Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients

Background A multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was created in 2005 to follow critically ill patients who had undergone a tracheostomy until their discharge from hospital. Composed of a surgeon, surgical resident, respiratory therapist, speech-language pathologist and clinical nurse specialist, thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Journal of Surgery 2011-06, Vol.54 (3), p.167-172
Hauptverfasser: de Mestral, Charles, MD, Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc, Fong, Nancy, RT, LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP, Fata, Paola, MD, MSc, Razek, Tarek, MD, Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 172
container_issue 3
container_start_page 167
container_title Canadian Journal of Surgery
container_volume 54
creator de Mestral, Charles, MD
Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc
Fong, Nancy, RT
LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP
Fata, Paola, MD, MSc
Razek, Tarek, MD
Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc
description Background A multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was created in 2005 to follow critically ill patients who had undergone a tracheostomy until their discharge from hospital. Composed of a surgeon, surgical resident, respiratory therapist, speech-language pathologist and clinical nurse specialist, this team has been meeting twice a week for rounds involving patients who transitioned from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the medical and surgical wards. Our objective was to assess the impact of this multidisciplinary team on downsizing and decannulation times, on the incidence of speaking valve placement and on the incidence of tracheostomy-related complications on the ward. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary care, level-1 trauma centre and teaching hospital and involved all patients who had received a tracheostomy during admission to the ICU from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2004 (preservice group), and from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2006 (postservice group). We compared the outcomes of patients who required tracheostomies in a 12-month period after the team was created with those of patients from a similar time frame before the establishment of the team. Results There were 32 patients in the preservice group and 54 patients in the post-service group. Under the new tracheostomy service, there was a decrease in incidence of tube blockage (5.5% v. 25.0%, p = 0.016) and calls for respiratory distress (16.7% v. 37.5%, p = 0.039) on the wards. A significantly larger proportion of patients also received speaking valves (67.4% v. 19.4%, p < 0.001) after creation of the team. Furthermore, there appeared to be a decreased time to first tube downsizing (26.0 to 9.4 d) and decreased time to decannulation (50.4 to 28.4 d), although this did not reach statistical significance owing to our small sample size. Conclusion Standardized care provided by a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was associated with fewer tracheostomy-related complications and an increase in the use of a speaking valve.
doi_str_mv 10.1503/cjs.043209
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3104317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A258241098</galeid><els_id>1_s2_0_S0008428X11500475</els_id><sourcerecordid>A258241098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c722t-9ac0f8e54145c0aea8fc35a54ce6f4b60bc014f98abb55d29a918b63363c88d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptk1uL1DAYhoso7rp64w-QsguKQsec2qY3wrJ4GFj0YhW8C2n6dSazadJt0sXx15sy6ziVIRchyZM33-FNkrzEaIFzRN-rjV8gRgmqHiWnmHGeEYrR4-QUIcQzRvjPk-SZ9xuEMKKsepqcEMwY5ZSeJrfLrpcqpK5NZep7UFoa_RuatBtN0I32SvdGWzls0zBItQbng-viAmSXOjvfVHKAVNtUDTpoJY3ZptqYtJdBgw3-efKklcbDi4f5LPnx6eP3qy_Z9bfPy6vL60yVhISskgq1HHKGWa6QBMlbRXOZMwVFy-oC1Qph1lZc1nWeN6SSFeZ1QWlBFedNQc-SDzvdfqw7aFR8e5BG9IPuYh7CSS3mJ1avxcrdi1g1RnEZBd48CAzubgQfRBcLAcZIC270ghe8LEqck0ie_0du3DjYmJ3gJeIFyukUz8UOWkkDQtvWTVWbJMUlyTlhGFU8UtkRagUWYojOQqvj9ow_P8KrXt-JQ2hxBIqjgU6ro6pvZxciE-BXWMnRe7G8-TpnXx-wa5AmrL0zY9DO-jn4bgeqwXk_QLvvBUZisrCIFhY7C0f41WH39uhfz_5rL0QP3WsYhIoOnfx2C1vw-wZg4YlA4mb6BdMnwPElxMqc_gFahP8_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>870860536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>de Mestral, Charles, MD ; Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc ; Fong, Nancy, RT ; LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP ; Fata, Paola, MD, MSc ; Razek, Tarek, MD ; Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc</creator><creatorcontrib>de Mestral, Charles, MD ; Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc ; Fong, Nancy, RT ; LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP ; Fata, Paola, MD, MSc ; Razek, Tarek, MD ; Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><description>Background A multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was created in 2005 to follow critically ill patients who had undergone a tracheostomy until their discharge from hospital. Composed of a surgeon, surgical resident, respiratory therapist, speech-language pathologist and clinical nurse specialist, this team has been meeting twice a week for rounds involving patients who transitioned from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the medical and surgical wards. Our objective was to assess the impact of this multidisciplinary team on downsizing and decannulation times, on the incidence of speaking valve placement and on the incidence of tracheostomy-related complications on the ward. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary care, level-1 trauma centre and teaching hospital and involved all patients who had received a tracheostomy during admission to the ICU from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2004 (preservice group), and from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2006 (postservice group). We compared the outcomes of patients who required tracheostomies in a 12-month period after the team was created with those of patients from a similar time frame before the establishment of the team. Results There were 32 patients in the preservice group and 54 patients in the post-service group. Under the new tracheostomy service, there was a decrease in incidence of tube blockage (5.5% v. 25.0%, p = 0.016) and calls for respiratory distress (16.7% v. 37.5%, p = 0.039) on the wards. A significantly larger proportion of patients also received speaking valves (67.4% v. 19.4%, p &lt; 0.001) after creation of the team. Furthermore, there appeared to be a decreased time to first tube downsizing (26.0 to 9.4 d) and decreased time to decannulation (50.4 to 28.4 d), although this did not reach statistical significance owing to our small sample size. Conclusion Standardized care provided by a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was associated with fewer tracheostomy-related complications and an increase in the use of a speaking valve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-428X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2310</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1503/cjs.043209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21443833</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJSUAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: CMA Impact Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Canada ; Critical Care - methods ; Critical Illness ; Device Removal ; Equipment and supplies ; Female ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Male ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Patient Care Team ; Patient outcomes ; Respiratory therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Speech ; Speech Therapy - instrumentation ; Studies ; Surgery ; Terminal illnesses ; Time Factors ; Tracheostomy ; Tracheostomy - adverse effects ; Tracheostomy - instrumentation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Canadian Journal of Surgery, 2011-06, Vol.54 (3), p.167-172</ispartof><rights>Canadian Medical Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 CMA Impact Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Medical Association Jun 2011</rights><rights>2011 Canadian Medical Association 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c722t-9ac0f8e54145c0aea8fc35a54ce6f4b60bc014f98abb55d29a918b63363c88d63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104317/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3104317/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21443833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Mestral, Charles, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Nancy, RT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fata, Paola, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razek, Tarek, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients</title><title>Canadian Journal of Surgery</title><addtitle>Can J Surg</addtitle><description>Background A multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was created in 2005 to follow critically ill patients who had undergone a tracheostomy until their discharge from hospital. Composed of a surgeon, surgical resident, respiratory therapist, speech-language pathologist and clinical nurse specialist, this team has been meeting twice a week for rounds involving patients who transitioned from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the medical and surgical wards. Our objective was to assess the impact of this multidisciplinary team on downsizing and decannulation times, on the incidence of speaking valve placement and on the incidence of tracheostomy-related complications on the ward. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary care, level-1 trauma centre and teaching hospital and involved all patients who had received a tracheostomy during admission to the ICU from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2004 (preservice group), and from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2006 (postservice group). We compared the outcomes of patients who required tracheostomies in a 12-month period after the team was created with those of patients from a similar time frame before the establishment of the team. Results There were 32 patients in the preservice group and 54 patients in the post-service group. Under the new tracheostomy service, there was a decrease in incidence of tube blockage (5.5% v. 25.0%, p = 0.016) and calls for respiratory distress (16.7% v. 37.5%, p = 0.039) on the wards. A significantly larger proportion of patients also received speaking valves (67.4% v. 19.4%, p &lt; 0.001) after creation of the team. Furthermore, there appeared to be a decreased time to first tube downsizing (26.0 to 9.4 d) and decreased time to decannulation (50.4 to 28.4 d), although this did not reach statistical significance owing to our small sample size. Conclusion Standardized care provided by a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was associated with fewer tracheostomy-related complications and an increase in the use of a speaking valve.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Terminal illnesses</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tracheostomy</subject><subject>Tracheostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tracheostomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0008-428X</issn><issn>1488-2310</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptk1uL1DAYhoso7rp64w-QsguKQsec2qY3wrJ4GFj0YhW8C2n6dSazadJt0sXx15sy6ziVIRchyZM33-FNkrzEaIFzRN-rjV8gRgmqHiWnmHGeEYrR4-QUIcQzRvjPk-SZ9xuEMKKsepqcEMwY5ZSeJrfLrpcqpK5NZep7UFoa_RuatBtN0I32SvdGWzls0zBItQbng-viAmSXOjvfVHKAVNtUDTpoJY3ZptqYtJdBgw3-efKklcbDi4f5LPnx6eP3qy_Z9bfPy6vL60yVhISskgq1HHKGWa6QBMlbRXOZMwVFy-oC1Qph1lZc1nWeN6SSFeZ1QWlBFedNQc-SDzvdfqw7aFR8e5BG9IPuYh7CSS3mJ1avxcrdi1g1RnEZBd48CAzubgQfRBcLAcZIC270ghe8LEqck0ie_0du3DjYmJ3gJeIFyukUz8UOWkkDQtvWTVWbJMUlyTlhGFU8UtkRagUWYojOQqvj9ow_P8KrXt-JQ2hxBIqjgU6ro6pvZxciE-BXWMnRe7G8-TpnXx-wa5AmrL0zY9DO-jn4bgeqwXk_QLvvBUZisrCIFhY7C0f41WH39uhfz_5rL0QP3WsYhIoOnfx2C1vw-wZg4YlA4mb6BdMnwPElxMqc_gFahP8_</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>de Mestral, Charles, MD</creator><creator>Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc</creator><creator>Fong, Nancy, RT</creator><creator>LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP</creator><creator>Fata, Paola, MD, MSc</creator><creator>Razek, Tarek, MD</creator><creator>Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc</creator><general>CMA Impact Inc</general><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><general>Canadian Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients</title><author>de Mestral, Charles, MD ; Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc ; Fong, Nancy, RT ; LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP ; Fata, Paola, MD, MSc ; Razek, Tarek, MD ; Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c722t-9ac0f8e54145c0aea8fc35a54ce6f4b60bc014f98abb55d29a918b63363c88d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Terminal illnesses</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tracheostomy</topic><topic>Tracheostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tracheostomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Mestral, Charles, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Nancy, RT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fata, Paola, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razek, Tarek, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Mestral, Charles, MD</au><au>Iqbal, Sameena, MD, MSc</au><au>Fong, Nancy, RT</au><au>LeBlanc, Joanne, SLP</au><au>Fata, Paola, MD, MSc</au><au>Razek, Tarek, MD</au><au>Khwaja, Kosar, MD, MSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Journal of Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Surg</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>167-172</pages><issn>0008-428X</issn><eissn>1488-2310</eissn><coden>CJSUAX</coden><abstract>Background A multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was created in 2005 to follow critically ill patients who had undergone a tracheostomy until their discharge from hospital. Composed of a surgeon, surgical resident, respiratory therapist, speech-language pathologist and clinical nurse specialist, this team has been meeting twice a week for rounds involving patients who transitioned from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the medical and surgical wards. Our objective was to assess the impact of this multidisciplinary team on downsizing and decannulation times, on the incidence of speaking valve placement and on the incidence of tracheostomy-related complications on the ward. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary care, level-1 trauma centre and teaching hospital and involved all patients who had received a tracheostomy during admission to the ICU from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2004 (preservice group), and from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2006 (postservice group). We compared the outcomes of patients who required tracheostomies in a 12-month period after the team was created with those of patients from a similar time frame before the establishment of the team. Results There were 32 patients in the preservice group and 54 patients in the post-service group. Under the new tracheostomy service, there was a decrease in incidence of tube blockage (5.5% v. 25.0%, p = 0.016) and calls for respiratory distress (16.7% v. 37.5%, p = 0.039) on the wards. A significantly larger proportion of patients also received speaking valves (67.4% v. 19.4%, p &lt; 0.001) after creation of the team. Furthermore, there appeared to be a decreased time to first tube downsizing (26.0 to 9.4 d) and decreased time to decannulation (50.4 to 28.4 d), although this did not reach statistical significance owing to our small sample size. Conclusion Standardized care provided by a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team was associated with fewer tracheostomy-related complications and an increase in the use of a speaking valve.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>CMA Impact Inc</pub><pmid>21443833</pmid><doi>10.1503/cjs.043209</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-428X
ispartof Canadian Journal of Surgery, 2011-06, Vol.54 (3), p.167-172
issn 0008-428X
1488-2310
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3104317
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Canada
Critical Care - methods
Critical Illness
Device Removal
Equipment and supplies
Female
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units
Interdisciplinary Communication
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Patient Care Team
Patient outcomes
Respiratory therapy
Retrospective Studies
Speech
Speech Therapy - instrumentation
Studies
Surgery
Terminal illnesses
Time Factors
Tracheostomy
Tracheostomy - adverse effects
Tracheostomy - instrumentation
Treatment Outcome
title Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A42%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20a%20specialized%20multidisciplinary%20tracheostomy%20team%20on%20tracheostomy%20care%20in%20critically%20ill%20patients&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Journal%20of%20Surgery&rft.au=de%20Mestral,%20Charles,%20MD&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=167-172&rft.issn=0008-428X&rft.eissn=1488-2310&rft.coden=CJSUAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1503/cjs.043209&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA258241098%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=870860536&rft_id=info:pmid/21443833&rft_galeid=A258241098&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0008428X11500475&rfr_iscdi=true