An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Retention of Complete Crowns Prepared with Five Different Tapers and Luted with Two Different Cements
This study includes comparatively evaluating and drawing general conclusion about the best advisable taper and cement for maximal retention. Eighty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth with sound surfaces were selected using dial vernier caliper. Selected teeth were randomly divided into five di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2010-06, Vol.10 (2), p.89-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Chandra Shekar, Sajjan Giridhar, Kamath Suhas Rao, K. |
description | This study includes comparatively evaluating and drawing general conclusion about the best advisable taper and cement for maximal retention. Eighty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth with sound surfaces were selected using dial vernier caliper. Selected teeth were randomly divided into five different taper groups (0°, 3°, 6°, 9° and 12°). The crown preparations with different tapers respectively were achieved by graduated customized device. Preparations were verified with special set up. Crowns were cast with Co–Cr alloy; metal copings were luted with glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cement. Retention was measured (MPa) by separating the metal crowns from the teeth under tension on a universal testing machine, data was recorded and statistically analyzed. Glass ionomer cemented 0° and 12° taper group showed increase in retentive strength (
p
= 0.003 hs), when compared to zinc phosphate cement. 9° and 12° group showed decreased retentive strength (
p
= 0.001 vhs) when compared with 0° taper group. No significant difference found between 0° and 3° and 6° group. The choice of cement for crowns prepared within this ideal range (0°–6° taper) might be of limited clinical significance. 3° and 6° taper with zinc phosphate or glass ionomer cement shown to be ideal for maximum retention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13191-010-0017-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3081264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229719931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383x-52fed1d35884c918fae4265ef49a9be47107941ebee7e7d40ded6ef2ea7263af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhAbggiwungO04sX1BqkILlVYCwcLV8ibjbqrEDrazu30CXhuvti0FidNYnu__Z0Y_Qi8peUsJEe8iLamiBaGkIISKYv8ILahSsuCkEo_RgijBDm92gp7FeE1IJYnkT9EJozVTvCIL9OvM4UuHf_QpePwtzd0NTh6fb80wmwQ4bQB_hQQu9d5hb3Hjx2nIH7gJfuci_hJgMgE6vOvTBl_0W8AfemshZAlemQlCxMZ1eDmnO2i18w-YBsZc4nP0xJohwovbeoq-X5yvmk_F8vPHy-ZsWbSlLPdFxSx0tCsrKXmrqLQGOKsrsFwZtQYuKBGKU1gDCBAdJx10NVgGRrC6NLY8Re-PvtO8HqFr8-xgBj2FfjThRnvT6787rt_oK7_VJZGU1TwbvLk1CP7nDDHpsY8tDINx4OeoZa2EYlUlMvn6H_Laz8Hl67RkrBS1pAc7eoTa4GMMYO9XoUQfQtbHkHUOWR9C1vusefXwhnvFXaoZYEcg5pa7gvBn8v9dfwMnYbUi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822376814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Retention of Complete Crowns Prepared with Five Different Tapers and Luted with Two Different Cements</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Chandra Shekar, Sajjan ; Giridhar, Kamath ; Suhas Rao, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chandra Shekar, Sajjan ; Giridhar, Kamath ; Suhas Rao, K.</creatorcontrib><description>This study includes comparatively evaluating and drawing general conclusion about the best advisable taper and cement for maximal retention. Eighty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth with sound surfaces were selected using dial vernier caliper. Selected teeth were randomly divided into five different taper groups (0°, 3°, 6°, 9° and 12°). The crown preparations with different tapers respectively were achieved by graduated customized device. Preparations were verified with special set up. Crowns were cast with Co–Cr alloy; metal copings were luted with glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cement. Retention was measured (MPa) by separating the metal crowns from the teeth under tension on a universal testing machine, data was recorded and statistically analyzed. Glass ionomer cemented 0° and 12° taper group showed increase in retentive strength (
p
= 0.003 hs), when compared to zinc phosphate cement. 9° and 12° group showed decreased retentive strength (
p
= 0.001 vhs) when compared with 0° taper group. No significant difference found between 0° and 3° and 6° group. The choice of cement for crowns prepared within this ideal range (0°–6° taper) might be of limited clinical significance. 3° and 6° taper with zinc phosphate or glass ionomer cement shown to be ideal for maximum retention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-4052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13191-010-0017-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21629450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Dentistry ; Medicine ; Original ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2010-06, Vol.10 (2), p.89-95</ispartof><rights>Indian Prosthodontic Society 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383x-52fed1d35884c918fae4265ef49a9be47107941ebee7e7d40ded6ef2ea7263af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383x-52fed1d35884c918fae4265ef49a9be47107941ebee7e7d40ded6ef2ea7263af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081264/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081264/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21629450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chandra Shekar, Sajjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giridhar, Kamath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suhas Rao, K.</creatorcontrib><title>An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Retention of Complete Crowns Prepared with Five Different Tapers and Luted with Two Different Cements</title><title>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><description>This study includes comparatively evaluating and drawing general conclusion about the best advisable taper and cement for maximal retention. Eighty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth with sound surfaces were selected using dial vernier caliper. Selected teeth were randomly divided into five different taper groups (0°, 3°, 6°, 9° and 12°). The crown preparations with different tapers respectively were achieved by graduated customized device. Preparations were verified with special set up. Crowns were cast with Co–Cr alloy; metal copings were luted with glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cement. Retention was measured (MPa) by separating the metal crowns from the teeth under tension on a universal testing machine, data was recorded and statistically analyzed. Glass ionomer cemented 0° and 12° taper group showed increase in retentive strength (
p
= 0.003 hs), when compared to zinc phosphate cement. 9° and 12° group showed decreased retentive strength (
p
= 0.001 vhs) when compared with 0° taper group. No significant difference found between 0° and 3° and 6° group. The choice of cement for crowns prepared within this ideal range (0°–6° taper) might be of limited clinical significance. 3° and 6° taper with zinc phosphate or glass ionomer cement shown to be ideal for maximum retention.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>0972-4052</issn><issn>1998-4057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhAbggiwungO04sX1BqkILlVYCwcLV8ibjbqrEDrazu30CXhuvti0FidNYnu__Z0Y_Qi8peUsJEe8iLamiBaGkIISKYv8ILahSsuCkEo_RgijBDm92gp7FeE1IJYnkT9EJozVTvCIL9OvM4UuHf_QpePwtzd0NTh6fb80wmwQ4bQB_hQQu9d5hb3Hjx2nIH7gJfuci_hJgMgE6vOvTBl_0W8AfemshZAlemQlCxMZ1eDmnO2i18w-YBsZc4nP0xJohwovbeoq-X5yvmk_F8vPHy-ZsWbSlLPdFxSx0tCsrKXmrqLQGOKsrsFwZtQYuKBGKU1gDCBAdJx10NVgGRrC6NLY8Re-PvtO8HqFr8-xgBj2FfjThRnvT6787rt_oK7_VJZGU1TwbvLk1CP7nDDHpsY8tDINx4OeoZa2EYlUlMvn6H_Laz8Hl67RkrBS1pAc7eoTa4GMMYO9XoUQfQtbHkHUOWR9C1vusefXwhnvFXaoZYEcg5pa7gvBn8v9dfwMnYbUi</recordid><startdate>201006</startdate><enddate>201006</enddate><creator>Chandra Shekar, Sajjan</creator><creator>Giridhar, Kamath</creator><creator>Suhas Rao, K.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201006</creationdate><title>An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Retention of Complete Crowns Prepared with Five Different Tapers and Luted with Two Different Cements</title><author>Chandra Shekar, Sajjan ; Giridhar, Kamath ; Suhas Rao, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383x-52fed1d35884c918fae4265ef49a9be47107941ebee7e7d40ded6ef2ea7263af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chandra Shekar, Sajjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giridhar, Kamath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suhas Rao, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chandra Shekar, Sajjan</au><au>Giridhar, Kamath</au><au>Suhas Rao, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Retention of Complete Crowns Prepared with Five Different Tapers and Luted with Two Different Cements</atitle><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle><stitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</stitle><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><date>2010-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>89-95</pages><issn>0972-4052</issn><eissn>1998-4057</eissn><abstract>This study includes comparatively evaluating and drawing general conclusion about the best advisable taper and cement for maximal retention. Eighty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth with sound surfaces were selected using dial vernier caliper. Selected teeth were randomly divided into five different taper groups (0°, 3°, 6°, 9° and 12°). The crown preparations with different tapers respectively were achieved by graduated customized device. Preparations were verified with special set up. Crowns were cast with Co–Cr alloy; metal copings were luted with glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cement. Retention was measured (MPa) by separating the metal crowns from the teeth under tension on a universal testing machine, data was recorded and statistically analyzed. Glass ionomer cemented 0° and 12° taper group showed increase in retentive strength (
p
= 0.003 hs), when compared to zinc phosphate cement. 9° and 12° group showed decreased retentive strength (
p
= 0.001 vhs) when compared with 0° taper group. No significant difference found between 0° and 3° and 6° group. The choice of cement for crowns prepared within this ideal range (0°–6° taper) might be of limited clinical significance. 3° and 6° taper with zinc phosphate or glass ionomer cement shown to be ideal for maximum retention.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21629450</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13191-010-0017-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0972-4052 |
ispartof | The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2010-06, Vol.10 (2), p.89-95 |
issn | 0972-4052 1998-4057 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3081264 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Dentistry Medicine Original Original Article |
title | An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Retention of Complete Crowns Prepared with Five Different Tapers and Luted with Two Different Cements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A43%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20In%20Vitro%20Study%20to%20Evaluate%20the%20Retention%20of%20Complete%20Crowns%20Prepared%20with%20Five%20Different%20Tapers%20and%20Luted%20with%20Two%20Different%20Cements&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20Indian%20Prosthodontic%20Society&rft.au=Chandra%20Shekar,%20Sajjan&rft.date=2010-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=89-95&rft.issn=0972-4052&rft.eissn=1998-4057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13191-010-0017-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2229719931%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822376814&rft_id=info:pmid/21629450&rfr_iscdi=true |