Nonlinearity and noise at the rod—rod bipolar cell synapse

In the retina, rod bipolar (RBP) cells synapse with many rods, and suppression of rod outer segment and synaptic noise is necessary for their detection of rod single-photon responses (SPRs). Depending on the rods’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the suppression mechanism will likely eliminate some SPRs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Visual neuroscience 2011-01, Vol.28 (1), p.61-68
Hauptverfasser: TREXLER, E. BRADY, CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R., ZHANG, YU
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Visual neuroscience
container_volume 28
creator TREXLER, E. BRADY
CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R.
ZHANG, YU
description In the retina, rod bipolar (RBP) cells synapse with many rods, and suppression of rod outer segment and synaptic noise is necessary for their detection of rod single-photon responses (SPRs). Depending on the rods’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the suppression mechanism will likely eliminate some SPRs as well, resulting in decreased quantum efficiency. We examined this synapse in rabbit, where 100 rods converge onto each RBP. Suction electrode recordings showed that rabbit rod SPRs were difficult to distinguish from noise (independent SNR estimates were 2.3 and 2.8). Nonlinear transmission from rods to RBPs improved response detection (SNR = 8.7), but a large portion of the rod SPRs was discarded. For the dimmest flashes, the loss approached 90%. Despite the high rejection ratio, noise of two distinct types was apparent in the RBP traces: low-amplitude rumblings and discrete events that resembled the SPR. The SPR-like event frequency suggests that they result from thermal isomerizations of rhodopsin, which occurred at the rate 0.033/s/rod. The presence of low-amplitude noise is explained by a sigmoidal input–output relationship at the rod—RBP synapse and the input of noisy rods. The rabbit rod SNR and RBP quantum efficiency are the lowest yet reported, suggesting that the quantum efficiency of the rod—RBP synapse may depend on the SNR in rods. These results point to the possibility that fewer photoisomerizations are discarded for species such as primate, which has a higher rod SNR.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0952523810000301
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3058690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0952523810000301</cupid><sourcerecordid>2512333251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e602d9c165c464e8fd7d67153f5e486fac6d341f0ba8cc613fa4ab108afa7a273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UctKxTAUDKLo9fEBbqS4cVVNmkdTEEHEF4gu1HU4TVON9CbXpFe4Oz_CL_RLTPH6xgSSxcyZM8MgtEnwLsGk3LvGFS94QSXB6VBMFtCIMFHlsiRsEY0GOB_wFbQa4wPGhBJOl9FKQTArGeMjtH_pXWedgWD7WQauyZy30WTQZ_29yYJvXp9f0pvVduI7CJk2XZfFmYNJNOtoqYUumo35v4ZuT45vjs7yi6vT86PDi1zTqupzI3DRVJoIrplgRrZN2YgyOWm5YVK0oEVDGWlxDVJrQWgLDGqCJbRQQlHSNXTwrjuZ1mPTaOP6AJ2aBDuGMFMerPqJOHuv7vyTophLUeEksDMXCP5xamKvxjYOScAZP41KMkkLzEuemNu_mA9-GlxKpyrM0q3E4Ie8k3TwMQbTflohWA3NqD_NpJmt7xk-Jz6qSAQ6F4VxHWxzZ75W_y_7Bj17mSM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904040967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonlinearity and noise at the rod—rod bipolar cell synapse</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>TREXLER, E. BRADY ; CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R. ; ZHANG, YU</creator><creatorcontrib>TREXLER, E. BRADY ; CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R. ; ZHANG, YU</creatorcontrib><description>In the retina, rod bipolar (RBP) cells synapse with many rods, and suppression of rod outer segment and synaptic noise is necessary for their detection of rod single-photon responses (SPRs). Depending on the rods’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the suppression mechanism will likely eliminate some SPRs as well, resulting in decreased quantum efficiency. We examined this synapse in rabbit, where 100 rods converge onto each RBP. Suction electrode recordings showed that rabbit rod SPRs were difficult to distinguish from noise (independent SNR estimates were 2.3 and 2.8). Nonlinear transmission from rods to RBPs improved response detection (SNR = 8.7), but a large portion of the rod SPRs was discarded. For the dimmest flashes, the loss approached 90%. Despite the high rejection ratio, noise of two distinct types was apparent in the RBP traces: low-amplitude rumblings and discrete events that resembled the SPR. The SPR-like event frequency suggests that they result from thermal isomerizations of rhodopsin, which occurred at the rate 0.033/s/rod. The presence of low-amplitude noise is explained by a sigmoidal input–output relationship at the rod—RBP synapse and the input of noisy rods. The rabbit rod SNR and RBP quantum efficiency are the lowest yet reported, suggesting that the quantum efficiency of the rod—RBP synapse may depend on the SNR in rods. These results point to the possibility that fewer photoisomerizations are discarded for species such as primate, which has a higher rod SNR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-5238</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0952523810000301</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21047445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animals ; Bipolar cell function ; Convergence, Ocular - physiology ; Electrophysiology ; Female ; In Vitro Techniques ; Male ; Microelectrodes ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; Photic Stimulation ; Rabbits ; Retinal Bipolar Cells - physiology ; Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells - physiology ; Synapses - physiology ; Synaptic Transmission - physiology</subject><ispartof>Visual neuroscience, 2011-01, Vol.28 (1), p.61-68</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e602d9c165c464e8fd7d67153f5e486fac6d341f0ba8cc613fa4ab108afa7a273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e602d9c165c464e8fd7d67153f5e486fac6d341f0ba8cc613fa4ab108afa7a273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0952523810000301/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21047445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TREXLER, E. BRADY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, YU</creatorcontrib><title>Nonlinearity and noise at the rod—rod bipolar cell synapse</title><title>Visual neuroscience</title><addtitle>Vis Neurosci</addtitle><description>In the retina, rod bipolar (RBP) cells synapse with many rods, and suppression of rod outer segment and synaptic noise is necessary for their detection of rod single-photon responses (SPRs). Depending on the rods’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the suppression mechanism will likely eliminate some SPRs as well, resulting in decreased quantum efficiency. We examined this synapse in rabbit, where 100 rods converge onto each RBP. Suction electrode recordings showed that rabbit rod SPRs were difficult to distinguish from noise (independent SNR estimates were 2.3 and 2.8). Nonlinear transmission from rods to RBPs improved response detection (SNR = 8.7), but a large portion of the rod SPRs was discarded. For the dimmest flashes, the loss approached 90%. Despite the high rejection ratio, noise of two distinct types was apparent in the RBP traces: low-amplitude rumblings and discrete events that resembled the SPR. The SPR-like event frequency suggests that they result from thermal isomerizations of rhodopsin, which occurred at the rate 0.033/s/rod. The presence of low-amplitude noise is explained by a sigmoidal input–output relationship at the rod—RBP synapse and the input of noisy rods. The rabbit rod SNR and RBP quantum efficiency are the lowest yet reported, suggesting that the quantum efficiency of the rod—RBP synapse may depend on the SNR in rods. These results point to the possibility that fewer photoisomerizations are discarded for species such as primate, which has a higher rod SNR.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bipolar cell function</subject><subject>Convergence, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microelectrodes</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Retinal Bipolar Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Synapses - physiology</subject><subject>Synaptic Transmission - physiology</subject><issn>0952-5238</issn><issn>1469-8714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UctKxTAUDKLo9fEBbqS4cVVNmkdTEEHEF4gu1HU4TVON9CbXpFe4Oz_CL_RLTPH6xgSSxcyZM8MgtEnwLsGk3LvGFS94QSXB6VBMFtCIMFHlsiRsEY0GOB_wFbQa4wPGhBJOl9FKQTArGeMjtH_pXWedgWD7WQauyZy30WTQZ_29yYJvXp9f0pvVduI7CJk2XZfFmYNJNOtoqYUumo35v4ZuT45vjs7yi6vT86PDi1zTqupzI3DRVJoIrplgRrZN2YgyOWm5YVK0oEVDGWlxDVJrQWgLDGqCJbRQQlHSNXTwrjuZ1mPTaOP6AJ2aBDuGMFMerPqJOHuv7vyTophLUeEksDMXCP5xamKvxjYOScAZP41KMkkLzEuemNu_mA9-GlxKpyrM0q3E4Ie8k3TwMQbTflohWA3NqD_NpJmt7xk-Jz6qSAQ6F4VxHWxzZ75W_y_7Bj17mSM</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>TREXLER, E. BRADY</creator><creator>CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R.</creator><creator>ZHANG, YU</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Nonlinearity and noise at the rod—rod bipolar cell synapse</title><author>TREXLER, E. BRADY ; CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R. ; ZHANG, YU</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-e602d9c165c464e8fd7d67153f5e486fac6d341f0ba8cc613fa4ab108afa7a273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bipolar cell function</topic><topic>Convergence, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microelectrodes</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Retinal Bipolar Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Synapses - physiology</topic><topic>Synaptic Transmission - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TREXLER, E. BRADY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHANG, YU</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Visual neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TREXLER, E. BRADY</au><au>CASTI, ALEXANDER R.R.</au><au>ZHANG, YU</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonlinearity and noise at the rod—rod bipolar cell synapse</atitle><jtitle>Visual neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Vis Neurosci</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>61-68</pages><issn>0952-5238</issn><eissn>1469-8714</eissn><abstract>In the retina, rod bipolar (RBP) cells synapse with many rods, and suppression of rod outer segment and synaptic noise is necessary for their detection of rod single-photon responses (SPRs). Depending on the rods’ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the suppression mechanism will likely eliminate some SPRs as well, resulting in decreased quantum efficiency. We examined this synapse in rabbit, where 100 rods converge onto each RBP. Suction electrode recordings showed that rabbit rod SPRs were difficult to distinguish from noise (independent SNR estimates were 2.3 and 2.8). Nonlinear transmission from rods to RBPs improved response detection (SNR = 8.7), but a large portion of the rod SPRs was discarded. For the dimmest flashes, the loss approached 90%. Despite the high rejection ratio, noise of two distinct types was apparent in the RBP traces: low-amplitude rumblings and discrete events that resembled the SPR. The SPR-like event frequency suggests that they result from thermal isomerizations of rhodopsin, which occurred at the rate 0.033/s/rod. The presence of low-amplitude noise is explained by a sigmoidal input–output relationship at the rod—RBP synapse and the input of noisy rods. The rabbit rod SNR and RBP quantum efficiency are the lowest yet reported, suggesting that the quantum efficiency of the rod—RBP synapse may depend on the SNR in rods. These results point to the possibility that fewer photoisomerizations are discarded for species such as primate, which has a higher rod SNR.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>21047445</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0952523810000301</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-5238
ispartof Visual neuroscience, 2011-01, Vol.28 (1), p.61-68
issn 0952-5238
1469-8714
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3058690
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Algorithms
Animals
Bipolar cell function
Convergence, Ocular - physiology
Electrophysiology
Female
In Vitro Techniques
Male
Microelectrodes
Nonlinear Dynamics
Photic Stimulation
Rabbits
Retinal Bipolar Cells - physiology
Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells - physiology
Synapses - physiology
Synaptic Transmission - physiology
title Nonlinearity and noise at the rod—rod bipolar cell synapse
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T02%3A16%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonlinearity%20and%20noise%20at%20the%20rod%E2%80%94rod%20bipolar%20cell%20synapse&rft.jtitle=Visual%20neuroscience&rft.au=TREXLER,%20E.%20BRADY&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=61-68&rft.issn=0952-5238&rft.eissn=1469-8714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0952523810000301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2512333251%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904040967&rft_id=info:pmid/21047445&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0952523810000301&rfr_iscdi=true