Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes
Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genome research 2001-11, Vol.11 (11), p.1842-1847 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1847 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1842 |
container_title | Genome research |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Friedman, R Hughes, A L |
description | Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R hypothesis). In the most extensive test to date of this hypothesis, we compared gene numbers in homologous families and conducted phylogenetic analyses of gene families with two to eight members in the complete genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and the available portion of the human genome. Although the human genome showed a higher proportion of recent gene duplications than the other animal genomes, the proportion of duplications after the deuterostome-protostome split was constant across families, with no peak of such duplications in four-member families, contrary to the expectation of the 2R hypothesis. A substantial majority (70.9%) of human four-member families and four-member clusters in larger families showed topologies inconsistent with two rounds of polyploidization in vertebrates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1101/gr.200601 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_311158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72257088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-196e29d0cfa3e67d3cf46475cae7ef71cec5810be658d9e8ee7881dd2bca8f5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMozji68A9IV4KLjrlt8-jChQy-YEAXug6Z9LZG2mRMWsF_b4cZfKxc3Qv3O5fDOYScAp0DULhswjyjlFPYI1NgRZmygpf7406lTEvKYEKOYnyjlOaFlIdkAsBLkIWcEvmk-x6DS7Srkt521jWJr5MGHSbVsG6t0b31LrEbwna63Zx8h_GYHNS6jXiymzPycnvzvLhPl493D4vrZWoKLvoUSo5ZWVFT6xy5qHJTF7wQzGgUWAswaJgEukLOZFWiRBRSQlVlK6NlzVb5jFxt_66HVYeVQdcH3ap1GM2ET-W1VX8vzr6qxn-oHACYHPXnO33w7wPGXnU2Gmxb7dAPUYksY2LM6V8QZAZyzHIEL7agCT7GgPW3GaBq04dqgtr2MbJnv93_kLsC8i8S04cJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18218051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Friedman, R ; Hughes, A L</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedman, R ; Hughes, A L</creatorcontrib><description>Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R hypothesis). In the most extensive test to date of this hypothesis, we compared gene numbers in homologous families and conducted phylogenetic analyses of gene families with two to eight members in the complete genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and the available portion of the human genome. Although the human genome showed a higher proportion of recent gene duplications than the other animal genomes, the proportion of duplications after the deuterostome-protostome split was constant across families, with no peak of such duplications in four-member families, contrary to the expectation of the 2R hypothesis. A substantial majority (70.9%) of human four-member families and four-member clusters in larger families showed topologies inconsistent with two rounds of polyploidization in vertebrates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-9051</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1054-9803</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-5469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1101/gr.200601</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11691848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Caenorhabditis elegans ; Caenorhabditis elegans - genetics ; Drosophila melanogaster ; Drosophila melanogaster - genetics ; duplication ; Evolution, Molecular ; Gene Duplication ; Genes - genetics ; Genes, Helminth - genetics ; Genes, Insect - genetics ; Genome ; Genome, Human ; Humans ; Letter ; Multigene Family ; Phylogeny</subject><ispartof>Genome research, 2001-11, Vol.11 (11), p.1842-1847</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-196e29d0cfa3e67d3cf46475cae7ef71cec5810be658d9e8ee7881dd2bca8f5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-196e29d0cfa3e67d3cf46475cae7ef71cec5810be658d9e8ee7881dd2bca8f5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC311158/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC311158/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11691848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedman, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A L</creatorcontrib><title>Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes</title><title>Genome research</title><addtitle>Genome Res</addtitle><description>Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R hypothesis). In the most extensive test to date of this hypothesis, we compared gene numbers in homologous families and conducted phylogenetic analyses of gene families with two to eight members in the complete genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and the available portion of the human genome. Although the human genome showed a higher proportion of recent gene duplications than the other animal genomes, the proportion of duplications after the deuterostome-protostome split was constant across families, with no peak of such duplications in four-member families, contrary to the expectation of the 2R hypothesis. A substantial majority (70.9%) of human four-member families and four-member clusters in larger families showed topologies inconsistent with two rounds of polyploidization in vertebrates.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans</subject><subject>Caenorhabditis elegans - genetics</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster - genetics</subject><subject>duplication</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Gene Duplication</subject><subject>Genes - genetics</subject><subject>Genes, Helminth - genetics</subject><subject>Genes, Insect - genetics</subject><subject>Genome</subject><subject>Genome, Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Letter</subject><subject>Multigene Family</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><issn>1088-9051</issn><issn>1054-9803</issn><issn>1549-5469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMozji68A9IV4KLjrlt8-jChQy-YEAXug6Z9LZG2mRMWsF_b4cZfKxc3Qv3O5fDOYScAp0DULhswjyjlFPYI1NgRZmygpf7406lTEvKYEKOYnyjlOaFlIdkAsBLkIWcEvmk-x6DS7Srkt521jWJr5MGHSbVsG6t0b31LrEbwna63Zx8h_GYHNS6jXiymzPycnvzvLhPl493D4vrZWoKLvoUSo5ZWVFT6xy5qHJTF7wQzGgUWAswaJgEukLOZFWiRBRSQlVlK6NlzVb5jFxt_66HVYeVQdcH3ap1GM2ET-W1VX8vzr6qxn-oHACYHPXnO33w7wPGXnU2Gmxb7dAPUYksY2LM6V8QZAZyzHIEL7agCT7GgPW3GaBq04dqgtr2MbJnv93_kLsC8i8S04cJ</recordid><startdate>20011101</startdate><enddate>20011101</enddate><creator>Friedman, R</creator><creator>Hughes, A L</creator><general>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011101</creationdate><title>Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes</title><author>Friedman, R ; Hughes, A L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-196e29d0cfa3e67d3cf46475cae7ef71cec5810be658d9e8ee7881dd2bca8f5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans</topic><topic>Caenorhabditis elegans - genetics</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster - genetics</topic><topic>duplication</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Gene Duplication</topic><topic>Genes - genetics</topic><topic>Genes, Helminth - genetics</topic><topic>Genes, Insect - genetics</topic><topic>Genome</topic><topic>Genome, Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Letter</topic><topic>Multigene Family</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedman, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genome research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedman, R</au><au>Hughes, A L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes</atitle><jtitle>Genome research</jtitle><addtitle>Genome Res</addtitle><date>2001-11-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1842</spage><epage>1847</epage><pages>1842-1847</pages><issn>1088-9051</issn><issn>1054-9803</issn><eissn>1549-5469</eissn><abstract>Duplication of genes, giving rise to multigene families, has been a characteristic feature of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. In the case of vertebrates, it has been proposed that an increase in gene number resulted from two rounds of duplication of the entire genome by polyploidization (the 2R hypothesis). In the most extensive test to date of this hypothesis, we compared gene numbers in homologous families and conducted phylogenetic analyses of gene families with two to eight members in the complete genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster and the available portion of the human genome. Although the human genome showed a higher proportion of recent gene duplications than the other animal genomes, the proportion of duplications after the deuterostome-protostome split was constant across families, with no peak of such duplications in four-member families, contrary to the expectation of the 2R hypothesis. A substantial majority (70.9%) of human four-member families and four-member clusters in larger families showed topologies inconsistent with two rounds of polyploidization in vertebrates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</pub><pmid>11691848</pmid><doi>10.1101/gr.200601</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1088-9051 |
ispartof | Genome research, 2001-11, Vol.11 (11), p.1842-1847 |
issn | 1088-9051 1054-9803 1549-5469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_311158 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Caenorhabditis elegans Caenorhabditis elegans - genetics Drosophila melanogaster Drosophila melanogaster - genetics duplication Evolution, Molecular Gene Duplication Genes - genetics Genes, Helminth - genetics Genes, Insect - genetics Genome Genome, Human Humans Letter Multigene Family Phylogeny |
title | Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A44%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pattern%20and%20timing%20of%20gene%20duplication%20in%20animal%20genomes&rft.jtitle=Genome%20research&rft.au=Friedman,%20R&rft.date=2001-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1842&rft.epage=1847&rft.pages=1842-1847&rft.issn=1088-9051&rft.eissn=1549-5469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1101/gr.200601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72257088%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18218051&rft_id=info:pmid/11691848&rfr_iscdi=true |