Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes

Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genome research 2001-11, Vol.11 (11), p.1842-1847
Hauptverfasser: Friedman, R, Hughes, A L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1847
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1842
container_title Genome research
container_volume 11
creator Friedman, R
Hughes, A L
description Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R hypothesis). In the most extensive test to date of this hypothesis, we compared gene numbers in homologous families and conducted phylogenetic analyses of gene families with two to eight members in the complete genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and the available portion of the human genome. Although the human genome showed a higher proportion of recent gene duplications than the other animal genomes, the proportion of duplications after the deuterostome-protostome split was constant across families, with no peak of such duplications in four-member families, contrary to the expectation of the 2R hypothesis. A substantial majority (70.9%) of human four-member families and four-member clusters in larger families showed topologies inconsistent with two rounds of polyploidization in vertebrates.
doi_str_mv 10.1101/gr.200601
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_311158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72257088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-196e29d0cfa3e67d3cf46475cae7ef71cec5810be658d9e8ee7881dd2bca8f5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMozji68A9IV4KLjrlt8-jChQy-YEAXug6Z9LZG2mRMWsF_b4cZfKxc3Qv3O5fDOYScAp0DULhswjyjlFPYI1NgRZmygpf7406lTEvKYEKOYnyjlOaFlIdkAsBLkIWcEvmk-x6DS7Srkt521jWJr5MGHSbVsG6t0b31LrEbwna63Zx8h_GYHNS6jXiymzPycnvzvLhPl493D4vrZWoKLvoUSo5ZWVFT6xy5qHJTF7wQzGgUWAswaJgEukLOZFWiRBRSQlVlK6NlzVb5jFxt_66HVYeVQdcH3ap1GM2ET-W1VX8vzr6qxn-oHACYHPXnO33w7wPGXnU2Gmxb7dAPUYksY2LM6V8QZAZyzHIEL7agCT7GgPW3GaBq04dqgtr2MbJnv93_kLsC8i8S04cJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18218051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Friedman, R ; Hughes, A L</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedman, R ; Hughes, A L</creatorcontrib><description>Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R hypothesis). In the most extensive test to date of this hypothesis, we compared gene numbers in homologous families and conducted phylogenetic analyses of gene families with two to eight members in the complete genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and the available portion of the human genome. Although the human genome showed a higher proportion of recent gene duplications than the other animal genomes, the proportion of duplications after the deuterostome-protostome split was constant across families, with no peak of such duplications in four-member families, contrary to the expectation of the 2R hypothesis. A substantial majority (70.9%) of human four-member families and four-member clusters in larger families showed topologies inconsistent with two rounds of polyploidization in vertebrates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-9051</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1054-9803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-5469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1101/gr.200601</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11691848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Caenorhabditis elegans ; Caenorhabditis elegans - genetics ; Drosophila melanogaster ; Drosophila melanogaster - genetics ; duplication ; Evolution, Molecular ; Gene Duplication ; Genes - genetics ; Genes, Helminth - genetics ; Genes, Insect - genetics ; Genome ; Genome, Human ; Humans ; Letter ; Multigene Family ; Phylogeny</subject><ispartof>Genome research, 2001-11, Vol.11 (11), p.1842-1847</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-196e29d0cfa3e67d3cf46475cae7ef71cec5810be658d9e8ee7881dd2bca8f5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-196e29d0cfa3e67d3cf46475cae7ef71cec5810be658d9e8ee7881dd2bca8f5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC311158/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC311158/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11691848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedman, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A L</creatorcontrib><title>Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes</title><title>Genome research</title><addtitle>Genome Res</addtitle><description>Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R hypothesis). In the most extensive test to date of this hypothesis, we compared gene numbers in homologous families and conducted phylogenetic analyses of gene families with two to eight members in the complete genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and the available portion of the human genome. Although the human genome showed a higher proportion of recent gene duplications than the other animal genomes, the proportion of duplications after the deuterostome-protostome split was constant across families, with no peak of such duplications in four-member families, contrary to the expectation of the 2R hypothesis. A substantial majority (70.9%) of human four-member families and four-member clusters in larger families showed topologies inconsistent with two rounds of polyploidization in vertebrates.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans - genetics</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster - genetics</subject><subject>duplication</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Gene Duplication</subject><subject>Genes - genetics</subject><subject>Genes, Helminth - genetics</subject><subject>Genes, Insect - genetics</subject><subject>Genome</subject><subject>Genome, Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Letter</subject><subject>Multigene Family</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><issn>1088-9051</issn><issn>1054-9803</issn><issn>1549-5469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMozji68A9IV4KLjrlt8-jChQy-YEAXug6Z9LZG2mRMWsF_b4cZfKxc3Qv3O5fDOYScAp0DULhswjyjlFPYI1NgRZmygpf7406lTEvKYEKOYnyjlOaFlIdkAsBLkIWcEvmk-x6DS7Srkt521jWJr5MGHSbVsG6t0b31LrEbwna63Zx8h_GYHNS6jXiymzPycnvzvLhPl493D4vrZWoKLvoUSo5ZWVFT6xy5qHJTF7wQzGgUWAswaJgEukLOZFWiRBRSQlVlK6NlzVb5jFxt_66HVYeVQdcH3ap1GM2ET-W1VX8vzr6qxn-oHACYHPXnO33w7wPGXnU2Gmxb7dAPUYksY2LM6V8QZAZyzHIEL7agCT7GgPW3GaBq04dqgtr2MbJnv93_kLsC8i8S04cJ</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>Friedman, R</creator><creator>Hughes, A L</creator><general>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes</title><author>Friedman, R ; Hughes, A L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-196e29d0cfa3e67d3cf46475cae7ef71cec5810be658d9e8ee7881dd2bca8f5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans - genetics</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster - genetics</topic><topic>duplication</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Gene Duplication</topic><topic>Genes - genetics</topic><topic>Genes, Helminth - genetics</topic><topic>Genes, Insect - genetics</topic><topic>Genome</topic><topic>Genome, Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Letter</topic><topic>Multigene Family</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedman, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genome research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedman, R</au><au>Hughes, A L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes</atitle><jtitle>Genome research</jtitle><addtitle>Genome Res</addtitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1842</spage><epage>1847</epage><pages>1842-1847</pages><issn>1088-9051</issn><issn>1054-9803</issn><eissn>1549-5469</eissn><abstract>Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R hypothesis). In the most extensive test to date of this hypothesis, we compared gene numbers in homologous families and conducted phylogenetic analyses of gene families with two to eight members in the complete genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and the available portion of the human genome. Although the human genome showed a higher proportion of recent gene duplications than the other animal genomes, the proportion of duplications after the deuterostome-protostome split was constant across families, with no peak of such duplications in four-member families, contrary to the expectation of the 2R hypothesis. A substantial majority (70.9%) of human four-member families and four-member clusters in larger families showed topologies inconsistent with two rounds of polyploidization in vertebrates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</pub><pmid>11691848</pmid><doi>10.1101/gr.200601</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-9051
ispartof Genome research, 2001-11, Vol.11 (11), p.1842-1847
issn 1088-9051
1054-9803
1549-5469
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_311158
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Caenorhabditis elegans
Caenorhabditis elegans - genetics
Drosophila melanogaster
Drosophila melanogaster - genetics
duplication
Evolution, Molecular
Gene Duplication
Genes - genetics
Genes, Helminth - genetics
Genes, Insect - genetics
Genome
Genome, Human
Humans
Letter
Multigene Family
Phylogeny
title Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A44%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pattern%20and%20timing%20of%20gene%20duplication%20in%20animal%20genomes&rft.jtitle=Genome%20research&rft.au=Friedman,%20R&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1842&rft.epage=1847&rft.pages=1842-1847&rft.issn=1088-9051&rft.eissn=1549-5469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1101/gr.200601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72257088%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18218051&rft_id=info:pmid/11691848&rfr_iscdi=true