A multicentre open-label safety and efficacy study of tetrodotoxin for cancer pain

Cancer pain is highly prevalent, and existing treatments are often insufficient to provide adequate relief. We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tetrodotoxin treatment in reducing the intensity of chronic cancer-related pain. In this multicentre open-label longitudinal trial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current oncology (Toronto) 2011-06, Vol.18 (3), p.e109-116
Hauptverfasser: Hagen, N A, Lapointe, B, Ong-Lam, M, Dubuc, B, Walde, D, Gagnon, B, Love, R, Goel, R, Hawley, P, Ngoc, A Ho, du Souich, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116
container_issue 3
container_start_page e109
container_title Current oncology (Toronto)
container_volume 18
creator Hagen, N A
Lapointe, B
Ong-Lam, M
Dubuc, B
Walde, D
Gagnon, B
Love, R
Goel, R
Hawley, P
Ngoc, A Ho
du Souich, P
description Cancer pain is highly prevalent, and existing treatments are often insufficient to provide adequate relief. We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tetrodotoxin treatment in reducing the intensity of chronic cancer-related pain. In this multicentre open-label longitudinal trial, 30 μg tetrodotoxin was administered subcutaneously twice daily for 4 days in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with persistent pain despite opioids and other analgesics. "Responder" was defined as a mean reduction of 30% or more in pain intensity from baseline; and "clinical responder" as some pain reduction, but less than 30%, plus agreement on the part of both the patient and the physician that a meaningful analgesic response to treatment had occurred. Of 45 patients who entered the longitudinal trial, 41 had sufficient data for analysis. Of all 45 patients, 21 (47%) met the criteria for "responder" [16 patients (36%)] or "clinical responder" [5 patients (11%)]. Onset of pain relief was typically cumulative over days, and after administration ended, the analgesic effect subsided over the course of a few weeks. No evidence of loss of analgesic effect was observed during subsequent treatments (2526 patient-days in total and a maximum of 400 days in 1 patient). One patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events. Toxicity was usually mild (82%) or moderate (13%), and remained so through subsequent treatment cycles, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity or tolerance. Long-term treatment with tetrodotoxin is associated with acceptable toxicity and, in a substantial minority of patients, resulted in a sustained analgesic effect. Further study of tetrodotoxin for moderate-to-severe cancer pain is warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.3747/co.v18i3.732
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3108870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>871379156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-4c8865735adf8600d63ca61c3c0d590da431da35d80ef3bbc12a581a536148183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1LAzEQxYMotlZvniU3L25Nms0mvQil-AUFQfQcpvnQyHZTk2yx_71rq6WeZmB-vHkzD6FzSoZMlOJah-GKSs-Ggo0OUJ8KKgshRuPDvb6HTlL6IIQxIcQx6o1oxTktZR89T_CirbPXtsnR4rC0TVHD3NY4gbN5jaEx2DrnNeg1Trk1axwczjbHYEIOX77BLkSsodE24iX45hQdOaiTPfutA_R6d_syfShmT_eP08ms0GU5zkWppay4YByMkxUhpmIaKqqZJoaPiYGSUQOMG0msY_O5piPgkgJnVeecSjZAN1vdZTtfWLO5AGq1jH4Bca0CePV_0vh39RZWilEipSCdwOWvQAyfrU1ZLXzStq6hsaFNSgrKxJjyqiOvtqSOIaVo3W4LJeonBaWD2qSguhQ6_GLf2Q7-ezv7Bom1hP0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871379156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multicentre open-label safety and efficacy study of tetrodotoxin for cancer pain</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hagen, N A ; Lapointe, B ; Ong-Lam, M ; Dubuc, B ; Walde, D ; Gagnon, B ; Love, R ; Goel, R ; Hawley, P ; Ngoc, A Ho ; du Souich, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Hagen, N A ; Lapointe, B ; Ong-Lam, M ; Dubuc, B ; Walde, D ; Gagnon, B ; Love, R ; Goel, R ; Hawley, P ; Ngoc, A Ho ; du Souich, P</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer pain is highly prevalent, and existing treatments are often insufficient to provide adequate relief. We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tetrodotoxin treatment in reducing the intensity of chronic cancer-related pain. In this multicentre open-label longitudinal trial, 30 μg tetrodotoxin was administered subcutaneously twice daily for 4 days in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with persistent pain despite opioids and other analgesics. "Responder" was defined as a mean reduction of 30% or more in pain intensity from baseline; and "clinical responder" as some pain reduction, but less than 30%, plus agreement on the part of both the patient and the physician that a meaningful analgesic response to treatment had occurred. Of 45 patients who entered the longitudinal trial, 41 had sufficient data for analysis. Of all 45 patients, 21 (47%) met the criteria for "responder" [16 patients (36%)] or "clinical responder" [5 patients (11%)]. Onset of pain relief was typically cumulative over days, and after administration ended, the analgesic effect subsided over the course of a few weeks. No evidence of loss of analgesic effect was observed during subsequent treatments (2526 patient-days in total and a maximum of 400 days in 1 patient). One patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events. Toxicity was usually mild (82%) or moderate (13%), and remained so through subsequent treatment cycles, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity or tolerance. Long-term treatment with tetrodotoxin is associated with acceptable toxicity and, in a substantial minority of patients, resulted in a sustained analgesic effect. Further study of tetrodotoxin for moderate-to-severe cancer pain is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1718-7729</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1198-0052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1718-7729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3747/co.v18i3.732</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21655148</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Multimed Inc</publisher><subject>Drug Development in Contemporary Oncology</subject><ispartof>Current oncology (Toronto), 2011-06, Vol.18 (3), p.e109-116</ispartof><rights>2011 Multimed Inc. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-4c8865735adf8600d63ca61c3c0d590da431da35d80ef3bbc12a581a536148183</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108870/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108870/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21655148$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hagen, N A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapointe, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong-Lam, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubuc, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walde, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagnon, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawley, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoc, A Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>du Souich, P</creatorcontrib><title>A multicentre open-label safety and efficacy study of tetrodotoxin for cancer pain</title><title>Current oncology (Toronto)</title><addtitle>Curr Oncol</addtitle><description>Cancer pain is highly prevalent, and existing treatments are often insufficient to provide adequate relief. We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tetrodotoxin treatment in reducing the intensity of chronic cancer-related pain. In this multicentre open-label longitudinal trial, 30 μg tetrodotoxin was administered subcutaneously twice daily for 4 days in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with persistent pain despite opioids and other analgesics. "Responder" was defined as a mean reduction of 30% or more in pain intensity from baseline; and "clinical responder" as some pain reduction, but less than 30%, plus agreement on the part of both the patient and the physician that a meaningful analgesic response to treatment had occurred. Of 45 patients who entered the longitudinal trial, 41 had sufficient data for analysis. Of all 45 patients, 21 (47%) met the criteria for "responder" [16 patients (36%)] or "clinical responder" [5 patients (11%)]. Onset of pain relief was typically cumulative over days, and after administration ended, the analgesic effect subsided over the course of a few weeks. No evidence of loss of analgesic effect was observed during subsequent treatments (2526 patient-days in total and a maximum of 400 days in 1 patient). One patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events. Toxicity was usually mild (82%) or moderate (13%), and remained so through subsequent treatment cycles, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity or tolerance. Long-term treatment with tetrodotoxin is associated with acceptable toxicity and, in a substantial minority of patients, resulted in a sustained analgesic effect. Further study of tetrodotoxin for moderate-to-severe cancer pain is warranted.</description><subject>Drug Development in Contemporary Oncology</subject><issn>1718-7729</issn><issn>1198-0052</issn><issn>1718-7729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1LAzEQxYMotlZvniU3L25Nms0mvQil-AUFQfQcpvnQyHZTk2yx_71rq6WeZmB-vHkzD6FzSoZMlOJah-GKSs-Ggo0OUJ8KKgshRuPDvb6HTlL6IIQxIcQx6o1oxTktZR89T_CirbPXtsnR4rC0TVHD3NY4gbN5jaEx2DrnNeg1Trk1axwczjbHYEIOX77BLkSsodE24iX45hQdOaiTPfutA_R6d_syfShmT_eP08ms0GU5zkWppay4YByMkxUhpmIaKqqZJoaPiYGSUQOMG0msY_O5piPgkgJnVeecSjZAN1vdZTtfWLO5AGq1jH4Bca0CePV_0vh39RZWilEipSCdwOWvQAyfrU1ZLXzStq6hsaFNSgrKxJjyqiOvtqSOIaVo3W4LJeonBaWD2qSguhQ6_GLf2Q7-ezv7Bom1hP0</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Hagen, N A</creator><creator>Lapointe, B</creator><creator>Ong-Lam, M</creator><creator>Dubuc, B</creator><creator>Walde, D</creator><creator>Gagnon, B</creator><creator>Love, R</creator><creator>Goel, R</creator><creator>Hawley, P</creator><creator>Ngoc, A Ho</creator><creator>du Souich, P</creator><general>Multimed Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>A multicentre open-label safety and efficacy study of tetrodotoxin for cancer pain</title><author>Hagen, N A ; Lapointe, B ; Ong-Lam, M ; Dubuc, B ; Walde, D ; Gagnon, B ; Love, R ; Goel, R ; Hawley, P ; Ngoc, A Ho ; du Souich, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-4c8865735adf8600d63ca61c3c0d590da431da35d80ef3bbc12a581a536148183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Drug Development in Contemporary Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hagen, N A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapointe, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong-Lam, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubuc, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walde, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagnon, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawley, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoc, A Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>du Souich, P</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current oncology (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hagen, N A</au><au>Lapointe, B</au><au>Ong-Lam, M</au><au>Dubuc, B</au><au>Walde, D</au><au>Gagnon, B</au><au>Love, R</au><au>Goel, R</au><au>Hawley, P</au><au>Ngoc, A Ho</au><au>du Souich, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multicentre open-label safety and efficacy study of tetrodotoxin for cancer pain</atitle><jtitle>Current oncology (Toronto)</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Oncol</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e109</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>e109-116</pages><issn>1718-7729</issn><issn>1198-0052</issn><eissn>1718-7729</eissn><abstract>Cancer pain is highly prevalent, and existing treatments are often insufficient to provide adequate relief. We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tetrodotoxin treatment in reducing the intensity of chronic cancer-related pain. In this multicentre open-label longitudinal trial, 30 μg tetrodotoxin was administered subcutaneously twice daily for 4 days in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with persistent pain despite opioids and other analgesics. "Responder" was defined as a mean reduction of 30% or more in pain intensity from baseline; and "clinical responder" as some pain reduction, but less than 30%, plus agreement on the part of both the patient and the physician that a meaningful analgesic response to treatment had occurred. Of 45 patients who entered the longitudinal trial, 41 had sufficient data for analysis. Of all 45 patients, 21 (47%) met the criteria for "responder" [16 patients (36%)] or "clinical responder" [5 patients (11%)]. Onset of pain relief was typically cumulative over days, and after administration ended, the analgesic effect subsided over the course of a few weeks. No evidence of loss of analgesic effect was observed during subsequent treatments (2526 patient-days in total and a maximum of 400 days in 1 patient). One patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events. Toxicity was usually mild (82%) or moderate (13%), and remained so through subsequent treatment cycles, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity or tolerance. Long-term treatment with tetrodotoxin is associated with acceptable toxicity and, in a substantial minority of patients, resulted in a sustained analgesic effect. Further study of tetrodotoxin for moderate-to-severe cancer pain is warranted.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Multimed Inc</pub><pmid>21655148</pmid><doi>10.3747/co.v18i3.732</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1718-7729
ispartof Current oncology (Toronto), 2011-06, Vol.18 (3), p.e109-116
issn 1718-7729
1198-0052
1718-7729
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3108870
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Drug Development in Contemporary Oncology
title A multicentre open-label safety and efficacy study of tetrodotoxin for cancer pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T03%3A04%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multicentre%20open-label%20safety%20and%20efficacy%20study%20of%20tetrodotoxin%20for%20cancer%20pain&rft.jtitle=Current%20oncology%20(Toronto)&rft.au=Hagen,%20N%20A&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e109&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=e109-116&rft.issn=1718-7729&rft.eissn=1718-7729&rft_id=info:doi/10.3747/co.v18i3.732&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E871379156%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871379156&rft_id=info:pmid/21655148&rfr_iscdi=true