creator><creator>Szczodry, Michal</creator><creator>Bruno, Stephen</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair</title><author>Chu, Constance R. ; Szczodry, Michal ; Bruno, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-aeb14bfea4810ec06d987b6bbe7268736ca11515895f7c5736c1a97cfd85722f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal models in research</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Articular cartilage</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory animals</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Special Focus</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chu, Constance R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczodry, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chu, Constance R.</au><au>Szczodry, Michal</au><au>Bruno, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair</atitle><jtitle>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Tissue Eng Part B Rev</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>15-115</pages><issn>1937-3368</issn><eissn>1937-3376</eissn><abstract>Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic in vivo study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning in vivo studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>19831641</pmid><doi>10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452</doi><tpages>101</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1937-3368
ispartof Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2010-02, Vol.16 (1), p.15-115
issn 1937-3368
1937-3376
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3121784
source Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Animal models in research
Animals
Articular cartilage
Biomedical research
Care and treatment
Cartilage
Cartilage, Articular - physiology
Disease Models, Animal
Humans
Laboratory animals
Osteoarthritis
Regeneration - physiology
Special Focus
Tissue engineering
Wound Healing - physiology
title Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A29%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Animal%20Models%20for%20Cartilage%20Regeneration%20and%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Tissue%20engineering.%20Part%20B,%20Reviews&rft.au=Chu,%20Constance%20R.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=15-115&rft.issn=1937-3368&rft.eissn=1937-3376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA219449530%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203228787&rft_id=info:pmid/19831641&rft_galeid=A219449530&rfr_iscdi=true